The Allure of Superficial Leadership
by Ram Charan
Monday, December 28, 2009, 1:34PM ET - U.S. Markets close in 2 hours and 26 minutes.
by Ram Charan
How often have you known a leader who takes command of the room the minute he walks in, gets all eyes focused on him, delivers a fantastic PowerPoint presentation, and has everyone eating out of the palm of his hand?
When that happens, people think to themselves, "Now that's a leader!"
But as time goes on, the same leader makes terrible decisions or none at all. The people who report to him lose focus, the organization loses direction, and the business begins to flounder.
The so-called leader, it turns out, has no real ability to lead a business.
Style Before Substance
The issue comes down to style versus substance. Far too often, the people who identify, develop, and appoint leaders focus on the appearance of leadership. They miss the most important aspect of it: knowing how to run a business.
In his book Blink, Malcolm Gladwell notes that CEOs are on average three inches taller than the average male, and he attributes this fact to an unconscious bias. An imposing physical stature, he surmises, sends unconscious signals about who is or isn't a leader, and thus influences who gets picked.
It may be hard to believe that people are swayed by such superficial qualities, and height is clearly an extreme example. But there are many other traps that cause us to put the wrong people in leadership positions, with terrible consequences for the person and the business.
Are They Really Leaders?
There are certain types of leaders who aren't necessarily business leader. Don't assume you've found a leader when you find one of the following:
When you hear leaders making frequent references to their alma mater ("When I was at Harvard...") or the big successful company they used to work for ("When I was at Toyota..."), be skeptical. Such people may be trying to impress by virtue of where they've been, rather than what they've done as a leader.
I'm not against education or valuable work experience. (In the spirit of full disclosure, I'm a proud Harvard grad myself.) The point is that some people are taken in and choose such "leaders" either because they assume something good must have rubbed off, or because they think it's safe.
It isn't. You have to look at the person's skills and record of actual accomplishment to have any sense of the person's capability as a business leader.
Some people have a way of stirring up energy and excitement in other people. They conjure a vision of something great and appealing and have extraordinary communication skills that fire up emotion. People believe them, and want to go where they're going.
The ability to inspire others is indeed a wonderful trait in leaders, but not every person who can arouse emotion can link her vision to the practicalities of business, and emotion alone cannot get an organization where it needs to be.
When a spiritual leader, rather than a business leader, runs the show, the initial burst of excitement can be uplifting. But it inevitably fades when results fail to materialize.
One way people gauge a leader is by how smart she is. We can't help but be impressed by the person who reacts quickly, gets to the answer fastest, can speak knowledgably on a breadth of topics, and has instant recall of names, quotations, and numbers.
Sometimes such people let you know how well-read they are. But being quick on your feet is not the same as intelligence, and intelligence is not the same as being a leader. Do we want intelligent leaders? Absolutely. Just don't choose leaders based on raw intelligence alone.
A leader is running a troubled division. Margins are shrinking, quality is deteriorating, and customers are defecting. But he is undaunted by every piece of bad news. In every review, he assures his superiors that change is right around the corner.
He has a plan, meticulously detailed in charts and graphs. He wants you to trust him, and because he seems so confident and sincere, you do.
Optimism and confidence are appealing, but make poor substitutes for the know-how of addressing problems. And we all know that problems neglected have a way of growing. The person who promises the answer but never delivers on it is not a business leader.
Focus on Substance
There are lots of personal traits we want in our leaders -- things like confidence, intelligence, and communication skills. But if we want our organizations to be in good hands, we have to focus primarily on the substance of leadership -- whether the person really knows what he or she is doing.
If you're an aspiring leader, don't assume you were born to be a leader. Leaders are largely made, not born. You have to build your leadership capabilities. The time you spend polishing your PowerPoint presentations or building your reputation may get you ahead temporarily, but in this age of transparency, the inability to deliver results will eventually catch up with you.
You have to put at least as much effort into developing the skills, or know-how, that leadership requires. That's the subject of my upcoming book, and my next Yahoo! Finance column.








Know-How: The 8 Skills That Separate People Who Perform from Those Who Don't
The new grand theory of leadership. The breakthrough book that links know-how -- the skills of people who know what they're doing -- with the personal and psychological traits of the successful leader.
"What Peter Drucker's The Practice of Management and The Effective Executive were to the 20th century industrial age, Ram Charan's Know-How is to the 21st century global digital knowledge worker age." --Stephen R. Covey, author of The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People and The 8th Habit
View more from Ram Charan at Ram-Charan.com
Ask a financial question and get answers from real people on Yahoo! Answers.
Historical chart data and daily updates provided by Commodity Systems, Inc. (CSI). International historical chart data and daily updates provided by Morningstar, Inc. Fundamental company data provided by Capital IQ. Quotes and other information supplied by independent providers identified on the Yahoo! Finance partner page. Quotes are updated automatically, but will be turned off after 25 minutes of inactivity. Quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes. Real-Time continuous streaming quotes are available through our premium service. You may turn streaming quotes on or off. All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. Neither Yahoo! nor any of independent providers is liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. By accessing the Yahoo! site, you agree not to redistribute the information found therein.
Yahoo! Answers is provided for informational purposes only, and no Q&A is intended for trading or investing purposes. Yahoo! shall not be responsible or liable for the accuracy, usefulness or availability of any Q&A information, and shall not be responsible or liable for any trading or investment decisions based on such information. View Complete Answers Disclaimer.