Wed, May 23, 2012, 5:28 PM EDT - U.S. Markets closed

Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Author Gapper: Rogue Traders a Feature of the System, Not a Bug

    Rogue traders pop up with some regularity, racking up nine- and ten-figure huge losses at well-known firms: Joseph Jett at Kidder, Peabody in the 1980s, Nicholas Leeson at Baring in the 1990s, Jerome Kerviel at Societe General in 2008. Earlier this year, Kweku Abodoli, a 31-year-old trader at UBS's London office, was busted after having notched some $2 billion in losses due to unauthorized trading.

    It turns out rogue traders are features of the system, not a bug. That's the argument made by John Gapper, columnist for the Financial Times, in his smart new e-book How to Be a Rogue Trader.

    As we discuss in the accompanying video, Gapper chalks up the persistence of rogue traders to the nature of banks, and to human nature. "When it comes down to it, banks are willing to take the risk that these individual exists within the organization," he said. Large investment banks only make money by taking risk. If they fret too much about the prospect of traders losing money, they wouldn't be able to make meaningful profits.

    The impulse that creates rogue traders — the force that spurs people facing losses to take bigger gambles rather than fold -- is also deeply-seated within humans. In the book, Gapper looks at experiments and research done on sparrows, bumblebees, and their cousins who dwell on the more evolved branches of the evolutionary tree — people. Clear trends emerge. "When you're well fed, you take no risk, and simply go where you'll get a certain amount of food." But when animals are cold, or tired, or facing starvation, they start to gamble. "There's a parallel there," said Gapper. "When you're in trouble, you've got to double up. And that's what these rogue traders do."

    The rogue traders Gapper assesses in his book share certain commonalities. "A lot of these rogue traders are outsiders," he said. "They've come from second-tier universities, they come from the back office and they want to make their mark." Typically, they are eager, clever, and charismatic. "When people ask questions, they charm their way out of the situation, and they're actually very good at bullying and menacing people and keeping those questions down."

    In an age in which employers have all sorts of methods to monitor their employees' activity, it seems like banks should be able to catch rogue traders before they inflict too much damage. But Gapper believes otherwise. Even the best-managed banks don't have systems to monitor the intra-day trades on their vast trading desks. And if a rogue trader has a partner in the back office, then the monitoring system actually abets the crime.

    Send an email to talkyourbook@yahoo.com, and we'll put your name in a drawing for a free e-copy of How to Be a Rogue Trader.

    Daniel Gross is economics editor at Yahoo! Finance

    Follow him on Twitter @grossdm; email him at grossdaniel11@yahoo.com

    Yahoo! Poll

    Will Congress get anything accomplished before the November elections?

    Loading...
    Poll Choice Options
    • Yes
    • No
     

    32 comments

    • NewEconomics  •  5 months ago
      "Large investment banks only make money by taking risk." - At least now someone said like it is. Great! Now - let tose investment banks take risk with their own money, not the taxpayers'.
    • DaveBliss  •  5 months ago
      The problem with the animal analogy is that there is little risk in the banking sector. Banks, especially the big ones, are so well protected that there is little risk of actual failure. The result is a culture that encourages stupid risk, rather than calculated risk.
    • Mel  •  5 months ago
      Rogue traders, "Hey, it's not my money."
    • g-man  •  5 months ago
      It is pretty straightforward. Enact financial laws and regulations that protect the public from those who would cheat, defraud, misrepresent, and steal. If people violate the laws or regulations, prosecute them. If found guilty, put them in prison.
      • Jones 5 months ago
        There is no need for this. It is precisely the opposite. Excessive regulation creates rogue traders.
    • achmed  •  5 months ago
      It's the way they have come to do business. I work for a fortune 500 company and we are encouraged to take risks at evaluation time, but officially told to play it safe. people trade like maniacs, and when it is successful, they are rewarded handsomely, when they lose, the manager denies knowledge of their activity. heads I win, tails you lose.
      • Ray 5 months ago
        The rogue traders are guilty of
        1) being bad or unlucky traders.
        2) being greedy and ambitious
        This probably applies to about 25% of the population.
    • TS  •  5 months ago
      They're not rouge traders, there's a better word for them. "Scapegoats" They take the fall so the company can keep going doing what they had to take the fall for. . .
    • John  •  5 months ago
      Rogue traders are fall guys for folks who are operating behind them.
    • R.T.  •  5 months ago
      No oversights, no limits, no supervision. Sounds like garbage management rather than
      rogue traders.
    • Honest John  •  5 months ago
      Not a bug,I beg to differ.They are locusts,destroying all in their paths,and as long as they're making money for the "company" it is allowed.When they lose money they are coined as "Rogue".All part of the SCAM
    • bruce b  •  5 months ago
      i'm swure their bosses pressure them to this. then when it fails they blame the employee and fire them and deny it.
    • JoeO  •  5 months ago
      Bonuses are too big so the desire to get becomes paramount especially with OPM.
      • Dan 5 months ago
        Don't forget that some traders have a character defect of needing a "rush", an adrenaline charge that comes from risk taking. In some people it is called a gambling addiction. The "rush" overwhelms other factors in making the trading decision and the result is defective decision making. So for these people using OPM is very similar to using crack cocaine or crystal meth.
    • BOJB12  •  5 months ago
      Second-tier universities? I get it, the first-tier folks, like Harvad and Wharton, go much higher to destroy companies like Enron - their entitlement to seek and destroy is much higher because of their insider networking. Any way, these rogue traders are like the drunken cowboys of the wild past who used to just barged into salons and shoot'em up just for fun in destruction. Like them in the past, these rogue traders are just shooting up other people's money.
    • TEN-OF-WANDS  •  5 months ago
      It would be nice if the audio were clearer.
    • Ken  •  5 months ago
      Here's an amazing fact about "Rogue Traders" that Gapper fails to mention in the interview. They have all made the BAD big bets. The "Rogue Traders" that win are actually called "CEO's". The "Rogue Traders" that have lost so much money that there is no solution possible are called "PONZI SCHEMERS". The "Rogue Traders" that have political connections are called "TREASURY SECRETARIES".

      And the head "Rogue Trader" that throws money at all of the above to help them cover their tracks is called "CHARIMAN OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE".
      • Ken 5 months ago
        I know I post some crap, but I really have no idea why anyone would give a thumbs down for my post above??? (unless you are a CEO or ponzi schemer.) The mere label of "rogue" is just a method used to assign blame and have a character to go after that sounds a little evil, "He's rogue!! We did not give him permission to use that money.". HOWEVER, when this same type of person WINS his bet, you never even hear about it. It's just goood times for the firm in that case and the person is not labeled anything, in fact he is likely promoted.

        So please explain your thumbs down.
      • Magron 5 months ago
        for once I have to say Ken is on to something.
      • Magron 5 months ago
        ^^ intellectual honesty. you dont see it often, savor it.
    • globetrotter  •  5 months ago
      To allow banks who take depositors money to do "trading" for their own benefit is like having drug dealers be in charge of pharmacies. Depositors want extreme security (vault) for their money, traders are fundamentally gamblers... then banks could not make those big bets if they only had their own money, they can do it because they have a huge pile of depositor funds to act as "collateral"... rather sick system
    • John  •  5 months ago
      i like you guys, but if you think the american economy is improving, you are absolutely wrong. people are getting laid off in droves in my neck of the woods. its a very bad sign
    • TIMOTHY  •  5 months ago
      Achmed is 1000% correct. When the trader gambles big and wins,,,he is rewarded and displayed to all other traders. It's what the banks want to do. They want the big wins,,,since that is how they make money. Only when the trader looses,,,then management acts like he is a rouge trader. #$%$,,,,since have we ever heard about a rouge trader who won? Has a bank ever fired someone who broke the rules and overextended himself but then won millions,,,or billions. Do the banks fire the guy who won billions but also broke the rules? Simple answer is NO
    • Professor P  •  5 months ago
      We have only discovered a small fraction of all of the rogue traders--the ones who cannot cover their losses by luck. If you sent me into a casino with a $1 billion credit line and gave me 20% of my winnings, I would have no problem winning $1 million more than 99% of the time. I would just "double up" each time I lost, until I finally made a winning bet. There must be thousands of bond traders who are effectively doing that.
    • George  •  5 months ago
      When the rogues win they're called genius entrepneurs. When they fail they're nuts.
    • Sisafitz  •  5 months ago
      The notion of "rogue traders" in an institution is usually a joke - they are at a company desk with access to their network and their trading accounts. That usually doesn't happen by accident. If anything, these people who double down on stupid [and wind up being a news story] are better categorized as a symptom of management being MIA, or incompetent. Running a financial institution with based on nothing more than some type of fraternity instinct usually blows up.
      • Ray 5 months ago
        I agree, if traders are punished for bad trading then their managers should be punished for their incompetence in hiring them.

    FOLLOW THE DAILY TICKER

    The Daily Ticker covers the most important business stories of the day -- the economy, investing, corporate leadership and politics. The Daily Ticker picks up where Tech Ticker left off and is hosted by Aaron Task, Henry Blodget and Daniel Gross. Often serious, sometimes irreverent and always interesting, The Daily Ticker gives viewers a unique take on the business world's most crucial stories.

    Subscribe and RSS

    [X]

    How to subscribe

    Roll over each section to subscribe using Add to My Yahoo! or RSS Feed feeds.

    Yahoo! News offers dozens of RSS feeds you can read in My Yahoo! or using third-party RSS news reader software. Click here to find out more about RSS and how you can use it with Yahoo! News.
     
    Recent Quotes
    Symbol Price Change % Chg 
    Your most recently viewed tickers will automatically show up here if you type a ticker in the "Enter symbol/company" at the bottom of this module.
    You need to enable your browser cookies to view your most recent quotes.
     
    Sign-in to view quotes in your portfolios.