Wed, May 23, 2012, 7:31 PM EDT - U.S. Markets closed

Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Nomi Prins: How Many Regulators Does It Take to Screw Investors Out of $1.2B?

    Follow Yahoo!'s The Daily Ticker on Facebook here!

    Three-plus years since the subprime mortgage crisis -- aided and abetted by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac -- triggered the collapse of Lehman and bailouts of the big banks and AIG, scant little progress has been made to safeguard the markets, investors or the economy.

    To add insult to injury, the big banks are bigger and more profitable than ever, but still not a single person has been held accountable for causing the worst recession since the Great Depression.

    "Nothing has changed since AIG," says Nomi Prins, author of Black Tuesday. "These companies are too complex [and] the regulators too inept."

    The most recent fallout from lack of regulatory oversight of the banking and investing industry is the collapse of MF Global, run by former Goldman Sachs CEO Jon Corzine. A stunning $1.2 billion in client funds are still missing more than month after the company buckled on fears of its leveraged bets on European debt. (See: It's the Leverage, Stupid: Jon Corzine's MF Global Goes Bust)

    The problem is banks and brokers "have too many different competing businesses that are mixed with customer funds… and [there's] so many different regulators whooshing about not being responsive, not being accountable, not talking to each other," says Prins, a former managing director at Goldman Sachs and currently a senior fellow at Demos.

    Take MF Global (please!): "You had MF Global U.K., which was responsible to the financial services authority in the U.K. You had MF Global Inc., which was [responsible] to the CME, the CBOE," she notes. "[And] you had it listed as a broker-dealer, which meant it was also supposed to be overseen by the SEC."

    Corzine testified under oath four times this month to four different Congressional panels and denied any wrongdoing or knowledge of what happened to his customers' missing $1.2 billion. "While the last few days of MF Global were chaotic, I did not instruct anyone to lend customer funds to MF Global for any of its affiliates, nor was I told that anyone had done so," he said.

    "How many inept regulatory bodies does it take to screw customers out of $1.2 billion?" Prins asks in a recent blog post. She believes Corzine is trying to dodge accountability and responsibility -- in the grand tradition of so many financial executives that came before him.

    "I believe that Corzine knew exactly where those funds went and why they were needed," she tells The Daily Ticker's Aaron Task in the accompanying interview. "In the twelfth hour of the firm's collapse there is no way as a person who knows these markets...who knows where money goes...who knows how it works had no clue what was going on."

    The way things are going for Corzine and the case of MF Global, it looks like he too may skirt free with no criminal charges levied against him.

    Watching the Watchdogs

    Such disregard for the pain and suffering caused over the last few years has many wondering: Where are the regulators? Where are the perp walks?

    Well, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the regulatory body in charge of overseeing the securities industry and markets, has been busy -- but only in allowing banks to settle charges of wrongdoing with nothing more than a slap on the wrist. By neither admitting nor denying wrongdoing, the SEC has allowed banks from JPMorgan to Citigroup "get off" on a wide range of issues with just financial penalties and settlements. (See: Taken to Task: Jamie Dimon's House of Ill Repute)

    Enough was finally enough for New York District Court Judge Jed Rakoff. Frustrated with inadequate punishment for financial malfeasance, he last month rejected the $285 million settlement between Citigroup and SEC, saying the deal was "neither reasonable, nor fair, nor adequate, nor in the public interest." (See: Taken To Task: Capt. Cronyism, Hank Paulson)

    The SEC case against Citigroup involves the bank misleading investors on risky mortgages. The regulatory body has appealed Judge Rakoff's decision. (See: "Risky" for Citi to Defend Itself Against SEC in Court — FT's John Gapper)

    It must be noted, however, that the SEC on Friday did bring the first big civil charges against six former executives of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

    But according to Prins, more civil charges are just par for the course and Americans can only expect more of the same until regulators start doing a better job, stop "punting" on the penalties for unlawful behavior and make way for some real financial reform.

    Until that time, don't be surprised when, not if, another MF Global hits.

    For more on MF Global's unraveling, see:

    "Your Money Is Not Safe": Gerald Celente on the Moral of MF Global's Collapse

    MF Global Saga Spotlights Crony Capitalism and Washington-Wall Street Revolving Door

    Yahoo! Poll

    Will Congress get anything accomplished before the November elections?

    Loading...
    Poll Choice Options
    • Yes
    • No
     
    • Rockin Ron  •  Los Angeles, California  •  4 months ago
      "Nothing has changed since AIG," says Nomi Prins, author of Black Tuesday. "These companies are too complex [and] the regulators too inept."
    • James  •  5 months ago
      We know you won't give us Dimon, Stumf, Raines, Mudd, Moziilo, Perry, Monahan, Blankfein, Geithner, Paulson, etc... but at least give us Corzine. Is that asking too much?
      • FRAUD 5 months ago
        The list will get longer as time goes on! They all own DC.
      • James 5 months ago
        We the People own DC, we are too #$%$ lazy to take it back. I have had enough and will be doing my part to set the banks straight after the holidays. Visit wwwmynpvcom and help spread the free message to the folks.
      • James 5 months ago
        XX made a comment that everyone should read and like. BAC is currently back-door commingling customer funds with derivative exposure so they can hold us hostage again when they need more money next month. Shut em down and take the assets of all officers and counter-parties.
    • HerbertG  •  5 months ago
      We have the best gov't and regulators that money can buy!
      • bob308 5 months ago
        So true.
      • Ron 5 months ago
        yes and they are sitting in as congress; to de-regulate more of such controls; so that even more corruption, theft can occur while certain members of congress can short and make even more greens on the stock markets.
      • Master 5 months ago
        Regulators are not funded.
        That is how to ensure regulations are not enforced.
    • A Yahoo! User  •  5 months ago
      Banks should be allowed to go bankrupt. Why would they care about the foolish things they do when they know taxpayers will bail them out? The rest of us, however, get thrown to the wolves.
    • bob308  •  5 months ago
      Relationships between federal regulators and big busness has always been a dubious arrangement. CRIME THAT PAYS IS CRIME THAT STAYS!
    • XX  •  5 months ago
      Nomi Prins is only telling half the truth. That's not the reason! The real reason is the special amendment inserted into the 2005 bankruptcy law by Rep. Jim Leach (R-Iowa), the same guy who co-sponsored the Gramm-Bliley-Leach Act that repealed Glass-Steagal. The amendment to that law grants derivatives contract holders and hypothecation contract holders the right to KEEP whatever assets are in their possession when the firm that deposited went bankrupt - stepping ahead of line of all other claimants. No wonder the money's now in JP Morgan's (and other banks') systems now.

      It's the same reason Bank of America recently moved $53 trillion in potential derivatives bets liabilities from its Merill Lynch unit to its main depositary unit holding some $1 trillion in mom-and-pop depositors' assets - OVER the objections of the FDIC, which is supposed to insure customer deposits. The derivatives contract holders required Bank of America to do it when its credit rating was downgraded. The counter-parties wanted their bets against Bank of America to remain safe.
      • saxonmor 5 months ago
        America...of the wealthy, by the wealthy and for the wealthy.
      • bob308 5 months ago
        Put your comment into plain language XX.
      • ethos 5 months ago
        BofA put its risky derivatives into an account backed by your deposits. If the derivatives go bust, guess who pays off the counterparties. Not BofA. The dumb depositors. Take your money out of BofA.
    • craign  •  5 months ago
      IMHO there will be no perp walks. Politicians are not going to bite the hand that feeds them. Oh there will be a lot of posturing and tough talk from both parties, but in the end nothing will be done.
    • frank  •  5 months ago
      SO MANY LOST SO MUCH.. (ACTUALLY STOLEN)
      • wrdsmth 5 months ago
        this past couple of years has seen the largest transfer of wealth/theft in the world's history...and it's all legal. doesn't make it right. that's just so, so sad. the robber barons of the 18th and 19th century blush at what this current batch has accomplished.
      • A Yahoo! user 5 months ago
        It's still theft. A law does not necessarily make it morally, or ethically ok.
    • saxonmor  •  5 months ago
      How Many Regulators Does It Take to Screw Investors Out of $1.2B?
      All of them (and congress too.)
    • bob308  •  5 months ago
      Bring back Glass-Steagall!
    • cecebe_ont  •  5 months ago
      There are no watch dogs, no accountability, and no ethical people at the top. Need I say more.
    • Ken  •  5 months ago
      THE BOTTOM LINE, Corzine was in charge of the company, wether he knew or didn't know about the issues. That can no longer be his excuse. Laws were put in place just for that "excuse." HE SHOULD HAVE KNOWN. IT WAS HIS RESPONSIBILITY TO KNOW AND HE MUST GO TO JAIL!!
    • Believe_Me  •  5 months ago
      I have read that creditors/bankers are trying to bring back Debtors' Prisons. Let's see how many moms and dads are sent away to jail and then compare that to how many 'Corzines' serve time for white collar crime in the banking industry. Makes me sick.
    • Ken the Libertarian  •  5 months ago
      The civil trials against CEOs and Board members will lead to financial settlements paid to the government by insurance companies whose premiums were paid by the company's stockholders.

      Not a penny will be paid by the people who caused the problem, the common stockholders get screwed and IT'S ALL LEGAL!!!!!!
    • Thomas W  •  5 months ago
      Great item. She is very well spoken. Clear, concise, not a single wasted word. Thanks.
    • ED  •  5 months ago
      Futher evidence that laws are for people without lots of money and no power.Unless you hurt someone with more money and power than you lol...
    • Stanley  •  5 months ago
      Corzine knows. He also knows that his friends in high places will lookout for him.
    • The shortanator  •  5 months ago
      Life as Usual for the Wealthy, still CEO's getting their Super Huge Bonus's changing jobs while collecting their HUGE Golden Parachute Commissions going to the next Corporation to collect the next one etc., etc. what a country....for the Wealthy that is!!!!
    • donald  •  5 months ago
      Crooks regulated by crooks investigated by crooks. Get it, nothing will ever be done.
    • DouglasA  •  5 months ago
      Investments have moved away from being invested in companies to being invested with investment funds. These funds are now so far removed from Capitalism that MOST of the Investments are just a convoluted mess of paper shuffling and wire transfering. ( not real money anymore ). It does not take a degree in economics to understand that Capitalism is broken and needs to be reconnected to REAL PRODUCTIVE WORK! But getting advice from somebody that worked at Goldman Sachs is a bitter pill to swallow!

    FOLLOW THE DAILY TICKER

    The Daily Ticker covers the most important business stories of the day -- the economy, investing, corporate leadership and politics. The Daily Ticker picks up where Tech Ticker left off and is hosted by Aaron Task, Henry Blodget and Daniel Gross. Often serious, sometimes irreverent and always interesting, The Daily Ticker gives viewers a unique take on the business world's most crucial stories.

    Subscribe and RSS

    [X]

    How to subscribe

    Roll over each section to subscribe using Add to My Yahoo! or RSS Feed feeds.

    Yahoo! News offers dozens of RSS feeds you can read in My Yahoo! or using third-party RSS news reader software. Click here to find out more about RSS and how you can use it with Yahoo! News.
     
    Recent Quotes
    Symbol Price Change % Chg 
    Your most recently viewed tickers will automatically show up here if you type a ticker in the "Enter symbol/company" at the bottom of this module.
    You need to enable your browser cookies to view your most recent quotes.
     
    Sign-in to view quotes in your portfolios.