Thu, May 24, 2012, 8:09 AM EDT - U.S. Markets open in 1 hr 21 mins

Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Red Alert: China’s ‘Rare’ Commodity Monopoly Threatens U.S., Leeb Says

    There's nothing new about pundits and authors warning about the thread posed by China's rapid rise. In his upcoming book, Red Alert, Stephen Leeb tackles this hot-button issue from a slightly different viewpoint.

    "Everything about China we have to pay attention to…but what really concerns me is their accumulation of all these commodities," Leeb tells me in the accompanying video.

    When you think of "commodities" you probably think about oil, gas, gold, corn, soybeans, and maybe copper or zinc. China has been on a global buying spree to gain access to many commodities, but Leeb's focus is on so-called heavy rare earth materials, which China already owns in abundance.

    "OPEC's control of oil [is] dwarfed by China's control of rare earths, which are probably just as vital as oil," Leeb says. "It's something we have to wake up to and wake up to very quickly."

    Back in 2005, the importance of rare earths became evident when Congress blocked China's attempt to buy Molycorp's Mountain Pass mine from Unocal, its owner at the time. China's control of rare earth minerals made headlines again last September when the Communist nation imposed an unofficial ban on related exports to Japan.

    But for the most part, rare earths are a backburner issue (at best) for most Americans, policymakers included. This is a big mistake, according to Leeb, who notes rare earth materials are used in high-tech weaponry and are "vital" to renewable energy production, notably wind turbines and hybrid cars.

    "If you want to create a society reliant on renewable energy, you need a major transition that's going to rely on critical commodities [like] heavy rare earths," he says. "Silver too is totally vital."

    Yes, while most of us think of silver as an alternative currency, Leeb notes it has major industrial uses, both conventional and in the development of solar panels. As a result, he is extremely bullish on silver, for the long term. (See: Why Higher Oil Prices Are Good for Silver)

    "I think silver is heading for $100 [and possibly] much, much higher numbers," he says. "It could become so valuable that like gold in the Depression," the government will confiscate individuals' silver holdings.

    For the moment, however, Leeb is far more concerned about what our government is failing to do to respond to China's challenge.

    "There's no point in demonizing China for pursuing its own economic interests," he writes in the preface to Red Alert. "But as a disciplined, fast-growing economic juggernaut, China poses a massive challenge to the United States and represents a major threat to our economic well-being. And we have only a limited window of time in which to respond to this challenge in any meaningful way."

    Failure to respond will result in "severe dislocations and an irreparable drop in our national income [and] our children will experience a decidedly lower standard of living," he warns.

    Aaron Task is the host of The Daily Ticker. You can follow him on Twitter at @atask or email him at altask@yahoo.com

    Yahoo! Poll

    Will Congress get anything accomplished before the November elections?

    Loading...
    Poll Choice Options
    • Yes
    • No
     

    87 comments

    • Joe  •  11 months ago
      While the US politicians wrangle with gay marriage,abortion and immigration, China,Brazil and India march on ito the future, while we become a third world nation.
      • Sergio 11 months ago
        The US is not mining heavy rare earth materials because china is doing it cheaper and deals with all the ennvoromental cost associated with its transformation, why should the US cross that bridge before the time comes??
      • Lynas You 11 months ago
        Sergio, it takes almost 12-15 years of work to make a source of rare earths, into a marketable product. That is why the US should get off their butts and get on it...
      • korok malfesio 11 months ago
        Jake999, unless you are a full-blooded American Indian, somebody in your family tree was an immigrant. How does it feel to be a turncoat, "libtard" descendent?
    • Bill  •  11 months ago
      Rare Earths are available here. They are almost always in locations with lots of thorium. Thorium is very very slightly radioactive (14.5 Billion year half life). If you mine rare earths you get lots of thorium. Due to our brilliant regulations, you have to treat the thorium as "radioactive waste". This makes the cost of mining the rare earths very high.

      How about this for a crazy twist... Thorium can be used as a energy source... (A very very dense energy source... like 1,000,000 times that of coal or oil). In a Liquid Flouride Thorium Reactor you can "burn" almost 100% of it and produce almost zero radioactive waste. (About 1% of the waste of our present nuclear reactors and it doesn't need 10,000+ years of storage... More like 300 years. A much less daunting prospect.) But, to do this the NRC has to get involved... They don't know how to evaluate a reactor with a liquid core... It's too different from what is used now. So... government regulations are choking two industries here... Isn't that nice ?
      • korok malfesio 11 months ago
        Wonder how the Japanese and Germans feel about thorium reactors.
      • Terence 11 months ago
        Molten salt reactors are a great option
      • Frankly 11 months ago
        I'm interested. How many thorium reactors are now operating in the world and how is the cost/safety doing? How much enrichment is needed for this 'very SLIGHTLY radioactive' raw material to be used for reactor feed stock? It sounds like a liquid core might, as you suggest, be a very different animal from those that have melted in Japan. The "zero waste" aspect sounds good, but how much at the mining and milling and refining sites would we be talking about? Who builds these at present?
    • Ramon Leigh  •  11 months ago
      Aramis is correct - rare earth materials are available in many,many places. They haven't been mined up to now because the Chinese have supplied them at such low cost.
      Leeb also apparently doesn't know every much about our economic history. Gold was not confiscated during the New Deal "because it was valuable." Value had nothing to do with it and most economists opposed the confiscation. FDR confiscated gold because he stupidly believed that by controlling (and increasing) the price of gold as a commodity, that would also increase the prices of other , unrelated commodities, in particular farm commodities, which had fallen in prices and had led to dissatisfaction in his supporting farm bloc. Of course, as any fool would know,
      when FDR raised the price of gold, there was zero effect on farm commodity prices. Leeb really should not provide opionions about subjects he obviously knows nothing about.
      • BigAl 11 months ago
        Frankly,

        You don't get it. The little manufacturing we have left NEEDS those materials.

        Placing tarriffs on them would make these industries (what's left of them) less competitive.
      • Howdy 11 months ago
        Correct, I believe US has more rare heavy materials which are not exploited due to the following two reasons. 1, China supplies it at incredible low price (imagine your gas is now 1 cent per gallon or even less.) 2, The environmental cost. To exploit the materials, severe pollution will happen.
      • Rudolf 11 months ago
        I am in Las Vegas, NV. Sometimes I feel surrounded. Area 51 (atomic testing) 100 miles to the north, Mountain Pass (rare earth) 100 miles to the south.
    • The_Mick  •  11 months ago
      Why is it that the writers know all about heavy rare earths, but when they were talking up Molycorp some months back they conveniently failed to mention it owns NO heavy rare earth mines whatsoever and wrote as if MCP owned the good stuff? My career began in mining chemistry and, even going along with Molycorp's rosy predictions of doubling production, I can't see any way it's future earnings will justify its current price.
      • woof 11 months ago
        What is your feelings about lyscf.pk stock from the aussy firm..
      • Space Vegetable 11 months ago
        Look into Thompson Creek (TC).
    • NothingYet  •  11 months ago
      The price of the silver in a solar panel right now is about 2-5% of the panel's cost, according to available data.

      If necessary, most of that silver can be replaced with copper if the simple one step metallisation process is replaced with an electroplated copper over silver process.

      :-)
      • IanM 11 months ago
        Either way silver or copper are going up.

        Likely both.
    • Jag1x  •  11 months ago
      I agree with the other comments that the environmental restrictions in the U.S. are hindering rare earth metal mining, not a fundamental lack of mineable ore (and I am not necessarily saying that those restrictions are a bad thing, I really don't know if the restrictions are excessive). Leeb's assertion that the U.S. doesn't know how to process the ore is laughable, U.S. companies don't want to process the ore because of the subsequent waste disposal concerns and the worker hazard concerns, the same reason the U.S. doesn't do much coal mining. 9000 Chinese die every year in coal mining accidents, that would never be tolerated in the U.S.
      20 years ago there were Japan Fan Boys that extolled everything Japan and said that U.S. companies needed to emulate the Japanese companies. Now there are China Fan Boys. Lebb is just a China Fan Boy.
    • FKU  •  11 months ago
      I'm betting that 99% of those commenting have no idea about which countries in the World have any available supply of Lithium that can be mined.
    • aircavalry  •  11 months ago
      The US has plenty of internal resources in rare earths, they just need to reopen mines. The mines were closed as the Chinese went after the market with low costs. t is very easy to keep your labor costs low when working in a mine is not optional for a Chinese laborer.

      Also, may companies are looking at alternatives to the key rare earths to make up for shortages.

      A book whose premise based on an interesting but false hypothesis.
    • CommonSense  •  11 months ago
      They aren't RARE, They are very abundent in Nature, but the extraction process, a solvent system is very polluting and do have thorium as a by-product. Expensive, and underpriced given the pollution.
      I know, we used to make in Bayville Texas from ores from Australia

      Silver, YET MY SHARES HAVE TANKED
    • NothingYet  •  11 months ago
      This man is a @#$%.

      :-)
    • m  •  11 months ago
      His PhD is apparently in Psychology! No wonder he is scientifically illiterate. The difference in thermal conductivity between relatively cheap copper and costly silver is about five percent.
    • The Ben Bernank  •  11 months ago
      AIn't nothing US can do about it, it's not illegal internationally to buy up resources. Let the bidding war begin!
    • m  •  11 months ago
      Stephen Leeb, give us a break! Years ago I subscribed to his utterly clueless newsletter. For many years he railed--railed--against oil stocks. You could get better insights at a redneck bar before closing time. Embarrassing to hear this guy tout investments years after sharp guys like Jim Rogers recommended them.
    • Anne  •  11 months ago
      So what company in the USA or Canada should we be investing in for rare earth metals?

      Anne
    • Johnny Randal  •  11 months ago
      The time has come that we need China as a friend not enemy...........Partner in Business.........Will that be possible ?
    • My 2 Cents  •  11 months ago
      Like it or not, Chine is operating more and more like a business. In our society, we think the government should stay out of the private sector. The chinese government is using its vast resources to invest, make money and manipulate markets on a large scale. Their government is revenue generating. Ours is an expense. This is a threat to the economies of the world. We need a response to this threat.
    • Stephen  •  11 months ago
      I hope we all realize that while many of these rare elements are becoming increasingly important, the struggle to control their distribution is our modern equivalent to the pre WW1 arms race. I'm not preaching doom and gloom here, its simply that to continue on our current path of progress we need more of these resources. The struggle of nations attempting to control these may well result in a large war. If people think we go and fight for oil then you haven't seen anything yet... FYI, It was our restriction of valuable resources that prompted Japan to attack us in 1941.
    • Aramis1951  •  11 months ago
      This is more of the fear-mongering which Dr. Leeb has raised to an art form over the course of his self-promoting life. There are rare earth deposits all over the world; they need only be brought to production.
    • NothingYet  •  11 months ago
      There is nothing the US can do about it... except for opening its own mines for these metals, of course.

      We got plenty of this stuff... it just didn't make sense to mine them as long as China kept supplying them cheaply.

      Another scare piece about China.

      Boring!
    • frosty  •  11 months ago
      China isn't the only geographic region where these rare earth elements are found
      Some mines are under construction right now in other countries that could help fill the demand however these other mines won't really be operational until 2015 - 2020.
      Recycling is a real option, given all the electronic gizmos out there. We successfully recycled lead acid batteries, and the same can be done here. We just need 3 years to fill the gap. I wouldn't worry about it. This country has the entrepreneurial spirit.!!!!

    FOLLOW THE DAILY TICKER

    The Daily Ticker covers the most important business stories of the day -- the economy, investing, corporate leadership and politics. The Daily Ticker picks up where Tech Ticker left off and is hosted by Aaron Task, Henry Blodget and Daniel Gross. Often serious, sometimes irreverent and always interesting, The Daily Ticker gives viewers a unique take on the business world's most crucial stories.

    Subscribe and RSS

    [X]

    How to subscribe

    Roll over each section to subscribe using Add to My Yahoo! or RSS Feed feeds.

    Yahoo! News offers dozens of RSS feeds you can read in My Yahoo! or using third-party RSS news reader software. Click here to find out more about RSS and how you can use it with Yahoo! News.
     
    Recent Quotes
    Symbol Price Change % Chg 
    Your most recently viewed tickers will automatically show up here if you type a ticker in the "Enter symbol/company" at the bottom of this module.
    You need to enable your browser cookies to view your most recent quotes.
     
    Sign-in to view quotes in your portfolios.