Thu, May 24, 2012, 9:50 AM EDT - U.S. Markets close in 6 hrs 10 mins

Contrary Indicator

November Jobs Report: Curb Your Enthusiasm

We shouldn't make too much of what seems to be a very positive November jobs report. The unemployment rate fell to 8.6 percent, and 120,000 jobs were added. As has generally been the case for the last two years, the monthly snapshot contained marginally positive — but conflicting — news on the state of the labor market.

Several key takeaways.

Rate Games. Each month, the BLS surveys people and asks if they've been working. It creates an estimate of the total number of people working and then divides that figure into its estimate of the total civilian labor force. The number of people who said they were employed rose from 140.302 million in October to 140.58 million in November, an increase of 278,000. (Good!) But the labor force fell, as people either aged out of the workforce, or got discouraged and stopped looking. The labor force actually contracted by 315,000 in the month, according to the household survey. (Bad!) This combination of more people saying they were working even as more people dropped out of the labor force helped bring about a sharp reduction in the unemployment rate. In a truly healthy labor market, both the number of people working and the labor force would be growing.

Hold the Exuberance on Payrolls. The agency figures out how many payroll jobs were gained or lost by surveying companies and asking how many people they have on their payrolls, how much they pay them, etc. Using the data from this establishment survey, it creates an estimate for the economy at large. BLS said 120,000 payroll jobs were added to the economy in November. While moving in the right direction, this number is something of a disappointment. That's about what the economy has been doing for the past year, and it doesn't represent any great acceleration. And expectations had been driven higher by the ADP/Macroeconomic Advisers reports earlier this week that projected a gain of 206,000 private-sector jobs for the month.

Conservative Recovery Intact. Another trend continued in November. In what we've labeled the "conservative recovery," the private sector adds jobs every month and the public sector — federal, state, and local government — cuts back every month. That happened again in November. The private sector added 140,000 jobs. Growth was driven by services industries, including retail (50,000 jobs), professional and business services (33,000), leisure and hospitality (22,000). Since bottoming out in February 2010, the private sector has added 2.947 million positions. Government employers, however, cut 20,000 jobs in November, led by a 5,000-job reduction at the U.S. Postal Service. Since April 2009, government has reduced employment by 692,000; it now employs about the same number of people it did in the summer of 2006.

(According to Bill Holstein, author of The Next American Economy: Blueprint for a Real Recovery, in order to keep America globally competitive more jobs need to be created in new industries like lithium batteries, new materials and nanotechnology. In the accompanying clip, he tells my colleagues at The Daily Ticker that this can only truly begin to happen when the government begins to work in tandem with the private sector. Unfortunately, Holstein is not optimistic this will happen any time soon because congress is more focused on partisan politics and just too out of touch with how to create jobs in this country.)

Slack Attack. By any measure, there's still an enormous amount of slack in the labor market, and in the economy at large. Compared with a year ago, 1.878 million more people had payroll jobs in November. Yet employment remains far below its late 2007 peak. BLS measures of how busy workers are stagnated in November — the average work week for all employees stayed the same, and the manufacturing work week fell a bit. While they're racking up record profits, companies don't feel compelled to part with more of their cash to keep employees happy. "Average hourly earnings for all employees on private nonfarm payrolls decreased in November by 2 cents, or 0.1 percent, to $23.18," BLS reported. Over the past year, average hourly wages are up just 1.8 percent.

Hindsight Looks Rosy. Every month, BLS goes back and revises the payroll jobs figures from prior months. For much of the past two years, the trend has been for BLS to revise those figures upwards. That continued. September's number, originally reported as 103,000 and revised last month to 158,000, was revised again — to an increase of 210,000 jobs. October's figure, originally reported as an 80,000 job gain, was revised to a gain of 100,000. In other words, looking back, BLS discovered another 72,000 jobs had been created.

Daniel Gross is economics editor at Yahoo! Finance

Follow him on Twitter @grossdm; email him at grossdaniel11@yahoo.com

His most recent book is Dumb Money: How Our Greatest Financial Minds Bankrupted the Nation

 

1,835 comments

  • 12know  •  5 months ago
    Obviously, the unemployed who have exhausted their benefits are not being counted. Plus, by the end of the year, unless Congress offers further extensions of unemployment, there will be an addition 2.5 million who will have exhausted their benefits and therefore NOT be counted as part of the unemployed.
    • kns1864 5 months ago
      I'm surprised Comrade Oblahma and the Democraps aren't trying to sabotage an extension of benefits. Dropping those 2.5 million from the statistics would lower the unemployment rate to well below 7%, then they could claim, "See, our policies are working." Garbage.
    • uncommon sense 5 months ago
      Whether or not a person has unemployment benefits is not a factor in whether they are counted as unemployed or not.
    • brandKNEW 5 months ago
      Or maybe, just maybe, people are actually getting jobs! Wouldn't that ruin your day right. "The country is healing.... Booooo."
  • Anonymous33  •  5 months ago
    I'm about to puke there's so much spin. First the alleged drop in unemployment is due to A) seasonal hiring and those jobs will be gone by the end of the month and B) the expiration of unemployment benefits for the latest batch of 99er's. Looking at the jobs created, they are almost all in retails sales and hospitality and they are all low paying jobs. By the way did anyone catch the graphic that said wages dropped by 0.01%. You can cook the books all you want but in the end all you'll have is a pot full of wet paper or ashes.
    • Bryan 5 months ago
      Low paying is better than no paying.
    • EricL 5 months ago
      Love that last line, Anon33! So true.
    • OldS 5 months ago
      What the number doesn't tell you is if the drop in wages was from more middle income/upper income workers being laid off. If you cut a bunch of higher salaries from your payroll, of course you will end up with a lower average wage......

      In one of my current jobs, they are "cherry-picking" positions to do away with. So far, most have been in the upper-middle to lower-high wage positions. At the same time, they have added more "entry" level positions. The net effect is a reduction in the average wage rate.
  • Wayne  •  5 months ago
    This is no news, these are temperary jobs for the Christmas season,it will go back up after new years
    • icemilkcoffee 5 months ago
      BLS jobs figures are SEASONALLY ADJUSTED.
    • RPC 5 months ago
      Exactly! No new real Manufacturing jobs in the US, Business TAXes have not changed (too high), factorrys are still leaving, Hi illegal Immigrants who broke our federal laws... Medical insurance is still way to high for a family... not good, Obama has to go!
    • Bill K 5 months ago
      Blaming the current economy on Obama is like blaming your town's new fire chief for a string of arsons that started 10 years ago!
  • H-Bomb  •  5 months ago
    Don't ya just love surveys, and fuzzy math. Add back that 315,000 that got discouraged from looking to all the others that stopped looking, and started actually working under the table, the real unemployment rate is more like 21.4%.
    • Gospel-truth 5 months ago
      nicely said
    • J 5 months ago
      Exactly and the unemployment under Bush was larger than reported, he was losing 750,000 jobs/month in the twighlight of his administration. Obama reversed that trend.
    • Brian W 5 months ago
      your math is ignorant and you have no facts to support you bogus statement
  • ANNMARIE  •  5 months ago
    If I remember correctly from other articles, the updated unemployment rate does NOT take into account those who are receiving the 99 week extension. Of course I want to see the rate go down, however this figure only serves the politicians for campaign purposes. It is still not even close to an accurate description of those who no longer receive benefits, who are no longer working on a full-time basis and those who are but took huge paycuts.
    • brian 5 months ago
      No, you remember incorrectly. It has nothing to do with unemployment benifit claims.
    • Georgia Girl 5 months ago
      None of these figures ever include the millions of formerly self-employed people who aren't eligible for unemployment when their businesses go under even though they pay into the system. Apparently you can't fire yourself and collect unemployment, but you can hire yourself and be required to pay unemployment insurance on yourself. All a scam!
    • ex 5 months ago
      Keep in mind how one can lie with statistics.
  • John  •  5 months ago
    When are they going to officially report the actual unemployment numbers? I can't believe that anyone would by stock today thinking that a contracting workforce is positive...
  • Richard  •  5 months ago
    So we can get unemployment down to zero if everyone would co-operate and stop looking for a job.
    This situation may not appeal to your common sense but it appeals to politicians.
  • bigd55  •  5 months ago
    And the spinning wheel keeps on spinning. Statistics can be maneuvered to mean anything you want them to. How many people do you kow who were unemployed got a job and if they got one are they making anywhere the money they were making before? I think we are still in the same mess we have been in. how about you?
  • DJ  •  5 months ago
    I personally never believe any government number. They are misleading and politcally driven. I believe what I see. And what I see aint good, not good at all.
  • L  •  5 months ago
    I want to know how the unemployment rate would change if they brought back 50% of the jobs they have shipped overseas.
  • Bucko  •  5 months ago
    Unemployment in this country is about 18%, not 8.6%. The media reporting is a big part of the problem in this country.
  • Ron  •  5 months ago
    The labor force actually contracted by 315,000 in the month and the labor force fell, as people either aged out of the workforce, or got discouraged and stopped looking. in November. The private sector added 140,000 jobs. Growth was driven by services industries, including retail (50,000 jobs), professional and business services (33,000), leisure and hospitality (22,000). Since bottoming out in February 2010, the private sector has added 2.947 million positions. THESE ARE SERVICE JOBS - WE DO NOT MAKE ANYTHING THEE DAYS THAT ANYONE REALLY WANTS O BUY EXCEPT GAMES AND TOYS Government employers, however, cut 20,000 jobs in November, led by a 5,000-job reduction at the U.S. Postal Service. NOW ALL WE HAVE TO DO IS REPLACE 534 MALFEASANT NIMRODS IN CONGRESS, THE SOCIALIST WEASEL WHO OCCUPIES THE WHITE HOUSE, AND ALL THE CABINET.
  • Wide G  •  5 months ago
    Some of this are real full time jobs, but it's mostly because of the holidays folks. It's not rocket-science. Come Jan it will go back up again.
  • charlesr  •  5 months ago
    I'd like to see 537 more people on unemployment: Obama, Biden and both houses of congress.
  • motorhogman  •  5 months ago
    They say "conflicting" I have a better way of describing it ! LIE !
  • Bug  •  5 months ago
    How ironic is it that the administration of "HOPE and CHANGE" has to ignore those who have given up HOPE to CHANGE the unemployment numbers?!?!?
  • Sundog  •  5 months ago
    Misrepresenting the unemployment numbers only benefits the government, not the people.
  • Teresa M  •  5 months ago
    Total #$%$ like always from the media . At best its part time christmas jobs that will be gone by Jan .
  • John  •  5 months ago
    Out here in Chicago there are neighborhoods that have never seen restoration or renovation in decades, there are cities new and old in the rust belt areas of the midwest that are dated, and declining with the decline of the manufacturing base. I am not a china basher, but we have taught them how to build an economy, now let's get back to working on ours.
  • DB  •  5 months ago
    Wish these reporters would give a realistic number not just who on the unemployment rolls. Sheesh. How many people are out of benefits? How many have stopped because there are not jobs? How many are working PT? How many are underemployed?

    Come on reporters - how about doing some 'real' homework and reporting how dismal the employment rate really is!

Get Daniel Gross News Sent to Your Inbox

Get Updates

Got a tip? Let us know!

About Daniel Gross

Daniel Gross joined Yahoo! Finance in the fall of 2010 as columnist, economics editor, and a co-host of The Daily Ticker. The best-selling author of six books, including Forbes Greatest Business Stories and Dumb Money: How Our Greatest Financial Minds Bankrupted the Nation, Gross has been covering politics, business, and economics for two decades. The longtime “Moneybox” columnist for Slate, he was a staff writer and columnist for Newsweek and a contributor to the “Economic View” column in the New York Times.

Subscribe and RSS

[X]

How to subscribe

Roll over each section to subscribe using Add to My Yahoo! or RSS Feed feeds.

Yahoo! News offers dozens of RSS feeds you can read in My Yahoo! or using third-party RSS news reader software. Click here to find out more about RSS and how you can use it with Yahoo! News.
Loading...
 
Recent Quotes
Symbol Price Change % Chg 
Your most recently viewed tickers will automatically show up here if you type a ticker in the "Enter symbol/company" at the bottom of this module.
You need to enable your browser cookies to view your most recent quotes.
 
Sign-in to view quotes in your portfolios.

Better, Stronger, Faster