Wed, May 23, 2012, 5:40 PM EDT - U.S. Markets closed

Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    The Big Takeaway From Iowa: 75% Of Republicans Don’t Want Mitt Romney

    The votes from the Iowa caucuses are in and Mitt Romney is the winner. But just by a meager eight votes.

    Rick Santorum came in a very close second with a tally of 30,007 votes compared to Romney's 30,015. Both took roughly 25% of the vote while Ron Paul came in a close third with 21%.

    Business Insider Politics Editor Michael Brendan Dougherty joined The Daily Ticker's Henry Blodget to discuss the results and what it all means. Watch the video for his analysis and read below to find out what Dougherty considers to be the big takeaway from Iowa.

    Provided by the Business Insider

    By Michael Brendan Dougherty

    Mitt Romney won 25.19 percent of the vote in Iowa in 2008 - and lost that contest by 9 points.

    Since then, Mitt Romney spent millions of dollars. He got better at debating. He annihilated Rick Perry. The SuperPAC aligned to Romney took out a surging Newt Gingrich with negative ads. And Romney focused his energy on attacking Barack Obama.

    All that got him was 25 percent of the vote again last night. Almost exactly the 2008 result he had in Iowa.

    He lost the nomination then. This isn't exactly the start to 2012 Team Romney was expecting.

    75 percent of Republican Caucus-goers want someone that isn't Mitt Romney - a result that reflects polls nationwide.

    And now Mitt Romney has four problems.

    1) The media is going to hound Mitt Romney for underperforming - because they hate a frontrunner, because they appreciate an underdog, and because they are desperate for a real, hard-fought contest.

    2) Newt Gingrich basically turned his concession speech into an announcement that his campaign would no longer be about winning. He will now focus on stopping Mitt Romney from winning and stopping Ron Paul from influencing Republican foreign policy. Mike Huckabee became determined to perform a kamikaze attack on Romney four years ago and it worked.

    3) Rick Santorum is going to soak up a lot of oxygen this week. If he had risen weeks ago, he would have been given intense scrutiny. Now all that scrutiny will be leavened by flattering accounts of "how he did it" and how "he might just do it again" in New Hampshire.

    4) Jon Huntsman was the only other candidate besides Rick Santorum that wasn't damaged by last night's results. He didn't compete, so he didn't underperform. He is going to get fresh attention and he is going to be focused on tearing Romney down.

    Romney can take care of all four of these problems if he simply translates his 40 percent poll numbers into 40 percent of the vote next Tuesday in New Hampshire.

    As for Ron Paul, it just didn't pan out for him and his fans. Ron Paul came in second in the Ames Straw Poll in August. But he finished third in the contest that really mattered.

    Despite that, Paul's campaign is a major success. He brought in a gigantic number of independent voters and first-time caucus-goers. Without Ron Paul, the turnout in the Iowa Caucus would have been abysmally low this year.

    Ron Paul may be retiring from electoral politics at the end of his current Congressional term, but he has proven that he is the only person attracting young voters to the Republican party. And he has injected some new and old ideas back into the Republican bloodstream.

    "We've had success reintroducing some ideas Republicans have needed for a long time," he said in his speech Tuesday night. "And that is the conviction that freedom is popular. Let's go back to to this real old fashioned idea, this dangerous idea: let's obey the Constitution."

    "We are gonna keep scoring, just as we have tonight" Paul said, encouraging his supporters to press on in New Hampshire.

    "There are all the reason to be satisfied," summing up his performance.

    And he's right. Even if he didn't win, as many thought he would a month ago, Paul has come a long way in four years. In 2008 Rudy Giuliani and other candidates openly ridiculed Congressman Paul during the debates and in interviews. In this contest, most candidates have adopted some of Paul's issues in opposing bailouts, calling for more oversight of the Federal Reserve.

    So of course his campaign is a success.

    Watch the interview to see who Dougherty predicts will grab the Republican presidential nomination and then the general election. And tell us what you think in the comment section below or on our Facebook page!
    Yahoo! Poll

    Will Congress get anything accomplished before the November elections?

    Loading...
    Poll Choice Options
    • Yes
    • No
     
    • Steve  •  Irvine, California  •  4 months ago
      and 75% don't like santorum, 79% don't like ron paul, even i can figure that out huh
    • Dick Nixon  •  Washington, District of Columbia  •  4 months ago
      Please...what a dumb assertion. In 1980, Reagan lost Iowa to GHW Bush, with Bush receiving 32% and Reagan 30%, not that much different than last night's results. And we all remember how THAT eventually turned out. Only on Yahoo...sheeeesh
      • smart 4 months ago
        The more you give the politicians, the more they spend. That is why raising taxes will not work. But America will have to get out of the mess Obama created with his deficit spending at 300% Bush Levels for 4 yrs. It's either the bureaucrats or taxpayers who will have to eat away at their budget. Especially in a recession, who in their right mind wants more big govt spending & more taxes? Obama & Dems gotta go! Vote Ron Paul in 2012. Source: google
        the-weekly-standard-obama-vs-bush-on-debt
      • dontcare 4 months ago
        Watch out for Tricky Dick!
      • smart 4 months ago
        So Obama supporters, you like the increased unemployment since Bush, you like the 1 Trillion more that Obama spends (will be 4 trillion more than Bush in deficit spending by Nov.) than Bush, you like the increased food stamp usage. Yeah right it's an economy that's getting better. Not. Wake up liberals, there will never be enough money to steal from the "rich" to fund these socialist plans. Socialism doesn't work. USA, capitalism
        since 1776.
    • vince  •  Elmhurst, Illinois  •  4 months ago
      I am still waiting for the media to start asking why? Why is it that we can choose a nominee after only two or three states get to speak up? Why can we stand as a country to let the same two or three states always lead off the primaries? Why do we not have a national structure that allows all Americans to have a voice in the primaries? Why does the election year need to start in the first week of Jan? Why don't we have a media that ask questions instead of regurgitating what everyone else is saying?
      • SkepticalOne 4 months ago
        Absolutely agree - totally ridiculous that one state has anymore say than another.
    • Mark  •  Livingston, New Jersey  •  4 months ago
      It looks like 100% of your readers do not like your headline. Where do they come up with the people who write these headlines? Must be minimum wage paying jobs that anyone can apply for and get. Right now I do not favor anyone over the other but this is just stupid.
      • Fullglass 4 months ago
        "Where do they come up with the people who write these headlines?" Simple, the Republican Carol Bartz - CEO of Yahoo to be replaced by another Republican in a few days - off-shored it to some guy in India who gets $0.25 for each headline he writes.
      • Actuarial 4 months ago
        Funny Does it sound like YAHOO honking for conservatives every day? or any day at all
      • Lead Apron Please 4 months ago
        Sounds like an ABC type of headline.
    • denise  •  4 months ago
      Its funny that they think Romney is the only one that can beat Obama, and Romney is the candidate most like Obama!
      • DV 4 months ago
        You need the independents to win, independents will not vote for anyone but Romney in the Republican party. Simple fact.
      • denise 4 months ago
        Right. Its just ironic that if the Republicans do win, things won't change much.
      • dennis 4 months ago
        I agree he is the Republican version of Bamma.
        Big difference he has been employed in the private business sector.
    • Pants  •  4 months ago
      Using the same logic and 2008 Democratic caucus results you could say that 63% of Democrats don't want Obama. Of course that didn't hold true in the genereal election when they only had one Democrat to vote for. Same thing will happen here.
      • smart 4 months ago
        The more you give the politicians, the more they spend. That is why raising taxes will not work. But America will have to get out of the mess Obama created with his deficit spending at 300% Bush Levels for 4 yrs. It's either the bureaucrats or taxpayers who will have to eat away at their budget. Especially in a recession, who in their right mind wants more big govt spending & more taxes? Obama & Dems gotta go! Vote Ron Paul in 2012. Source: google
        the-weekly-standard-obama-vs-bush-on-debt
      • STEVE 4 months ago
        Smart just discovered that he can paste.
    • michaelc  •  4 months ago
      Well, the horserace has started and they're out of the gate! But it is along race and, as we all know, anything can happen. A horse can stumble, a horse can break a leg, a horse can throw his jocky, a horse can jump over the rail or a horse might even just drop dead in his tracks. That's what makes horseracing and politics entertaining and exciting. At least to some.
    • K  •  Chicago, Illinois  •  4 months ago
      this is why i don't believe anything that daily ticker posts.
    • John Anderson  •  Wappingers Falls, New York  •  4 months ago
      To say 75% don't want Mitt Romney is ridiculous. All you can say is that 75% who voted "prefer" someone else on the ballot over Romney. Same goes for Santorum.
    • DV  •  Islip, New York  •  4 months ago
      Dumbest headline ever. Just because someone voted for their number 1 choice and say their #2 choice was Romney, DOES NOT mean that the "don't want" Romney. They is false reasoning. Think about it, if you order Salmon in a restaurant, does it mean that you don't like Tuna? Shame on the Daily Ticker.
    • Patriot!  •  Los Angeles, California  •  4 months ago
      100% of Republicans Want Any Candidate Over Obama! That's what it should have read!
    • sick and tired  •  4 months ago
      And Iowa is only a filter, a filter to weed out the pretenders and allow the real candidates to emerge.

      Sounds like a liberal trying to slow down the front runner. If your 75% theory is true, what does that say about Clinton (over Bush and Perot)? Obama has about a 35% approval rating and I'd like to know what % of that 35 are blacks who voted for him simply because he was black. Apparently the liberals fear Romney taking the white house.

      And Iowa is only a filter. Ask Michelle Bachmann.
    • John Galt  •  4 months ago
      Well, in 2008 66% of Democrats didn't want Obama.
    • Smoothie  •  Ontario, California  •  4 months ago
      You are just partially correct. 75% now aren't Romney supporters, but 100% of Republicans DON'T WANT OBAMA !!!!!!!
    • Troy  •  4 months ago
      Headline Fail!
    • Independent Thinker  •  Seal Beach, California  •  4 months ago
      Who writes these moronic headlines? Using your mental-midget math, the headline could have read: "75% or more of Republicans don't want either: Ron Paul, Mitt Romney, Rick Santorum, Rick Perry, or Michelle Bachman." Do you ultraliberals in the press think we don't know what you're up to? Your willingness to transparently shill for the worst President of all times shows that you not only can't think with an open mind, but you don't even feel the need to hide your extreme biases any more. Independents put Obama in office and will also remove him.
    • SeQuEnTiAL  •  4 months ago
      Who cares, when the Fed Reserve clearly has more power than the president does? They are all irrelevant candidates, especially Obama the incumbent. If anything Republicans will lose to him because they DON'T have a real opponent that will be good to the average taxpayer/worker. It would be easy for them to win 2012 then.
    • Keep USA jobs HERE  •  Columbus, Ohio  •  4 months ago
      Mitt Romney is just too Liberal and too caring about the middle class.
    • Jim  •  Minneapolis, Minnesota  •  4 months ago
      The idiots in Iowa do NOT represent America! Their expectation that all the candidates MUST personally visit their local deli, market or town hall is ridiculas and unrealistic for the rest of the country. The amount of personal pandering the idiots from Iowa demand is completely out of touch with the rest of the country. Their like a bunch of children that demand personal attention and are embarassing.
    • bladerider  •  San Francisco, California  •  4 months ago
      And 75% don’t want Santorum, 80% don’t want Paul, 85% don’t want Gingrich, Blah, Blah, Blah. Romney will win New Hampshire, Romney will Win GOP, Obama will beat Romney. Romney is the modern day Kerry. GOP should start focusing on 2016

    FOLLOW THE DAILY TICKER

    The Daily Ticker covers the most important business stories of the day -- the economy, investing, corporate leadership and politics. The Daily Ticker picks up where Tech Ticker left off and is hosted by Aaron Task, Henry Blodget and Daniel Gross. Often serious, sometimes irreverent and always interesting, The Daily Ticker gives viewers a unique take on the business world's most crucial stories.

    Subscribe and RSS

    [X]

    How to subscribe

    Roll over each section to subscribe using Add to My Yahoo! or RSS Feed feeds.

    Yahoo! News offers dozens of RSS feeds you can read in My Yahoo! or using third-party RSS news reader software. Click here to find out more about RSS and how you can use it with Yahoo! News.
     
    Recent Quotes
    Symbol Price Change % Chg 
    Your most recently viewed tickers will automatically show up here if you type a ticker in the "Enter symbol/company" at the bottom of this module.
    You need to enable your browser cookies to view your most recent quotes.
     
    Sign-in to view quotes in your portfolios.