Wed, May 23, 2012, 7:10 PM EDT - U.S. Markets closed

Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Life After Solyndra: U.S. Needs to Remain Top Energy Innovators, Says Daniel Yergin

    Follow The Daily Ticker on Facebook here!

    Perhaps no President before has pushed the U.S. to adopt and create new forms of energy as strongly as President Obama. In his 2010 state of the union address, Obama declared, "the nation that leads the world in creating new energy sources, will be the nation that leads the twenty- first century global economy."

    The recent bankruptcy of solar panel maker Solyndra, a recipient of a $550 million government guaranteed loan, may put a crimp in those plans. Not only is it a public relations disaster for the White House, but critics now question the viability of renewable energy businesses and the role of government to support it.

    In the accompanying interview Daniel Yergin, author of The Quest, the follow up to his Pulitzer Prize winning book The Prize, discusses the future of U.S. energy policy.

    While not coming down one way or the other on the Solyndra situation, Yergin does believe strongly that the government should back new forms of energy. "Supporting R&D, supporting basic science, supporting the engineers and scientists who will bring change, I think that's a very important role," he says. "It's something that the department of energy has historically done."

    Venture capitalists have poured money into cleantech in the last few years hoping to hit on the next big thing. "Investment in the U. S. cleantech industry went from $286 million in 2001 to $3.7 billion in 2010—a rise of more than ten times. In 2010 cleantech represented 17 percent of total VC investment in the United States," Yergin writes in The Quest. That kind of investment, Yergin says, has helped the U.S. remain the leader "in terms of innovation in energy."

    The greatest gains in energy technology in the last decade, however have not come in the form of renweable wind and solar, Yergin notes. That distinction belongs to the natural gas market, where new hydraulic fracturing technology known as "fracking" has created the potential to extract massive reserves of natural gas locked in shale deposits. Earlier this year, President Obama said those natural gas reserves could keep America running for 100 years.

    But critics claim fracking contaminates the water supply and leads to other environmental hazards. Yergin recently worked on a Department of Energy committee investigating the use of fracking. The group recommended more safeguards but did not call for the practice to cease.

    In the end, Yergin says, the key to keeping the U.S. energy more independent in the future is to pursue a wide range of energy options. "We do need this kind of diversified resilient portfolio," he says to ensure economic progress and national security.

    Tell us what you think!

    Yahoo! Poll

    Will Congress get anything accomplished before the November elections?

    Loading...
    Poll Choice Options
    • Yes
    • No
     

    19 comments

    • Anonymous  •  7 months ago
      great
    • simplicity  •  7 months ago
      Energy is based on region, Geothermal has it's region, Solar and wind has it's region where they work best..Green energy can many times be self manufactured at home..
    • RayRay  •  7 months ago
      Solar energy companies DO NOT need our tax dollars to be successful. Many of them are doing well on their own, because they're run by competant business people. It's obvious the administration is completely inept at business assessment/planning due diligence. Solyndra is but one example, there are numerous others that are just beginning to surface. LEARN THE LESSON, leave the private sector alone-the market will determine success.
      • Pipe Guy 7 months ago
        And the oil companies have been reaping massive profits for years on end and they still get government subsidies. Answer that before you whine about a few dollars in solar energy subsidy.
    • Dennis  •  7 months ago
      Green energy = doing something easy the hard way. We have oil, hydro, and nuclear, here and now, if we would just use them. The environmentalists should all be lined up, shot and burned as fuel.
      • William 7 months ago
        I'll bet I'm a far better shot than you are, and I am an environmentalist. You want a war? Bring it on. My family has killed enemies of this republic and its antecedents for nearly 400 years.
    • Erik  •  7 months ago
      Green Energy government subsidies have proven to be a black hole where our tax dollars disappear for ever. Even worse, such subsidies have proven to be job DESTROYERS in places like Spain. What a waste. This is a SCAM and Obamanation is in the middle of it.
      • William 7 months ago
        See if your capitalist wealth will buy you a brain at WalMart.
    • gerald  •  7 months ago
      If we rebuild the country more energy efficient in terms of logistics of all us people then we might see savings and conservation is not a bad idea either.
      • Erik 7 months ago
        Reading between the lines.... you want to force people to take public transportation.
    • Ken  •  7 months ago
      The culture of death is chocking energy production. Look at China by contrast, that's opening one new coal powered electricity generator per week.
      • William 7 months ago
        Perhaps you might look into what dropping pH is doing to the marine phytoplankton that manufacture the oxygen you breathe.
    • T.J. Whoopee  •  7 months ago
      Supporting R&D on a limited basis - yes. Huge subsidies which line the pockets of corporate cronies for technology that is no where near viable on a large scale basis (without huge subsidies) - NO! We will all be sitting around in the dark in 15 years if we don't get behind some combination of clean coal, nuclear, natural gas, etc... It's fracking obvious to people that have any knowledge of the energy industry. Wind and Solar are not able to supply our future energy needs and we can't get a power plant built due to government interference. Hey Washington - You want jobs? Get out of the way!
    • JoeBagaDoughnuts  •  7 months ago
      THORIUM FLOURIDE SALT REACTORS we already invented it but because you cannot build nuclear bombs out of it they ditched the project!!!!
    • peter  •  7 months ago
      There is no problem with Obama's vision but you can not avoid as suckers are boarn everyday in Wall Street and there will be cheaters who take advantage of the Govt . programs. Already many banks and look good companies failed or scooped the money out of the system. That does not mean we should blame the statesman and his vision.
    • kj  •  7 months ago
      green energyn is a rip off...they wanted 32k...21k after tax rebates to put solar panels on my house they were going to charge me 400.00 a month tfor me to save $70 on my electric bill
      its still 7000-10000 more for a hybrid which isn't new technology anymore
      its a joke
    • HanO  •  7 months ago
      The US is the top energy innovator. We were the ones that came up with the Shale Gas and now Shale Oil revolution. Meanwhile, all these politicians and clueless (government) "greens" continue to push money losing, job destroying "clean" tech. The only thing clean about clean tech is how the taxpayers' pocketbooks get cleaned out by these dishonest special interest groups.

      In the last round, ethanol went bankrupt. Now solar is also. "Clean" energy is a total joke. A report just came out today saying 67% of the people trained to install it are sitting on unemployment. The rest of the country will be joining them if we continue to chase after this technologically immature, most expensive form of energy.
    • IBT  •  7 months ago
      Most "Green Energy" sources: ethanol, solar panels, wind turbines, etc... are too expensive for "normal" citizens. At the same time, the top 1% of the population has too much money. Lets solve both issues at the same time and require that the "rich" (defined by income) be required to ONLY use "green energy". They all have to buy electric cars (Al Gore can no longer drive around in an SUV). They must power their homes using wind and/or solar power. Take them completely off the power grid (and no gas or diesel powered "back up" generators allowed. Once enough of the "rich" are using these sources, the price will have to go down because of "economies of scale" in production and then everybody will be able to afford them. Of course, that would mean GM would have to stop producing gas powered vehicles and sell only "green" cars in the future. But that's OK, I am sure that the UAW will be more than happy to stop making cars with high profit margins in favor of more environmentally friendly offerings.
    • Roger  •  7 months ago
      Big oil produces something that works.What did Solyndra produce? Nothing!
    • William  •  7 months ago
      Right. We'll never run out of oil or coal or natural gas, because God created us in His image and He passes all the gas we'll ever need.
      Turn off Fox News and look around, folks. Not only will we run out of affordable fossil fuels in this century, but if we don't have alternative renewable energy sources on tap at affordable prices when that happens, we'd better hope there's no electricity going to the fan when the shit hits it. In the absence of an firm, federally-sponsored research effort to replace fossil fuels in the nearest possible future, we face catastrophic collapse of our infrastructure, food distribution, heating and cooling, and communications before the end of this century. People who think otherwise are either remarkably ignorant or deliberately trying to destroy our country. Once the technology is in place, then we can worry about how many and which companies can own it.
    • cinna23  •  7 months ago
      Natural gas 'shale game' is baloney. Conventional gas production is actually falling. Only if we make radical increases in energy efficiency(average 50 mpg cars..what a joke who drives a 50 mpg car?) can we hope to make up for depletion. Yergin is the mouthpiece of Big Oil.
    • startups  •  7 months ago
      There is huge waste in gov. energy R&D. And why so slow in oil transport and heating efficiency where oil and gas is involved, for example. Oil is more of a crisis than people realize, and gas is not sustainable either.

      We are not solving the right problems in energy. It's not CO2, that's a non problem, yet that's where most of the talk is and energy research $ as well. The Congress is way off base in its energy spending policies; really sad.
    • Dark side  •  7 months ago
      I'm sure glad I'm getting out of the taxpaying citzen racket and shakedown starting 1/1/12.
      I will no longer support this government and for which it stands....
      Besides, the currency wars are underway and the Illuminati and their flunkies like Obama, Bush II and Clinton are not done raping the american people.
    • freewilly  •  7 months ago
      Yergin is generally correct, especially re need for US investment in BASIC research.
      And natural gas is the elephant in the room. If we believe in market economics, then we'll let wind and solar compete to provide energy at a COMPETITIVE price WITHOUT huge govt subsidies. Meanwhile, nat gas can provide clean electricity and perhaps even power fleet cars like in the past. Let's be honest and admit that coal is dirty and needs to be phased out, that oil ruins our current account deficit, and that offshore and north slope oil is no solution as it is a drop in the bucket. We need to think clearly, that our standard of living depends on affordable energy, so unless we really like depressions and a plunging standard of living, we need fossil fuels, and that natural gas is the cleanest and most abundant. Yes, we need to monitor environmental effects of fracking, but they seem to be acceptable overall. And with respect to CO2, again it is either a US depression or use fossil fuels. Certainly India, China Russia and Brazil are using them....how about a reasonable pragmatic approach taking economic realities into account ?????

    FOLLOW THE DAILY TICKER

    The Daily Ticker covers the most important business stories of the day -- the economy, investing, corporate leadership and politics. The Daily Ticker picks up where Tech Ticker left off and is hosted by Aaron Task, Henry Blodget and Daniel Gross. Often serious, sometimes irreverent and always interesting, The Daily Ticker gives viewers a unique take on the business world's most crucial stories.

    Subscribe and RSS

    [X]

    How to subscribe

    Roll over each section to subscribe using Add to My Yahoo! or RSS Feed feeds.

    Yahoo! News offers dozens of RSS feeds you can read in My Yahoo! or using third-party RSS news reader software. Click here to find out more about RSS and how you can use it with Yahoo! News.
     
    Recent Quotes
    Symbol Price Change % Chg 
    Your most recently viewed tickers will automatically show up here if you type a ticker in the "Enter symbol/company" at the bottom of this module.
    You need to enable your browser cookies to view your most recent quotes.
     
    Sign-in to view quotes in your portfolios.