Wed, May 23, 2012, 1:41 AM EDT - U.S. Markets open in 7 hrs 49 mins

Keystone Pipeline Is Dead But Far From Buried

There's a great country music song by Dierks Bentley that goes, "I know what I was feeling, but what was I thinking?" that should be playing in the Oval Office today. That's because an unpopular president, in the throws of a hotly contested re-election bid, just handed his opponents a plum by effectively killing a popular and widely supported pipeline project that would have brought much needed oil into this country from our friends in Canada at a time when Iran is sabre rattling, crude oil is above $100/barrel and gasoline is creeping back toward $4.00 a gallon.

While the 1700-mile project could still come back to life, the notion of TransCanada (TRP) restarting the application process from scratch following three-years of wasted Washington wrangling seems unlikely. There is already talk that Canadian Prime Minister Steven Harper will redirect the project to the West and sell its oil to China.

To be fair, the President was up against a tight decision deadline that was purposely put in place by Congress to make it difficult - or at least painful - to block their $13 billion dollar plan. By siding with environmentalists over the majority, the President will not only have to answer questions on his commitment to secure America's energy independence, but also on his ability to create badly needed jobs.

As much as the latter point is important and the country needs all the jobs it can get, the Keystone Pipeline seemed to be first and foremost about energy. Had the President's well known support for green energy programs been more successful that would be one thing, but by most accounts his initiatives have created more kickbacks, cronyism and complaints than kilowatts.

Again, I call upon Dierks Bentley: "I knew that there'd be hell to pay, but that crossed my mind a little too late. What was I thinking?"

From Macke's point of view, the silver lining in an otherwise ''idiotic policy'' decision might be in the form of alternative energy stocks. I argue the point that any alternative to the status quo is a good alternative and should therefore be seriously and swiftly pursued.

Will this pipeline project return to haunt the President on the campaign trail or was it the right thing to do?

Your comments are welcomed below, on Twitter @MattNesto or reach out to us on Facebook.

Breakout Asks

Do you think Facebook (FB) will end this year above or below its IPO price of $38 a share?

Loading...
Poll Choice Options
  • Yes, FB will recover
  • No, FB is too unstable
 
  • Jenny  •  Albuquerque, New Mexico  •  4 months ago
    From what I've read a lot of the oil going through this pipeline would be exported. That is why the pipeline is running down to the Gulf. How is that going to help end our dependance on foreign oil. I also heard that a lot of the Alaskan oil is exported. ??? Doesn't make sense. And believe me if you lived in an area that was polluted by oil production: Valdez, AK, Gulf States, Ecuador, Kalamazoo, MI - just to name a few you wouldn't be so keen on this project. Just try to think of your fellow human beings. Just because it's not in your backyard doesn't make it okay. There are alternatives like solar, wind, kinetic energy and a lot more that just don't get the attention because of the oil and gas industries. And as far as I know wind turbines, solar panels etc... don't just magically appear - people have to build and assemble them which creates JOBS.
    • A Yahoo! user 4 months ago
      I have a question for you, Jenny. Do you drive a car, heat your home, or fly on airplanes? If so, is that possible because of wind and solar power, or because of the oil and gas industry?
    • Itsthetruth 4 months ago
      In order to compete economically with oil, wet dreams like solar, wind, kinetic energy need $10/gal oil - but not to worry, Obuma is working on that one too.
    • Jenny 4 months ago
      Thank you for asking an intelligent question and I will do my best to answer it. Yes, I drive a car, heat my home and very occasionally travel by airplane and I am aware of the fossil fuels needed to do these things at the current time. And since my husband and I have become aware of the damage caused by processing and using fossil fuels we have made many efforts to greatly reduce our use of them, here are some examples: We purchased a hybrid vehicle in 2009 and we drive only when necessary. We walk and bike as much as possible. As soon as we can afford it we will buy an all electric car. I keep the heat below 65 degrees in the winter which believe me is quite chilly in the winter, we put on sweaters, hats etc instead of cranking up the heat. We have also weather proofed our windows as much as possible (we rent so can't do as much as we would like). Our goal is to move into a house with passive solar or geothermal heating and solar panels for electricity. When we do fly to visit family we purchase the carbon off-sets. We also support and donate to organizations which are getting more wind and solar power to the grid. Is it enough? In my opinion NO because it really hurts me to read the stories of the people's health and lives that have been harmed by fossil fuel production and use. Just before I received your question I watched a video of some residents of the Gulf coast whose children are and have been very sick since the BP oil spill. BP is claiming that the Gulf is cleaned up and it is simply not true. I read an article a week ago that said dangerous levels of contaminants have been found in the Gulf seafood as well. There are so many examples of the harm caused by fossil fuel production I can't even begin to list them all here but if you are interested check out the documentaries "Crude" and "Gasland" for starters. This is why so many people in Nebraska don't want the Keystone pipeline running thru their land. They don't want their water, land and air polluted. Can you blame them? Would you want your air, water and land polluted so someone else could get oil? So, the point is we need to support cleaner alternative energies (some researchers are looking into algae and some other none-food crops to produce oil) and look for solutions to lessen and get off fossil fuels. And I think one point a lot of people miss is that fossil fuels are going to run out. I am not an expert, but I have read some articles that say that the oil resources are on the decline and the demand is on the rise so even if we drill it all and pollute the land, air and water it is still going to run out and then what. Is that the end of our civilization? So, that is my question to you. What happens when the fossil fuels are gone and we haven't pursued alternatives?
  • jerry  •  Doylestown, Pennsylvania  •  4 months ago
    So why is gas and oil our #1 export if we need it so much?
    • F-U 4 months ago
      That would be because the oil companies that are drilling for, refining and preparing this said oil for sale get better prices from other countries. Just because oil is from the US does not mean that it is forced to be sold to the American public for driving around your gas guzzling suvs and trucks!!!
    • A Yahoo! user 4 months ago
      Some of the commentators are off base when the say that the pipeline will lessen our dependence on imported oil. Last time I checked Canada was a foreign country. The truth is, oil is a global commodity and countries that produce it, including countries that dislike us need to sell it because they need the money. Iran may be a special case. They might be willing to let their people starve as they shut off their oil exports, but they need only look to their neighbors to see than their people could rise up against them too someday soon.
  • A Yahoo! user  •  Richardson, Texas  •  4 months ago
    How many thousands of miles of oil pipelines already run through the U.S., including through Nebraska and the Dakotas? What about all the rail lines carrying tank cars full of oil? I don't care if some of it will be turned into refined products and exported from Houston. American companies will be adding value to a product using American workers and selling it overseas for a profit. Obama is against that?
    • little bit 4 months ago
      My name is not Obama and I am against it.
  • Hattie D  •  Riverview, Florida  •  4 months ago
    George Soros owns property with oil on it in South America and BO has already dropped a couple billion into that. He isn't going to invest here. It might create jobs for Americans.
    • Craig 4 months ago
      Don't forget chavez in brazil
  • kevin  •  Beckley, West Virginia  •  4 months ago
    oil prices put us were we are now...... everyone dont get taxpayer gas
  • James and Imee  •  Kinston, North Carolina  •  4 months ago
    I wish everyone would quit thinking that the pipeline oil would be going to the USA. It (the shale oil) once changed to a usable form was promised to buyers outside of the USA. We should just build a refinery for the future and current lld be designed to meet only the needs of the US and then state government at the Canadian and USA border. No multi-state pipeline needed.This one refinery would reduce the cost to taxpayers of having to pay market value for the biggest buyer of fossil fuel products in the USA (The federal and state governments).
    • F-U 4 months ago
      Congrats, an actual thought that shows no bias based on party affiliation! The lack of most of these commenters looking at this situation objectively shows how bad off this country really is... Its not solely the politicians fault people, you put them in office, you sit back and allow yourselves to be continuously distracted from the real issues at hand and you don't even read the fine print before you spout off your opinion that is based on bits and pieces of ur ignorance. Hell in a handbasket...
  • khgj  •  Fort Washington, Pennsylvania  •  4 months ago
    3 years wasn't enough time to make a decision? Congress only wanted this administration to stop stalling and get to a decision (up or down). Obama orignally pushed his decision out past the election. How do people do business in this environment? Impossible. I thought Obama said he would do anything to put America back to work and keep America safe. I looks like all of that was lies. Maybe that congressman was right ("You lie")?
  • GEORGE  •  Miami, Florida  •  4 months ago
    I guess our President would much rather buy oil from his cousins in the Middle East. What happen to creating jobs here?
  • Brenda  •  Gig Harbor, Washington  •  4 months ago
    Our society once was a "CAN DO' society. Now "Failure is our direction".
  • Michael  •  Doylestown, Pennsylvania  •  4 months ago
    Yes the prez is stupid for this decision,its not in his master plan for america (Ya I bet). all the jobs that this project could provide and not just the people working on the pipeline its about all the supply jobs to boot. if he is so worried about the enviroment impact then run the darn thing right down the middle of the freeway to texas like they do with trains in some places, think of that, not having to buy or take anybodys land for this project as its already owned by the govt and mantained. if there was a spill it would be contained or if it started leaking how long do you think it would take before someone saw it with traffic driving by it all the time, this type of project would provide jobs for years to come, and improve our oil situation here not to mention keeping our money here and helping our # 1 ally to the north
  • charles d  •  4 months ago
    huge mistake by bho....all politics
  • Jayne  •  Los Angeles, California  •  4 months ago
    What was he thinking? Lizards over starving families? I am glad he made this decision. Lets give him a little more rope so he can hang himself.
  • Robert  •  Atlanta, Georgia  •  4 months ago
    This pipeline appears on the surface to be a fantastic idea in order to provide oil to the U.S.
    However, what is not mentioned in this article (or others like it) is the fact that the U.S. already drills more than enough oil. How much oil? So much so that the number one U.S. EXPORT (NOT "import") is oil.
    So, does the U.S. really need this pipeline? Or does it need to re-examine its energy policy?
  • meerkat  •  Cartago, Costa Rica  •  3 months ago
    If you hate oil and oil industry ask yourself why during Barack Husseín´s reign not a single atomic power plant (no CO2) have been built in the US while both China and India are builiding dozens of them to decrease pollution and their dependance on fossile fuels.
  • Jr  •  San Diego, California  •  4 months ago
    Americans, you fail to see what is really going on. Obama claims he wants jobs but the only jobs he's made were government. Remember he added 16000 people to check-up/spy on the rest of us. See he wants America to fail so he scoop us up in his real plan - Socialism
    As for green engery well we have seen were the money went and what do we have to show for it? Nada, Nicht, Nothing
  • Joseph  •  Philadelphia, Pennsylvania  •  4 months ago
    Any decision that helps President Obamanable get beaten like a birthday pinata is fine with me.
  • Independent Thinker  •  Seal Beach, California  •  4 months ago
    The US has been rightfully fretting over its dependence on MIddle East (OPEC) oil for almost 40 years. Now, our friendly neighbor, Canada, can produce more than it needs and is willing to sell the rest to us. And we're going to turn that down due to the "environmental scare" caused by a pipeline, of which there are already hundreds in this country? This President wants us to die economically.
  • Big Daddy, Legend of the ...  •  Romeoville, Illinois  •  4 months ago
    Is it possible that Canada will wait 1 year till we get a Republican in the Oval Office and then get the Keystone pipeline built???
  • forrest p  •  La Vergne, Tennessee  •  4 months ago
    All I can say is Jimmy Carter should be grinning bigger than ever. Obama has passed him by as the biggest joke of a President in our history. Like it or not oil is the life of our economy. Without it we're screwed. All you Obama supporters and greenie weenie A'HOLES can thumbs down that.
  • Ryan  •  Chicago, Illinois  •  4 months ago
    What a surprise!!! The same guy (B.O.) that has ignored THREE Federal Court ORDERS to stop stonewalling, and immediately issue, drilling permits that had ALREADY been approved for offshore oil drilling in TX and LA now stops an oil pipeline!!! He controls the EPA who is supposed to issue the permits. At last count, those offshore platforms and the pipeline account for over THREE THOUSAND JOBS! Two of those “jobs on ignore” are friends of mine that have worked as “Roughnecks” for about 20 years, and make over $700 a day (16 hr days) when they work. Sure El Prez wants to stop the recession and create jobs!

ABOUT BREAKOUT

Breakout is Yahoo! Finance’s daily all-out, roll-up-your-sleeves, dive-in, interactive investing show, offering fresh segments throughout the trading day. If you love making money, if you want to protect what you have, if you’re passionate about understanding these crazy markets, you’re in the right place. Welcome!

MEET THE TEAM: Matt Nesto, Jeff Macke, Aaron Task, Jennifer Carinci and Kevin Chupka

Investing 101

Subscribe and RSS

[X]

How to subscribe

Roll over each section to subscribe using Add to My Yahoo! or RSS Feed feeds.

Yahoo! News offers dozens of RSS feeds you can read in My Yahoo! or using third-party RSS news reader software. Click here to find out more about RSS and how you can use it with Yahoo! News.

DISCLAIMER

Merrill Lynch is not responsible for any content on this site.
 
Recent Quotes
Symbol Price Change % Chg 
Your most recently viewed tickers will automatically show up here if you type a ticker in the "Enter symbol/company" at the bottom of this module.
You need to enable your browser cookies to view your most recent quotes.
 
Sign-in to view quotes in your portfolios.