Wed, May 23, 2012, 7:21 PM EDT - U.S. Markets closed

Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Mission Accomplished? Obama Makes Case for Military Action in Libya

    President Obama said Monday evening he authorized the use of force in Libya to prevent "a massacre that would have reverberated across the region and stained the conscience of the world."

    The speech, Obama's first major address about U.S. military action in Libya, was aimed at several different audiences: The American public, Congress, our NATO allies, Arab and Muslim leaders in the region as well as the world at large.

    Given the nearly impossible task of appealing to those varied constituencies, the speech was widely viewed as a success for President Obama.

    It was "his best stab" at providing a "more coherent" rationale for military action in Libya, says Jonathan Allen, senior congressional correspondent at Politico.com.

    Still, many questions remain unanswered, including:

    • What Libya will look like after the operation?
    • If the primary goal of the mission has been accomplished -- to prevent a "massacre" of rebel forces and innocent civilians in Benghazi -- why are we still there?
    • How it's possible that regime change in Libya is a stated goal of the U.S…but not of this particular military campaign? ("Of course, there is no question that Libya - and the world - will be better off with Gaddafi out of power…but broadening our military mission to include regime change would be a mistake," the President said.)

    Allen and I discuss these issues in the accompanying video, as well as related questions about the political backlash President Obama is facing from both members of his own party and Republicans.

    "At the moment, there isn't critical mass to cause Congress to rebuke the President over this" but opposition is "coming from all corners," Allen says, noting centrist Senators such as Richard Lugar (R-IN.) and Jim Webb (D-Va.) have been among the most critics of President Obama's handling of Libya.

    Finally, there's still an open question about how the America people view the campaign. Prior to the speech, Gallup showed 47% of Americans approved the mission and 37% disapprove.

    The polls are still coming out after the speech but Allen says "the administration has a ways to go to explain to the public" why we're using force in Libya but not other regional hot-spots.

    What do you think?

    Yahoo! Poll

    Will Congress get anything accomplished before the November elections?

    Loading...
    Poll Choice Options
    • Yes
    • No
     

    45 comments

    • Chad  •  1 year 2 months ago
      Don't you know? Obama is a 1 world government kind of guy. He waited until the Union said Go. And then he went. The USA will be submissive to the larger world powers, not the leader. Libya did not attack us, but now we are there protecting the rebels? If the rebels want protection then stop rebelling! Obama despised Bush for defending our nation unilaterally or even with the consent of our allies. Now Obama is willing to commit our military to this action when we were not attacked? So it seems he is more concerned with the World Union than thinking about America's security. The World Government is another reason why I think the Obama Administration is spending the dollar so far into debt that all paper money will soon be abolished. And it's then when no one will buy or sell anything without a mark in their right hand or forehand. And it���s then when Globalism really takes hold and it's then when America has very little to say. Presently, Obama is just appeasing the crowds by saying ���it���s in our national interest���. That���s a lie. But it IS in the "global interest" that Gaddafi be removed, so that we can have a working unison world government. Also note, who is foot the bill for this military excercise in Libya? You and me? haha
      • Joe 1 year 2 months ago
        first off i think that if its it the "global interest" its probably in Americas interest as well. second Iraq and Al-Qaeda are two completely separate things we were attacked by Al-Qaeda not by Iraq. Iraq was very similar to Libya because they both were ruled by dictators but on 9/11 we were attacked by Al-Qaeda not by Iraq, its important that people learn the difference between the two
    • alter  •  1 year 2 months ago
      Impeach.
      • John 1 year 2 months ago
        So much better when president Monkey Face started a phony war in Iraq based on lies.
      • Jack Flash 1 year 2 months ago
        John, Who is president Monkey Face? Must be old BO! He is the only one who looks
        like curious George!
      • George Bush 1 year 2 months ago
        Thats right, its Bushs fault!! we are you libs every gonna take responsiblity? Im sorry you're on govt. subsidies, welfare and food stamps. My deepest apologies..
    • SGR  •  1 year 2 months ago
      "Ghadaffi must go" "Our mission is NOT to affect regime change". It is Humanitarian -"If we had not acted there would have been hundreds of thousands of civilians slaughtered" ( Secretary CLINTON)
      "Lybia poses no imminent threat to and is not in our vital interests".( Secretary Gates ). But - France and England are Neighbors to Lybia and it is in their vital interest and therefore sort of "in our interest " also.( Secretary Clinton.) We are turning over Command and Control to NATO.An American general is in charge of combat for NATO and a Canadian is the supreme commander of NATO. Without a strong U.S. presence in all of this Nato will fail. Germany is out already, Italy and Spain are reluctant participants, The Arab league has backed down with only a few planes from Quatar.
      All the talk about Ghadaffi being a murderer, a supporter of terrorists, he murdered many Americans on the Pan Am flight and some U.S. serviceman in a german nightclub --That has been known for years. A month or so ago our State Department ( Secretary Clinton ) gave 400,000 dollars to Ghadaffi's son's foundation. And our country is giving millions to Ghadaffi in Foreign Aid ( By this administration and by the Bush administration). Obama should have done one of two things -- We should have stayed out of this ( as did Russia and China ) or we should have said we are in this to stop a bloodbath of civilians AND get rid of Ghadaffi. 85% of Lybia's oil goes to Europe. Do you suppose thats why England and France dragged Obama along to the United Nations where Obama consulted with that that body more than he did our own Lawmakers and accepted the mission laid down by the United Nations? One world Order?
      Who are the opposition that we are aiding in this war by giving close air support to--Knocking out Ghadaffi's tanks, artillery, and killing Ghadaffi soldiers.Do you suppose that all those tomahawk missiles (190 or more) we lobbed into Lybia caused some collateral damage- killing civilians? Has it all been mishandled? I believe it has. President Obama sits behind that desk that has a sign that reads " The Buck Stops Here "
    • Al  •  1 year 2 months ago
      Libya and Iraq AND Afghanistan all are TRIBAL countries, foreign to the united freedom democracy gives. They do not comprehend the all for one theme; they are tribal--meaning, they hate each other if they belong to rival tribes. Look at the weapons given to Iraqi police used to decimate rival villages instead of maintain the peace! We have to STOP interfering in governments that are so scattered that only a dictator can CONTROL all the different factions. I hope we will NOT repeat the lessons in Iraq and Afghanistan, but it seems we are still trying to force people into democracy who have no idea what it is--and are not ready for it. We must come to terms with the fact that not all the world is READY for democracy! I have 3 tours to Iraq--I KNOW.
    • TLMF  •  1 year 2 months ago
      Amazing how all these reporters and experts still lack the ability to point out the most obvious and conflicting fact. There are MILLIONS of LIBYAN CIVILIANS WHO SUPPORT Ghadaffi! This so called "slaughter" we prevented is completely questionable.

      It's clear we went there to support rebel COMBATANTS who were heavily armed, and we're using the term "civilian" to justify our offensive Can just one of these journalist or experts please address this!
      • TLMF 1 year 2 months ago
        I know that millions of Chinese were well informed of a government missile test, when our "free and unbiased" media spread brazen lies about cover ups to an ignorant American and British public who believed every word of it. That is a fact.

        As for Libya, our press has actually covered countless pro-Gahdaffi demonstrations, and have shown plenty of images of the well armed thugs (or CNN would call them civilians) using US air power to regain control of strategic cities.

        Asking me to prove general known knowledge is somewhat difficult. I'll throw a question back to you. Can you prove your father was never a rapist? I'm not saying he is, but can you prove it?
      • Wynona 1 year 2 months ago
        Can't just one critic cite their sources? How do you know that MILLIONS of Libyans support Ghadaffi -- couldn't they "support" him as the Iraqis supported Sadam (because they had to)?
        Can't just one of these bloggers address this and tell us how you know this....
      • Peter 1 year 2 months ago
        Don't watch FOX news, watch something like BBC international for a more non bias (and non US) view. Every dictator, even the most horrific ones will have supporters, everyone he pays to support him. If you really watched international news and other conflicts, you would know that.
    • DanielK  •  1 year 2 months ago
      President Obama does not do what he says. He says one thing then does another. Before his speech, he already flip-flopped at least three times. More importantly he has not answered the most important questions such as: Who are the rebels that he is aiding? Are any actually Al-Qaeda, or representing Iran? Why is this important...because Al-Qaeda #1 goal), is to bankrupt and Defeat the U.S. and Iran's #1 goal) is to remove every Muslim leader of an Arab country who is or has been working with the Western Democracies.
      Thus could we be cutting off our own feet?
      • Wynona 1 year 2 months ago
        And where were you when Cheney invaded Iraq?, flip-flopper!
    • Competitive Free Enterpri ...  •  1 year 2 months ago
      Who ARE the "rebels"? Is it just a coincidence that the countries from Tunisia to Yemen surround Saudi Arabia and Israel? What will the government be? In Egypt the "rebels" are looting, raping and murdering anyone who doesn't agree with them; is this what are sense of values support? Many are "employed" by the U.S., especially the CIA, but few seem to "work" and do their jobs.
      • Pipe Guy 1 year 2 months ago
        Where do you get your information? I have seen no reports that back your statements. Again, where do you get your information?
    • Ronnie  •  1 year 2 months ago
      Thank you Mr. President for offering such transparent reasons for the same old "snatch and grab." More thoughtful reasons would have led to confusion as to the real purpose of "our" mission.
    • No job  •  1 year 2 months ago
      I heard Obama say we had no plans to send ground troops into Libya. I like in poedunk Idaho and I heard yesterday that troops from Camp LeJeune are being deployed to Libya. Go Figure.
    • Jonathan  •  1 year 2 months ago
      Yeah Obama..you're not concerned with the massacres taking place in Yemen, Saudi Arabia or Bahrain, because those despots are your 'allies.'

      We're not buying into your lies Obama..you're a fraud. If Lybia's primary natural resource was cabbage, would we be there?

      Change we can really believe in!
    • anonym  •  1 year 2 months ago
      Until a real leader leads the movements or revolution of faith/cause of freedom and democracy in Lybia, the Lybia war is a tribal war between fractions or civil war in which galdafi fraction against rebels fractions,the rebels are not unified,therefore they can't make headways into Tripoli . If you want a western influence dmocracy and freedom Lybia to emerge,sustain and survive, you need a real leader and a real movement of democracy and freedom. The lession of Egypt uprising exhibits the revolution fruit belongs not to the people but temporal military power. Any outside help for the Lybia rebel fractions will bring another generation of tribal leader to control Lybia .
    • europhile  •  1 year 2 months ago
      back in the day: 1776, the United states colonists had had no training in democracy. It's all DIY, dont you know.
    • j.n.  •  1 year 2 months ago
      it's all b.s.
    • The Old Professor  •  1 year 2 months ago
      Our pathetic, psychopathic Narcisist-in-Chief was bound and determined NOT TO WASTE an aooprtunity to push the New World Order as a form of government.

      Hitlery Clinton was also enthusiastic to create her own war, as well.
    • Thomas Wayne  •  1 year 2 months ago
      I think the Tomahawk missiles have expiration date. If they don't find ways to use them, they would be going to the scrap yard. Or if they don't use them, they can't justify the budget allocation. Or the missile manufacturers can't make a sale.
    • fast mario  •  1 year 2 months ago
      Consider that Obama has three courses of (in)action:

      1) Blame "The Previous Administration"
      2) Blame Hillary
      3) Blame BOTH Bush -AND- Hillary

      ..... and just watch the "bobblehead sheep" go right along for the ride because they're so @#$% STUPID!
    • harry o  •  1 year 2 months ago
      how many of Obamas family members will be there fighting???????
      .
      .
      .a Big....ZERO

      tokens dont fight!
    • Former Yahoo Finance User  •  1 year 2 months ago
      There is always a reason! WMDs that don't exist! Free Kuwait which we never cared about. Stop Vietnam from going communist BTW we never cared about them either and they went communist anyway after 50,000 dead and billions of dollars, make the world safe for democracy and what do we deliver to the world?! Hitler - Stalin - Tojo and Mussilini! You are certified idiots if you believe this tripe.
    • anarchist  •  1 year 2 months ago
      "The United States simply will not tolerate self aggrandizing despots who place their personal interests in front of the citizens which they serve. The world shall take notice that the United States military shall bomb any corrupt and incompetent leader who chooses to oppress his people." - BHO 3/29/11.

      Ten minutes later three tomahawk missiles hit the White House.
    • ezjim  •  1 year 2 months ago
      Why not reimburse the American Taxpayers for the money spent on almost 200 Tomahawk
      missiles at a million plus dollars each, and the thirty million plus lost on a crashed F-15 aircraft,
      Throw in enough for overhead expenses and maybe ten percent profit. Take the money from the frozen assets of the Lybian dictator and or the Lybian government. If all we can export anymore is our jobs and war; we might as well make some money. It worked for the Vikings.

    FOLLOW THE DAILY TICKER

    The Daily Ticker covers the most important business stories of the day -- the economy, investing, corporate leadership and politics. The Daily Ticker picks up where Tech Ticker left off and is hosted by Aaron Task, Henry Blodget and Daniel Gross. Often serious, sometimes irreverent and always interesting, The Daily Ticker gives viewers a unique take on the business world's most crucial stories.

    Subscribe and RSS

    [X]

    How to subscribe

    Roll over each section to subscribe using Add to My Yahoo! or RSS Feed feeds.

    Yahoo! News offers dozens of RSS feeds you can read in My Yahoo! or using third-party RSS news reader software. Click here to find out more about RSS and how you can use it with Yahoo! News.
     
    Recent Quotes
    Symbol Price Change % Chg 
    Your most recently viewed tickers will automatically show up here if you type a ticker in the "Enter symbol/company" at the bottom of this module.
    You need to enable your browser cookies to view your most recent quotes.
     
    Sign-in to view quotes in your portfolios.