Mark Twain famously once said, "If you don't like the weather in New England, just wait a few minutes".
If only the same were true for our economy. With polls showing widespread dissatisfaction with the economic path we are on, as well as the way the crisis is being handled, the thought of asking the American people to wait a little longer for things to turn around is not likely to be warmly received.
And yet, three years into a recession that many feel never really ended, that is exactly what is ahead of us. "We're just going to have a weak, feeble recovery while the private sector gets its debt position in order," Martin Wolf, Chief Economics Commentator at The Financial Times said in his first appearance on Breakout. "After a huge financial crisis with asset prices very weak, a bubble in housing prices, huge over indebtedness, you have a very, very weak private sector. This takes years to unravel."
Years? That is completely unacceptable and if true, could spell trouble for the current occupant of the White House - unless he does something big and new to get things going.
According to Bloomberg News, "Since World War II, no U.S. president has won re-election with a jobless rate above 6 percent, with the exception of Ronald Reagan, who faced 7.2 percent unemployment on Election Day in 1984." And the Central Pennsylvania Business Journal chimes in with this research: "Overall economic performance, as measured by Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in presidential election years, is the strongest indicator of electoral success for an incumbent president. The only candidate to win re-election during a weak election-year economy was Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1956."
So what can be done that hasn't already been tried?
According to Martin Wolf, who has won awards, written books, and served at the World Bank for a decade, not a lot. "The policies which have been pursued prevented a depression, that's all, and turned it into a miserable recession and a miserable recovery. Everything we know from research and experience from other countries is that this is just a very lengthy process," Wolf says.
"The thing they missed most, apart from (larger and longer) stimulus, was policies to accelerate debt reduction in the household sector," Wolf says. "There's obviously a huge mortgage debt overhang that's slowly being wound down but very, very slowly. I wonder if the administration couldn't have produced a program which would have accelerated the reduction in debt and made it easier for households to bear the debt burden and that might have got some spending going."
And then the killer...
"Beyond that -- it's really rather difficult to see what else could be done."
Wolf has an idea that he refers to as his "most radical proposal" based on reforming the corporate tax code. With U.S. companies sitting on record levels of cash, "they are not investing because they don't feel there is demand," he says. "The one thing you might want to think about is to encourage companies to disperse funds to shareholders rather than to retain it in these huge cash balances. If the investments are not going to come -- and I can't see why it should -- maybe it (the money) should be just transferred to shareholders and spent by them."
Of course the catch with this idea is how one would "encourage" companies to part with their cash and then spend it, rather than just re-parking it somewhere else.
As dour as all of this is for the domestic economy, Wolf is equally optimistic about the developing world. "We are clearly dependent on emerging market demand for the next 10 or 15 years. It is the only place where there can be really strong demand growth. Unfortunately, the emerging economies, for all their progress, aren't big enough to pull the whole developed world which is still about 60% of the world economy. In the end, it's helpful but it's not enough."
Aside from biding time, it seems nothing will be enough to accelerate the unwinding process.
"The Fed has sort of shot its last bolt or at least isn't doing anything, so there's nothing coming from the government. The external sector isn't giving you much either, so you just have a very, very weak economy. So is it actually in recession? I don't know."
What do you think? Is the U.S. already in - or headed back towards - recession? Can more be done to stimulate demand?
Your thoughts and comments are welcomed below or via email at BreakoutCrew@Yahoo.com

245 comments