Wed, May 23, 2012, 7:07 PM EDT - U.S. Markets closed

Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Jeffrey Miron: States Are Underestimating Budget Crisis By Trillions

    Follow The Daily Ticker on Facebook here!

    Earlier this summer financial analyst Meredith Whitney released a new warning on the financial state of the states saying, the fiscal mess is far worse than official estimates. The only way to avoid massive municipal defaults she concludes is by raising taxes and cutting social services. Whitney first predicted hundreds of billions in defaults in a 2010 60 Minutes interview. They've yet to happen and many analysts doubt they ever will.

    Jeffrey Miron economics professor at Harvard university and a senior fellow at the Cato Institute isn't so doubtful. He's out with a report of his own that states, "state government finances are not on a stable path; if spending patterns continue to follow those of recent decades, the ratio of state debt to output will increase without bound." Driving those costs he says are health care costs.

    "Things are bad for basically all the states for almost identical reasons," Miron says in the accompanying interview with The Daily Ticker's Aaron Task.

    In addition to the bad fundamentals, many states are, "not stating their current fiscal situations accurately," Miron concludes. The problem is pension liabilities are not being accounted for in state budgets. The results: states across the country, he estimates, are underestimating their liabilities by $1-2 trillion.

    That's the bad news.

    The good news is there's time to fix the problem. Miron estimates states have two or three decades before the true state GDP to debt ratio rise to the 90-100%, which is the historically range where governments have problems servicing their debt.

    Yahoo! Poll

    Will Congress get anything accomplished before the November elections?

    Loading...
    Poll Choice Options
    • Yes
    • No
     

    226 comments

    • RH  •  8 months ago
      "...far worse than official estimates"?

      No, "...far worse than officials lied about"".

      This is the dutch boy with his fingers in the dike, but where HE wanted help, our government spends it's time trying to pretend things are fine.

      Remember, folks; The Recession ended 2 years ago, right?

      RIGHT?
    • eaglemusky  •  8 months ago
      Investors buy muni bonds because the debt is guaranteed by “too big to fail” insurance companies.
      When “too big to fail” insurance companies fail, the Federal Government picks up the debt. Muni bonds are on the same track as the sub prime loan debt fraud.
      Forget logic and common sense. According to a recent Wall Street Journal article, the SEC has very little control over the $2.9 trillon muni bond industry. States can do whatever they want to and the bottom line is the Federal Government guarantees their debt.
    • Ted  •  8 months ago
      illinois. poster child for enormous pensions and terrific health care. All not funded. Just, I guess, a ponzi scheme.
    • frankmargel.com  •  8 months ago
      Happy Monday to all my friends right here on the Ticker. America is looking at a down market today, but it's been below 14k for sometime now. The states have a better chance of ringing the dinner bell at the Halls of Reason due to balance budget amendments. The federal government is bankrupt and has no dinner bell, it has only empty dinner plates and "Fly Boy Economics" to raise the stakes even higher. Look, there he is again telling the Tea Party Congress to pass another bailout... Grandstanding failures are telling Congress to act now! Yeah, okay there... Next!
      • Ron 8 months ago
        Sorry to remind you - the S&P 500 is now at 1998 levels. Just 2% dividends. Good luck pension funds...
    • John S  •  8 months ago
      And this is why Stimulus II as prosposed is another stealth bailout of state governments. The stimuli are band aids for the economy - NOT growth hormones and they know it.
    • ts  •  8 months ago
      should of been a water worker in ohio: Akron: 80 K ayear (with overtime )
      retired at 52: 56,000 ayear.

      Average citizen or household in akron 35,000 per year. No pension. work till 67 . ss 1400 per month.
    • Chillipepper  •  8 months ago
      Get ready California for the real thing. Keep feeding the public Unions and the illegals.. It is coming the Big One..
      • oldanddon'tcareanymor ... 8 months ago
        Feeding the illegals? It seems they are persecuting the illegals. It would be better not to do either.
      • MICHAEL 8 months ago
        chilli, just keep on eating your welfare cheetos, and sitting in your trailer, and let working people work, so we can support you
      • Thereisnohopeforus 8 months ago
        You got that right! Kalifornia is toast! I live in this completely corrupt, welfare state. But not much longer. Montana here I come. That sucking sound you hear is the vortex being created by the working, paying people who have money leaving Kalifornia and the welfare based, union #$%$ drowning in the debt bomb that's about to hit.
    • asdf  •  8 months ago
      Many states are projecting the prosperity of the recent past into the far future. We are heading back to ordinary times when tax revenue will be much less.
    • Rock Solid Truth  •  8 months ago
      ......unless of course you be honest......and figure in the extreme deflationary depression which is just around the corner.......then time runs out very very quickly. It has never happened before so we don't have name for it.....extreme hyperinflation in food and energy concurrent with extreme deflation in all manufactured non food items. Very Very bad scenario. Wages and tax revenue disappear at the very same time the cost of living skyrockets. No wonder everyone is paying their credit cards and dumping their mortgages.
      • John S 8 months ago
        You are right if for any other reason than economies and markets have the nasty habit of causing the most pain to the most people - and the scenario you describe would indeed do that.
      • Chuck Brownly 8 months ago
        it is called STAGFLATION and it won't be deflationary as you think!
    • zz  •  8 months ago
      Government pensions are a problem at federal state and local. They all take care of their cronies, while the taxpayer gets hosed, especially your kids. Remember the Newport Beach lifeguard story? $120K pay & full pension in 20 years. "But these are no ordinary lifeguards" said the city. Everybody's a Hasslehoff.
    • IBT  •  8 months ago
      A Senator or Representative should NEVER get a pay increase. When they are elected, whatever the salary is, that is what they should get as long as they keep getting re-elected (even after sitting out for a term). While the starting salary can go up over time, incumbents should NEVER get an increase. These were not supposed to be lifetime jobs. People were supposed to go to Washington for a couple of terms and then return to the REAL world to work for a living. We do not need TERM limits, just limits on the amount of money they can sponge off the taxpayers. No raises, no pensions.
    • CommonSense  •  8 months ago
      Well if the population is 310 million and he's talking Tillions, 12 $%%i ZEROs
      That's like 6 Zeros per person, a lot to collect from the unemployed!
      • JB3 8 months ago
        Check your math. $10,000 per person (obviously they aren't all employed, or of working age but this is just quick math) would be $3.1T. Spread over 10 years, you'd be looking at less than $1000 (~2% effective tax rate increase across the board) per person and over $3T thanks to interest savings. Realistically, your probably looking closer to $2T total (includes interest savings), due to unemployment and non-working age people (less than 19 y/o on average). And that's with just 3 zeros, not 6.
      • cd 8 months ago
        You have to double that. Abut 1.2 of the population doesn't pay taxes.
      • Joe 8 months ago
        So now the discussion is simply...what are we going to confiscate from whom...

        How's that Hope and Change working for you...
    • anonym  •  8 months ago
      There are triple-folds of trillions of financial deficits,including Federal(sovereign) budget deficits,the now revealed states budget deficits,and the last but not least the banks,corporations,hidden capital reserves deficits which need to recapitalize the capital loss during the 2008 financial collapse.
    • simple_simon_over  •  8 months ago
      I have an idea; stop giving retirement benefits to state employees that are 35% better than those that people in the private sector receive. If they don't like it, they can quit and come work in the real world, though I doubt many teachers could hack 50 hour weeks year round.....
      • user 8 months ago
        Ok, good start.. If we privatize government, do you think the market can be reliant enough to keep us from a oligarical despotism?
      • user 8 months ago
        What if we got to vote on the raises and benefits of all government employees. With technology the way it is now, I would think there could be an efficient way of managing state workers pay... It could be done locally.
      • Chris 8 months ago
        Good point although I feel very understated. Most state and local government employees can retire after 25-30 years with a pension based on 90% of their highest ever year of overtime pay wih guaranteed COLAs + health insurance for free .. and this transfers to surviving spouses ... so it's good for 40 years... so their benefits are worth 3x their pay... most private workers have benefits valued 20-30% of pay... so they are 1000% better benefitted than the rest of us. Remember... this is state and local government.. federal is closer to the 35% better figure you quote.
    • trinhou  •  8 months ago
      What strikes me about states' "pension debt" is the question of why should government employees be unionized anyway? Workers are organized to stop the governments from hiring child labor or to make them pay standard holidays and vacation pay or heat their workspaces or make sure they get paychecks every week? No. Unions are basically engaged in the practice of blackmailing employers. Unions shouldn't be tolerated within government for teachers, police, firefighters or anyone else. Next thing you know, they'll be unionizing the military! Government employees should be compensated just like everyone else, they're not special, they don't do extra work or more important work.
    • BlueF  •  8 months ago
      If Obama's millionaire tax passes effectively making a portion of municipal bond interest taxable to millionaires and billionaires, it will be the last nail in the coffin of state debt refinancing.
    • GCTIII  •  8 months ago
      Herein lies the problem you cannot keep spending more then you take in. This should be apart of employment with the public sector just like the private sector. Times get hard you take a pay cut or cut back people. The math is simple. The problem is people do not get it.
      Pensions should not be available until your 59 or 60. The more you tax the less you will get as more and more people will barter instead of declaring the money. This is the main problem in Europe. They barter to get around the repressive taxes there.
    • bdm  •  8 months ago
      the states and local governments brought this mess on themselves they were fat and happy when the markets were high... showing surpluses in the budget funds which gave them a green light to either reduce or not make annual payments, instead they shifted that cash over to pay for other "stuff" this has compounded the problem as the market has stepped back meaning the funds are woefully underfunded....
    • Joe  •  8 months ago
      sir...we arent presently taking enough money from you to pay the people who we promised wed take care of for votes. so.....looks like were gonna need to be taking more...or risk getting voted out of office for looking incompetent.....

      does anyone believe that giving politicians more money wont result in more entitlement spending???
    • Rita  •  8 months ago
      You need to eliminate or alter all public sector pensions.
      They are not structured to be sustainable. They need to be structured more like Lottery payouts. When one retires and qualifies for a pension, then the pension needs to be a structured payout. Something like $50,000 a year for the next 30 years. Not $50,000 the first year and we'll increase every year until you die. In the first case, I pay for the pension the year someone retires. In the second case, I run a Ponzi scheme.

    FOLLOW THE DAILY TICKER

    The Daily Ticker covers the most important business stories of the day -- the economy, investing, corporate leadership and politics. The Daily Ticker picks up where Tech Ticker left off and is hosted by Aaron Task, Henry Blodget and Daniel Gross. Often serious, sometimes irreverent and always interesting, The Daily Ticker gives viewers a unique take on the business world's most crucial stories.

    Subscribe and RSS

    [X]

    How to subscribe

    Roll over each section to subscribe using Add to My Yahoo! or RSS Feed feeds.

    Yahoo! News offers dozens of RSS feeds you can read in My Yahoo! or using third-party RSS news reader software. Click here to find out more about RSS and how you can use it with Yahoo! News.
     
    Recent Quotes
    Symbol Price Change % Chg 
    Your most recently viewed tickers will automatically show up here if you type a ticker in the "Enter symbol/company" at the bottom of this module.
    You need to enable your browser cookies to view your most recent quotes.
     
    Sign-in to view quotes in your portfolios.