Sunday, December 27, 2009, 3:01AM ET - U.S. Markets Closed.

Jim Citrin Leadership by Example

Jim Citrin, Leadership by Example

Talent is Overrated

by Jim Citrin

Very Good (319 Ratings)
3.476486/5
Posted on Friday, November 21, 2008, 12:00AM
If you listened to the mellifluous President-Elect Obama deliver his acceptance speech at Grant Park on November 4th, you wouldn't be alone in thinking that his oratorical gift was naturally endowed. So too with Tiger Woods, who famously has been honing his apparently innate gift for golf since he outputted Bob Hope on the Mike Douglas Show at age two. Similarly, in describing his investment prowess Warren Buffett has oft been quoted as saying that he "was born to allocate capital."

We all believe that the world's best performers are different than us. And that perhaps unfortunately is true. However, you might be surprised at exactly how they are different and what truly accounts for their success. Conventional wisdom would explain that the super-human performers came into the world with a gift for doing exactly what they ended up doing and that they had the good fortune to discover their gift early in life. But as Geoff Colvin, Senior Editor at Large with Fortune Magazine puts forth in his ground-breaking new book, Talent is Overrated, it turns out that "great performance is in our hands far more than most of us ever suspected."

In my mind, Talent is Overrated has the three key elements that make a business book great: 1) It poses one important and specific question, 2) The question is answered authoritatively, with both facts and compelling examples and 3) The answer is counterintuitive. Put any of the best business books through this sieve -- Good to Great, In Search of Excellence, The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People, and The Tipping Point -- and they will pass this tripartite test.

Summary of the Book's Key Points:

Contrary to popular belief, what makes certain people great is not inborn talent. Rather, it is something called "deliberate practice," a sustained, often life-long, period of purposeful effort designed to improve performance in a specific domain. This turns out to be just as true in business as it is in sports, music, medicine, chess, science, and mathematics.

Deliberate practice is characterized by several elements: It is an activity designed specifically to improve performance, often with a teacher's help; it can be repeated a lot; feedback on results is continuously available; and it's highly demanding mentally. It is far different than the general notion of "practice makes perfect." Instead of repeating a task over and over again in your comfort zone, deliberate practice requires that you identify certain sharply defined elements of performance that need to be advanced and then work intently on them.

Once a highly specific capability is improved, whether it's mastering a passage from a demanding music composition, delivering an investment recommendation in a staff meeting, or answering a key question in a job interview, then it's on to the next step. Top performers get the help of coaches or mentors to select and design the best practice activity, repeat them to a stultifying degree, adjust their techniques based on objective feedback, and concentrate so intensely on their efforts that it strains their mental abilities.

If you are motivated to achieve, the fact that deliberate practice is extremely difficult is actually good news. Why? Most people don't do it or stick with it, so your commitment to do so will distinguish you. What makes deliberate practice so powerful is that it pushes you beyond what you can currently do and enables you perceive more, to know more, and to remember more than most other people.

Excellent performers perceive more by developing better and faster understanding of what they see. This is evidenced by the best typists seeing more words on a page than others and expert radiologists detecting subtle but life-threatening issues from x-ray readings that elude medical residents. Highly trained pilots are twice as good as new pilots at sorting through the cacophony of air traffic control; and in business and finance, the best performers understand the significance of particular information and data that average performers don't even notice.

Great performers in every realm also recall more. Jack Nicklaus could reportedly remember every shot he had hit in every tournament. The best direct marketers remember the results of every campaign and which specific variables caused the largest movements in response rates.

At the extreme, the effects of deliberate practice actually change the body and the brain. Endurance runners for example have larger than average hearts. But they weren't born that way; their hearts grew only after years of training. When they stop training their hearts revert toward normal size. When kids start practicing a musical instrument, their brains develop differently. Brain regions that hear tones and control fingers garner more territory. London taxi drivers, who train rigorously for two years on average, have been found to have larger areas of the brain where spatial navigation is governed. It is significant that the process by which the brain changes is very slow and requires many years of intensive work. Activities need to be replicated thousands and in some cases millions of times for the "rewiring" of the brain to take effect.

The fact is that great performers are different from everybody else. But the key points to recognize are, one that they didn't start out that way, and two, that the transformations didn't happen by themselves.

Colvin Speaks

In my interview with Colvin, he said "The heart of the matter is that this is demanding stuff. To excel, you have to pursue these activities at length and with intensity." He added that it's difficult to sustain the effort in something if you're continually doing a cost-benefit analysis. "You need to look deeply into yourself and select something you will find rewarding for its own sake to which to devote yourself." Of course, it's relatively straightforward to do this if you have a deep passion for an activity; but how do you discover it when it's not obvious? "You may not have the passion a priori," Colvin said, "but as you pursue an endeavor with focus it will often develop."

I asked Colvin how he is personally applying the principles from the book. In his work, which involves writing and speaking, Colvin is thinking much more specifically about the core elements of great performance and how each can be improved. For example, he cites the use of story in his articles. "It's much more effective to show rather than to tell the reader something important. I now review my writing and ask myself, ‘Am I telling or showing? How can I show more?'" He is also seeking feedback of editors and mentors much more than he has in the past. He advises you to find someone in your organization that you respect and know well enough to solicit genuine feedback and then focus on improving that which is most important.

Outside of work Colvin is applying his learning in an entirely different way - moving away from great performance. "I've changed my outlook when I play golf," he said. "I now understand the reality of where excellence comes from and know that I will never be world-class (he's a single-digit handicap). I can stop deluding myself which is actually quite liberating and have much more fun out there."

The implications of Talent is Overrated are important and actionable. For your career, the principles are essential because the standards of performance in business will continue to rise relentlessly driven by the power of information technology and the fact that you may well be competing in (and for!) your job with other workers around the world. Beyond your career, however, the book is incredibly exciting if your life is your work. It will show you how to maximize what you've got and what you can accomplish. There are also profound insights about how parents can create a home environment that encourages children to excel and about how great performance can be achieved and sustained late into life.

Colvin brings to life deliberate practice with a wide array of examples. He takes the reader deeply behind the common knowledge of how Tiger Woods, Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, Bobby Fischer and other "child prodigies" really became great. We see the true genius behind other renowned performers, such as Chris Rock as a stand-up comedian, Jerry Rice as the best receiver in NFL history, and Benjamin Franklin as an essayist. Colvin also convincingly draws on in-depth research on large groups of violinists, mathematicians, and other groups of anonymous high achievers. In fact, much of Colvin's research underpinning is drawn from the leading expert on great performance, Dr. K. Anders Ericsson, a professor at Florida State University, whose work over the past thirty years has set the standard in the field.

If you are motivated to devote yourself to becoming a great performer at work or in an avocation, Talent is Overrated will show you how to focus on an area and develop and pursue a disciplined regimen of deliberate practice. Doing this over the long term will lead you further than you may have ever hoped or dreamed.

Rate This story

Very Good (319 Ratings)
3.5/5
Sign-in to rate!

262 Comments

Showing comments 6-35 of 262<< PreviousNext >>
Sort: first to last
  • Pat - Monday, December 1, 2008, 9:21AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 5/5

    Reading the comments on this article is truly amazing. How can so many people miss the point? He is not saying, talent is not needed, especially in the realm of sports. What he is saying is that, yes, even Michael Jordan probably worked as hard as he could developing his talent. So can all of us. We can make it far in life by putting this technique to practice....this does not mean that I will make the NBA by shooting for 8 hours a day.

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Monday, December 1, 2008, 5:33AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 2/5

    Talent isn't over-rated, it just needs the help of other characteristics to achieve a level of success, such as dedication. You need focus and drive as well because truly, what good is talent, if you sit at home on the couch eating potato chips and playing video games all day long? Talent can be waisted. Yes, if you're a genious you can be a scientist, but you have to focus, plan, and work towards being a good one. You can't be a scientist without having studied and worked towards your goal.

  • Robert - Saturday, November 29, 2008, 4:12PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    This is the saddest kind of racism. What does Barack Obama have to do with Tiger woods?

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Saturday, November 29, 2008, 11:28AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    IMO this just points out the obvious. Hard work can make up for a lack of 'talent' to a point. Although, 'talent' without hard work is just a waste.

  • GeraldK - Friday, November 28, 2008, 5:24PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 5/5

    Right on!! Raisin

  • Dan - Friday, November 28, 2008, 11:34AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    Talent Is Overated, by Jim Citrin. Why not call this, I'm a hack with an MBA, and I want to play the sucker game with you people with more bad advice. Just look at the title and what we got stuck with in the government for the past 8 years. We got a President who got a D- minus in college economics and a movie to prove his biggest talents was driving under the influence, smoking, and basically bringing baseball teams, and oil companies into ruins, a Vice President who had to do the work of the President because the current President we have is clueless, but yet the Vice President of our country shot his attorney bird hunting. Thanks to this administration (and their disciples past and present) with an bountiful, yet endless amount of talent of destroying the economy and government, we have today the reason why Jim Citrin is the hack he is. An economy on the verge of collapse and two wars, one that we can get out of, the other a slow motion, long playing version, of Vietnam (with less casualties). Yet Jim Citrin says that supposedly talent is overrated? I think the only thing Citrin is trying to be is something relevant at a time when his opinions are equivalent to nothing at all. One can see this in his quoting of Colvin's advice when he uses Jerry Rice (NFL Hall of Famer), and Ben Franklin as examples. While Franklin is one decent example, an overpaid man playing a children's game isn't. It doesn't take a professor to figure that one out. BOTTOM LINE: Jim Citrin, who looks like a Gordon Gecco wannabe, is trying to feed more glop to the masses yearning for a economy salvation. Only problem, Jim Citrin, this isn't the 1980's of the Regan Era, and we the people are sick and tired of the platitudes, and the cliches. We want ACTION, not words. So quit giving us the glop, and doing something about the problem. Only problem is, that the talent you say is overrated, is about all you have Jim Citrin. Your game is great for talking in the 1980's, but we have heard enough, and we the people "ain't buying it!"

  • Greg J - Friday, November 28, 2008, 11:14AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 4/5

    I do not care for the title, because superior talent is not at all over-rated. Still, for those of us who are not gifted with out-of-this-world talent, we have to work within our means to get the most out of what we have. It has been my experience in the business world that there are very many ways to the top. True, those who possess a superior intellect and have a strong work ethic to boot go farther and faster than most others. Not all of us have a superior intellect, but we can all develop a better work ethic. That is a choice, and a lot of people choose not to work hard, no matter what their profession. I have seen many people of average intelligence do very well simply because they commit themselves to continuous improvement, work efficiently, develop relationships, manage their time and have a reputation for dependability. That formula is not enough to command a seven figure income, but it is certainly enough to get ahead. It has worked for me since the day I started college, and it will keep on working until the day I die.

  • Joshua O - Friday, November 28, 2008, 9:54AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 5/5

    I'm six feet six inches tall. If a person wants to be as tall as me and they work really hard at it for years and years will they get to be as tall as me? I am not making fun of this story. I know that sticking to something pays off but I am convinced that a significant portion of great talent is innate. It is true this would not come out without practice. However, as annoying as it sounds to people who work hard at something, part of it is truly a gift from mother nature.

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Friday, November 28, 2008, 6:01AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 3/5

    Agree: focusing and persistence are omnipotent.

  • Hunter C - Friday, November 28, 2008, 3:02AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    This guy sounds like a used car salesman, "Buy my product! Buy my product!" These bastards are nothing more than "hustlers" and con-artists with MBAs.

  • Heckster - Thursday, November 27, 2008, 7:09PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 5/5

    Anyone that buys this book has no talent. Anyone with talent will understand all this book has to offer from the very seed of it described in the review. That's enough for success, for a talented person. Talent is not overrated, and we need as much of it as we can get. Every week this book stays on the best seller list will be another indicator of how scarce talent is, and how many untalented people have gotten ahead by running with the pack, which helps explain why the economy is such a mess. We are plagued with sub par performances dressed to the nines. This problem is so big, that I just thank our lucky stars we are a hard working people, because that's what we'll be doing to dig out over the next three years. Now, is there anyone with enough talent to get the drugs out of our schools???

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Thursday, November 27, 2008, 9:30AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 2/5

    Talent is always overrated. Honesty and Integrity will never be overrated. Just imagine what if all of the principals in the current stock market debacle had been honest. What a novel idea!

  • Pete - Wednesday, November 26, 2008, 5:55PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 5/5

    great article

  • t - Wednesday, November 26, 2008, 12:36PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    So there is no such thing as genetic variability?

  • Daniel - Wednesday, November 26, 2008, 12:11PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 5/5

    It is curious to see how people inmediately rejects this idea that contradicts their believes so strongly. It is enough to take a look to some of the comments, and you can tell most of them haven tread the book. Personally, I have never believed in destiny, or bad or good luck. I think every person builds his own destiny, and I have lived my life according to that and I havent been disappointed. About the book, I think it is awesome. I personally go for the highest stantards in my life and career, and seeing this confirmation that great performance is achieved by intelligent practice, and also giving the initial tools to reach the places qhere you want to be makes me feel better about myself. It confirmes that evetrything is in your hands and you can go as far as you want to go, as long as play smart and work hard when is due.

  • Jack - Wednesday, November 26, 2008, 10:26AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    I cannot agree with the provocative title. Talent is the seed that makes "deliberate practice" fruitful. Some people have talent. Some people work hard. You can be successful being one or the other, but it is the rare person that combines the two. And those guys are the big winners.

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Wednesday, November 26, 2008, 6:03AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 5/5

    Unlikely, but it sure feels good to believe that talent is overrated

  • Norman - Tuesday, November 25, 2008, 6:57PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 5/5

    This excellent article explains the book and why the author approves. It is written clearly and entices me to read the book. This author is not required to echo the content of the book, as some comments would have us believe. Rather, he is to tell us of his impressions and reasons for or against reading the book. Objective achieved.

  • Lee - Tuesday, November 25, 2008, 6:05PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    I need to become a bank so I can apply for bailout money. Anybody have an idea on how to do it?

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Tuesday, November 25, 2008, 5:03PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 3/5

    Interesting but overrated. Junk science by an MBA. How can an MBA discuss scientific theories let alone develop a scientific theory when they shunned science classes? Is the author familiar with the scientific process? I suspect he has made a few anecdotal observations and has made wide sweeping generalizations to come up with his "Junk Science Theory". I'm sure he has thoroughly tested his half-baked hypothesis to make sure it is valid (Yeah Right!) Do I trust a scientist over an MBA? Of course!

  • ChrisF - Tuesday, November 25, 2008, 4:26PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 4/5

    If nothing else; it's what we'd all like to believe (even Tiger).

  • looneytarian - Tuesday, November 25, 2008, 3:36PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 3/5

    First thing to understand is that talent is not innate. There is very little that anyone with sufficient determination and persistance cannot do and do well if they wish. That being said, that does not mean that anyone can be a Mozart. Some people seem to have natural aptitudes in certain directions that allows them to excel in a given field. Even so, they cannot excel without practice and diligence. That does not mean there aren't exceptions or limitations. As much I would love to be able to, I will never be able to sing like Elvis, my vocal cords would sooner imitate a lion's roar. For most people, talent does not come from some mystical depth from within, it comes from practice, hard work, study, application, etc. As such, this means that talent in not overrated, it is underrated. The superstars of music, sports, of whatever field, are few... but make no mistake that they all spend HOURS a day practicing their trade. This amount of practice combined with an aptitude and love for the field is what puts them ahead of their peers. I would bet that anyone can be successful at most anything, but the trick is to find what you are good at and enjoy and then to either find or make an opening for yourself in that area.

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Tuesday, November 25, 2008, 2:08PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 5/5

    I would NOT buy anything this Black Friday... Sales are going to be Dismal and retailers will be marking down through the New Year. Wait, and for the same $, get the bigger TV next month.

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Tuesday, November 25, 2008, 1:51PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 5/5

    I hardly post comment in public sites. The wording and meaning of "Deliberate Practice" fit better than the words I used for my practices, which were the main forces propelling my self-improvement and accomplishments in variety of areas. So I feel compelled to share with the public, and accumulate the writing for myself and my company. Everyday I train the selected few in my small software company in variety of skills (mostly thinking and communication skills) using deliberating processes. It is great to see how well they progressed in few weeks. When I tell people about a good insight or skill, the first person to benefit is actually myself, because it forces me to clearly define and explain the complex skills I used, and most often discover even better insights and skills, and understand people indepth. Here is a simple example from yesterday. I had explicitly set goals for a manager to improve decision making skill. Yesterday his argument is that he doesn't feel comfortable to grant some engineers the access to a computer program because it is not secured to do so. So I asked him to argue with himself. Then he further said that 1) the account name might be lost. 2) Engineers might screw up. 3) He can start some programs in the machine and engineers just use them externally. So all these statements are just supporting himself, and he just can not argue with himself. Then I ask him to argue strongly in opposite arguments and comparative arguments. I had trained him on this arguing mechanism in the past but he just does not use it. Step by step, he counter argued himself that 1) more restricted accounts are already in use and shall be used to do the job, 2) the chances and severity that these engineers compromising the system is far lower than other threats, 3) starting the program only by him can not do the job. So he overturned his prior argument and made the decision. Next time he shall demand more improvements from himself. I admit that I do have some talent in asking questions to others and myself ever since I was a child. I actually did a lot of deliberating practices even though I did not knew I shall have used this word. I gained so much and had so much fun in software skills, business, individual and society behavior, evolution and human emotional quality, soccer, foosball, and recently the fall of credit economy. My practices fit principles of some books that I don't know and shall read to clarify. "Real experience is relevant and shall be matched to principles"

  • EdC - Tuesday, November 25, 2008, 12:42PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 4/5

    An interesting area for discussion. Another aspect to this is emotional intelligence. Sadly, when you grow up in a dysfunctional and abusive family, your EI suffers and you go through life with emotional baggage that detracts from whatever talents you might have been blessed with.

  • SANTA SEZ.... - Tuesday, November 25, 2008, 12:06PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 5/5

    I want to sooo bad to strike the faces & ears and twist noses of everyone who gives one star and talks evil of this man. This is talented writing made perfect through disciplined training; please take notes.

  • Benjamin - Tuesday, November 25, 2008, 10:01AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 5/5

    I agree that talent is overrated. I made it to the top by getting talented people to do my work for me. Benjamin Sora

  • John - Tuesday, November 25, 2008, 9:56AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    What about Newton's Principia? Is that not a book of accomplishment? Or Euclid's Geometry? Were those efforts made by people of "talent" or those who worked hard? Any article that makes the point that "Talent is overrated" and then proceeds to use child prodigies Tiger Woods, who hit a golf ball at 2, and Mozart, who began composing at 4, cannot be taken seriously. Practice augments those who are talented, but it does not make talent any less important.

  • chief - Tuesday, November 25, 2008, 9:50AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 3/5

    Jim Citrin's writing prowess is overrated. If his abilities in this article are any indication of his rhetorical skills, Jim's stock of knowledge is petty indeed.

  • SaveTheUSA - Tuesday, November 25, 2008, 9:14AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 3/5

    Age old argument of nature vs nurture. Common sense says that there are elements of both in most success stories. Don't get too hung up on it...work hard and focus and you will have success (albeit in varying degrees).

Showing comments 6-35 of 262<< PreviousNext >>
The columns, articles, message board posts and any other features provided on Yahoo! Finance are provided for personal finance and investment information and are not to be construed as investment advice. Under no circumstances does the information in this content represent a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security. The views and opinions expressed in an article or column are the author's own and not necessarily those of Yahoo! and there is no implied endorsement by Yahoo! of any advice or trading strategy.

Recent Articles by Jim Citrin

More from Jim Citrin

The Dynamic Path

The Dynamic Path is a framework to live by if you aspire to reach your greatest potential in sports, business, public service, and life in general.

Based on three years of research and candid interviews with many of the world's most inspiring athletes and leaders, The Dynamic Path shows you how to develop the mind of a champion, avoid the "perilous perch," and build an enduring legacy, among many other personal transformations.

Order your copy today.

View more about Jim Citrin

More from Yahoo! Sources

  • CNN Money
  • Consumer Reports
  • Kiplinger
  • The Motley Fool
  • Business Week
  • Wall Street Journal

Historical chart data and daily updates provided by Commodity Systems, Inc. (CSI). International historical chart data and daily updates provided by Morningstar, Inc. Fundamental company data provided by Capital IQ. Quotes and other information supplied by independent providers identified on the Yahoo! Finance partner page. Quotes are updated automatically, but will be turned off after 25 minutes of inactivity. Quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes. Real-Time continuous streaming quotes are available through our premium service. You may turn streaming quotes on or off. All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. Neither Yahoo! nor any of independent providers is liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. By accessing the Yahoo! site, you agree not to redistribute the information found therein.

Yahoo! Answers is provided for informational purposes only, and no Q&A is intended for trading or investing purposes. Yahoo! shall not be responsible or liable for the accuracy, usefulness or availability of any Q&A information, and shall not be responsible or liable for any trading or investment decisions based on such information. View Complete Answers Disclaimer.