Wed, May 23, 2012, 5:13 PM EDT - U.S. Markets closed

Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    7 Billion People Equals (At Least) One Major Problem: Jeffrey Sachs

    Follow The Daily Ticker on Facebook here!

    The human population will reach 7 billion by the end of the month, according to United Nations, and that's no milestone to celebrate, says Jeffrey D. Sachs, director of The Earth Institute.

    Instead, we need to be concerned, he says. It's been only 12 years since we welcomed the 6 billionth human, and Sachs predicts it's likely only another 13 or 14 years before the population adds another billion people.

    "This is a crowded planet," says Sachs. "This is trouble, frankly, for the planet." With this many people and counting, feeding, sheltering and protecting ourselves creates enormous environmental and economic challenges.

    Can we prosper with this many people?

    The key to managing it, Sachs says in the accompanying interview, is to begin to stabilize the population. One important way to do that is to lower fertility rates. And, the best way to do this is to reduce infant mortality rates, which on the surface may seem contradictory, but not as Sachs explains.

    "When children survive predictably then parents choose to have fewer children," he claims. That is why parents in the developed world tend to have less children than those in poor nations. "In the high-income and most of the middle-income countries, population is stabilized. It's in the poorest countries -- where you don't have access to health care, family planning, where the children die in large numbers, where the girls aren't able to stay in school -- that the population is soaring."

    Still, the developed world causes its own stresses on the planet. In a way, we're victims of our own success. The rising price of commodities around the globe isn't simply about supply and demand caused by a growing population, it's also the result of rising income per person. With a growing global middle class, there's a larger population able to buy meat, heat their homes and drive cars.

    "That is shaking the world economy, no doubt about it," Sachs says. It's also an environmental concern that calls for newer and more sustainable technologies, he says.

    Sachs believes it's possible to make these changes, but it will take enormous cooperation -- which isn't always easy for a small group to do, forgot about the entire civilization.

    Yahoo! Poll

    Will Congress get anything accomplished before the November elections?

    Loading...
    Poll Choice Options
    • Yes
    • No
     

    353 comments

    • Chevalier  •  7 months ago
      "Idiocracy" is a prophetic movie.
      • ErnstG 7 months ago
        I totally agree. The movie is so underappreciated. Its premise is so right on the money and stark it is totally unexpected. It articulated what many of us are prophecizing, scratch this, witnessing as happening even now, but in a comedy kinda style. I think it is the best stealth conservative movie that came from Hollywood in a long long time.
      • Josh 7 months ago
        That's the first thing I thought of when seeing this article... I don't know whether to laugh or shake my head on this one...
    • Michael D  •  7 months ago
      Actually 3rd world population are the only ones that are increasing beyond any limits, the population of Western Europe and the US is stable, while that in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Republics is actually decreasing, which is bad news for the civilized world. Birth control should be implemented mostly in the 3rd world and islamic countries which account for the largest population increases. I would like to see the UN or other International Organization try to control population growth in countries like Pakistan, Indonesia, Egypt, Turkey, or Iran. This is a guarantee of a Holy War or Jihad or WWIII, that neither the West nor the East can afford because they do not have the population to sustain it.
      • Andy 7 months ago
        Actually the U.S. was at less than zero population growth begining in 1974. Uncontrolled immigration, primarily from Mexico and Central America, has resulted in an expansion of the population beyond the 1974 total.
      • Cameron 7 months ago
        Yes and there are now 50 mn hispanics, mostly mexcian and central american. They are mostly young and despite falling feritlity rates in mexico, the US welfare state is reversing that in tyhe US
      • TS 7 months ago
        Actually birth control will be the downfall of the human species. As we speak the smart intelligent are taking it reducing their birth rate, and the ignorant aren't increasing their birth rate. Guess what, in a couple of centuries we'll all be going back up the trees and forgetting how to use tools.
    • Sloth Machine  •  7 months ago
      Just show every guy a poster of Roseanne Barr in a bikini every time he starts getting in the mood. Population Crisis over.
    • Peppino  •  7 months ago
      Kill everyone who appears on The Jerry Springer show!
    • wazzup  •  7 months ago
      The sad truth is only the poor and uneducated are breeding like rabbits - so not only is population growth out of control, the growth are nearly all burdens for the society/world. I'm only stating a fact, don't shoot the messenger... Population control should be the #1 issue the whole world need to focus on to fix, as nothing is as important on that scale...
      • A Yahoo! User 7 months ago
        That is completely true. Most poor families have multiple kids, which seems stupid on their part. You have very little money but you continue to reproduce. That just means you will have to spend even more of the money you don't have to raise your children. Stop having children!
      • Meat. 7 months ago
        No worry's. Monsanto is on the job. We will all be sterile by the time it is all said and done.
      • Nevada 7 months ago
        And the most troubling part is that those that have so many children are still in their prime child bearing years. South America has an average age of something like 25 and so does Asia. There is only so much water (who would have thought you'd pay more for a bottle of water than a gallon of gas), food etc to go around. All the green energy, recycling and cumbaya's in the world are not going to stop the inevitable destruction of mankind. We are litterally f****** ourselves to deat,
    • Chris  •  7 months ago
      Mother Nature has a way of thinning the herd so to speak when population density reaches critical mass. It's pretty much inevitable.
      • Hal 7 months ago
        Yes...McDonald's sells BigMacs all over the world now!
      • ErnstG 7 months ago
        When western taxpayers are forced to bail out famine and AIDS basket cases, Mother Nature is not in control.
      • Christopher 7 months ago
        the next war will kill 30% of the population
    • Someone  •  7 months ago
      he is talking sensible. I wonder when our goverments will stop giving out free money to people to have more children. They should promote adoption instead. Tax breaks should be limited to 2 child per family. For adopted children you can have more tax breaks.
      • djreef 7 months ago
        The old lady and I will be looking into this option in the next year, or so since we haven't had success in having our own kids. She's Peruvian, so we'll have easy access to orphans from her home country without having to deal with all the #$%$ red tape here in the States.DJ
      • Christian 7 months ago
        our population growth has leveled off..he is not talkign about America as he states, he is talking about places like India and poor countries without the resources to educate their population or the health care to save the babies
      • CharlMty 7 months ago
        So you are saying that a $18K Incentive is making people spend $200K+ in raising a child???? Wow... you logic is infalible.

        America is not the issue...
    • Timothy  •  7 months ago
      In an intelligent world, Warren Buffet would have 100 kids and the welfare mom would have zero. Buffet's billions would be divided up and wealth would not concentrate in the few. The welfare mom would not spread her lifestyle of dependent poverty to offspring.
      Unfortunately, that is just the opposite of what is happening.
    • Res  •  7 months ago
      If Sachs or anyone else has a problem with too many people on the planet, then do us all a favor and get rid of yourselves!
    • This is Me  •  7 months ago
      Cultural and economic conditions will not change because of reduced infant mortality and those are the true drivers of high fertility. Try to convince a 3rd world Latino that he doesn't have a GOD-given right to be fruitful and multiply. Try to convince a 3rd world African that contraception isn't an EVIL White-mans invention to limit the black population. Try to convince a Muslim that Allah doesn't need him to have 20 kids for JIHAD. ....I'll bet you can't.
    • Boubou  •  7 months ago
      Sachs - a voice of sanity in a debate characterized by bitterness, ignorance and tribal enmities fueled and exploited by the party machines and the press.
      I salute him.
    • A Yahoo! user  •  7 months ago
      Tie a knot in it ...
    • Bozer  •  7 months ago
      It's not the boom itself but who's booming. Right now the biggest boom is in the poorest parts of the world and the welfare state. How do you get them to understand the consequences? I guess they are counting on other people paying for their irresponsibility by laying guilt trip on the rest of us.
    • legend  •  7 months ago
      There was one lily pad in a pond. The next day there were 2 and the third day there were 4 and each day they doubled. On what day was the day before the pond was completely covered by lily pads? Answer -- when the pond was 50% full.
    • wazzup  •  7 months ago
      The study of rats shows that when the food supply is plenty, rats breed like crazy until food supply runs out, then rats start to eat their young and mass starvation ensues... this is where we're headed folks...
      In exchange for food and supplies in dirt poor regions of the world, they must give up their right to reproduce until they've proven they can help themselves. It's the #1 reason poverty and crime can never be irradicated or drastically reduced...
    • Jason Kile  •  7 months ago
      thanks for the info...really needed this info for a project im doing
    • theshawn  •  7 months ago
      Once again, another reason to role back laws designed to act like "if it'll postpone one death then it's worth it" type baloney. Just let people die doing stupid things, let them die of natural causes instead of doing everything possible to extend their life. We ALL die, it's time to quite avoiding it at all costs.
    • TRCiii  •  7 months ago
      GLOBAL MOBILITY AND RESOURCE SHARING VS. NATIONAL CULTURAL PREJUDICE.
      For the benefit of all humanity, it would seem wise to encourage global mobility
      and global resource sharing, while at the same time limiting the population growth of all culture. The problem however is that different cultures are by nature very prejudiced, favoring their own culture even to the point of demanding the death of all other cultures, hence resulting in wars. In particular, the Muslim based cultures would appear to be seeking global proliferation to the total exclusion and demise of all others. On the other hand, we here in the US go to the entirely opposite extreme of encouraging diverse cultures to tout their
      pride to the pount of it being offensive and divisive, thereby creating an environment of baby wars and cultural hatred. In particular, is it not obvious in this country that illegals are proliferating at a rate that will absolutely destroy this country's culture. Is it not time we stop the insane idea of global homogenization, and grant respect to each country and its own unique culture, placing limits on how much they can grow?
    • Samson  •  7 months ago
      I wonder if I want a boy or a girl now? lol

      At first I wanted to a girl. But, it seems like I probably have to bat off the boys from my little girl. Teach her boys are bad news. Say, you're going to college, a all girls college. No boys for you, not until you have a degree. lol

      If I had a boy, probably be easier. Just let the little dude do his thing. Probably have to teach him a thing or two about how to treat girls and asks them out though. It's super easy at middle school or high school. Man, I wish I could go back myself. lol
    • Mark  •  7 months ago
      If 7 billion is not enough - what will be enough - when humans stand on evey square foot of the earth? Where will we grow our food? In a vat in the kitchen?

    FOLLOW THE DAILY TICKER

    The Daily Ticker covers the most important business stories of the day -- the economy, investing, corporate leadership and politics. The Daily Ticker picks up where Tech Ticker left off and is hosted by Aaron Task, Henry Blodget and Daniel Gross. Often serious, sometimes irreverent and always interesting, The Daily Ticker gives viewers a unique take on the business world's most crucial stories.

    Subscribe and RSS

    [X]

    How to subscribe

    Roll over each section to subscribe using Add to My Yahoo! or RSS Feed feeds.

    Yahoo! News offers dozens of RSS feeds you can read in My Yahoo! or using third-party RSS news reader software. Click here to find out more about RSS and how you can use it with Yahoo! News.
     
    Recent Quotes
    Symbol Price Change % Chg 
    Your most recently viewed tickers will automatically show up here if you type a ticker in the "Enter symbol/company" at the bottom of this module.
    You need to enable your browser cookies to view your most recent quotes.
     
    Sign-in to view quotes in your portfolios.