Wed, May 23, 2012, 6:08 PM EDT - U.S. Markets closed

Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Debt Ceiling Vote a “Political Sideshow”, Mish Says: Real Issue Is “Govt. Spending Run Amok”

    By a whopping margin of 318-97, the House Tuesday evening overwhelming rejected a proposal to raise the debt ceiling without accompanying spending cuts. The so-called "clean" debt ceiling vote was expected to fail and leaves Congress two months to reach a compromise before U.S. government goes into technical default on its debt. (See: U.S. Hits the Debt Ceiling: What Does It All Mean?)

    In recent weeks, a growing number of market participants have said a technical default wouldn't be nearly as "catastrophic" as Tim Geithner and others have warned. As Clusterstock's Joe Weisenthal reports, this seemingly "out-there viewpoint" is becoming mainstream and is shared by a number of market notables, including hedge fund legend Stan Druckenmiller, bond fund maven Jeffrey Gundlach and IRA's Chris Whalen. (On Wednesday morning, House Speaker John Boehner released a letter signed by more than 150 economists, including Nobel laureate Robert Mundell of Columbia, supporting his call to only increase the debt ceiling if accompanied by significant spending cuts.)

    You can now add Michael "Mish" Shedlock of Sitka Pacific Capital to this growing list.

    "I would like to see the implications" of a technical default, Shedlock tells Henry and me in the accompanying video. "I think all of they hype surrounding this…is a political sideshow and nothing more."

    As with the others cited above, Shedlock believes "there is no political willingness by either party to address the real issues here, which is government spending run amok."

    While the Republicans are positioning themselves as the party of fiscal responsibility and austerity, Shedlock notes Rand Paul's balanced budget amendment only received 7 votes in the Senate last month. And while that was 7 votes more than President Obama's budget received, Shedlock was "quite frankly disgusted" by the lack of GOP support for Sen. Paul's proposal and fears the Republicans will "at some point in this game of chicken…give up and agree to hike the debt ceiling."

    Eventually, the bond market will force the politicians to cut spending and Ben Bernanke to tighten monetary policy, Shedlock says. "All it takes is rapidly rising interest rates," he says. "It's going to happen. I would prefer it happen sooner rather than later to force the hands of Bernanke and the politicians."

    By his own admission, Shedlock (among many others) has been warning about this scenario for a long time and Treasury yields have been falling of late, not rising. Still, he is steadfast in a view that cutting spending, while painful short-term, is absolutely critical for America's long-term economic viability. "People like Paul Kurgman think we should just continue on the path we're on until the economy recovers," he says. "The economy is not going to recover until you stop throwing money at it — wasting it on projects that don't need to be done."

    Aaron Task is the host of The Daily Ticker. You can follow him on Twitter at @atask or email him at altask@yahoo.com

    Yahoo! Poll

    Will Congress get anything accomplished before the November elections?

    Loading...
    Poll Choice Options
    • Yes
    • No
     

    171 comments

    • Susan  •  10 months ago
      This a well resarched and thought out article which pinpoints thebcrux of our problem, ie, lack of resolve on all pols part to deal with the hard issue of how to reduce waste and govt spending.
    • andrew v  •  10 months ago
      YOU DO KNOW that we live in a DEMOCRACY and we can blame our elected officials all we want but the final word is ours if we choose to say it and apparently we don't ANDY
    • andrew v  •  10 months ago
      WE are concievably the most selfish greedy amorAL nation of adults ever, leaving 15 TRILLION $ debt for our kids and grandkids to pay they can't so we are going to lower totally their standard of living to that of Africa NICE JOB OBAMA
    • andrew v  •  10 months ago
      WE: the existing adults haveNO NOI NO intention of paing off the 15 TRILLION $ we've borrowed we are gonna totally screw our grandchildren and great grandchildren with this burden and we say we love our children ,grandchildren etc HAH!
    • Virginian  •  11 months ago
      a bunch of crooks, all 535 of them. in 2006, the Democrats were screaming bloody murder because of deficits. VP Cheney said "deficits don't matter" and obviously the whole GOP agreed with him and went on to spend like drunken sailors (my apologies to the sailors, they go home when the wallet is empty). Fast forward to 2011, the GOP is screaming bloody murder because of deficits while Democrats are poh-poh'ing the problem which is as obvious to us today as it was back in 2006.

      Americans have to understand that you cannot expect the whole world and not paying taxes (or out of your own pocket) or that someone else than myself is going break his/her back paying taxes for my benefit. The whole of the US is on the brink of collapse because of GOP AND Democrats, they are equally guilty. The reality is that we will have to cut many key programs, including Medicare/Medicaid and Armed Forces, to be able to balance the budget. Tough choices have to be made but that is what they are in DC, Sacramento, Richmond, etc to do.
      • Sandra Smith 11 months ago
        This is correct up to a point. Cheney never said deficits don't matter in that context. This would be more accurate if it was broken down, not by dems and repubs, but liberal and conservative. Liberals, while in control of congress, have almost destroyed us, conservatives haven't. The democrat party is the home of most liberals, and now, socialists, and they are the problem. It is always the cry of dems and libs, once a disaster of their own making occurrs, to shout that everyone is to blame. That simply is not the case. Check the history of lib congresses in the past 60 years.
      • scott b 11 months ago
        of course cheney meant it in that context. the full quote is "reagan proved that deficits dont matter. we deserve to get ours"
      • Douglas 11 months ago
        533 of them. Rand Paul has proposed a legitimate balanced budget bill. His dad Ron Paul has consistently voted against raising the debt ceiling, taxes, or spending. Mainstream media do not like to talk about them.
    • Samuel  •  11 months ago
      Why there aren't any cut on Congressman Wages, Pensions, or Benefits?
      • Rascal Dog 11 months ago
        Lobbyists pay more than the Government.
      • Dayton Local 11 months ago
        who cares? the total benefits for all the congressman won't amount to any change in the budget. Why waste time on this pittily little crap when they should be fixing entitlements which are now 60% of the budget.
      • Tony 11 months ago
        Dayton Local: I agree that entitlements are a big part of the problem. The budget for the department of Health and Human Services is the largest at over 850 billion for 2010. A big part of that is Medicare. But I do not understand your statement that defense is less than 1% of budget. The DOD budget was over 700 billion for 2010 which was by far the second largest expenditure for the government. The only thing close was the Treasury Dept which includes the interest on our debt.
    • olga  •  11 months ago
      lets cut gov. perks. by the way, do the lobbyists pay taxes on their bribes????
      • clipboard 11 months ago
        No, they're all a bunch of A$$holes.
      • Tony 11 months ago
        Dont' know for sure, but my guess is that they probably are able to use them as a tax deduction to reduce the amount of taxes they pay.
      • Gamblor 11 months ago
        You are not required to pay taxes on illegal income.
    • Carmen  •  11 months ago
      Democrats screamed that deficits under Bush were "destroying our country" and "pillaging our children's future". I agree that deficits under Bush were harmful, but the FAR larger deficits under Obama and the Democrat Congress make Bush's deficits (and the lion's share of Bush's deficits took place with a Dem controlled Congress. Congress controls spending, not the President) look like a lemonade stand by comparison.

      Since Obama and the Democrat controlled Congress increased the national debt over $4 Trillion in 3 years while skyrocketing the unemployment rate, they're screaming that any cuts to their out of control spending would tank our economy.

      Take a close look at who these people are.. what they said before and what they're saying now, and the results of their wasteful spending binge. It's one of the purest examples you'll ever see of a group committed to putting their party and their politics ahead of the best interests of the country.
      • Rick 11 months ago
        >>Since Obama and the Democrat controlled Congress increased the national debt over $4 Trillion in 3 years while skyrocketing the unemployment rate, they're screaming that any cuts to their out of control spending would tank our economy.<<

        Yeah, and the fact that Bush left the economy in tatters had nothing to do with it. Got any more of whatever it is you're smoking?
      • discoverybg31 11 months ago
        Um, no. Reagan increased our debt by a factor of 4. Bush II did it again by a factor of 2, almost ALL of which was in his first term.

        The unemployment rate is dropping. You may have noticed that, but I doubt it.

        Your last paragraph is pure projection. The Republicans have been doing exactly that for the last 30 years. They got everything they wanted for 6 years. Everything. It decimated the economy and destroyed our standard of living.

        The hilarious thing is that you and your ilk expected the Democrats to fix years of destruction in weeks and then pointed and said "SEE!" when they couldn't. According to your logic, 9-11 is entirely, 100% Bush's fault. No Clinton intelligence failure, nothing. No transition. No inheriting issues. All his. The first Bush recession was all his fault, too. The tech bubble implosion was completely a non-issue.

        Seriously. You don't get it one way with your guy and a different way with the other guy.
      • scott b 11 months ago
        the unemployment rate has gone DOWN since obama was president you idiot
    • Arctic Iceman  •  11 months ago
      Dwight Eisenhower (the last real Republican) must be spinning in his grave! "Beware the military-industrial complex", he said.

      It's the Defense budget stupid!

      We now have almost 1000 military bases in around 130 countries. Add another 1000 in the U.S. Sounds like an empire to me.

      Let's cut the the defense entitlements now, it's about 22% of spending. Let's stop the useless wars now and stop turning our brave young people into wounded warriors who will require medical and other assistance for life.
      • The circle of 11 months ago
        IKE was one of THEM.

        That is why he said it, out the door.

        Masonic orders and Zionist Bankers.

        Look for their symbols and codes.
      • Jim,MtnViewCA,USA 11 months ago
        You can zero out the defense budget and still be insolvent.
        Do the math. It will take more. Much more.
      • Dayton Local 11 months ago
        defense entitlements? way to try and spin the reason we are a free country you tard. How about fix the real entitlements that are more than 60% of the budget.
    • demic  •  4 months ago
      Ok thats just rich blame all this on Obama who came into office with the recession already in progress, he said it was bad mccain said it was bad, no one knew how it would unfold and it all unfolded badly while he was in office, so its all supposed to be his fault because he couldn't stop it. The man isn't asking for more money for himself hes asking for more money to help out the citizens of this country, and to pay the bills that are coming up very soon, when he came into office we were already into a 11 trillion dollar deficit likely was more but thats what they say, ok he's not in this by himself nor are the democrats, the republicans are blowing everything out of context like their the victors of all this, it doesn't matter who was in office when the deficit growth took place just know that its here it has to be dealt with.every time Obama ask for money the republicans grandstand and say no unless they can attach something to it, They don't shine light on anything their throwing money at are they and you know their spending it, heck they sign the checks.raise taxs back up to what they should be put people back to work, stop wasteing money on earmarks and subsidys that help the wealthy, reign in that 700 billion dollar tax cut for the wealthy.and stop useing us as sacrifical lambs in this recession deficit game their all playing. the republicans don't get a free ride in all of this. remember idiots they are the reason we are in this situation today. the deficit will never to be payed down if any of them truely cared about the deficit then why did they create one in the first place? raise the #$%$ debt ceiling and get on with it , it's our money i say pay the bills, the debt ceiling gets raised always without any flare now it's a side show, is it because of bigotry or bias or shear ignorance that we are playing this we're broke money game.If we're not so broke that they can give away 700 billion dollars without question as to how are they going to pay for it, and yes it is awasteful spending gimmick, then we ain't broke think about it.
    • AO  •  11 months ago
      Here are Obama���s thoughts on the debt limit in 2006, when he voted against increasing the ceiling:

      The fact that we are here today to debate raising America���s debt limit is a sign of leadership failure. It is a sign that the U.S. Government can���t pay its own bills. It is a sign that we now depend on ongoing financial assistance from foreign countries to finance our Government���s reckless fiscal policies. ��� Increasing America���s debt weakens us domestically and internationally. Leadership means that ���the buck stops here. Instead, Washington is shifting the burden of bad choices today onto the backs of our children and grandchildren. America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership. Americans deserve better. - B. Obama 2006
    • Tim  •  11 months ago
      Nobody knows how bad it will be if we default but we do know it won't be a good thing.

      How about this? Politicians stop putting your party ahead of your country. Start making big steps toward a balanced budget today and, at the same time, prevent a default.

      Once that is done, get back to work and make more progress toward a balanced budget.

      Repeat until there is a surplus and we are pay off our debt.
    • JohnDc  •  11 months ago
      Obama and liberals indeed run amok in spending. Obama is spending america into bankruptcy and i believe he knows it. He's pandering to his base for his 2012 re-election, those americans who think the gov't as their provider for their basic needs. Well, if the gov't has money then I could swallow the pain, but
      real talk if we spend all these entitlement programs on credit .. that's another issue and a BIG PROBLEM. The president needs to know that the rate of govt spending is unsustainable .. the same say as the rate of americans buying house in 2006 upto 2008 was unsustainable.

      At some point, it will reach its breaking point. How can an economic giant as big as america be bailed out?

      However, Obama could care less about america's debt as long as he can secure his re-election. To do that, is to provide an artificial economic atmosphere that all is well economically in america. That america can still afford all the entitlement programs.

      Behind the articial facade is large mountain of debt america is accumulating that threatens the economic future of the country.
      Debt approaching 90% of GDP is record high for america. This has posed the the biggest threat
      of america's extinction right below nuclear strike.
    • Patriot  •  11 months ago
      Not sure it really matters anymore. Most Americans are on the government giveaway programs and nobody wants to cut. When you consider welfare, food stamps, government subsidized schools and housing, school lunches, tarp, bailouts of GM, Chrysler, union pensions, banks, Fannie, Freddie, and the list goes on and on, then theres all the government agencies like border patrol, homeland security, the pentagon, dept. of energy, interior, and the list goes on and on, then there is all the subsidies for cities, agriculture, states, and that list is endless. THERE ARE NOT ENOUGH PRIVATE TAXPAYERS TO PAY OR VOTE A DIFFERENCE. IF YOU THINK WE ARE BROKE NOW -JUST WAIT!!! GOD BLESS AMERICA!
    • Steven B  •  11 months ago
      The solution is actually quite simple. We have to make moderately painful cuts to the military, entitlement programs and discretionary spending, while modestly raising taxes for everyone, including the 49% that pay none now. Why can't our politicians get this done?
    • JohnDc  •  11 months ago
      Obama loves his ideologies more than America .. He was never proud of america .. before he's proud now.

      To hell with the rising debt, as long as he wins 2012 re-election and let those who are successful subsidize for the lazy and failures.

      That's Obama's contract with his people.
    • BOZO  •  11 months ago
      Like all Ponzi scheme it requires more and more funds to continue.....
    • yahoo user  •  11 months ago
      Congress is spending the money faster than bernanke can print it.
    • Mike B  •  11 months ago
      David....That extra tax money from the last 20 years, do you think the government would have saved it? NO!! They would find some new agency or welfare state to give it to! The question is simple: Who do you trust with YOUR money, yourself or the government? Seems pretty obvious.
    • Impaler  •  11 months ago
      Its like a teenage girl asking to max out a second credit card to go to the mall and the parents letting her

    FOLLOW THE DAILY TICKER

    The Daily Ticker covers the most important business stories of the day -- the economy, investing, corporate leadership and politics. The Daily Ticker picks up where Tech Ticker left off and is hosted by Aaron Task, Henry Blodget and Daniel Gross. Often serious, sometimes irreverent and always interesting, The Daily Ticker gives viewers a unique take on the business world's most crucial stories.

    Subscribe and RSS

    [X]

    How to subscribe

    Roll over each section to subscribe using Add to My Yahoo! or RSS Feed feeds.

    Yahoo! News offers dozens of RSS feeds you can read in My Yahoo! or using third-party RSS news reader software. Click here to find out more about RSS and how you can use it with Yahoo! News.
     
    Recent Quotes
    Symbol Price Change % Chg 
    Your most recently viewed tickers will automatically show up here if you type a ticker in the "Enter symbol/company" at the bottom of this module.
    You need to enable your browser cookies to view your most recent quotes.
     
    Sign-in to view quotes in your portfolios.