Thu, May 24, 2012, 8:30 AM EDT - U.S. Markets open in 1 hr.

Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Shiller: Housing Could Fall Another 25% But Is Harder to Predict Than the Weather

    The housing bubble of the early 2000s was "unprecedented" and the "biggest in U.S. history," according to Yale professor Robert Shiller.

    As a result, he says "it's very hard to forecast" where housing goes from here, now that it has officially fallen into double-dip territory, based on the S&P Case-Shiller Index.

    Housing "might fall [another] 10-25% in the next few years," but forecasting housing today is harder than predicting the weather, Shiller says. "I don't see how anyone can quantify a forecast because it's such an unusual event."

    In his latest books, The Subprime Solution and Reforming U.S. Financial Markets, Shiller argues the path to recovery is paved with financial innovation; 11 million homeowners under water is proof "they weren't protected and need a way to hedge their housing risk."

    But "the economy is sick right now [and] I don't have any miracle cure," he admits.

    Best known for his earlier works, Animal Spirits and Irrational Exuberance, Shiller is arguably the world's foremost authority on financial bubbles. So if he can't predict with any certainty where housing is going, what hope is there for the rest of the punditry?

    The American Dream: Myth vs. Reality

    One reason Shiller is so renowned is his extensive work on the long-term history of financial markets. Typically, markets fall below their long-term average after bubbles burst, one reason why the bears see much more pain ahead for housing even if prices are now back to 2003 levels. But stocks didn't 'revert to the mean' after the bursting of the 1990's bubble and Shiller says there's no "hard and fast rule."

    Speaking of rules, many Americans were raised to believe that housing was always the best investment. But on an inflation-adjusted basis, U.S. home prices were flat from 1890 to 1990, according to Shiller, meaning the whole concept of housing wealth was "a bill of goods."

    But the idea of the "American Dream" does have merit. "Home ownership pays a dividend in self respect," he says. Indeed, the idea of owning your own home has personal and societal benefits; the problem was the widespread misconception that housing was the path to wealth and financial freedom.

    Aaron Task is the host of The Daily Ticker. You can follow him on Twitter at @atask or email him at altask@yahoo.com

    Yahoo! Poll

    Will Congress get anything accomplished before the November elections?

    Loading...
    Poll Choice Options
    • Yes
    • No
     

    150 comments

    • Peteg  •  9 months ago
      Home prices may have been flat but since buying a home is a LEVERAGED investment most people still made a lot of money by buying homes. However, LEVERAGE works both ways as people who bought at the top of the bubble found out.
    • Dasafac Jack  •  11 months ago
      Rich people inherit houses or have no problem buying what they want.
      Poor people rent or if they can't afford rent they live with their family and try to get rent sudsidy from the welfare, section 8.
      That leaves the middle class to buy houses, with few exceptions.
      The problem is the middle class is shrinking every year.
      The middle class unemployment rate is high and rising, and you can't get a morgage when you have no job. The credit rating of millions of the middle class has been ruined and it will take many years to repair the credit rating. Higher down payments are being required and you can't save for a down payment while earning low wages.
      Housing looks very dreary for many years unless we can stop companies from outsourcing their labor to foreigners.
      • wiser 11 months ago
        Why worry about credit ratings? Live within your income. Credit is what got America into this mess in the first place.
      • Dasafac Jack 11 months ago
        I only mentioned credit rating because that determines if you get the mortgage or not. I agree it is best to live within your income but you also need shelter and house payments can be a good thing. Often house payments can be less than rent with a possibility of building equity.
      • William M 11 months ago
        I am a millionaire and I rent. I am not the only one. We rent for various reasons. And many of us are self-made millionaires. I am one of those. Read Stanley and Danko's "The Millionaire Next Door," so that next time you will write the truth.
    • Buddha  •  11 months ago
      "U.S. home prices were flat from 1890 to 1990, according to Shiller, meaning the whole concept of housing wealth was 'a bill of goods.'" Um, no. Housing wealth isn't suppossed to be really from the appreciation of the house over inflation, it is that the money you are spending for your housing is going to building your own equity over building someone else's equity as a renter.
      • Johndo 11 months ago
        Thank you Buddha! The only one with any sense!
      • Nodentures 11 months ago
        Buddha disagreed with Schiller but contradicted himself.

        Housing wealth IS the equity built up over time in relation to inflation when compared to
        a renter that builds "equity" by parking the difference in money saved by renting vs. buying.

        Otherwise it's called equity, don't redefine it. You don't have wealth if the amount of money you have goes up because of inflation. Pricing power is unchanged.
      • William M 11 months ago
        Uh uh! unless you rent the same square footage as your house. Many large corporate owned apartments are 700 to 1000 square feet. The rent costs are typically much lower than your interest, maintenance, insurance, property taxes, and principle. You'd do much better off by staying in small surroundings, invest in a global stock index fund monthly for the same 30 years as a mortgage.
    • Mike G.  •  11 months ago
      A "house" is something you "buy" and live in. A "home" is something you invest your heart and soul into and make loving memories.

      I am not blind to the fact that the housing value downturn is real and to put it simply...it hurts. I have just come to grips that I am not moving in the foreseeable future.

      I was recently going to refinance my home but shied away as I wasn't sure that I wanted to know what the decreased value of my home actually was. Furthermore, being four years into the note, I am noticing now that I am paying significantly more principal balance down per month with less going to interest. Not to mention that I'd add $5,000 to my current balance and be back out to 30 years.

      Now, I will either wait this dreadful housing period out or I'll live where I am for the rest of my life, being 40 yrs old. That's not the worst thing...I have a loving family and a roof over my head.

      No matter how bad I or anyone reading this thinks they've got it, every one of us is better off than 90% of other people in the world. Some people die of starvation for cripes sakes!
      • Second Timothy 11 months ago
        Who is cripe?
      • Abbie Normal 11 months ago
        Why not refinance and drop the interest rate from 6 to 4%? Apply the monthly savings to the new lower payment and you will pay off the house faster than just staying with the current high interest loan.
      • Linda 11 months ago
        If you did refinance and apply the savings to pay it off faster, how soon before you could refinance again for a say 10yr loan at an even lower percentage rate?
    • JL Henry  •  11 months ago
      If you believe in the law of supply and demand then when you have more people selling vs buying prices will continue to decline. What needs to happen is to allow the markets to hit bottom so the healing process can begin. The longer all the modifications and bad mortgages are allowed to be carried by the banks, the longer this down fall will continue.
      • GregP 11 months ago
        Seems obvious doesn't it? I have been saying the same thing for some time. Let the chips fall so we can begin to recover.
      • S.Bob 11 months ago
        #Sellers = #Buyers.
      • scott b 11 months ago
        that doesnt make a good story now does it. its much more exciting to talk about disasters than it is to say something positive about the future. people in america are so stupid today they believe anything they see on tv. everyone who owns a house should know that it is a major liability. owning a house is nothing but expense after expense. you buy a house because you dont want to live in apartments, not to invest. home appreciation is just a pleasant by product of not having to live with white trash
    • LK  •  11 months ago
      If the dollar devalues and inflation soars, would you rather rent or own? A home is still a good inflation hedge. Landlords will pass on the costs of inflation to you. A bank with a fixed rate mortgage on your property can't.
      • A Yahoo! User 11 months ago
        You would think so until reality hits you from the behind in things called property taxes (good luck passing that on to subpar tenants, let alone decent ones who may move at drop of a hat if you mess with them), and rent control and subsidies for when the masses can no longer afford basic shelter in America anymore. See rent control initiated in the 70's for NYC for starters.
      • Ol Codger 11 months ago
        If you are talking rental properties, Jack has some good points. If you are talking a place to live for you and your family, LK is right on. Avoid areas with more renters than owners such as San Francisco where voters will keep adding property taxes but in locations with more owners than renters, owners will vote down the property taxes. Think California's Prop 13 which is still popular and would easily pass again today. Owners should fight any and every inititative to bring in more rental properties. Rentals destabilize neighborhoods and increase the odds of low income owners being taxed out.
      • quixote 11 months ago
        if inflation goes up significantly, banks will first raise interest rate to counter that. for example, if inflation is predicted at 10%, banks will raise their interest rate to be more than 10%. if we have a hyper inflation like zimbabwe, banks most likely will stop lending. Nobody will lend u money that can buy a car today, and get back an amount that only can afford a candy tomorrow.
    • scott b  •  11 months ago
      the economy is all about jobs. people without jobs cannot buy houses. soon as the job market recovers the housing market will recover. people keep forgetting that housing is a secondary market. before people can start bidding up the prices of houses again, more people have to have jobs. it just kills me that people are still talking out housing. housing is irrelevant until the unemployment figures come down
    • jdind  •  11 months ago
      we had a housing bubble in TX during the oil boom of the 1980's, when the bust occurred, prices drops 30-50%. It took 10 years for prices to climb back to even. We've got years to go, especially the after the widespread damage done to the economy by wall street this time around.
    • Christopher  •  11 months ago
      Housing CAN and probably WILL fall further all across the country. And that includes FL, NV and CA markets which are already hammered... Listen folks..., it all comes down to supply and demand. Always does... And the areas that are going to continue to get hammered are where overbuilding took place and/or is still taking place... Unfortunately, the banks let delinquent borrowers remain in their homes for the past several years, and that artificially held up prices and didn't let them reach bottom yet... Now that the big banksters are finally playing hardball and foreclosing, the number of homes on the market is going to skyrocket and add to an already plump supply of unsold homes... Thus, it's almost a certainty that prices will have to fall quite a bit farther to help bring the supply/demand equation back into balance by say 2013-2015 or later... And all this is REGARDLESS of what it costs to actually build a home these days... In this situation, I'd also suspect building supply prices to actually fall, and prices charged by builders' labor to decline... It'll all have to work itself out, and thus far we've only seen part of that equation play out... Hate to say it, but Bobby's probably right on the mark...
    • ptrick  •  11 months ago
      That may be the case in FL, NV, spots of CA and some other places, but here in MD, VA, NJ, and NY - prices are still way above median income levels.
    • Valhalla360  •  11 months ago
      This point needs to be restated: Housing has been flat over the last 100years when adjusted for inflation. This only makes sense. If you have the same amount of inflation adjusted dollars, you can only afford the same amount house. There will be localized volitility but long term you don't make money on them with any regularity.
      -
      You buy a house becasue you will live there for many years, not as an investement.
    • Canuck  •  11 months ago
      This is awesome. I am a young adult still living at home saving up cash for a down payment. Keep the drops coming!
    • A Yahoo! User  •  11 months ago
      Basic economics.

      Housing prices will drop until the average house is around 3 times the average income, 4 at the absolute max. That is the only stable, sustainable price for a house - it is all you pay back in a 30 year mortgage and still have a life.

      This means that electricians, plumbers, dry-wallers - bascially, all the trades that had their salaries double and triple during the boom - have to see their real wages reduced by as much as 50% before the industry will be competitive again.

      And realtors - they are already struggling to justify their existence, much less the 6% fee they charge. All the information is readily available online - actually, more information than realtors disclose. Realtors should be fixed fee, not commission.

      There is still a lot of pain to come.
    • dennis  •  11 months ago
      Cost of replacement becomes part of the equation at some point.
      Housing and oil both have costs to replace and market.
      Devaluation of the US Dollar is the other major factor.
      Shiller is an expert and look where we are with all the experts running the show.
      Income to debt ratio is the key.
      Think for yourself to succeed.
    • Ron Paul 2012  •  11 months ago
      As long as there are property tax and association fees for your home you are still borrowing the land from your lord. Stop paying either of them if you don't believe me and see what happens to your paid off home.
    • Irene P  •  11 months ago
      If the housing market is harder to foreccast than the weather then why do it?
    • outofnewmarket  •  11 months ago
      The downside is the price of energy to heat your house and property taxes. In my state the property tax keeps going up and the valuation keeps going up regardless of real comps or reality for that matter.

      When you factor in 3-4K to heat a home with the thermostat at an uncomfortable 62F all winter and the area towns refusing to reduce any spending (I pay 7K a year for a really old home) owning a home is way out of line with the new wage basis today.

      My advice as a homeowner, rent. The whole system is completely broken.
    • somebody  •  11 months ago
      I agree with him based on I know with the current trade rules. That ofcourse are totally backed by the corporate lobbyist. Wages will continue to drop and home prices will be forced to follow. Dont forget also when interest rates start to go up that will increase morgage payments, So people will forced to sell even cheaper to keep morgage payments at a rate the buyers can afford.
      They told us the global economy would be good for us. What they meant was it would be good for the corporations
    • the anti-liberal  •  11 months ago
      Housing will definitely fall another 25% or so but that doesn't mean home ownership is a bad thing. I would much rather own than rent. The problem is most people buy more house than is necessary. I have a 1500sqft house with a 2 1/2 car attached garage on a 1/2 acre lot in St. Clair Shores, Mi. My house payment is under $500. My neighbor who is renting pays $1200/mo has no garage half the lot and 900sqft. house. The property taxes are falling which is making it even cheaper. You can't rent a house in the ghetto for my house payment.
    • Jeff B  •  11 months ago
      Good thing my house is paid for.

    FOLLOW THE DAILY TICKER

    The Daily Ticker covers the most important business stories of the day -- the economy, investing, corporate leadership and politics. The Daily Ticker picks up where Tech Ticker left off and is hosted by Aaron Task, Henry Blodget and Daniel Gross. Often serious, sometimes irreverent and always interesting, The Daily Ticker gives viewers a unique take on the business world's most crucial stories.

    Subscribe and RSS

    [X]

    How to subscribe

    Roll over each section to subscribe using Add to My Yahoo! or RSS Feed feeds.

    Yahoo! News offers dozens of RSS feeds you can read in My Yahoo! or using third-party RSS news reader software. Click here to find out more about RSS and how you can use it with Yahoo! News.
     
    Recent Quotes
    Symbol Price Change % Chg 
    Your most recently viewed tickers will automatically show up here if you type a ticker in the "Enter symbol/company" at the bottom of this module.
    You need to enable your browser cookies to view your most recent quotes.
     
    Sign-in to view quotes in your portfolios.