Wed, May 23, 2012, 1:19 AM EDT - U.S. Markets open in 8 hrs 11 mins

Use the Fed to Fix Housing Market Crisis: Suttmeier

According to a recent Yahoo! Real Estate survey, a majority of Americans believe the Federal Government should do more to assist homeowners. Four out of five adults think the 2012 election will have an impact on the housing market.

The issue, as the same study found, is that nobody can seem to agree on which party, let alone specific policy, is going to help. Said another way, Americans have no idea how to solve the housing crisis, but we're positive the people we elect are going about it all wrong.

Richard Suttmeier of ValuEngine.com has a solution that's sure to offend and outrage both sides of the political fence, despite being so crazy that it just might work. In short, the market strategist thinks the Federal Reserve should "reuse" its $2 trillion balance sheet to lower the rates of healthy homeowners and, in so doing, invigorate housing construction.

Here's how it would work: The Fed would set aside funds at the yield of the 10-year note (currently under 2%) then lend that money to regional and community banks. The banks could then loan that money with 30-year fixed rate mortgage 60 to 100 basis points above the 10-year rate.

Suddenly you have mortgages priced in the 2.5-3% range. The banks could use the same funding to provide construction and development loans to restore what he calls "the lifeblood of the economy" by starting to build homes again.

Okay, there are some issues with the plan that spring to mind, not least of which being why America would fund the building of new homes when we already have what Suttmeier estimates to be roughly 150k unsold new homes on the market already?

His two-fold answer is that demand is stymied by the lack of financing options available to homeowners and the supply is unappealing.

"No one wants to buy a foreclosed home," he says.

It's true, as far as it goes, but it still leaves a lot of houses sitting around unsold clogging up the residential real estate market.

Could Suttmeier's plan work? Maybe but it would require leaps of faith in terms of policy that neither politicos nor voters are prepared to make. What we know for sure is that the best alternative seems to be decades of "austerity" (read: economic suffering) and a lost generation of Americans with no stake in their communities.

Got a better idea? We want to hear it in the comment section below.

Breakout Asks

Do you think Facebook (FB) will end this year above or below its IPO price of $38 a share?

Loading...
Poll Choice Options
  • Yes, FB will recover
  • No, FB is too unstable
 
  • Andy  •  Walnut Creek, California  •  3 months ago
    Where is my help? Oh that's right, I don't get any because I've been responsible all along. I didn't take out an exotic mortgate. I didn't use my house as a 'cash cow' during the bubble. I pay a higer percentage of income in taxes than Romney or Buffet and countless others. I didn't run up consumer debt; I lived within my means. And for all this I get screwed yet again for being responsible. I thought I was being smart. Turns out I was being stupid. I should have kept taking money out of the house until, enjoyed it, run up credit card debt and enjoyed it; then walked. What an outrage. Here's a better idea, help the responsible here who are innocent bystanders that have already had bailouts funded off their backs.
    • NewEconomics 3 months ago
      Hear! Hear! Keep the pressure on our representatives so that they don't coddle anyone. I don't expect help, but sure enough I do not expect to help those who through their own greed landed in trouble.
    • Un4g8able 3 months ago
      In other words, what's in it for you? An improved housing market and economy, that's what's in it for you.

      3 yrs ago the chief economist w Goldman urged a "national cramdown" for peoples' housing and personal debts; a way for individuals to hit the "Reset" button-- the banks got to hit "Reset" w bailout money-- and the idea went nowhere, probably for fear of the "It's Not Fair" crowd.

      So here we are, 3 yrs later, and: most people needing help have gotten none, and people NOT needing help have been HARMED by falling housing values caused by... the people who needed help and got none! I declare, we are a NATION of GENIUSES!
    • Robert W 3 months ago
      Well, you're supposed to go out and borrow more money and buy up overpriced real estate at what you think is a bargain. Then spend the next 30 years holding that asset against all hope, then, just after you pay it all off, die. Then they don't have to repay any of your withheld benefit money and you spent your whole life slaving away to pay interest to the bank.
  • Robert  •  West Palm Beach, Florida  •  3 months ago
    I know people that buy foreclosed homes from banks at discount prices. Then they put repairs into it to make it habitable again and sell them for a profit but still at or below the market for the area they are in. It is a win-win for all involved. What is a matter with this idea??? It has created jobs, cut into the housing glut and requires banks to get real about what a property is really worth in the shape it is in.
    • Truffledog 3 months ago
      Still drives down prices and keeps the foreclosures coming. Much better to keep homeowners in place. Still need a mechanism for people to trade underwater mortgages when they need to relocate. Assumable Ultralow interest rates reduce the ownership cost enough that the actual price gets less meaningful.
    • Cpt Insano 3 months ago
      People with money are snapping up the bank homes at .50 on the dollar and either turning them or renting them for a profit.
    • Nate 3 months ago
      We do have enough people to do it. The problem is, the banks are not letting the houses go for market value. Whether or not you believe the market is down 50%, 75%, 100% doesn't matter. It is there, plain and simple. The problem is, banks are dragging their feet on getting these foreclosures on the market for many reasons. The first and foremost, the banks are being made whole from the back door, open ended bailout of fannie and freddie. Why would a bank sell the house for market value, when they can hold onto the house and get the full amount for the loan from fannie and freddie, and then sell it later when the market returns. If you stop the backstop of fannie and freddie and government bailouts, the banks will be forced to get these off their books. You will see the houses marked to what they should be, investors and home owners will jump into the market because they are priced right, and you will see the glut be reduced. GET THE GOVERNMENT OUT OF THE MARKETS AND YOU WILL SEE THINGS RETURN TO NORMAL. Why doesn't anyone understand this?
  • Kevin  •  New York, New York  •  3 months ago
    The "crisis" (lowering home values,reduced construction) IS the fix to the housing bubble.

    To fix the crisis would be to break thing once again.
    • cino 3 months ago
      reduced construction YES, but the values have to stabilize.
    • A Yahoo! User 3 months ago
      Amen Kevin.
    • TRUMPET 3 months ago
      Exactly!
  • Ryan  •  3 months ago
    Pointless - the Fed is already helping the housing market by keeping interest rates low. No need to arbitrarily lower mortgage rates further. The glut of unsold homes is now more a function of the economy, and people's unwillingness to commit to home purchase in a period of uncertain employment, than due to the rate paid on the mortgage. We have bigger problems to deal with than this. Besides providing additional incentives for more home building and more aggressive lending is what got us in this housing problem in the first place. "It's the economy, stupid!"
    • Ryan 3 months ago
      oops, forgot a comma after "Besides..."
  • DAVE  •  3 months ago
    government solutions are always the best answer............yikes
    • smoke 3 months ago
      Government are sometimes the only solution. Most government solutions work great if the honesty is put in place . The problem we are facing is no honesty in government or business in the USA.The first thing that needs fixed is the honesty problem, to bad the American people would not know honesty if it kicked them in the face , look at the fools supporting NEWT Gingrich. GO FIGURE.
    • Rex 3 months ago
      Smoke, please die or move back to Europe you fascist clown.
  • Rules Too  •  Panama City, Florida  •  3 months ago
    In other words, screw the elderly and savers that have already been hosed so he can reward the debtors and Wall Street Bankers. What a load.
  • Bend101  •  3 months ago
    "No one wants to buy a foreclosed home," he says.

    REO properties are selling faster than non-distressed properties. Plenty of people want to buy a foreclosed home, if it's priced right.
  • TRUMPET  •  3 months ago
    Here's a better idea. Do the opposite of the artificial, overly accommodative Federal Reserve policy. It doesn't work because it is artificial market manipulation. If anything has been learned since Greenspan and Bernanke thought they could oversee permanent prosperity through monetary policy and quantitative easing, it is than they most assuredly can not.
  • J  •  3 months ago
    Since when is there a housing "crisis"? Last time I looked, the houses were still there.

    Prices are reverting to the norm. What's wrong with that? So what if a few Banksters lose money and are exposed as crooks?
  • Kyle  •  Warren, Michigan  •  3 months ago
    Big problem with the whole premise that Homebuilding is the so-called Lifeblood of the Economy. Homebuilding should be the RESULT of a good economy from increasing U.S. jobs & increasing salaries which create legitimate demand, NOT a determinant of a good economy. This is where Washington has it backwards and until they figure it correctly, they are attacking the wrong side of the equation.
  • PITHIAN  •  Tampa, Florida  •  3 months ago
    . . . . invigorate housing construction. . . ?

    More houses need to be constructed in a market where there are already too many vacant houses waiting for qualified buyers? Any jacking around with the market will only serve as incentive for more people to stop paying their mortgages.
  • Stockloss  •  3 months ago
    Due to Fed intervention, rates are already at historic lows (around 3.75% on 30 yr fixed and 3% on 15 yr fixed). Taxpayers have already subsidized the housing market way too much. If lower rates are good, then why not go to zero at taxpayers expense? Enough already. Rates are not the problem. Speed up the forclosure process and let the market absorb the inventory until normal supply and demand balance is restored. Other posters have noted that investors scoop up these forclosures, fix them up and rent them. As has been said below, win-win (of course, the homeowner who cannot afford his home will become a renter but that is how free markets are supposed to work).
  • G-Men  •  3 months ago
    More Socialist Propaganda. The market will self-correct if government gets the hell out of the way.
  • Henri  •  Santa Clara, California  •  3 months ago
    Why not give discounts / tax breaks to savers who will buy these homes outright for cash? Whats the point in handing out more cash to losers ?
  • DaveL  •  Round Lake, Illinois  •  3 months ago
    MORE debt is not the solution and will only hurt consumers. It helps the debt securitization industry and Wall Street always wants to create more debt so everything you will ever see published or proposed by the mainscream media will be promoting more debt.

    However, the only way to have a sustainable housing system is to LET HOUSING PRICES CORRECT TO THE MARKET PRICE. That is the average home in your zip code is 2-3 X the median income in your zip code. Period. No more debt gimmicks, no more bailouts for the debt industry, no more giveaways to an oversized housing and real estate industry, just let the price correct! Getting rid of unnecessary costs like mortgage brokers, realtors, stupid building codes and red tape would help too.
  • unknown  •  3 months ago
    We could always do a reverse plan of this guys logic. Give the savers 15% interest on their money. They might spend some of it on housing.
  • Ken  •  3 months ago
    They need to pull out all of these props and let the housing market hit bottom. Then we can really recover. As in the Great Depression, the Federal government is extending the duration of this crisis with all the intervention. Rip the band-aid off, quit bailing everyone out and let's have a real sound money, responsibility driven rebound.
  • Chris  •  3 months ago
    I swear, was this much angst and hand wringing and repeating the mantra "THE CENTRAL PLANNERS MUST SAVE US" going down back when the tech bubble burst?!? I remember going through that and losing a good amount of money. As much pain as that caused, I (and a lot of others) learned an important lesson about diversification of investments and educating myself better on how to properly evaluate the worth of a company compared to its stock price. I don't recall anybody asking for big government to save them then from that bubble. Bubbles are bubbles, lessons need to be learned about how not to get burned by the next big thing that just can't lose.

    Bailouts just sicken me, whether it is corporations or individuals. All parties need to put on their big boy pants and deal with the decisions that they've made! Learn your lesson and be the better person (or corporation) for it by making better financial decisions in the future.
  • Dan  •  Reno, Nevada  •  3 months ago
    How about letting folks use deferred retirement money (401K) tax free to pay off enough principal to qualify for a lower interest loan. I am about $20K upside down, need an additional $40K to pay down to a level where I could refinance at a much lower interest rate. Not tax free, the $60K from my retirement would cost about $15K in tax.
  • DRight  •  3 months ago
    The FED caused the housing crisis.

ABOUT BREAKOUT

Breakout is Yahoo! Finance’s daily all-out, roll-up-your-sleeves, dive-in, interactive investing show, offering fresh segments throughout the trading day. If you love making money, if you want to protect what you have, if you’re passionate about understanding these crazy markets, you’re in the right place. Welcome!

MEET THE TEAM: Matt Nesto, Jeff Macke, Aaron Task, Jennifer Carinci and Kevin Chupka

Investing 101

Subscribe and RSS

[X]

How to subscribe

Roll over each section to subscribe using Add to My Yahoo! or RSS Feed feeds.

Yahoo! News offers dozens of RSS feeds you can read in My Yahoo! or using third-party RSS news reader software. Click here to find out more about RSS and how you can use it with Yahoo! News.

DISCLAIMER

Merrill Lynch is not responsible for any content on this site.
 
Recent Quotes
Symbol Price Change % Chg 
Your most recently viewed tickers will automatically show up here if you type a ticker in the "Enter symbol/company" at the bottom of this module.
You need to enable your browser cookies to view your most recent quotes.
 
Sign-in to view quotes in your portfolios.