Breakout

Sponsored by

No, This Market Isn’t Cheap Says Ellis

Breakout

Leaving aside the European mess, Chinese slowdowns, and faux fiscal cliffs, stocks appear cheap on a price to earnings (P/E) basis. Calculated by simply dividing the level of the S&P500 (^GSPC) by total earnings stocks are trading at a P/E of 12x --14% below the historical average of 14x. So stocks are a buy, right?

According to Lincoln Ellis of the Strategic Financial Group, the P/E game is a sham, starting with the notion that 14x is a genuine average.

"That multiple is really only indicative of the last 25 years" Ellis says in the attached video. "We are in a very difficult and different environment."

Looking at the less bullish era from the 1950s to the early '80s stocks traded around 10x, a valuation Ellis believes to be more applicable today. Calling low P/Es a "siren song" luring investors to their doom, Ellis advises investors to take a cue from the late Baron Biggs and do more legwork before diving in blind.

For a more useful measure of how expensive the market is Ellis suggests the Shiller P/E which adjusts for inflation for the last 10 years. By that gauge stocks are trade at 22x, well above their historical average.

The bottom line is that P/E is at best, one part of huge number of factors that go into deciding whether or not stocks are "cheap." Anyone who tells you otherwise is selling you something you shouldn't buy.

View Comments