Thu, May 24, 2012, 10:05 AM EDT - U.S. Markets close in 5 hrs 55 mins

Contrary Indicator

TARP Component Closes, Returns Tiny Profit for Taxpayers

Another TARP component has closed out — at a small profit to taxpayers.

When most people think of TARP, the Troubled Asset Relief Program, they think of the central component, the Capital Purchase Program, in which Treasury took equity stakes in hundreds of U.S. banks. But the TARP, like Walt Whitman, contained multitudes. While the CPP garnered the most headlines, it only accounted for a portion of the funds. TARP contained several other initiatives: aid to the auto industry and AIG, funds for mortgage modification, a separate program to help private investors buy toxic securities. (The full extent of the program can be seen in the TARP transactions report).

The small business and community lending initiative was one of the smallest components of TARP, a rounding error really. When the Small Business Administration makes loans, it bundles them up into securities and sells them to investors. In theory, securities backed by the SBA's 7a loans are relatively safe investments. The agency guarantees the lion's share of the loans. But when markets seized up in late 2008 and early 2009, there were few buyers.

Under TARP, Treasury was given the authority to spend $370 million to help unfreeze the market. In 2009 and 2010, Treasury spent $368.15 million to buy 31 securities backed by SBA loans. Over time, borrowers paid down the principal of the loans, and last June Treasury began to sell the securities to other investors — usually at a small profit. Last week, with the sale of the last eight securities for $63 million, Treasury officially closed out the program. The upshot: Treasury paid $368.15 million for the securities in 2009 and 2010, and received $376.2 million. That's a return of about $8 million, or 2.2 percent. It doesn't sound like much, but it's more than investors in two-year Treasuries would receive. Whatever benefit the small business and community lending initiative provided, it did so at no cost to the government or taxpayers.

Daniel Gross is economics editor at Yahoo! Finance.

Follow him on Twitter @grossdm; email him at grossdaniel11@yahoo.com.

His most recent book is Dumb Money: How Our Greatest Financial Minds Bankrupted the Nation.

 

28 comments

  • Thomas  •  Chicago, Illinois  •  3 months ago
    I think the "no cost" comment is incorrect, there to be a cost to pay for the people who setup, administered and managed the program. Funny they never mention that part of the "no cost" equation, still in the end a near break even isn't a bad thing.
  • JR  •  3 months ago
    Whaa, whaa, whaa is all I'm hearing from the cynical right wingers. Gotta hate, gotta hate, gotta hate etc. And what you have proposed as the alternative action? And what would that have costed?
  • soul.on.ice  •  3 months ago
    LOL at all the #$%$ off people claiming costs for overhead... don't be salty because a program you all expected to fail WORKED! now you all are just nitpicking and finding bulllshieett reasons to say it didnt... give it up assshoooles
  • Vanja  •  3 months ago
    There have certainly been failures within TARP (numerous banks closed or were seized after receiving TARP funds) and the jury is out on others (taxpayers still own around $16B of GM) but there have been numerous successes (annualized return over 20% on TARP monies repaid by Goldman and others) and I suspect, in the end, TARP will prove at least moderately successful.
  • Irene P  •  Hudson, Florida  •  3 months ago
    Please tell me how much of the 800 billion in cash that Bush sent to Iraq in 2003 and 2004 did we get back and how much profit did we make.
    • Tom 3 months ago
      Define "we". If you mean Haliburton then LOTS, if you mean the taxpayer well not so much.
  • NunYa B. Ness  •  3 months ago
    This picking and choosing of parts of TARP to say it broke even or made money is very misleading. Overall there are still billions outstanding that we will probably never see back.
    • frandrea 3 months ago
      Along with millions of jobs that never left.
    • Stephen 3 months ago
      It would be nice to know how many billions and where they were lost.
  • Tom  •  3 months ago
    Kudos to the Bush administration for implementing and the Obama administration for executing the program.

    I'm shocked that the Tea Party was wrong.
  • Sean  •  Portland, Oregon  •  3 months ago
    "" That's a return of about $8 million, or 2.2 percent. ""

    Hey liar, what do you want to bet that the administrative overhead WELL EXCEEDS that $8 million?
    • Casualcat 3 months ago
      wwaaaaa !!!

      He could have said he had proof that the earth revolves around the sun, and if Obama is involved it has to be a lie ....
  • Not Me  •  3 months ago
    The money is peanuts. The true cost was the abandonment of free markets in favor of a government managed economy.
    • TrueTeaandOccupyUnite 3 months ago
      Except if the gov't hadn't stepped in there would have been no market left to be free.
    • onemansopinion 3 months ago
      Well said TrueT!
    • Edd 3 months ago
      How many of the roads, bridges, highways, and internet lines you use all the time did that wonderful free market build?
  • H  •  3 months ago
    TARP was the tip, the secret loans is the iceberg...
    • Stephen 3 months ago
      The "secret" loans (I assume you are talking about the Federal Reserve) are short term loans that get paid back almost immediately. At no time have they amounted to more than a small fraction of what the media has reported. Relax, the world is not ending.
    • Tom 3 months ago
      You mean the "secret loans" that only you know about because, after all, they're secret?
  • Robert Dana  •  Charlotte, North Carolina  •  3 months ago
    While the article only touched on it but the govt made even more money from the banks. Many banks were forced to accept the money to hide the true troubled banks and they all paid it back with interest as agreed. For those of you with comprehension challenges...the banks paid their loans back. They didn't whine to the govt that the rate was too high or their bank wasn't worth what it used to be. So you homeowners out there who want to/have walked away from your mortgages, you need to look no further than the mirror to see who the real crooks are.
  • URFREE  •  3 months ago
    So the same government that allowed crooks to steal taxpayer dollars now gets kudos for turning in a 2.2% profit? What are you smokin dude? Gotta get me some!
  • Bryon  •  Cincinnati, Ohio  •  3 months ago
    Tiny profit? From borrowed funds that have not been repaid?
  • Patrick  •  3 months ago
    ha ha ha! from loan years back till repayment now, real value of USD has gone down 25%... the difference alone equates to absolute loss. OBAMA has been robbing you with devaluation using bernake's printing. NEVER FORGET THAT when you vote.
  • frank  •  Tucker, Georgia  •  3 months ago
    ANOTHER WONDERFUL GAIN ! LOAN IN PRESENT DOLLARS, GET REPAID IN INFLATED DOLLARS AND HE SPIN DOCTORS WILL DESCRIBE IT AS A GAIN.
  • Mozart  •  3 months ago
    So all those Bush bashers who said the TARP bailout of the Wall Street folks is just sour grapes! Bush had faith in his crony capitalist base. He knew that they would be able to generate a profit, eventually paying off the 0.25% gov't loans. Sure, that profit was based on lending the money back to the gov't by purchasing T-bills paying a tad bit over 2%. So it is no coincidence that Bush's elite, returned about 2.2% ROI to the taxpayers. And the bonuses that Bush's crony capitlaist buddies skimmed off the top, eventually trickled down, which is why Obama likes to take credit for the recovery started under Bush. You just got to love revisionist libs. They are just sooo jealous, that Bush's buddies paid themselves billions in bonuses, when they destroyed their companies, and the world economy. I can't wait for President Romney to destroy the US economy, and payh is Wall Street crony capitalists off too! That 2.2% return is looking mighty sweet!!!!
  • 'Fair'isabadword  •  Miami, Florida  •  3 months ago
    weren't supposed to make a 'killing'...just to help ailing businesses, and it succeeded..not as well as it could have because of so much republicon-filibustering and blocking and blaming and opposition and... well...u c what i mean...........................once, AGAIN, thanx, obama, for your part in being so responsible with your Elected position....
  • redman1974  •  Andover, Minnesota  •  3 months ago
    Let's learn this lesson and never, ever, ever, ever, ever, let the government get involved in a private sector function again. And while we are it privatize Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae
  • Chris  •  3 months ago
    SBA loans a profit? Do you know that the massive bureaucracy behind the SBA means for every dollar in interest charged there are $5 in costs? If the SBA were a bank it would be insolvent. It's been a travesty for decades and it ain't getting any better under Obama.
  • Bob  •  Needham, Massachusetts  •  3 months ago
    seeing that they used our tax dollars, and we took the risk to make some money; I'll expect a check in the mail; and seeing that Obama considers me rich and puts me in the 33% bracket I'll expect a larger portion.Of course those of you that do not pay any taxes, and live off what I pay don't deserve anything.

Get Daniel Gross News Sent to Your Inbox

Get Updates

Got a tip? Let us know!

About Daniel Gross

Daniel Gross joined Yahoo! Finance in the fall of 2010 as columnist, economics editor, and a co-host of The Daily Ticker. The best-selling author of six books, including Forbes Greatest Business Stories and Dumb Money: How Our Greatest Financial Minds Bankrupted the Nation, Gross has been covering politics, business, and economics for two decades. The longtime “Moneybox” columnist for Slate, he was a staff writer and columnist for Newsweek and a contributor to the “Economic View” column in the New York Times.

Subscribe and RSS

[X]

How to subscribe

Roll over each section to subscribe using Add to My Yahoo! or RSS Feed feeds.

Yahoo! News offers dozens of RSS feeds you can read in My Yahoo! or using third-party RSS news reader software. Click here to find out more about RSS and how you can use it with Yahoo! News.
Loading...
 
Recent Quotes
Symbol Price Change % Chg 
Your most recently viewed tickers will automatically show up here if you type a ticker in the "Enter symbol/company" at the bottom of this module.
You need to enable your browser cookies to view your most recent quotes.
 
Sign-in to view quotes in your portfolios.

Better, Stronger, Faster