Wed, May 23, 2012, 5:12 PM EDT - U.S. Markets closed

Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    The 5 Most Interesting Disclosures from Corporate America in May

    Every day, the crew at Footnoted.com scours SEC filings for the latest in corporate disclosures: excessive compensation, CEO perks, lawsuits, changes in investment strategy, and new risk factors. Founder and editor Michelle Leder joined us in New York to discuss some highlights -- and lowlights -- from May.

    The highlights:

    The Mile High Club. It seems that for CEOs of big companies, the use of the private jet is almost as important as the pay — or the satisfaction you get from running a global corporation. May's high-flyers include billionaire media mogul Barry Diller, who managed to get two public companies, IAC and Expedia, to pay for his private jet airfare, and Aubrey McClendon of Chesapeake Energy, whose executive compensation exploits are already legendary.

    Online Security. Jeff Bezos, the founder and CEO of Amazon.com, is one of the more cuddly and well-liked executives out there. Love the site, love the guy. And yet the company feels compelled to shell out $1.6 million per year for his personal security.

    The Music Man. Edgar Bronfman, Jr., helped turn his family's big fortune from the liquor and chemical businesses (Seagram's and DuPont) into a much smaller one by investing in entertainment and music. Now it seems like he's recouping some of it through the sale of Warner Music Group. Shareholders in the company have done poorly over the years, but a deal to sell the company is letting Bronfman walk away with a $21.7 million payment.

    Aspirational Brands. When you think of aspirational brands, you think of Neiman Marcus, Tiffany, and. . . . . AIG? In its recent 600-page 10-Q filing, the largely-government-owned insurance company uses a strange adjective to describe its earnings.

    Rumor Has It. Search juggernaut Google faces a host of risk factors: the rise of Facebook, a large-scale failure of the internet, a decline in ad sales. But as Footnoted discovered in Google's recent 10-Q, the company has recently added a new one: rumors. Apparently, corporate insiders at America's savviest company have discovered that gossip and speculation have the potential to influence the trajectory of a stock.

    Daniel Gross is economics editor at Yahoo! Finance

    email him at grossdaniel11@yahoo.com; follow him on Twitter @grossdm

    Yahoo! Poll

    Will Congress get anything accomplished before the November elections?

    Loading...
    Poll Choice Options
    • Yes
    • No
     

    14 comments

    • YFU Number One  •  11 months ago
      Talk about having a sense of ENTITLEMENT! These guys are too much, the way they blow the SHAREHOLDERS' money on perks, wow!
    • Kevin  •  11 months ago
      An interesting segment of how the wealth users (corporate officers) are using the wealth owner's (investor's) money.
    • Meca-leca-hi-meca-hiney-h ...  •  11 months ago
      My wife had a company jet, but one of her clients stepped on it and broke it.
      - She has a day care.
      • frankmargel.com 11 months ago
        Thanks, what a great comment! Post often! Thumbs up!
    • Donald Smith  •  11 months ago
      Now do u see why they can't afford a retirement pension for the workers? And u thought it was because they need to "compete."
      • Smelly_Feet_Wyoming 11 months ago
        The end of the defined benefit pension is the biggest coup in the history of America for big business and the rich. Pensions had a derivitive effect on business values.

        During down markets pension assets declined, meaning that companies had to put in more. The prospect of these (potential) future liabilities made M&A buyers think long and hard 2x about the value befor buying a company.

        During an up market the pension needed less or no funding and might even be overfunded. Meaning M&A buyers would have to reimburse sellers for the extra value driving the price even higher. The effect of these things was to limit M&A by making it much harded to accurately determine value.

        Enter the 401(k). There are no more defined benifits so there are no more promises/liabilities. This made companies much easier to value more accurately in the absence of these volitale swings. With companies easier to value. Investment banking and Private Equity soared.

        At the same time more $$$ was to be directed to mutual funds (inside the 401K/IRA) making a boom for the mutual fund industry.

        Lets recap
        Winners
        Investment banks
        asset managers
        Private equity
        CEO's

        Then there is that whole "little" thing about companies not making any promises to employees any more. A precident that help lead to hatred of and war against unions and companies generally treating employees like $hit. "We don't owe you anything" is the first necessary step toward abandonment. This virus has infected customer service (for a human dial 1).

        Companies want guarantees from us but they are not willing to give guarantees to us. This was the begining of and promotes the psychology that business is above us and rockstars and can do what ever they want mentality that everyone is buying into and that is sold as the (new) American Dream substitute.

        This game of 3 card monty that has stung the middle class is ruining America.
      • Donald Smith 11 months ago
        Smelly, thank you for your energetic reply. I and i would just like to mention free trade as a factor for concentration of wealth for the few at the expense of many. Execs saw that the margins were greater if they could get cheaper than slave labor to produce their stuff. The only thing in their way was tariffs. No problem, just dish out the kool-aid propaganda that tarrifs were bad, free trade was good, make the right political contributions to both parties and bob's your uncle. With the increased margins, the ceo pay exploded and the American worker was cut out of sharing the wealth he helped to create. When the retirement plan was eliminated the excuse from the kool aid factory was that the companies had to "compete." The corporate elite found this nifty little word "compete" was an excuse that fits all. Register the biz in Swiz or Ireland and pay no US tax because we have to compete. Eliminate health care because we have to compete. Eliminate minimum wage because we have to compete. Etc.
    • LK  •  11 months ago
      In 1980 the average executive's salary was 40 times the average worker's.Today it is more than 300 times the average worker's. Meanwhile, wages have been completely stagnant for the average employee since then when adjusted for inflation. And on top of that workers have lost their pension plans and now must risk their retirement if they have anything left over after receiving their paychecks to risk on the stock market. Needless to say, 40 percent of workers don't invest in their 401k plans because they don't make enough money to. And yet tax rates on the wealthy at 35 percent are the lowest they've been in about a century. Why can't these rich yahoos pay more in taxes? It's ridiculous. They get everything and the rest get nothing. It's a sure road to a monarchy--entrenched wealth and power. And a sure road to revolution.
      • Cut Chris Hope 11 months ago
        LK has it right! on all accounts save one: Can't raise taxes on the Robber Barons when they control Congress. In fact, under an Oligarchy, the Rich and Powerful ARE the Government - - in Fact. To Wit: The stinkin rich oil companies get a $4 Billion Corporate Welfare Check yearly from the Government; most large Corporations do not pay any income taxes; the Ethanol Industry gets a government Welfare Check, by starving millions of people World Wide; government bailouts for everyone except those that really need it, like small business, education, the unemployed, the poor, the sick, and the nation's seniors; everyone with a half a brain knows that the Nation could cut the cost of health care by ONE/THIRD - - SIMPLY BY GOING TO A SINGLE PAYER SYSTEM. IT WOULD BE AS SIMPLE AS PLACING EVERYONE UNDER MEDICARE! It's not rocket science! The Large Health Care Insurance Companies are pocketing 33% of the premiums paid by insurers. This is absolutely outrageous!

        Both Political Parties are, in my opinion, corrupt to the Core. We do need a Third Party, and my understanding is that Independents now make up 29% of the Voters, so, there may be some hope!

        One other thing: to break the grip of the rich and powerful, Banking and Investment interests have to be separated; and, the Fed, if it continues to exist, must be freed completely from the grips of Wall Street. Most sensible people now realize that Wall Street has an iron hold on key Government posiitons in addition to the Congress. In too many instances, the @#$% all come from Goldman Saks, and other, "Biggies." on the Street. This will be a tough nut to crack - - peacefully!
      • Donald Smith 11 months ago
        The latest stats show that ceo pay is over 1000 times the average worker. Then u have all the other execs like the cfo, coo, various vp s getting fat at the same trough. If some guy started the biz, built it up - then have at it. But 99% of the time the elites are guys that have been brought in and are there only for the plunder.
    • Flyer1  •  11 months ago
      So, why can't these folks pay more taxes again?
    • frankmargel.com  •  11 months ago
      Bumper sticker reads: END CORPORATE WELFARE ! Have a great day Dan and guests! Frank out!
    • Donald Smith  •  11 months ago
      Do u see now why gov workers have benefits and private sector don't?
      • reader 11 months ago
        No, please explain.
    • Jose  •  11 months ago
      Interesting - most shareholders don't have the time/take the time to read all the footnote disclosures. If the company is reporting it as personal use of the corporate jet, they are classifying it as taxable compensation to the CEO. If the board of directors/shareholders are aware of it and approve, what's the problem? If you own stock in the company, you have a right to complain about it - go to the annual meeting - use your proxy to vote against the current board, etc.; if you don't own stock in the company, why do you care?
      • Mark 11 months ago
        Because most people don't go to the annual meeting.. and have no idea until stories like this are written.

        I'd say 95% of the global population is clueless.. I don't give a crap.. just saying..
      • Still Worried 11 months ago
        Because if you went to the annual meeting and brought this up, the suits would look at you like a cockroach and it wouldn't matter a hoot. They just don't care.
      • STEVE 11 months ago
        Because the executives are paid in stock, and then, having gained control of the corporation, vote themselves raises while laying off average workers to pay for their increased pay.
    • Donald Smith  •  11 months ago
      He could have gotten the maps for free at triple A.
    • moneydepaul  •  11 months ago
      SHUT UPPPPP Let businesses spend what they want....lets investigate scrutinize everyones expenses on this board and I am sure 50% of it is for going out to eat and plasma screens.

      All you guys are just HATERS!! you want to shift the blame to someone (might as well be people that have it better than uuuuuuu)

      Think this lady makes $$$ on people like you that want to know all the pointless @#$% that these CEO's and business owners spend on.

      Do you even know how hard it is to start and maintain a business??? NO you dont because you probably never have tried sooooo

      SHUT UP!!! and let people spend their $ how they see fit
    • eagle71  •  11 months ago
      If she worked for Yahoo, I would suggest you fire her. Fire Dan Gross now!!!!!
    • HEWHO  •  11 months ago
      a
    • Timothy  •  11 months ago
      Aaron or Henry wouldn't bore us with something like this.

    FOLLOW THE DAILY TICKER

    The Daily Ticker covers the most important business stories of the day -- the economy, investing, corporate leadership and politics. The Daily Ticker picks up where Tech Ticker left off and is hosted by Aaron Task, Henry Blodget and Daniel Gross. Often serious, sometimes irreverent and always interesting, The Daily Ticker gives viewers a unique take on the business world's most crucial stories.

    Subscribe and RSS

    [X]

    How to subscribe

    Roll over each section to subscribe using Add to My Yahoo! or RSS Feed feeds.

    Yahoo! News offers dozens of RSS feeds you can read in My Yahoo! or using third-party RSS news reader software. Click here to find out more about RSS and how you can use it with Yahoo! News.
     
    Recent Quotes
    Symbol Price Change % Chg 
    Your most recently viewed tickers will automatically show up here if you type a ticker in the "Enter symbol/company" at the bottom of this module.
    You need to enable your browser cookies to view your most recent quotes.
     
    Sign-in to view quotes in your portfolios.