The Exchange

Big Data Could Create an Era of Big Discrimination

The Exchange
Kate Crawford
.

View photo

Kate Crawford is a Principal Researcher at Microsoft Research, a Visiting Professor at the MIT Center for Civic Media and a Senior Fellow at the Information Law Institute at NYU.

Personal data harvested by marketers is growing so vast and far reaching that it is threatening to unleash a new wave of digital discrimination, one that ordinary people won't even be able to see happening, Microsoft principal researcher Kate Crawford is warning.

Combining the troves of information collected by retailers, mobile carriers, Internet companies and others into massive databases creates so-called big data sets. Computers then troll the data looking for patterns that can be used to make predictions about consumer habits.

“Some people think that big data is really quite fantastic because you're working at a mass level and therefore you can't actually conduct group-based discrimination,” Crawford said, speaking at the EmTech conference at MIT last week. “It's actually quite the opposite. Big data is not color blind, it's not gender blind and, in fact, marketers are using big data to have ever-more precise categories about you.”

A recent study at Cambridge University looking at almost 60,000 people’s Facebook “likes” was able to predict with high degrees of accuracy their gender, race, sexual orientation and even a tendency to drink excessively. The model could tell a gay man from a straight man correctly 88% of the time and predict race with 95% accuracy, for example. Government agencies, employers or landlords could easily obtain such data, Crawford warns.

A lender, for example, who didn't want borrowers of a certain race could show online offers only to people whose social network activity fit certain parameters. Banks must report detailed statistics about their actual lending activity to regulators, but web advertising parameters are seemingly free of discrimination. By never putting offers in front of unwanted groups, and thus never formally rejecting them, those who engage in online discrimination could sidestep fair lending and redlining laws that apply in the physical world.

Most concern about data collection has focused on the government, particularly after the revelations from former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden. Crawford welcomed the increased skepticism following the Snowden leaks but warns there is much potential harm from commercial misuse of data, as well.

“It's not that big data is effectively discriminating -- it is, we know that it is,” says Crawford. “It's that you will never actually know what those discriminations are.”

Another problem can arise when collected data isn’t representative of the entire population. For example, well-off people are more likely to carry smartphones than the poor. Two years ago, the City of Boston released an app called Street Bump that automatically sends reports about potholes using data from smartphone sensors. But the city had to be mindful that reports were more likely to come from areas with higher phone ownership rates.

Big data predictions and pigeon-holing can also be harmful when wrong. A decade ago, some TiVo users spent weeks trying to convince their machines to stop recording shows aimed at demographic groups they weren't in. "If TiVo Thinks You Are Gay, Here's How to Set It Straight," read one Wall Street Journal headline from 2002. Mistaken algorithms today could scare off employers, college admissions officers or others screening candidates via big data. "If I predict something about you and I'm right, that can be just as dangerous as if I predict something about you and I am wrong," Crawford says.

Crawford also wants to temper the excitement around studying real-time Twitter activity to guide rescue efforts during natural disasters. A review of activity on the social network during Hurricane Sandy last year, for example, found that the peaks of activity occurred not in places with the most damage or need for help, like the outskirts of Queens and Staten Island, but in areas where Twitter use was most prevalent, like Manhattan.

Databases are now combining a vast array of different sources – everything from the output of mobile apps and Web searches to radio tags on items bought at a store and phone-location trackers.

Even data scrubbed to remove personal references can be reconnected to individuals. Cellphone carriers are selling collections of data about phone movements, for instance, with all personal details removed. But a group of researchers from MIT, the Universite Catholique de Louvain in Belgium and other institutions looked at one such collection and were able to pinpoint 95% of the unique users by analyzing just four GPS time and location stamps per person.

Several years ago, researchers at Carnegie Mellon University were able to create a system to uncover Social Security numbers from birthday and hometown information listed on social networking sites like Facebook.

All the studies point to a need for additional protections and awareness, Crawford says. “We can't afford to set up a system with no opt out and no protections for its citizens,” she says. “Frankly, it doesn't take a science-fiction scenario to realize what is at stake.”

To keep up with all the latest tech industry news, follow Aaron Pressman on Twitter and Tumblr.

Rates

View Comments (446)