Saturday, December 19, 2009, 5:44PM ET - U.S. Markets Closed.

Jim Citrin Leadership by Example

Jim Citrin, Leadership by Example

Hank Paulson: Man of the Moment

by Jim Citrin

Good (371 Ratings)
2.423176/5
Posted on Tuesday, September 23, 2008, 12:00AM
He's the man who is getting $700 billion to bail out the nation's financial system.  He personally drove the US government acquisition of insurance giant AIG and stepped in to engineer the nationalization of the formerly private mortgage behemoths Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. He cajoled Jamie Dimon and Alan Schwartz to consummate the fire sale of Bear Stearns to JP Morgan Chase with a promise of $29 billion in financing from the Fed only to decide a few weeks later to allow the equally venerable Lehman Brothers to go into bankruptcy.

Move over Senators Obama and McCain and make way for the most powerful Treasury Secretary to come our way in modern times.  He's Henry Merritt Paulson Jr., a.k.a. Hank.  He leads a department that employs over 110,000 people and important institutions including the IRS, the U.S. Mint, and the FBI.  But who is Hank Paulson? Where did he come from? What drives him? How has he changed since grudgingly agreeing to come to Washington in 2006 after a distinguished career culminating in becoming chairman and CEO of the bluest of blue chip firms, Goldman Sachs, and where does he go from here? 

To get at these questions and push beyond well known sources, I interviewed a cross section of current and retired Goldman Sachs partners, including two members of Paulson’s executive committee, as well as a variety of leaders from the financial community more broadly.  Let’s take each of the above questions in turn.

Who is Hank Paulson?

Now 62, Paulson was born in Palm Beach, Florida and grew up in a suburb of Chicago, Barrington Hills, Illinois.  As a youth excelled in just about everything he did.  He was an Eagle Scout, a star football player, and a talented student.  He attended Dartmouth College, graduating with Phi Beta Kappa honors in 1968, where he reveled in protecting his quarterback and breaking holes for his running backs as an all-Ivy League offensive lineman. He was a direct admit to Harvard Business School, graduating in 1970. 

As a person Paulson is direct and self-confident with a palpable inner strength. Some say this comes from his faith as a Christian Scientist, which prohibits him from smoking or drinking.  He and his wife Wendy have two children, daughter Amanda, who is a journalist for the Christian Science Monitor, and a son, Merritt, who owns minor league baseball and hockey franchises in Portland, Oregon.  Disciplined about keeping fit, Paulson has always been an adventurer, traveling the world, and developing a passion for and expertise in environmental work and endangered animal species.

His career has been a model of private sector accomplishment and public service leadership.  After receiving his MBA, Paulson went to Washington to become staff assistant to the Assistant Secretary of Defense at The Pentagon. Two years later he moved to the White House, serving as assistant to John Ehrlichman from 1972 to 1973.  He joined Goldman the following year in the firm's Chicago office and became a partner in 1982.  He rose through the investment banking group, becoming co-head in 1990.  At the end of 1994 Paulson became chief operating officer of the firm, and in June 1998 succeeded Jon Corzine (another famous Goldman alum now Governor of New Jersey) as chief executive.

When President Bush asked him to become Treasury Secretary, he is said to have balked; and for good reason.  The two prior Treasury Secretaries, Paul O’Neill, former CEO of Alcoa and John Snow, former CEO of railroad giant CSX, were regarded as largely ineffective and what’s more, the President had only two and a half years left in what was an increasingly unpopular term.  Paulson told the President that he would only agree to the job if he was guaranteed to have the authority to make an impact.  Since his confirmation by the Senate in June 2006, he certainly has had his authority and he certainly has made and continues to make his mark.

What Motivates Him?


People who know Paulson stress that his motivation is pure, to help achieve stability in the financial system and the economy.  He genuinely views his role as giving back to the nation and to the industry that has given him all of his advantages.  He has a deep faith in markets but also in a role for government, especially when markets break down. 

Paul certainly did benefit from the markets, which have afforded the financial opportunities from his career at Goldman Sachs.  While he took a significant pay cut moving into Treasury, it was from an atmospheric level, swapping out more than $20 million in annual compensation for a governmental salary of $183,500.  He also built an equity stake in the firm that grew to approximately $500 million which he had to sell prior to joining the Cabinet (like other federal appointees, he benefited from a capital gains tax exemption given to all who have to sell their holdings prior to taking office).

A $700 Billion Checkbook

Last Saturday, the Bush administration formally proposed a vast bailout of financial institutions in the United States, requesting unfettered authority for the Treasury Department to buy up to $700 billion in distressed mortgage-related assets from banks and other private firms. The proposal, which would raise the national debt ceiling to $11.3 trillion, is notable for its simplicity and the power it will bestow upon Paulson.  It would grant the Treasury Secretary unprecedented authority to buy and resell mortgage debt with no restrictions other than requiring semiannual reports to Congress. 

The bill seems certain to be approved swiftly by Congress, which is a testament to the credibility that Paulson has earned with his hands-on management of the current financial crisis.  It should be noted that a key part of Paulson’s effectiveness and credibility is based on the seamless partnership that he has built over the past two years with Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke (during the current crisis they reportedly speak up to ten times a day).  Together they forged the ambitious plan to buy $700 billion in troubled assets with taxpayer money.

To put the $700 billion in context, it is roughly equal to what the United States has spent so far in direct costs on the Iraq war and more than the Pentagon's total yearly budget appropriation.  Another way to look at it, spread across the entire population, it would amount to more than $2,000 per person.

I asked a leading real estate investor, who oversees a market-outperforming multibillion dollar fund, to give me his assessment of Paulson’s performance.  “I'm incredibly impressed with Hank Paulson's decisiveness, leadership and pragmatism,” he said.  “I remain scared to death of what the ongoing de-leveraging and reversal of years of lax credit may still lead to, but I believe that history will applaud his interventions.”

Another senior Wall Street executive told me, “Paulson has been very hands on and taken the captain’s chair.  He stepped up to the plate while the White House and Congress simply didn’t know what to do.  It is not an overstatement to say that Paulson’s aggressive interventions, with Bernanke’s support, helped prevent a crash of the world financial markets.  Like him or not, you have to respect him.”

How has Paulson’s Management Style Changed Since Goldman?

If you watch Paulson at press briefings or in Senate hearings, you get a sense of the man.  Some of the adjectives that describe him best are direct, intense, powerful, serious, competitive, can-do, and frankly, ballsy.  One of his former Goldman executive committee members said, “Hank hasn't changed at all since he was at Goldman. Literally.”  Another current partner added, “He is exactly the same, very forceful and willing to take the lead and take a position. But he also uses a strong team around him to affect the game plan.  I think he has done a tremendous job in the face of extreme pressure and be willing to make tough decisions. Thank goodness he is in the job.”

Where Does Paulson Go From Here?

Common sense would dictate that Senators Obama and McCain would plan to keep Paulson on as Treasury Secretary.  He has said publicly that after he leaves his Treasury post, he would like to play a leading role in environmental work on a global basis.  However, the aforementioned real estate investor, who like Paulson is a Dartmouth grad, has a somewhat different plan for the Secretary. “I’d like him to remain Treasury Secretary for the time being, but only until he accepts the role of Dartmouth's seventeenth president in 2009!”

Rate This story

Good (371 Ratings)
2.5/5
Sign-in to rate!

306 Comments

Showing comments 6-35 of 306<< PreviousNext >>
Sort: first to last
  • b - Tuesday, September 30, 2008, 7:53PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    Hank is a POS, ask heim where he got the 700 billion $ number (no data to support it, out of mid air), he's made for me the same cloth that got us here. Give a million to the 138 million tax payers, have them pay there homes & let the crooks on top flip for the bill. ThomJefferson is rolling over in his grave...

  • harmoniusdis... - Tuesday, September 30, 2008, 7:43PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    So government ie: Hank 'I won't let 'em tank' Paulson takes over operations of corporations rather than letting them fail and obliterate (like would be expected for joe avearge.) Mussolini had a term for it... something to do with the merger of state and corporate interests? Oh yeah! FASCISM!

  • Jesse - Tuesday, September 30, 2008, 3:58PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    the historic coverage is OK but that is where it ends. he has no thought plan and no understanding of what the true impact of his bias spending will result in. my quess is that objective logigal people will see him as without competence.

  • BenL - Tuesday, September 30, 2008, 3:40PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    You have got to be kidding me. Because from what I can tell, Paulson, Bush, and everyone else in Washington seem to have committed themselves to wrecking any confidence that the market may have had otherwise a few weeks ago. This current situation is largely a crisis of confidence, and the last thing we need to fix that is the President going on TV and saying that there's going to be 'grave consequences' if the bailout bill doesn't pass. What ever happened to real leadership in Washington and 'we have nothing to fear but fear itself'? FDR must be rolling in his grave...

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Tuesday, September 30, 2008, 3:06PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    Citrin, you just lost all credibility. Paulson is a disaster. All year he has advocated artificially propping up home prices, and he is convinced - or wants us to believe - that this will benefit the economy. Saying that artificially inflating home prices helps the people/economy as a whole is like saying inflation helps us on whole. It surely does NOT help a young couple trying to buy their first house. It does not not even help an existing homeowner trying to upgrade. It only helps those in over their heads or those trying to make a quick buck. Paulson is being socialistic trying to keep things on a more even keel that economic fundamentals will support. Recessions are not disastrous. They are part of the economic cycle. We need to swallow one right now for more prosperity long term.

  • Dzung - Tuesday, September 30, 2008, 1:59PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 4/5

    It's amazing how many clueless idiots read these yahoo articles. You should be thankful your house is still there and hopefully will continue to be there thanks to Paulson. Do some reasearch before calling your saviour the devil. Good job Critin.

  • CC - Tuesday, September 30, 2008, 1:26PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    if yahoo loves the bailout so much, let Mr. Yang pay for it! Stop the propaganda!

  • Robert - Tuesday, September 30, 2008, 1:21PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    What a clueless twit. Paulson is a typical bushleague appointee TOTALLY INCOMPETENT!

  • Jiggz D - Monday, September 29, 2008, 11:26PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    You obviously forgot to mention that when AIG got $85B from the gov't, Goldman Sachs has $20B exposure with AIG! For some reasons, I feel some connection between Paulson and the $85B. And this is no different from the $700B that Paulson is now asking Congress, which initially he wants to manage on his own without oversight! Mr. Paulson needs to resign or be fired ASAP for the good of the country! LET THERE BE NO BAILOUT! A WORKOUT MAYBE LIKE LENDING WALL ST. MONEY FOR 2% INTEREST!

  • Ken - Monday, September 29, 2008, 9:01PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    Also fails to mention Paulson's connection to the failed Nixon administration for which he was assistant to John Daniel Ehrlichman for 2 years. John was a key figure in events leading to the Watergate first break-in and the ensuing Watergate scandal, for which he was convicted of conspiracy, obstruction of justice and perjury. He served a year and a half in prison for his crimes. Paulson has learned to be a public crook/criminal for about 20 years. America, please bend over and squeal like a pig. Obama or McCain will not change this, American People will.

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Monday, September 29, 2008, 8:45PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    You notice the wall street types telling us how lucky we are to have people like Paulson and Bernake at the helm. I was an English major, and the more I learn about it, the more I think MBA's are morons. They are all about "free market solutions" for the little people, aren't they? Well, if these mortgage-backed securities are such a good investment, why don't we auction them off? Could it be that American tax payers are the only people they can get to take them? And that's only because the congress and George (F******)Bush tried to shovel it on us. They will try again. Just when you thought our leadership could not get worse! Do not trust them. They are putting H.U.D, Bernake, and cox on the "oversight" committee. CROOKS!

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Monday, September 29, 2008, 7:45PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    Paulson was just on 60 minutes and he admitted to knowing the finanical market was already in trouble in 2006. This story is one sided and wasn't researched very well. In Jan president said finanical market is good. 2 months ago he said we just need america to have trust. Now some forgein big wigs ask president what is he going to do and now they want to use 700 billion in tax payer money to bail companies that failed to do business properly? I can't believe someone can be so short sighted to write this garbage.

  • madmilker - Monday, September 29, 2008, 4:49PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/09/whatever_the_plan_is_paulson_t.html ......duh!

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Monday, September 29, 2008, 3:42PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    Finally politicians rise to the occasion! They could not see themselves going home to explain the bailout to their constituents. Ouch... now let the market work like it is supposed to.... It is going to get ugly for everyone.

  • wei - Monday, September 29, 2008, 2:06PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 5/5

    We should be happy that we have Hank in the position when we are in the huge financial crisis. He knows the market and the consequence it can have if we do not handle it in a right way immediately. That is, a serious, deep and painful recession where everyone would come out blackeyed.

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Monday, September 29, 2008, 1:51PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 4/5

    It would help us all if posters did some homework before ranting.

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Monday, September 29, 2008, 1:44PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 2/5

    I see this $700 bailout plan as nothing more than a threatening hostage note from a desperate kidnapper. And, the hostage died a long time ago. Henry Paulson and others have been threatening us for days that America's financial infrastructure will immediately crash and burn without the $700 billion bailout. NOT TRUE. How long has it been since Paulson said that? Well, we haven't crashed yet. Sure, some institutions have failed, and some have become stronger....and the stock market and been up and down. But, the stock market has a safety net to automatically close down to prevent another crash like 1929. Why hasn't anyone discussed the fact that a small percentage of Americans have PLENTY of money! Yes, America has PLENTY of money!....just look at the recent issue of Forbes "The 400 Richest People in America". Why does it matter if certain banks and lending institutions go bankrupt? That just gives opportunity for those 400 people and other American companies to buy up the failing banks, or create new banks and lending institutions of their own. Keep the government out of it! If there is demand for money, someone out there will supply it, and it doesn't have to be the American tax payer. I do NOT believe our country will "go broke" without a Wall Street bailout. In free market enterprise, if one or more companies go broke because of bad judgment or shifts in market demand, there will always be another individual, corporation, or investment company ready for the opportunity to take over. Just look at what Warren Buffett did recently with investing into Goldman Sachs. I say let the greedy and corrupt bad seeds of Wall Street die, and let's pass the torch on to a new breed of investors. Maybe the new investors will be more prudent. These failing financial companies have already bitten off the hand that feeds them, so why should we try to feed them again. WHY? WHY? WHY? Please listen to the economists from Harvard, Yale, MIT and University of Chicago who all say NO BAILOUT! If Congress insists on billing the tax payers for $700 billion, then use that money to fix our country's tangible infrastructure by building new mass transit routes, roads, bridges and schools and put AMERICA BACK TO WORK in our own country with all that money! Please don't throw away my money just to guarantee worthless and intangible Credit Swap Default contracts and other financial derivatives.....that, my friend, is a house of cards. And, I would be HAPPY to see it crash and burn. The sooner the better!!

  • John - Monday, September 29, 2008, 1:07PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    You've got to be kidding. Paulson just took 700 billion of our money and bailed out his friends and they will give him a multi million dollar job when we throw him out. That's why he doesn't care.

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Monday, September 29, 2008, 11:34AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    Who wouldn't take a two-year stint under Bush if it means getting a capital gains exemption on MILLIONS of dollars??!! Where has Mr. Paulson been for the previous two years as this financial collapse is occurring all around him? Asleep at the wheel and just another Washington bureaucrat! Send him to Dartmouth come January 2009 where he can manage their money!

  • "Jackson Cash" - Monday, September 29, 2008, 11:28AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    Citrin you are a fool. Paulson is nothing more than the grossest conflict of interest ever to game the public's confidence. Any fool that thinks that corporate elitists are more valuable than every man woman and child is ripe for an ass kicking. Mark Twain once said, "Always do what is right. In doing so one with gratify some and astonish the rest." This bailout for the rich is utterly deplorable and Congress and the American public should be ashamed for letting such a conflict of interest lead to the biggest corporate scandal using tax payers money in the history of mankind. Deplorable.

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Monday, September 29, 2008, 11:28AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    The bailout will be seen, in retrospect, as a travesty. Theft from the American people to feed the Wall Street fat cats at the very time when America can least afford it. And why? To purchase swimming pools, mansions, and new Maseratis for incompetent bankers. Are we really that stupid? And don't forget the runaway inflation that will follow. I wonder when we'll see the first $10 loaf of bread? Or the $10 gallons of milk? Congress better think again. How can they be so stupid? Paulson works for Wall Street, not the taxpayer.

  • Rosemary - Monday, September 29, 2008, 12:29AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    I'm no genius in economics, but I could see this disaster on the horizon two years ago. I have been totally appalled that Paulson, Bush, Bernanke and others in the know have repeatedly tried to pull the wool over our eyes, then acted surprised that this situation took such a bad turn. Come on now! Deregulation, easy money and greed over a long period of time have put us on this road to a downfall, and Paulson was a key player in the game. How can we be dumb enough to engage the guys who led us into this crisis as "a strong team to affect the game plan" to get us out of it? I've been around long enough to know the meaning of the saying, "Don't let a fox guard the chicken house." Here we are, hiring a whole den of foxes, not only to guard the chicken house, but to pluck the feathers from all of the chickens before they/WE are slaughtered! This is completely INSANE! ~ ~ Appalled Yahoo! Finance User

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Sunday, September 28, 2008, 10:05PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    Very sad... We need full disclsoure from all yahoo's writers on what and who they write about (not just stocks). What kind of circus is this? Once upon a time, the author worked at Goldman Sachs. Why is he writing a one-sided piece about a Goldman's ex-CEO boss? Alternative solution to $700 billion bailout: Warren Buffett purchased $5 billion of preffered Goldman shares, he also has an option to purchase another $5 billion in common shares. Let the free market system work like it is supposed to by asking 100 of Warren's buddies to each drop in $5 billion (as private placement offering) on this great deal that U.S. taxpayers do not seem to want to appreciate and understand...

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Sunday, September 28, 2008, 9:06PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    Man of the moment???? Paulson engineered the whole subprime scam by selling and marketing bad paper to other countries and banks knowing that the paper was worthless and homeowners would default. Paulson should be thrown in jail! Paulson and Bernanke have been consistently wrong about the state of our economy. They have both been saying housing has bottomed for the past 2 years and every month they keep being proven wrong. Once again, repulsive paulson will be wrong again in regards to this bailout. Its not a coincidence that Paulson used to be goldman sachs ceo and goldman is basically the only investment bank left. The bail out is to bail out all the rich executives that took excessive risk and now the tab is passed to tax payers. All these firms that went under, Lehman, bear stearns, aig..... All the executives from these firms are going to start a new firm. So taxpayers are stuck with their bill, and they are off starting a new firm making new money. This country sucks and I will never invest another penny in it. After I retire, im out of here. I recently just converted all my money to swiss francs, sold out of my stocks at dow 12,500, and will just buy commodities on this pullback. I lost all confidence is our inflation ridden, debt ridden, broken infrastructure, crumbling roads economy!!

  • TASADDUQ A - Sunday, September 28, 2008, 2:21PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    Paulsen, Bush, Greenspan, Brnanke are not public servants. They are doing good for their friends.

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Sunday, September 28, 2008, 2:16PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    How can we trust any one from Wall street? Even if we give benefit of the doubt to Mr.Paulson and assuming he has no motives to bail out wall street and honest desire to help tax payers, how do we know he is right? I just listened to brilliant forecaster Dr.Marc Faber, he calls for resignation of Mr.Paulson and Dr.Bernanke for failing to recognize the great financial calamity. The whole regulatory body failed in US government, just like law enforcement body failed with 9/11. FDIC could have avoided largest bank failure of Washington mutual, by taking steps, instead they sold it to JP Morgan Chase. FDIC could have come out and assured public, they could have raised deposit amount insurance up to one million at least temporarily, and ask the bank to offer CDs at a higher rate, then the bank would have had money coming in with little cost overhead. Head of FDIC should look for a new job else where in another field. It is an absolute shame they let Washington mutual go down the drain. Bank consolidations is not good. The big problem is government and union employees are not afraid of losing jobs even when they make huge mistakes; corp world is different, huge mistakes cause bankruptcies and all employees lose their investments and jobs. We have lawyers mostly as elected leader who do not know what to do, they are trained for litigation, instead we should be electing analytical minds from Economics, Business, Engineering, Mathematical and scientific fields.

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Sunday, September 28, 2008, 12:15PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    What a load of crap!!! Where was Paulson when Bear Stearns was falling??? He just wants to bail out Goldman.

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Sunday, September 28, 2008, 8:43AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    Do you really think "Main Street" is stupid enough to believe this crap?

  • Sandy Burger - Saturday, September 27, 2008, 11:22PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    Paulson is a criminal who will get justice from God. He will never be able to enjoy all the money he earned by taking taxes on hard earned income of common people. If I become a president, I will have him hanged

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Saturday, September 27, 2008, 8:46PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 4/5

    I sleep better knowing Hank Paulson is in the Treasury. If we could convince him to run for President, the US would be a much better place

Showing comments 6-35 of 306<< PreviousNext >>
The columns, articles, message board posts and any other features provided on Yahoo! Finance are provided for personal finance and investment information and are not to be construed as investment advice. Under no circumstances does the information in this content represent a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security. The views and opinions expressed in an article or column are the author's own and not necessarily those of Yahoo! and there is no implied endorsement by Yahoo! of any advice or trading strategy.

Recent Articles by Jim Citrin

More from Jim Citrin

The Dynamic Path

The Dynamic Path is a framework to live by if you aspire to reach your greatest potential in sports, business, public service, and life in general.

Based on three years of research and candid interviews with many of the world's most inspiring athletes and leaders, The Dynamic Path shows you how to develop the mind of a champion, avoid the "perilous perch," and build an enduring legacy, among many other personal transformations.

Order your copy today.

View more about Jim Citrin

More from Yahoo! Sources

  • CNN Money
  • Consumer Reports
  • Kiplinger
  • The Motley Fool
  • Business Week
  • Wall Street Journal

Historical chart data and daily updates provided by Commodity Systems, Inc. (CSI). International historical chart data and daily updates provided by Morningstar, Inc. Fundamental company data provided by Capital IQ. Quotes and other information supplied by independent providers identified on the Yahoo! Finance partner page. Quotes are updated automatically, but will be turned off after 25 minutes of inactivity. Quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes. Real-Time continuous streaming quotes are available through our premium service. You may turn streaming quotes on or off. All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. Neither Yahoo! nor any of independent providers is liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. By accessing the Yahoo! site, you agree not to redistribute the information found therein.

Yahoo! Answers is provided for informational purposes only, and no Q&A is intended for trading or investing purposes. Yahoo! shall not be responsible or liable for the accuracy, usefulness or availability of any Q&A information, and shall not be responsible or liable for any trading or investment decisions based on such information. View Complete Answers Disclaimer.