Thu, May 24, 2012, 8:54 AM EDT - U.S. Markets open in 36 mins.

Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    “Tax the Rich” Could Be Winning Strategy for Obama, Politico’s Ben White Says

    Follow The Daily Ticker on Facebook here!

    With his approval ratings slump in the polls, his lock on the base slipping and his economic policies having little effect, President Obama appears to be trying a new strategy on the campaign trail.

    Since unveiling his jobs plan in front of Congress earlier this month and in barnstorming stops and fundraisers over the last few weeks, the President is showing a feistier side in an effort to turn the tide. Instead of shying away from claims his policies are fueling the fire of class warfare, the President has been embracing his position, referring to himself as a "warrior" at last week's stop in Cincinnati:

    "The Republicans, when I talked about this earlier in the week, they said, well, this is class warfare. You know what, if asking a billionaire to pay their fair share of taxes, to pay the same tax rate as a plumber or a teacher is class warfare, then you know what, I'm a warrior for the middle class."

    "He tried consolation, he tried 'the adult in the room strategy' to cut this deal with Boehner… his base said 'you're caving on everything. We don't like this.' They were threatening to basically revolt," says Ben White Politico's Wall Street Correspondent.

    Obama's "more progressive vision" to tax the rich is not a guaranteed winning strategy but it's the "only strategy" that can work, White tells Aaron Task in the accompanying interview. "He's basically decided at this point this campaign is going to be based on, 'here's my vision on how we're going to fix this.' Not necessarily what I've done so far on the economy because he has no story to tell there."

    The election outcome will likely be decided by the economy. If the economy dips into recession again or unemployment rises, Obama won't win a second term.

    White predicts Obama will face former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney in the general election in a "very close race." White thinks Romney could have a winning ticket if he picks Florida Senator Mario Rubio as his running mate. (Stay tuned for part 2 of this interview where White handicaps the GOP field.)

    Yahoo! Poll

    Will Congress get anything accomplished before the November elections?

    Loading...
    Poll Choice Options
    • Yes
    • No
     
     
    Top Locations Austin

    832 comments

    • Rose Black  •  Austin, Texas  •  1 month 2 days ago
      In all fairness, the fact that some people fail to understand giving a fair and equitable share is not only the right thing to do, it is the American thing to do. We have people right now who are defending this country and relying on us to keep it together long enough to bring them back alive, and if you are so self centered that you refuse to do what's right because you don't like it; you don't deserve to call yourself American.
    • Bucky Ruckus  •  7 months ago
      Obama is a "warrior"? LMFAO
    • aurw  •  7 months ago
      What this country needs is a newspaper that tells the truth, banks that service their depositor and, politicians that govern instead of playing the political game.
      • Cheeka 7 months ago
        that is exactly what Obama is trying to do!
      • William 7 months ago
        Amen brother!
      • JujuP 7 months ago
        Yeah, Obama's game playing is just awful.
    • Tom Joad  •  7 months ago
      GOP - Power to the Powerful!
    • Ronald C  •  7 months ago
      It's time for Democrats and Republicans to get a grip on what is good for the country not there special interest. Let's get rid of the lobbyist so the politicians can do there job!
      • CB 7 months ago
        LETS GET RID OF ALL THE POLITICIANS BOTH PARTYS DO LIKE ICELAND GET RID OF THERE CROOKED GOVERNMENT
    • storminNorman  •  7 months ago
      If we knew that "tax the rich" would work and lower the debt; then I am all for it. But they would only get about half of the "paper savings" because of loopholes and smart tax accountants which is less than 1% of the debt. Then even when they do collect the extra tax money, can you REALLY trust them to apply it to the debt or would they divert it to other "partisan projects". Look what happened over the 50 years of the"Locked box Social Security" fund.....Their first priority is Power, Greed, and re-election.......that's why congress has a 8% approval rating and 80% of the voters think the country is headed in the wrong direction.
    • FoxNuwsRTraitors  •  7 months ago
      The tax revenues increased and employment increased from 2003-2008 because of bubbles - not the Bush-GOP tax cuts. Proof: the revenue increases and employment increases disappeared when the bubbles burst - even though the tax cuts remained.

      If the tax cuts had been responsible for the growth, then the revenue and employment increases would have remained - just as the tax cuts remained. However, this did not happen!
      • dave 5 months ago
        Yet the republimorons keep insisting that TAX CUTS are good for the country and will create jobs. Funny how the rich make more and then KEEP it isn't it??.Then they spend more money on accountants and tax lawyers than MOST people make a year. Less money coming in as revenue means LESS money to spend and pay bills. This is not just how it works for most of us,its how its supposed to work for all of us,the government included !!! The idiots complaining about lower income people NOT paying taxes should be told how little money these people make,they can barely survive on the income they do have. They DO PAY taxes,but ,they get it back at the end of the year in a refund, The govt. gets to play with that money all year long before it gets sent back, so whos getting something for nothing ??.
    • FoxNuwsRTraitors  •  7 months ago
      Right now the total federal tax burden on US citizens is just 14.8% of GDP - the lowest in 60 years.

      The tax rate on the wealthiest 400 incomes - which averaged $345 million in 2010 - is just 17.2% - the lowest rate in at least 80 years - thanks to 15% tax rate on dividends and cap gains. If Conservative GOP trickle-down economic theory had any merit at all, US job growth right now should be extremely high - due to these historically low levels of taxation and tax rates - and the exact opposite is true!
      • FoxNuwsRTraitors 7 months ago
        FY2010 federal tax revenues = $2.162 trillion from CBO
        2010 US GDP = $14.660 trillion
        FY2010 federal tax revenues / GDP = 14.8%

        In FY2000, the year we had our smallest deficit, tax revenues and spending were both approximately 21% of GDP. Now spending has inched up to 24.5% of GDP since then - mostly due to unfunded GOP wars, their legacy costs each year - and the GOP medicare prescription drug program adding $60 billion of deficit spending each year while helping to bankrupt medicare. But revenues have fallen off a cliff due to the Bush tax cuts and outsourcing devastating the middle class tax base - from 21% of GDP down to 14.8% of GDP. Obviously, most of the deficit problem is a revenue problem - not a spending problem.
      • Law-abiding Citizen 7 months ago
        People like THIS is why there is a debt problem....Here's a HISTORY LESSON: The issue isn't revenues, it is SPENDING. Your limited, cherry-picked, numbers are "accurate" but misleading. If you review the whole picture, you get an HONEST assessment. Until Reagan, US Spending was less than 20% of GDP except for times of war. Reagan spent greatly, up to 23.5% of GDP, to combat the Recession left by Carter and his later budgets began trending downward until the following Recession that troubled Bush I. Between Clinton and Bush 2, Spending was between 18% and 20.7% of GDP until Obama took office...after that, US Spending has INCREASED to a 25% of GDP and is projected to be greater than 22.3% of GDP through 2016. By comparison, the receipts (i.e. revenues) under Bush 1 were up to 18.8% of GDP, which are comparable to the historical average of 17.9% of GDP since the end of WW2. Incidentally, the lower revenues SINCE 2009 are due to losses of the recession, NOT unlike the low receipts seen during the Great Depression (as low as 7% in 1940). If the economy improves, receipts will increase to above the historical average, WITHOUT any taxes targeted on the wealthy imposed by Obama. NOTHING will get better until the economy improves and in the current environment, MORE taxes on anyone can only hurt the chances of recovery. As I see it, a liberal either knows the historical facts or ignores them, if the former, then he is ignorant (perhaps intentionally), if the latter then he is a corrupt proponent of a dysfunctional ideology, either way, he is WRONG.
    • dennis  •  7 months ago
      Your party sucks. No your party sucks.
      Everyone agrees on one thing.......both parties suck.
    • denise  •  7 months ago
      Obama's next slogan: "Close the loopholes!"
      • JOHN W 7 months ago
        The US doesn't have a maximum tax rate, only a minimum tax rate. Let Buffett, Soros, and all the other lefteys write the government a big fat check. Put your billions where your mouth is!!!!!
      • Kevin 7 months ago
        Closing America is what he should say
    • Zoober  •  7 months ago
      Any tax increases should be required to reduce the deficit. Do not give these free spending idiots in congress that are clueless in efficiently spending our resources to waste. Congress acts like they don't know how we got to this place. Once a group has proven incompetence they should have their power removed.
    • Fish head  •  7 months ago
      It simply won't be enough.
    • old reb  •  7 months ago
      I will pay my 3rd quarter estimated tax on the 4th of October 2800.00. I don't object to paying this, but I do agree with Mr. Buffett, they paid their fair share in the past and it is time to (PONY) up their share of the cost of goverment again. I will also agree on cuts to some of our elected and appointed officils too.
    • Poison  •  7 months ago
      The discussion about taxes always brings up the questions of "fair share", "shared sacrifice" and "fair pay".

      Let's look at fair pay. The value of somebody's labor is a funstion of their ability to perform work. Some work is worth more than others (nothing to do with the value of being human). Employers have problems that need to be solved, some are more valuable than others. For example, the fast food franchise owner needs somebody to ask if you need fries with your burger. It is a problem, just not a valuable problem, and one that most people can solve, thus the pay is low. The heart patient, who has consumed too many fries with his burgers, has a problem too, he needs by pass surgery. It is problem and valuable one at that. One that not many people are able or qualified to solve, thus they get paid a lot to solve it. The punchline, there is good reason why the cardiologist makes more than the fast food worker. Do you want to live in a country that tries to force these two people into the same wage class? I don't.
    • Dr. Hootie Brown  •  7 months ago
      here's a site you can vote and get real numbers. Not bogus poll like media has. Springfielder com
    • FoxNuwsRTraitors  •  7 months ago
      In 2003 - the last time there was a change to the tax laws - 32% of Americans paid no federal income tax. Now 47% (or 51%) pay no federal income tax - without any changes to the tax laws.

      This shows how fast free trade/outsourcing/high tech are turning middle class tax payers into unemployed or low-paid welfare cases.
    • swebster1975  •  7 months ago
      The economy would only improve if we returned to the Clinton Tax rates of the 90s.......does that mean I get to go back to 1 dollar gas too.......
    • J  •  7 months ago
      How do you define RICH, as.in dollars?
    • STEPHANIE  •  7 months ago
      Another refinery closing in philadelphia metro area. Thats three total and at least 5000 jobs lost if something isnt done soon!!
    • Mel  •  7 months ago
      The rich are where the money is. Many top earners would willingly pay higher taxes for public services that promise high value. Yet trickle-down theory, which is supported neither by theory nor evidence, continues to stand in the way. This theory is ripe for abandonment.

      Robert H. Frank, an economist at the Johnson School of Management at Cornell University, is the author of “The Economic Naturalist,”

    FOLLOW THE DAILY TICKER

    The Daily Ticker covers the most important business stories of the day -- the economy, investing, corporate leadership and politics. The Daily Ticker picks up where Tech Ticker left off and is hosted by Aaron Task, Henry Blodget and Daniel Gross. Often serious, sometimes irreverent and always interesting, The Daily Ticker gives viewers a unique take on the business world's most crucial stories.

    Subscribe and RSS

    [X]

    How to subscribe

    Roll over each section to subscribe using Add to My Yahoo! or RSS Feed feeds.

    Yahoo! News offers dozens of RSS feeds you can read in My Yahoo! or using third-party RSS news reader software. Click here to find out more about RSS and how you can use it with Yahoo! News.
     
    Recent Quotes
    Symbol Price Change % Chg 
    Your most recently viewed tickers will automatically show up here if you type a ticker in the "Enter symbol/company" at the bottom of this module.
    You need to enable your browser cookies to view your most recent quotes.
     
    Sign-in to view quotes in your portfolios.