Wed, May 23, 2012, 7:24 PM EDT - U.S. Markets closed

Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    The Most Outrageous Acts of Corporate America

    Follow The Daily Ticker on Facebook here!

    Big housing allowances, massive payouts for sealing deals, a potential ten-figure payment for blowing a deal, and an awesome international case of pay for underperformance.

    Yes, it's that time again. Michelle Leder of Footnoted.com joins us to discuss some of corporate America's biggest outrages and adventures in executive compensation. September's crop, discussed in the accompanying video, includes:

    eBay's Home Economics. To lure Thomson Reuters executive Devin Wenig to move across the country and take a post as President of eBay Marketplaces, the giant internet firm offered some nice goodies: a salary of $750,000 and $2.4 million in restricted stock to start, a $10,000 monthly temporary housing allowance, and frequent travel for Wenig and his family from coast to coast (business class of course). Then there's this: a $1 million "home purchase payment" that he can apply toward the acquisition of a starter mansion. That should be enough for a down payment — even in Silicon Valley.

    Paper Company Prints Money—for Bosses. In September, Temple-Inland agreed to be acquired by International Paper for $3.7 billion. If the deal comes to fruition, it'll represent a nice payday for Temple-Inland investors, and a fantastic payday for top Temple-Inland executives. As Footnoted.com found, CEO Doyls Simons stand to reap $61.4 million: "29.6 million in equity, $6.2 million in retirement benefits, $8.8 million cash (both severance and prorated bonus for the year of termination) and three years of continued benefits." And so he doesn't have to pay taxes on all this compensation, the company will give him another $16.6 million to send to the Internal Revenue Service.

    Motorola's $3.5 billion Kiss-Off. Over the summer, Google agreed to acquire Motorola's Mobility unit for $12.5 billion. But there are obstacles to the deal being completed: another buyer could come along, Google could, in a rare move, decide to be evil and walk way; or the government could put the kibosh on the merger because of concerns over competition. Should that happen, however, Motorola's shareholders won't walk away empty-handed. The deal includes a clause stipulating that Google has to pay Motorola a $2.5 billion "reverse termination fee" if it can't bring the acquisition to fruition, and that Google could be on the hook for another $1 billion if the government refuses permission.

    H-P's expensive Auf Wiedersehen. Leo Apotheker, the former CEO of German software company SAP, was hired with great fanfare as CEO of struggling computer company H-P last fall. Ten months later, he was dismissed with a little less fanfare — and a lot of loot. His sending off gift included a huge severance package: $7.2 million in cash, plus $18 million in stock. Also, he'll get $300,000 in relocation assistance plus cash to cover higher taxes levied on income if he chooses to move to France or Belgium.

    Daniel Gross is economics editor at Yahoo! Finance

    Email him at grossdaniel11@yahoo.com; follow him on Twitter @grossdm

    Yahoo! Poll

    Will Congress get anything accomplished before the November elections?

    Loading...
    Poll Choice Options
    • Yes
    • No
     

    427 comments

    • Dan  •  7 months ago
      A guy that makes $2500 dollars an hour thinks it's his job to sit around and whine that the guy who makes $17 bucks is overpaid.
      • Michael C 7 months ago
        No, it's his job to EVALUATE the guy who makes $17 bucks an hour.

        And yes, $17 bucks an hour is far more than some jobs are worth.
      • Alans 7 months ago
        But michael, what Dan is saying is true right now, republicans say that if they take over there will be no minimum wage because owners/c.e.o's are crying that $8 an hour minimum wage is too much. That is a FACT.
      • concerned citizen 7 months ago
        hey Michael, do you make $2500 an hour? If not you are definitely arguing the wrong case. I'm sure the CEO's doesn't need your help with the PR spin, they can pay some guy $17 per hour to do it for him, lol. I think the point Dan is trying to make is the guy who is paid $2500 and hour did evaluate the guy and he got it WRONG, yet these CEO's still get the big bucks for blowing the deal. I have not problem with someone getting rewarded for making the right decision, but to get it wrong and take a tax payer bail out? What's wrong with this picture?
    • Mel  •  7 months ago
      Why aren't these companies trying to find cheaper CEO's from India like they do other workers?
      • rhoda 7 months ago
        Great idea, Mel
      • Robert C 7 months ago
        Then noone would have a job.
      • Sam 7 months ago
        Because Indian CEOs are as expensive if not more. India is a couple of steps ahead of us as far as income disparity is concerned. Why do you think workers are so cheap over there?
    • A Yahoo! User  •  7 months ago
      They are not private companies. They are publicly traded companies. The shareholder's interests are supposed to be represented by the board of directors but they routinely ignore their fiduciary duty to act in the best interests of the shareholders (as noted in Alans post). That is a major problem with the stock market these days. Since most holders of equities are passive (either mutual funds, ETF's or separate account managers) who do not pay attention to corporate governance, the boards and the executives are never held accountable for their actions. Stocks are "rented" rather than "owned" these days. There are far too many traders and far too few actual investors for meaningful change to occur in corporate governance any time soon...
      • Alans 7 months ago
        That's a very good analogy about stocks, and true.
      • Bourbon 7 months ago
        Here's the answer to overpaid CEOs. Make them run for the office every 4 years by stating their plans for the Company, their qualifications for the job, and the salary and all side benefits they want. Require that the board of directors find at least two candidates for the job so shareholders have a choice. Then let the shareholders vote.

        I guarantee you that outrageous severance payments will not be part of any candidate's platform as it would anger the shareholders. Overall compensation would also probably drop as shareholders weigh the option of paying high for a big name CEO who hasn't delivered the goods recently, versus maybe taking a chance on that SVP of marketing or finance who wants to move up to the next level and is willing to make lower salary a part of the reason to vote for him. Better, freer corporate governance is the solution.
      • Manly HA 7 months ago
        The CEO job is very, very competitive. Board of directors look for the best they can find and then cut the best deal they can. If their chosen CEO doesn't perform it is their job on the line. Understand that some jobs are worth more than others. I once read that Tiger Woods made a billion dollars for hitting a little white ball. Fair, I don't know, but there are reasons for different jobs being worth different amounts. What about the professional athletic that signs a $50 million dollar contract then gets hurt and can't play. Fair to the shareholders?
    • John  •  7 months ago
      Executives are also robbing private pension plans of the average working person . They raid the pension fund by reducing the non-executive employees benefits and then re-allocate the executive branch with more pension benefits. They do this in the name of tough times.
      Sometimes they add more to the pension funds, but they make sure that the average guy still gets less as they reap even more. And it's all legal, often lobbied, or should I say bribed, off of our corrupt politicians on both sides of the isle.
      • Greyh 7 months ago
        Pensions? What pensions? I don't know of any public companies that offer pensions anymore. Its every man and women for themselves. What a great place we live in!
      • George 7 months ago
        have you looked at the underfunded union pensions? You should be whining about that but this marxist socialist is another ninney who is just playing on peoples frustration. None of the examples are criminal.
      • writethiss 7 months ago
        Really, all this moaning about executive pay when this whole COUNTRY is being leveraged in a massive corporate takeover. It's a corporate take over of our democracy, aided by the Supreme Court. Our politicians are bought and paid for by multi-national corporations, sovereign wealth funds and hedge funds -- and they don't care if America's middle class goes down in flames and its economy, on a broader scale, goes down the toilet like Greece. They will profit from the demise. And they are profiting from it.
        If you care -- be you a Democrat or a Republican -- you need to stand up and demand your elected representatives make a pledge to end to corporate money in politics. Demand that they support a constitutional amendment to reverse Citizen's United. It is the only way for Americans to reclaim America.
    • Robert  •  7 months ago
      The most outrageous act is shutting down American factories, laying off American workers to set up production in the 3rd world. That way, they don't have to pay decent, middle class wages; they can pay slave wages in China.
      • Brad 7 months ago
        Robert - foolish statement! You and your friends (and me & mine) insisted that production be moved!! We buy the cheaper crap usually, which only leads to more & more cheaper crap. YOU save thousands of $$ per year because of the imported junk. And in China, the wages they pay are not bad to chinese, they are only bad by our standards.......
      • Excelsior 7 months ago
        You voted to have the Federal regulations and taxes clearly indicate that you prefer to have all industrial activity moved offshore. Are you so stupid as to think that I will not do what you are paying me to do?
      • Todd 7 months ago
        Robert is under the common misconception that globalism is about "slave labor" for U.S. companies, when the reality is that the standard of living is improving in the emerging world, perhaps even a little too quickly. China is concerned about inflation creating social upheaval and wage inflation is a big part of that. India has quite a bit of wage inflation also and the standard of living is increasing rapidly, to the point of purely domestic car makers like Tata being viable. etc. etc.
    • Harold  •  7 months ago
      HP shareholders should sell their shares and just move on with another company. This company is becoming like Yahoo.
    • rhoda  •  7 months ago
      It is one thing for the initial entrepeneur to make multi million, even billions. Bloomberg, Jobs, Zuckerberg, Gates, etc., all built their businesses from their own innovations and initiative. Most CEOs are just managers, even if they are very good managers. They sit on each other's boards and vote themselves obscene sums whatever their performance - then use every trick, some very questionable, to avoid taxes. Even the original entrepeneurs should pay substantial taxes to the country that made it possible.
    • imgamekc  •  7 months ago
      So many people on here are so lost in what really happens on the exec boards.. these people often appoint each other to their boards and it is a matter of a rigged game at that point. Where the "board" aka. friends and cohorts vote for each others pay and benefits packages.
    • RICHARDR  •  7 months ago
      This would make a great weekly TV show, bringing to light the unbelievable waste of corporate money. That's right folks, that is your investment dollars being squandered by way of the interlocking boards of directors who award these perks to one another. We investors need to demand accountability, just like we should demand accountability from the government. People are people and they will all take advantage when they think that no one is looking. Keep your eyes on them and we will maybe get some honesty.
    • No Way Out  •  7 months ago
      The common thread throughout Wall St, not just with the banks, but with all large publicly-traded companies, is that these boards/executives are making decisions about how to spend somebody else's money. You never see these types of arrangements in privately held companies of similar size. This OPM mentality is what leached over into the public employee unions over the past two decades and has resulted in ridiculous pension and benefit plans that will bankrupt most states/municipalities over the next decade. The bottom line is flat out greed combined with no accountability - middle class workers in the private sector get hit from both sides as their state and local taxes are raised to cover the public employee crooks, their federal taxes will be raised to cover the economic costs of the banking crisis, and any retirement assets they have flounder under the weight of egregious compensation of corporate executives. We need a middle class party that will fight both ends of this spectrum and protect the workers in the middle.
    • Sand  •  7 months ago
      Hey, my spouse worked at Standard and Poor's. Because wrong conduct was exposed, along with unethical and corrupt behavior, they unleashed their fury and everything else in between. Unbelievable that this kind of rubbish is tolerated in this day and age! Support the Healthy Workplace Bill!
    • LIGHTFOOT  •  7 months ago
      And - there is $17 million annually for CBS paying a news anchor to real a teleprompter for 30 minutes each evening. And - $20 million paid by NY Yankees for an outfielder to play 3 hours a day for 140 games.... It's not just Wall Street Execs with outrageous greed factors.
    • Rob  •  7 months ago
      The right wingers will defend the logic of paying a CEO $20 million per year....and their argument is worthy. However, what is the logic in paying somebody $25 million to FAIL?
    • Average Guy  •  7 months ago
      These guys are simply not worth the money. Most of these put up results no better or worse than any average mid level manager could obtain. They also get the money up front before there is actual performance.
    • Katuna  •  7 months ago
      So these CEOs make a pile of money that may make the shareholders richer, but the merger (they got the money for) may take the competition away making it more expensive for their products. Wheres the common good here
    • russell d.  •  7 months ago
      Republicans protect corporate corruption to the death,while Democrats protect government corruption to the death,between both parties corruption does quite well in America,its a shame all those Republicans,and Democrats hopes,and dreams are in the toilette,because of the corruption they protect,and blame the other evil party for its obvious coruption.
    • m j  •  7 months ago
      Here is what you can do as good citizen...
      1. Keep your money with good banks or credit unions.
      2. Don't do any business (loans/FDs) with such big banks.
      3. Avoid doing business with any individual or institute overpaid.
      4. Any time before you spend money see where it gonna end up.
    • Money  •  7 months ago
      Bank of America derivative move puts US tax payers on the hook for 75 trillion.
    • anonym  •  7 months ago
      The President or CEO's talents can be measured by his skills in inovating new products(like Steve Jobs),Marketing and Promotion of new products,his skills in managing management workers productivity relationship,not merely skills on accouting strategy skills and company stocks price profit margin manipulation strategy.
    • Zoober  •  7 months ago
      We hold up corporate executives that slash jobs and send jobs overseas like they are great business people. The Jack Welch types are what ruined this country but no matter how much you pay an idiot like this they think they are worth more. Ruthless is not the key attribute that business leaders need.

    FOLLOW THE DAILY TICKER

    The Daily Ticker covers the most important business stories of the day -- the economy, investing, corporate leadership and politics. The Daily Ticker picks up where Tech Ticker left off and is hosted by Aaron Task, Henry Blodget and Daniel Gross. Often serious, sometimes irreverent and always interesting, The Daily Ticker gives viewers a unique take on the business world's most crucial stories.

    Subscribe and RSS

    [X]

    How to subscribe

    Roll over each section to subscribe using Add to My Yahoo! or RSS Feed feeds.

    Yahoo! News offers dozens of RSS feeds you can read in My Yahoo! or using third-party RSS news reader software. Click here to find out more about RSS and how you can use it with Yahoo! News.
     
    Recent Quotes
    Symbol Price Change % Chg 
    Your most recently viewed tickers will automatically show up here if you type a ticker in the "Enter symbol/company" at the bottom of this module.
    You need to enable your browser cookies to view your most recent quotes.
     
    Sign-in to view quotes in your portfolios.