Thu, May 24, 2012, 8:54 AM EDT - U.S. Markets open in 36 mins.

Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Taken to Task: President Obama Needs to Back Elizabeth Warren

    One month from today, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau officially opens for business. As the name implies — the bureau is designed to protect consumers from predatory financial practices, with the goal of ensuring American consumers can choose from products where both the costs and the risks are clear up front...and that nothing is buried in fine print.

    Which brings us to a new segment we like to call: Taken to Task

    Millions of ordinary Americans were burned by the 2008 crisis, which revealed the financial system — especially the mortgage market -- was filled with unsavory characters and illegal practices.

    In an effort to prevent a repeat, the CFPB was created by the Dodd-Frank financial reform act.

    But one year later, no one has been named to actually lead the bureau, which is under pressure from Wall Street and its Congressional allies, who want to cut its funding and severely limit its powers.

    The agency was the brainchild of Elizabeth Warren, a longtime consumer advocate and expert on personal bankruptcies.

    Last fall, President Obama named Warren as Assistant to the President and Special Advisor to the Secretary of the Treasury on the CFPB. That's a very fancy title but Obama declined to formally name Warren to actually lead the bureau, presumably out of fear she would not be able to win Senate approval.

    The Republicans — and a few Democrats - who oppose Warren deserve criticism. I'd actually pay good money to see some bullying Senators go after Warren, who looks like a kindly kindergarten teacher (and was in a past life) but is as tough as an NFL linebacker and smart enough to teach at Harvard, where she's a law professor.

    But the real fault here likes with President Obama, who I'd like to take to Task for not standing up for what — and who — he claims to believe in.

    More than 300,000 Americans have signed online petitions that champion Warren for the job of leading the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

    You can add my name to the list and I encourage all of you to let President Obama and your Representatives in Congress know that Wall Street already has plenty of friends in Washington and it's long past time for ordinary Americans to have someone competent, strong and committed looking out for us, too.

    Elizabeth Warren is a champion of the middle class and exactly the kind of person America needs to lead the agency.

    Aaron Task is the host of The Daily Ticker. You can follow him on Twitter at @atask or email him at altask@yahoo.com

    Yahoo! Poll

    Will Congress get anything accomplished before the November elections?

    Loading...
    Poll Choice Options
    • Yes
    • No
     
     
    Top Locations New York

    130 comments

    • Joseph  •  5 months ago
      it may work out yet. when "O" got cold feet, Warren decided to run for the senate in Mass.
    • denis d  •  6 months ago
      Champion of the middle class? Thats funny how people who fit into that bracket think thats "exactly" what we need but with all pride set aside the federal guide lines state a family of 4 starts at $20,050 but to be technical, your not out of poverty until that family of 4 exceeds $44,100. Thinking about where I grew up and the people I went to school with etc.... very few meet this guideline and according to recent polls the poverty of Americans is growing not yearsly like it used to be measured by, but rather, daily. Those who make up the vast majority of the economy happen to be those who by definition are poverty strickened citizens and as for the middle class? Thats a thing of the past seen as how your considered middle class when you yearly salary is over $100K per year for a family of 3, not 4. In short, America needs people who represent realistic indaviduals and those who have lived and are living in the exact situation they claim to represent however, those in DC will see to it that this never happens as the simple thought of an "average American" representing the people is in their mind absurd. How dare us "regular" American people think that someone of that social class could have the knowlage or psychological intelligance to get anything done. Incase some of you fell asleep over the past 50 years, the democratic party has taken shape not to represent the average American nor by any means do they represent us rather they beleive that we as a people do not know whats best for us hence the reason for creation of so many government agencies that attempt to get indwelt into the daily lives of those of us who are trying to get rid of them. DSS/DCS was mentioned by Hillary Clinton as every American should be required under federal law to have a social worker in their homes if they have children, of coarse when asked later if she would agree to have one of these federally mandated social workers in her own home she quickly stated that "hell would freeze over before that would happen" as she stated, ("I know how to raise children and I did a role model job with "my daughter"). Lets not forget the good Rev Al Sharpton and the man who is on the 24/7 phone line with the Almighty, Jesse' Jackson who 3 years ago when republicans were pushing for the rights of all parents to choose to obtain a voucher and freedom to choose privat education for their children, please notice the quote of Rev Al ("There is no way that I or anyone in the democratic party will allow "others" to go to the schools we pay "big bucks" to send our children and grandchildren to. My grandchildren will not be taught along side of those who live in the ghetto) of coarse the only media who happend to play the actual recored video of responce was that evil Fox news but hey, I thought these democrats represented us? I thought they preached equallity for all yet when the "republicans" offered Americans the choice and chance for some of those children who grew up in the ghetto, a chance to go to a top private school, we as a people got stumped by the very ones who want to keep us in their controle.
      The point is even those in the media are living on there own planet. Idiots like that bimbo who demands a couple million per year to sit down and spew her opinion rather than report and factual issues? Yet she is the same type similar to Nancy Pelosi who will back up anything in attempt to creat a better legacy for their own story rather than the good of the people.
      There is a book out that was writte many years ago that covers how any and all positions in American Government needed to maintain a below average salary to discourage those seeking greed, wealth and power and to help allow those who wanted to run not only to represent the people, but who have the heart to become true public servents.
    • Pat Walsh  •  6 months ago
      not another dike.
    • Wal_ie  •  6 months ago
      ....
      Sponsored by

      ....Taken to Task: President Obama Needs to Back Elizabeth Warren
      ABSOLUTLY!!!! I never gave money to an elected position--I did Warren!
    • jamese  •  8 months ago
      Obummer's Warren waffle is absolute proof that we elected a cheer leader not someone capable of leadership. Another case of his speech's not being the same as his deeds.
    • Jimmy the C  •  8 months ago
      Has this clown ever heard of facts?
    • AverageJoe4  •  11 months ago
      The Government passes ObamaCare and then gives waivers in exchange for favors and political contributions.

      The Government has an immigration law BUT refuses to enforce it and denounces anybody who tries to enforce it. Again due to favors and political contributions.

      More regulations EXCEPT for those due to favors and political contributions!!
    • Harley Dude  •  11 months ago
      Maybe if you can't understand the term "Adjustable Rate Mortgage" you should not sign the contract.
      • Mike 11 months ago
        If only it were that simple, bro. Banks have gotten much craftier.
      • Someone other than you 11 months ago
        I wouldn't call someone saying, "You can afford it... home values are only going to go up and interest rates won't rise... you'd be stupid to not take this deal..." crafty. I think a lot of people are simply stupid.
      • David 11 months ago
        Maybe you should read "The Big Short", by Michael Lewis, or look a little further and you'll find folks who were told they were getting a fixed rate actually then got an ARM and were told "tough luck". In part I agree with you, but the real scam was way above and far larger than some dupe signing an ARM he couldn't afford.
    • AustriaU  •  11 months ago
      Wall street isn't the issue. GSEs subsidize the mortgage market and literally provide negative incentive for banks to limit volume or delinquencies. Why would a private sector bank put itself at a disadvantage in the industry when Fannie et. al will purchase any mortgage off their books no questions asked? Why would Fannie care about delinquencies when the treasury endlessly writes off their losses to taxpayers? System is broke, but it doesn't start with wall st.
      • Roger L 11 months ago
        The Boomers went on a two decade spending spree. Now they are looking at retirement with a mountain of debt and a pile of rusty toys. They need all the help they can get.
      • WISCHEESE 11 months ago
        I said years ago when this crap started, the taxpayers should have got the bailout, not the banks. People would have just jump started the CONSUMER BASED economy, and payed their debts with THEIR MONEY!

        WE ALL KNOW NOW NOBODY PAYS TAXES BUT THE MIDDLE AND LOWER CLASS!
      • Michael 11 months ago
        Do you do not believe we need the CFPB? I disagree.
    • Erkki  •  11 months ago
      Why do we need millions of wasted beauracracy to solve a simple problem. Don't allow interest only, neg amort and no down home loans. People need to learn to save for a down payment and establish credit before they purchase a home. You could also add provisions that tie the originator to the loan to encourage prudent lending.

      This downturn was caused by cruddy products, that were encouraged by political meddling (see home ownership as "American Dream"), greedy mortgage brokers (state your income to qualify for the size of home you want wink wink), GSE's that were allowed to buy junk, rating agencies (looking at their pocket books over jobs) and insurance agencies (credit default swaps=AAA subprime?). Just enforce existing rules. This consumer protection is political bularky and is hurting more than helping both banks and consumers.
      • NoSoupForYou 11 months ago
        confused. Fist sentence = no bureaucracy. Second sentence = we need regulation.

        "You could also add provisions that tie the originator to the loan to encourage prudent lending. "(more regulation) ...that is key IMO. Forcing a bank to eat part of the LT risk is fantastic. In this way the market will self-correct and force banks to lend properly with adequate financial products. That alone may solve the majority of the problem. Banks will fight that with every lobbyist on the planet...a good indicator its the right thing to do.
      • Jon Williams 11 months ago
        Not quite so fast, Yes you can force the banks to maintain at least part of the risk of the loan and that woudl help. But, you also need to ensure that the executive of the bank are held accountable when they cause (or allow wink wink) the bank to break the law.
        The root issue is not that the bank has no skin in the game, it is that the people who make the decissions are not responsible (in any real sense) for the consequences.
        Good luck on that though, we can even get a binding say on pay for shareholders and they are the owners, they ones doing the paying.
      • r 11 months ago
        Risk retention will be at the expense of the consumer, remember Wells Fargo tried to make 30% down the norm. On the other had it doesn't affect Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, FHA and VA so that makes up almost 99% of the mortgage market. Risk retention is a big joke.
    • Skedaddle  •  11 months ago
      I think the relevant questions are:

      (1) Is she qualified?
      (2) Is she fair?

      Her credibility on fairness (#2) has been tarnished by her research on how much health care costs have contributed to foreclosures. The timing of this research was questionable given the relevance to the debate over the PPACA legislation, for which she appears to have been rewarded with this position. Given her qualifications are based on her expertise on foreclosure, the first point (#1) seems also muddied. What I will never understand is, if a given case can be easily made, why do researchers so often seem to spoil the quality of research to fulfill an agenda or predisposition.
    • richard  •  11 months ago
      i think the woman kicks a-- and we need more people like that in govenment. especially someone that goes after the banker crooks.
      • Aunt Bea 11 months ago
        She's a political hack who doesn't know her a__ from her a_____.
    • Just thinkin'  •  11 months ago
      So many comments here are childish and ill informed. She, and the written intent of the agency, isn't there to prevent people from making dumb decisions (you smug geniuses), it's there to make the terms easily understood and to create standards of practice that don't destroy the economy when greed and super-wealth are the only rules in town. The abuses of predatory lending practices, long fine print sections that nail credit card users with progressively massive fines for minor errors, and a conscious strategy by lenders to extrapolate the strategies learned in the payday check business to the broader market do not constitute a free and open market. There is no such thing as a free market on this planet. Market rules are made by those with the power to make them, i.e. those who can buy influence in Washington. Trust me, if you are ever down ( and 90% of us have been or will be) and someone says "hey, have I got a deal for you" , like investments in things they own that have topped and they need a sucker to unload, or a home for a family that thought they'd never have one....you'd jump. Don't be so smug.
      • Walter 11 months ago
        And Affirmative Action was never intended to be a quota system, the EPA was never empowered to declare CO2 a pollutant, and the NLRB was never intended to tell businesses where they could build their plants. The road to ruin is paved with good intentions. In ten years (probably less) this high-sounding agency will morph into another bureaucratic monstrosity with tentacles that reach far into our lives. Thanks, but no thanks!
      • greg b 11 months ago
        The "long fine print sections" were a result of trial attorneys the kind of which were taught by law professors such as Prof. Warren. She is an academic with no real world experience. She really thinks a contract to borrow money with all the federal requirements of disclosure can be done on one page. She is another person from academia that this Administration is relying upon. Without real world experience, she and the rest of them will create more problems for small banks and credit unions than they will solve. Be careful what you ask for.
      • Aunt Bea 11 months ago
        Oh, grow up! You're probably still leaving cookies for Santa, too..
    • tizzy  •  11 months ago
      Bigger government isn't the answer! Maybe the emphasis should be enforcing the lending laws currently on the books, getting rid of Freddie & Fannie, not issuing loans to people who have no verifiable income and requiring a minimum of 20% down-payment UNLESS YOUR A VET USING THE G.I. BILL.
      The Federal government has failed at everything it's tried to do. Think I'm kidding, take a hard look at the USPS, AMTRAK, MEDICARE, MEDICAID, DEPT OF ENERGY, to mention a few.
    • Joe6Pack  •  11 months ago
      Wall Street does have too many friends in Washington, but the middle class does not need Elizabeth Warren or her beauracracy. Government is full of numbnuts that end up serving the plutocracy.

      As far as consumer protection goes, eliminate Fannie, Freddie and FHMA. Require 20 and 20 - 20% down and 20 years fixed OR BETTER. Eliminate too big to fail. Too big to fail means too big to gamble. If you gamble, you and your investors will pay the cost.

      Wall Street gave us the Internet Bubble, but did they give us Google, Facebook and others? I even question if they gave us Amazon, Apple and Microsoft? I think VC did.

      Wall Street is full of the same Corporate Entitlement Class psychopaths that make up Corporate America. Goldman Sachs is simply made up of the creme de la creme of the psychopathic Corporate Entitlement Class. Obama will only go so far to stand up for his bullshit beliefs. When Goldman wants his opinion, they give it to him.
    • Jay  •  11 months ago
      Elizabeth Warren is well meaning but she has no idea what she is doing. She is really creating a bureaucratic mess. Dodd-Frank bill?! We are going to follow the same people around that got us into this mess? Dodd essentially took bribes from the mortgage industry and Frank was directly responsible for the Fannie Mae\Freddie Mac mess. He looked the other way when this mess was being created. What they should have done was bring back Glass/Seagal which Clinton and Frank helped undo. Elizabeth Warren certainly isn't the answer.
    • Anonymous  •  11 months ago
      If you're too stupid to read a mortgage contract or a credit card contract, perhaps you shouldn't be allowed to obtain either? Government DOES NOT know better than you. It's just more of the same nanny-state in full-control of your life. NO THANK YOU!
    • Rich  •  11 months ago
      Warren is a nut case
    • Andrew The great  •  11 months ago
      Wall Street, home of the Con men playing with monopoly funds.

      Charles Ponzi would have prospered the past 20 years.

      Your a bunch of whores and two bit greenmailers and you would sell your mother for a deal and send her COD.

      If only the masses could rally and put a knife in the heart of the beast once and forall.
    • Freedmfiter  •  11 months ago
      Barney Frank , Chris Dodd and a Congress that thinks you can legislate behavior, are the real villians in the mortgage meltdown. Their policies with Fannie and Freddie gave the bankers carte blanch to wreck havoc with the market, and now they are going to fix everything with more regulation...YIPI !!!

    FOLLOW THE DAILY TICKER

    The Daily Ticker covers the most important business stories of the day -- the economy, investing, corporate leadership and politics. The Daily Ticker picks up where Tech Ticker left off and is hosted by Aaron Task, Henry Blodget and Daniel Gross. Often serious, sometimes irreverent and always interesting, The Daily Ticker gives viewers a unique take on the business world's most crucial stories.

    Subscribe and RSS

    [X]

    How to subscribe

    Roll over each section to subscribe using Add to My Yahoo! or RSS Feed feeds.

    Yahoo! News offers dozens of RSS feeds you can read in My Yahoo! or using third-party RSS news reader software. Click here to find out more about RSS and how you can use it with Yahoo! News.
     
    Recent Quotes
    Symbol Price Change % Chg 
    Your most recently viewed tickers will automatically show up here if you type a ticker in the "Enter symbol/company" at the bottom of this module.
    You need to enable your browser cookies to view your most recent quotes.
     
    Sign-in to view quotes in your portfolios.