Friday, July 4, 2008, 11:07PM ET - U.S. Markets Closed for Independence Day.

Suze Orman Money Matters

Suze Orman, Money Matters

An IRA Nest Egg You Can’t Pass Up

by Suze Orman

Very Good (81 Ratings)
3.641978/5
Posted on Thursday, November 30, 2006, 12:00AM

I'll bet that right about now you're focused on all the gifts you want to get for your family and friends. But please don't overlook what I consider the must-have gift for yourself in any season: a non-deductible IRA.

That might not sound as exciting as the latest gaming console, but what if I told you that my gift idea could potentially create a six-figure retirement nest egg that's absolutely tax-free? Not tax-deferred -- tax-free.

A Can't-Miss Opportunity

Now that I have your attention, here's the deal: This past spring, Congress passed a new law that will make it possible for everyone -- regardless of income -- to convert their IRAs into a Roth IRA beginning in 2010.

That's a huge investment opportunity, because money you eventually withdraw from Traditional IRAs is taxed at your income tax rate, while all Roth IRA withdrawals are 100-percent tax-free if you've had the account at least five years and wait until you are 59-1/2 to make withdrawals.

While high income earners (singles or couples making more than $100,000) still won't be able to invest directly in a Roth IRA, this new ability represents a great opportunity.

If you've previously shunned IRAs, the best move you can make between now and 2010 is to invest as much as possible in a Traditional IRA. Then, in just over three years, you'll have a nice sum you can convert to a Roth IRA.

The Rules of the Game

Here's what you need to know about IRAs:

  • Everyone can contribute to a Traditional IRA, but not everyone can deduct their contribution.

    In 2007, the maximum annual IRA contribution will be $4,000 ($5,000 if you're at least 50 years old). If you aren't eligible for a retirement plan offered through your job, you're allowed to deduct your IRA contribution regardless of your income. Otherwise, the deduction is allowed only if you're single with income below $62,000 or married and file a joint tax return with an income below $100,000.

    The married limit rises to $103,000 in 2007. (If only one of you has a plan at work, the income limit for IRA deductibility is $166,000.) But here's what many higher-income folks overlook: If your income is above those cutoffs, you can still invest in a Traditional IRA and benefit from the tax-deferred growth of your account.

    The only catch is that you can't deduct the contributions that you make to your IRA. That's why this type of IRA is known as a non-deductible IRA. When you reach retirement age and make withdrawals from a non-deductible IRA, you'll owe income tax -- but only on the amount above the contributions that you originally put in.

    A non-deductible IRA is simply a Traditional IRA in which you don't get any upfront tax break on your contribution. Thus you don't have to pay taxes on those contributions when you withdraw them.

  • Not everyone can contribute to a Roth IRA.

    The rules are different here: Only individuals with incomes below $114,000 and couples filing a joint tax return with an income below $166,000 can invest in a Roth IRA. If your income is above these thresholds, a Roth is out of bounds.

    Up to now, that's meant that high-income earners have been shut out from directly investing in Roths.

  • Currently, not everyone can convert a Traditional IRA to a Roth IRA.

    As of right now, you can convert a Traditional IRA to a Roth only if your adjusted gross income is below $100,000. That's the limit whether you're single or married.

A Real-World Scenario

Here's where things get interesting. Come 2010, the $100,000 conversion limit vanishes. Anyone, regardless of income, can convert money in a non-deductible or Traditional IRA into a Roth IRA. No strings attached.

That brings us back to my original point: The best gift for high-income earners is to open a non-deductible IRA, because in 2010 you'll be able to convert the money into a Roth IRA.

Yes, you'll owe taxes on any account gains that have accrued between now and your conversion, but once you get the money into a Roth you have a 100-percent tax-free account.

Let's say you're 35 years old and decide to open up your first Traditional IRA by investing the maximum $4,000 this year, and then another $4,000 in 2007. When the max rises to $5,000 in 2008, you stash that sum away in 2008, 2009, and 2010. That's a total of $23,000.

Let's assume that in 2010 the IRA's total value has risen to $28,000. That's $5,000 in gains over what you originally deposited. If you convert the Traditional non-deductible IRA into a Roth, at that point you'll only owe income tax on the $5,000 in gains your account accrued.

Happy Holidays to You (or Your Heirs)

The new law even makes it easy to handle the conversion tax bill. If you convert in 2010, you can spread your tax bill over two years -- 2011 and 2012. (You can also choose to convert smaller amounts over as many years as you want as a way of minimizing your tax bill in any single year.)

Once you convert the money, that $28,000 grows tax-free. And if for whatever reason in 2016 (five years after your conversion) you happen to need money, you can withdraw any amount from your converted Roth IRA up to the $28,000 without any additional tax or penalty, even though you'd only be 45 old.

But let's assume you won't touch the money. If you convert the $28,000 in 2010 and it keeps growing at an average of 8 percent a year for the next 20 years, you'll have more than $130,000. That's $130,000 that Uncle Sam doesn't get a penny of.

Even better; if you don't need the money in retirement, you can just let it sit untouched for your heirs to eventually inherit. With a Traditional IRA, you must start making withdrawals by age 70-1/2.

Now do you see why I think you can't afford to pass this up? It's a potential six-figure-plus gift to yourself or your heirs.

Rate This story

Very Good (81 Ratings)
3.5/5
Sign-in to rate!

18 Comments

Showing comments 1-5 of 18Next >>
Sort: first to last
  • jdude - Wednesday, August 29, 2007, 12:01PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 4/5

    In response to biggnick18, keep in mind that if you're a high income earner that can't deduct traditional IRA investments, then you can't invest in a Roth to begin with. So your choices become invest in the traditional, convert to Roth in 2010 and pay the taxes, and never pay tax again on it. Or, don't convert and pay taxes when you start taking distributions while getting tax free growth in the meantime. Or, forget the IRA all together and pay taxes as you go. You're a high income earner, throw out the pay as you go option - better to have the investment grow tax free. So we are left with the convert or not-convert option: If in 2010 you still have a ways to go timewise until retirement, the value of paying the tax upfront at conversion and then letting the investment run with no taxes ever again (either as you go or when distributions are taken - not paying as you go helps you investment grow faster) may very well be greater than not converting and paying taxes when you start to take distributions, since you've lost the benefit of tax free growth. So, the advantages depend largely on your time horizon.

  • Gonzo - Saturday, August 4, 2007, 3:58PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 4/5

    How is this beneficial to high income earners? you still get taxed up front when you contribute to the Traditional IRA and the money you make between now and 2010 gets taxed during the conversion. Thats essentially the same thing as a Roth IRA - Taxed upfront but not on the back end when you retire. I don't see what is so special about this for high income earners.

  • marathn_man - Thursday, June 14, 2007, 3:08PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 3/5

    Its a wait and see game right now until we get to 2010 for possible law changes. At that point any deductible IRAs can be rolled into a 401k leaving nondeductible IRAs available for the ROTH conversion. Suze's disclaimer of "If you've previously shunned IRAs..." at the beginning of the article should've been more pronounced due to the dire unintended tax consequences that could occur with huge deductible IRAs out there.

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Tuesday, March 27, 2007, 6:33PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 3/5

    Good advice to check fairmark.com - it is an excellent information resource site. As to Roth vs. Regular IRA the really critical issue is to pay taxes when the rate applied is lowest - that might or might not be later neccessarily. Taxes are multiplicative - net value is what matters - many people and financial planners fail to properly account for opportunity costs. Note that Regular IRAs convert all earnings to be taxed as income so there is a loss of possible lower LTCG and now Dividend rates - taxed deferred earnings as a benefit via IRA accounts is not a given. Good aspects of this tax law change may be to allow and prompt a retiree to consider conversion to Roths as a means of reducing the RMD requirements and a better instrument for conveying estate assets.

  • gene47h - Tuesday, March 27, 2007, 12:12PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 5/5

    Does it still make sense to convert a traditional IRA into a Roth in 2110 if the person will be 63 years old?

Showing comments 1-5 of 18Next >>
The columns, articles, message board posts and any other features provided on Yahoo! Finance are provided for personal finance and investment information and are not to be construed as investment advice. Under no circumstances does the information in this content represent a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security. The views and opinions expressed in an article or column are the author's own and not necessarily those of Yahoo! and there is no implied endorsement by Yahoo! of any advice or trading strategy.

Own the Power to Control Your Destiny

Women & Money

With her signature mix of insight and compassion, Suze Orman equips women with the financial knowledge and emotional awareness to overcome the blocks that have kept them from making more out of the money they earn.

Buy "Women & Money" now.

More from Yahoo! Sources

  • CNN Money
  • Consumer Reports
  • Kiplinger
  • The Motley Fool
  • Business Week
  • Wall Street Journal

Sponsored Links

Earn From 3.04% to 3.35%
With AAA rated, GE Capital Corp. Not an offer of securities for sale.
www.geinterestplus.com
Forex Currency Trading
Trade Forex Online with GFT. Free Practice Account. Try Risk-Free Now.
www.GFTforex.com
Countrywide® Home Loans
No Closing Cost Refi Options. No Points or Processing Fees. Call Now.
www.Countrywide.com
stock information at Scottrade®
Trade stocks for just $7. Unlimited shares. Trade like the pros.
www.Scottrade.com
Forget Forex
Discover Which Currency Options Are Dishing Out Gains of 333% Or More.
www.MoneyAndMarkets.com
real estate Investments
Our experience brings superior investment returns to savvy investors.
www.wangardadvisors.com