Wed, May 23, 2012, 6:16 PM EDT - U.S. Markets closed

Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Doves Take Flight But More Fed Action Is Not the Answer: Axel Merk

    Follow Yahoo!'s The Daily Ticker on Facebook here!

    The Federal Open Market Committee will release its interest rate decision today at 12:30 p.m. ET Wednesday. Interest rates are expected to remain at zero, as the Fed has pledged to keep rates low at least through mid-2013.

    The question on many investors' minds is whether the Fed will begin another round of bond-buying, a.k.a. quantitative easing. The U.S. economy has surprised to the upside over the past few months, beating back recession talk although the unemployment rate remains uncomfortably high.

    The Fed has a dual mandate: full employment and price stability. The unemployment rate has fallen to 8.5 percent - the lowest rate in three years - but many economists attribute the decline to a smaller pool of people searching for jobs. Many of the long-term unemployed have simply stopped applying. The Fed's aggressive bond-buying strategy has won its fair share of critics who say the economy has not improved despite the Fed's purchase of more than $2 trillion of securities since the start of the financial crisis.

    Axel Merk of Merk Funds tells The Daily Ticker's Aaron Task that the Fed's monetary policy actually hinders the economy's recovery and its insistence to "keep the floodgates" open puts downward pressure on the U.S. dollar.

    "We have a Fed that wants the housing market to go up at just about any cost," Merk says. As long as the Fed maintains its uber-easy stance, the longer it will take to remove the "bad stuff" from the system, he suggests.

    If the Fed signaled it would raise rates, people would be "racing to buy a house," thereby removing excess inventory from the market and stimulating demand again, Merk says.

    Even with mortgage rates near historic lows, many Americans have shied away from buying because of the uncertain jobs picture. Real estate data provider Trulia Inc. found that buying is cheaper and more affordable than renting in 72 percent of major U.S. cities. Bernanke reiterated his concerns about the health of the housing market, writing in a recent report that "house prices have fallen an average of about 33 percent from their 2006 peak, resulting in about $7 trillion in household wealth losses...Continued weakness in the housing market poses a significant barrier to a more vigorous economic recovery."

    Inside the Mind of the FOMC

    Beyond any signal about QE3, what's most interesting about Wednesday's announcement will be reading the projections and forecasts of Fed officials, part of the FOMC's new communications strategy.

    Deciphering prior Fed statements was a task even seasoned economists and Fed watchers had difficulty with, and now the whole world will be able to get inside the brains of FOMC economists. They will be releasing short- and long-term rate projections in addition to giving explanations and analysis supporting their views.

    Most Fed watchers have welcomed the central bank's new commitment to transparency but Merk notes the FOMC is now chock-full of doves. Due to the committee's normal rotation, Richard Fisher of Dallas, Charles Plosser of Philadelphia and Narayana Kocherlakota of Minneapolis -- who dissented against Bernanke's policies last year -- are not voting members of the FOMC in 2012.

    Yahoo! Poll

    Will Congress get anything accomplished before the November elections?

    Loading...
    Poll Choice Options
    • Yes
    • No
     

    35 comments

    • A Yahoo! User  •  3 months ago
      If we can just get house prices back up to where nobody can reasonably afford them, like before, then everything will be hunky-dory, just like before!
      • Franklin 3 months ago
        Americans like high housing prices far from jobs, long commutes to work, and cheap gas. We would be better off with cheaper houses built close to jobs and expensive gas.
    • mary  •  3 months ago
      Housing has corrected by 33%, not fallen as if it were correctly priced in the first place. We had a housing bubble thanks to the Bansters, thanks to AIG's willingness to deal in credit default swaps, and thanks to ratings agencies who were willing to lie about the quality of mortgage related bonds.
      • Maverick 3 months ago
        Just wait until the dollar corrects down 33% and then the hyperinflation spiral will be at full tilt. Hang on everyone. Gonna be a bumpy ride.
    • Ulrich  •  North Stormont, Canada  •  3 months ago
      The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
    • Enough already  •  3 months ago
      Didn't we get in this mess in the fist place by getting people who couldn't afford a house to buy one?
      • MS 3 months ago
        Douglas. From where in this article did you formulate the assumption that pushing houses on those who cannot afford them was being proposed? Mr. Korn touched on rising or static mortgage rates, housing prices and soft demand. I didn't read anything about pushing sub prime rate loans. Maybe I missunderstood your point.
      • Ashkan Juju 3 months ago
        Agreed MS. Douglas's comment doesn't have anything to do with the article.
      • DavidJ 3 months ago
        Maybe, but his point is relevant when one considers that a predictable result (and goal) of further easing would be to reinflate the housing bubble. That's the whole point of keeping interest rates so low -- to stimulate borrowing, which of course is normally followed immediately by spending on things like houses.
    • A Yahoo! User  •  3 months ago
      It's quite a heavy price we pay as a nation to pretend our houses are worth more than they really are.
      We have government paying people to buy houses, hundreds of billions of dollars going to prop up failed, government-subsidized mortgage schemes, perhaps trillions of taxpayer dollars being used to bail out poorly-run banks decimated by government-encouraged real estate speculation, a central bank bent on destroying the currency to prop up house values, and an economy brought to the brink of ruin. Might it not be simpler and far more prudent and economical to treat houses like any other objects in the marketplace, worth only what willing, unassisted buyers will pay for them?
    • Tommy  •  3 months ago
      This is a clear sign of Benanke and the doves having little interest in maintaining the value of the US dollar. Time for all other countries to work on immediately setting up a new reserve currency. Bernanke and these doves are telling the rest of the world your US dollar holdings are going to be worth nothing!!!
      • montgomery 3 months ago
        SHALOM Iis working for socialism, New World Order, and Israel.
      • STEVE 3 months ago
        The Fed is simply countering currency strengthening moves by China, Japan and others. Inflation will come from trade deficits.
    • DavidJ  •  3 months ago
      Talk of more Fed action is just a tacit admission that all actions that went before, both monetary and fiscal, failed.
    • Brad  •  Dallas, Texas  •  3 months ago
      One problem with Housing is pundits that dont know what they are talking about. In this ticker Aaron says that it is impossible to get a loan. When you have people that are widely watched saying things like this, it tends to make people who are thinking about buying a home put off the decision.

      You can purchase a home in Dallas with a loan amount up to $270,000 with as little as 3.5% down and a 580 FICO score with FHA. Loan amounts are higher in other areas. USDA offers 100% financing in rural areas and standard conventional loans up to $417,000 (higher in some areas) with only 5% down and as little as a 620 FICO score.

      Now if you are trying to buy a $1 Million condo in NYC like Aaron is probably trying to do, you are going to need to put more down, as you should.

      There has never been a better time to buy. Values are down and interest rates are at all time lows. Call a local Mortgage Professional and avoid the Big Banks like the plague and you will get the real scoop on how to buy a house.
      • DavidJ 3 months ago
        You can only buy a house if the owner can afford to sell. We would love to move but would lose too much of our equity in the process, so we're going to wait it out, just like millions of other owners, which is why the housing recovery will take years to work itself out.
    • Pat Hudgins  •  Newark, Delaware  •  3 months ago
      More easing means more inflation.
      High cost is the reason recovery is hiding under the rock.
      Most individuals and small companies are in financial survival mode, due to high cost (INFLATION).
      No more QE, Please!
    • Sean  •  3 months ago
      Fed/Transparency - Oil/Water
    • Charlie  •  Rochester, New York  •  3 months ago
      It doesn't matter that buying is cheaper than renting if you get locked into a house you can't sell.
    • Fabian  •  Irvine, California  •  3 months ago
      You both miss the point; it's not about specialization of labor it's about tricking the tax code.
      We admit as a fact that you'll not find a US worker who will build up electronic components (I still don't buy that, they were saying the same about the Swiss watch industry in the 70's, that's another story) so you buy these components abroad. Where it gets tricky is when you buy them from yourself and ask your subsidiary to over bill them in order to reduce your profits state side to keep these profits abroad where they may not be taxed. If you level the playing field, a huge financial incentive disappears and this may bring some jobs back. Furthermore, I don't understand why a corporation that's able to play the international gets such a tax advantage to a corporation that can't.
    • Tiger  •  3 months ago
      More trouble lies ahead hang on for a rough ride.
    • LOST  •  3 months ago
      Borrow for the future.... or save for the future... now that is still the question. Who is going to profit from either decision? Spend more than you earn.

      Democrats and Republicans both seem to go along with this theory.
    • Boycott Ukraine  •  3 months ago
      The Fed has taken it upon themselves to stimulate the economy through whatever means to infinitude. They now see NO downside to unwinding the mega-printing they've done in the past. Do they have good reason to not fear? Well, the government can now manipulate inflation reporting to such an extent they now feel they can hide behind such reporting forevermore. The problem is even today, few Americans actually believe the inflation numbers the government produces. We saw all-time highs in the commodity markets in 2010 with virtually every commodity but natural gas, all while the US government reported almost nonexistent inflation. Real Estate did hit the skids but should that amount to everything in the inflation index?
    • A Yahoo! User  •  Chicago, Illinois  •  3 months ago
      Did anyone else notice that they promised to keep interest rates low until the spring after the election. Bennie might as well be OWEbamy's campaign chairman.
    • frankmargel.com  •  3 months ago
      Axel, Aaron, and all the rest of my friends and pals right here on the Ticker, happy Wednesday. Cyclical monetary demise by way of artificial and intrinsic manipulation is not genuine growth here in America, it's the FED. Folks are making and printing money, but it's not the FED! LMFAO! Vote Obama out! NEXT!
    • A Yahoo! User  •  3 months ago
      Time for a dove hunt. This is outright theft.
    • josh  •  3 months ago
      The only action the Fed's should take is raise the Interest rate to 6% or higher it's the only way were going to get out of this mess.
    • Commander Cody  •  3 months ago
      Bernanke is a great American hero. We are lobbying for a big statue on the Capitol grounds, and to have his portrait replace the other Ben on $100 bills. Thank you, Ben, for shepherding us through these difficult times.

    FOLLOW THE DAILY TICKER

    The Daily Ticker covers the most important business stories of the day -- the economy, investing, corporate leadership and politics. The Daily Ticker picks up where Tech Ticker left off and is hosted by Aaron Task, Henry Blodget and Daniel Gross. Often serious, sometimes irreverent and always interesting, The Daily Ticker gives viewers a unique take on the business world's most crucial stories.

    Subscribe and RSS

    [X]

    How to subscribe

    Roll over each section to subscribe using Add to My Yahoo! or RSS Feed feeds.

    Yahoo! News offers dozens of RSS feeds you can read in My Yahoo! or using third-party RSS news reader software. Click here to find out more about RSS and how you can use it with Yahoo! News.
     
    Recent Quotes
    Symbol Price Change % Chg 
    Your most recently viewed tickers will automatically show up here if you type a ticker in the "Enter symbol/company" at the bottom of this module.
    You need to enable your browser cookies to view your most recent quotes.
     
    Sign-in to view quotes in your portfolios.