Wed, May 23, 2012, 7:36 PM EDT - U.S. Markets closed

Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Obama’s 2013 Budget: ‘Decent’ But Won’t Solve Country’s Huge Debt Problems Says Budget Expert

    Follow Yahoo!'s The Daily Ticker on Facebook here

    President Obama will submit his budget for the 2013 fiscal year that begins Oct. 1 to Congress on Monday. Many of the spending proposals included in the budget resemble initiatives he proffered last September, including a $350 billion short-term jobs creation plan. Congress blocked Obama's $447 billion jobs proposal last year. Obama's budget calls for raising taxes on the rich, including the so-called "Buffett Rule" that affects Americans making more than $1 million a year. Obama would replace the Alternative Minimum Tax with the "Buffett Rule" which was adopted in 1969 but became anachronistic because it did not adjust for inflation, therefore targeting both wealthier and middle class households. Republicans oppose tax increases on all income groups.

    Whether or not Congress will pass Obama's budget remains unclear. Republicans have rejected many of Obama's previous spending proposals and Democrats and Republicans alike are reluctant to attach themselves to anything related to spending and domestic program cuts during an election year. The White House forecasts that the budget deficit will slip to $901 billion in fiscal 2013, down from this year's $1.33 trillion estimate. Spending cuts will total $4 trillion over the next decade. Obama's budget hews closely to the deficit-reduction law agreed to in August by Congress.

    Obama officially unveiled his budget at Northern Virginia Community College, a backdrop intended to emphasize his commitment to the nation's education system. Obama's budget allots at least $65 billion for education resources.

    On Sunday White House Chief of Staff Jacob Lew said the budget addresses the ballooning deficit and includes new revenue sources needed to bolster the fragile economic recovery.

    "The time for austerity is not today," Lew told NBC News. "If we were to put in austerity measures right now, it would take the economy in the wrong way."

    Maya MacGuineas, president of the Committee for a Responsible Budget, says the president's budget does not go far enough to tackle the country's massive debt challenges.

    "In order to fix our debt and deficit problems, we are going to have to deal with every part of the budget," MacGuineas tells Aaron Task in the above video. "This budget doesn't do enough to reform our healthcare and our social security programs. We have a fiscal crisis breathing down our neck."

    MacGuineas says she's concerned that Congress may not act on the budget until after the November election, a decision that could have severe consequences.

    "The real action when it comes to budgeting is what goes on in Congress," she notes. "Congress needs to hammer out some compromises." Doing nothing would "dig this deficit hole even deeper."

    Budget highlights/projections include:

    • $50 billion in spending to improve roads, rails and airport runways (the administration estimates this will create "thousands of jobs")
    • $60 billion in spending to modernize schools and help states hire teachers, emergency workers
    • Giving small businesses a tax credit to hire new employees
    • Requiring households that make more than $1 million to pay at least 30 percent in taxes
    • Allowing the Bush 2001 and 2003 tax cuts expire for families making $250,00 or more per year
    • For every $1 in revenue the government raises, the government will cut $2.50 in spending
    • $360 billion cut in Medicare and Medicaid over 10 years and $278 billion cut from programs like farm subsidies and federal employees' pensions
    • Defense spending - excluding war funding - to total $487 billion over 10 years, a decrease from the 2012 budget and the first drop since the 1990s
    • Environmental Protection Agency funding drops to $8.34 billion, the agency's third straight round of cuts
    • $61 billion tax on big banks over a decade to assist struggling homeowners and recover the costs of the financial bailout
    • Raising the top individual income tax rate to 39.6% for the wealthiest taxpayers starting in fiscal 2013
    • Tax breaks for oil, gas and coal companies are eliminated
    Yahoo! Poll

    Will Congress get anything accomplished before the November elections?

    Loading...
    Poll Choice Options
    • Yes
    • No
     

    27 comments

    • julia  •  3 months ago
      It's one thing to make a budget,it's another to stay within it.
    • BobDiaz  •  3 months ago
      The bottom line is that the Government will still spend more than it takes in and the National Debt will grow even larger. The debt is now greater than the GDP and it still keeps growing. The problem is kicked down the road making it harder to solve in the future.
      • DuaneS 3 months ago
        I agree with your sentiment that we should reduce the deficit to a sustainable level. But, OK, the debt is greater than the GDP, so what. That's comparing apples with oranges, or more precisely like comparing the balance sheet to the income statement. If we just kept deficit to a sustainable constant non-zero level percent of GDP, and hence the debt to a constant percentage of total assets, we'd be fine. Everyone agrees about that, the argument is what to cut and what to raise.
      • BobDiaz 3 months ago
        I said, "The debt is now greater than the GDP and it still keeps growing." Please take my remark in full context. The comment shows how large it has become.
        -----------
        ANY deficit spending shows that we are getting DEEPER in debt and it's NOT OK. Take the National Debt and divide it by the population and your share is around $49 THOUSAND. This can NOT go on forever and sooner or later the system will collapse.
        ---------
        Deficit = How much we are spending that we don't have (debt increase)
        National Debt = The total for how much we owe.
        Please learn the difference.
      • DuaneS 3 months ago
        Bob, I know the difference, I was not sure you did. OK, I guess we agree about the basic facts. I was taking exception to the irrelvancy of comparing deficit to GDP in an alarmist way. And, I reiterate, if we have a deficit, but that deficit is small enough to not cause the debt to increase proportionally relative to GDP, we have a stable situation. So some amout of deficit is normal. By the way, if we did reduce the debt to zero, that would be problematic, since there would be no treasury debt to buy, and hence no govt-guaranteed safe place for private investments. Also, I do not think 49K being my share of the debt is totally alarming. My private debt, including mortgage, is far greater than that, but is outweighed by assets, and I will be well able to pay it off, just as we together are able to pay down the national debt if we want to. Let's cut spending a bit, raise taxes a bit, and we can stop screaming about it. The Obama plan is a step in the right direction, but we need more of the same.

        No one disagrees, except about what to cut and what to raise.
    • gus  •  3 months ago
      so $1 trillion in additional debt won't solve the debt problem? wow. thanks for the expert analysis.
    • Ray  •  Providence, Rhode Island  •  3 months ago
      Liar liar
      I am for seniors said Obama
      Liar liar
    • Ray  •  Providence, Rhode Island  •  3 months ago
      Some good but mostly BAD
      What u tax goes away
      What u don't tax GROWS
      This president is all show
      but no go
    • Patriot  •  Lubbock, Texas  •  3 months ago
      Explanation----Another laughable campaign document from the community organizer! Time to replace him America in November 2012!
    • Fedup  •  3 months ago
      For the hundredth time, there is nothing wrong with social security except the "temporary" payroll tax cut will help make it less secure. Still good til 2036 and even then it could pay out 75 percent of promised benefits. It is a sham argument that there is a social security crisis. The government has a budget crisis, but SS is not the problem.
      • ROY 3 months ago
        2036 is not that far away. Within my lifetime. Perhaps not yours, which is why you say there is no problem? And why should SS not honor all of the promised benefits? SS is a problem. Stop ignoring it.
      • Yahoo 3 months ago
        Its not a scam unless the gop say it..Even some of the democrats have said it..But unless the majasty and the queen polosie and their joker reid say it to be so then its not so in the mind of the liberals..2036 if we dont add more illegals to it..
      • STEVE 3 months ago
        Social security is easily fixed by raising the limits on contributions.
    • Ratkellar  •  3 months ago
      We tried the world's largest stimulus and it keeps our head barely above water. WH says: "If we were to put in austerity measures right now, it would take the economy in the wrong way." If we do not address the deficit, the economy and Americans go the wrong way. Sometimes you gotta take the chemo to save the patient. Time to take some more medicine, even if it hurts.
    • CYBER_DOG  •  3 months ago
      i put in a vote of no confidence
    • TerenceZ  •  3 months ago
      Republicans...all they can do is reject reject reject, because they've got no brains to make a plan themselves, and they're too scared to admit it. So they make themselves look better by rejecting everyone else's plans.
    • hen  •  Cleveland, Georgia  •  3 months ago
      no balls it washington.
    • frankmargel.com  •  3 months ago
      Hi Maya and Aaron! Conservative Talk radio superstars like myself want to see the Tea Party Congress work with a conservative president. Obama is trying.... LMFAO! NEXT!
    • arkie  •  Indianapolis, Indiana  •  3 months ago
      how about a republican making up a budget if obamas is so bad? gop budget would cut out medicare, medicaid, veterans benefits, social security, unemployment, aid to schools, reduce police departments, give bubba more gun rights to make up for police cuts, cut taxes for corporations so the rabble will have more jobs {yeh, that really works}, give the rich a nice tax break since there is no more government assistance to pay for. things would be just peachy then according to the right wing nuts. i was working and doing fine then came bush and his band of merry men who robbed from the poor and gave to the rich. no natural disaster worse than a determined republican. NUFF SAID
      • cowboys95 3 months ago
        They have the last two years, where have you been?
      • peg leg pete 3 months ago
        2 years to undo 8 years.hum
    • Elder walker  •  Mt Clemens, Michigan  •  3 months ago
      It's a start and our debt is so large that Jesus Christ may come before it is reduce down to manageable levels and as one poster said making a budget is one thing but keeping to it is definitely another and this budget is only for this adminstration and maybe the next four years but what happen after that?
    • Mattoknowso  •  3 months ago
      Hey folks; here are the numbers. If the Fed Govt could save (not spend) $1 billion PER DAY; that's 365 billion per year. In just 3 years the savings would be $1 trillion. But the deficit is $15 trillion, so it would take 45 years to pay of!!! And Obama wants to add one trillion per year. This is not a joke. We are in very serious trouble and adding to the deficit just makes it worse. We may never recover until the final bankrupt moment when there is no real money except printing worthless piles of it. A vote for Obama is a vote for assured future collapse.
      • bladerider 3 months ago
        Matto, you are way oversimplifying it with your freshman analysis in linearity. Everything happens exponentially, we could be well recovered in a few years.
      • Mo 3 months ago
        We have and are in a down turn in revenues. Consider that in a BOOM economy (coming soon to a world near you) revenues will be at least 3 times what they are now. Based on this and inflation the budget could be reduced to ZERO within a decade. Also please note that we don't have to reduce the government debit to zero but just need to get it down to half of what it is now as that is the approximate historical norm. In other words once the boom starts we will be good in just five years and this past few years will just be a bad dream in the rear view mirror. Sesame
      • survivor 3 months ago
        bladerider...his analysis is giving the politicians the max benefit of the doubt...every one knows... the way they spend money... even with an exponential analysis won't help...
    • NA  •  3 months ago
      Obama supporters favor tax and redistribute policy. To that effect, the Bush tax cuts should be allowed to expire at the end of the year for everybody. Poof...Obama has his revenue. But..Mr. President can you cut spending?
      • survivor 3 months ago
        obama: ah NO...my job is to spend money...
      • DuaneS 3 months ago
        I know you are only being sarcastic, but as a liberal, I support this. Roll back all Bush-era tax policy, which is mostly giveaways to the 1% and oil companies. Also tax capital gains at the same rate as ordinary income. The country's economy has tanked and the deficit has skyrocketed since the Clinton years, when the budget was BALANCED.
    • Johnathan  •  Chicago, Illinois  •  3 months ago
      Its funny how people know enough to say that Obamas plan won't work but yet these same people can't come up with a plan that will work.
    • BSTEENB718  •  Inver Grove Heights, Minnesota  •  3 months ago
      Obama's own proposal to tax the so called wealthy does not include inflation adjustments. The same old problem this country had with the AMT and snaring the middle class. The guy is an idiot, socialist and has proven that he can not be trusted.
    • DuaneS  •  3 months ago
      Why not tax capital gains at the same rate as ordinary income?
    • ~* FUZZY *~  •  3 months ago
      This is the same budget that was voted down 97-0 by the US Senate last year LOL, and this liberal #$%$ article says it is "decent" ? ROFL ! What happened to Obama's promise to cute the deficit in half by the end of his first term ? How can Obama produce a budget that puts us a further 1 trillion dollars in the hole ?

    FOLLOW THE DAILY TICKER

    The Daily Ticker covers the most important business stories of the day -- the economy, investing, corporate leadership and politics. The Daily Ticker picks up where Tech Ticker left off and is hosted by Aaron Task, Henry Blodget and Daniel Gross. Often serious, sometimes irreverent and always interesting, The Daily Ticker gives viewers a unique take on the business world's most crucial stories.

    Subscribe and RSS

    [X]

    How to subscribe

    Roll over each section to subscribe using Add to My Yahoo! or RSS Feed feeds.

    Yahoo! News offers dozens of RSS feeds you can read in My Yahoo! or using third-party RSS news reader software. Click here to find out more about RSS and how you can use it with Yahoo! News.
     
    Recent Quotes
    Symbol Price Change % Chg 
    Your most recently viewed tickers will automatically show up here if you type a ticker in the "Enter symbol/company" at the bottom of this module.
    You need to enable your browser cookies to view your most recent quotes.
     
    Sign-in to view quotes in your portfolios.