Friday, December 25, 2009, 2:31AM ET - U.S. Markets Closed for Christmas.

Jim Citrin Leadership by Example

Jim Citrin, Leadership by Example

A Choice Between Wealth and What's Right

by Jim Citrin

Excellent (264 Ratings)
4.47727273/5
Posted on Wednesday, March 21, 2007, 12:00AM

How much are your honor and reputation worth? In the case of Gerald Grinstein, CEO of Delta Air Lines, it's worth well over $10 million.

This past week, Grinstein announced that he's refusing any and all of the compensation due to him, including cash, stock options, and restricted stock, when the No. 3 airline in the U.S. emerges from bankruptcy this spring or summer.

Instead, Grinstein has said that he'll contribute what he would have gotten in the post-bankruptcy pay due to him under his employment agreement to scholarships and hardship assistance for Delta employees, families, and retirees.

Two Views on Outgoing Compensation

Contrast Grinstein's words and actions with those of other recent high-profile cases, where tens of millions of dollars (or more) in compensation was awarded to chief executives removed from their positions for performance reasons. These individuals decided to accept what was legally due to them according to their employment agreements.

There are two views on this issue:

The non-populist view

The market for leadership talent is ruthlessly competitive. The market and the board of directors determine CEO compensation levels, and, in terms of separation, the board knows what it's doing when it makes an executive appointment.

The outgoing compensation usually includes not just a severance payment, but back pay in the form of accelerated vesting of already-granted equity. This is the reward for all the work an outgoing CEO did over the tenure of the position.

Why is there so much focus on CEO compensation anyway, when top athletes and movie stars often make more for a season or film than even the best-performing stewards of our nation's economy? It's a double-standard.

After all, shouldn't there be outsized rewards for giving up 80 or more hours a week; being away from loved ones for long stretches; dealing with the 24/7 stress of living in the glare of restive shareholders; and being the bottom line for all of a company's actions and performance?

Finally, when a company faces bankruptcy, the pre-bankruptcy-protection shares of stock are usually rendered worthless, so it's only appropriate to renegotiate that component of compensation when the company's reorganization plan is filed.

The Grinstein view

CEO compensation packages have simply gotten out of control. The ratio of annual CEO compensation to the average pay for employees rose from 107 to 1 in 1990 to 411 to 1 in 2005, according to the Institute for Policy Studies and United for a Fair Economy.

In addition, for Grinstein, it just wouldn't be right to take money that -- while contractually due to him -- isn't consistent with the spirit of what he's trying to accomplish at Delta: Make the airline the best-performing, most competitive carrier in the industry again.

Also, the compensation plan is intended as an incentive for future executive performance. Since Grinstein has announced that he'll step down once his mission -- bringing Delta successfully out of bankruptcy -- is complete, the plan shouldn't apply to him.

Deciding What's Right

For those faced with similar decisions, there are potential factors to consider:

Need: Can you support your family by foregoing the outgoing compensation?

Future achievement: Can you bounce back? Even in some of the most notable CEO ousters, there's a demonstrated track record of dramatically increased earnings, cash flow, revenues, and operational excellence.

Age: Are you of an age where you feel you can take the money and run into a smooth retirement out of the public glare? Or do you want to position yourself for your next chapter by foregoing the money in favor of securing the moral high ground?

Given that Grinstein is 74 years old, his decision clearly isn't based on a cold analysis of what's better for his career. Rather than preserving his reputation for the next gig, he's guided by his moral compass in determining the right thing to do.

United in Name Only

Grinstein is determined to do what he can. He says that he's completely committed to helping Delta achieve enduring success. By extension, he wants Delta to lead by example as a company.

As part of its compensation plan filed this past week, Delta will award 1,200 senior managers 2.4 percent of new stock in the reorganized company. That compares markedly with United Airlines, for example, in which management pushed for the top 400 executives to receive 15 percent of the company's stock when it exited bankruptcy last year. When creditors pushed back, the United executives ended up receiving 8 percent of the equity.

Delta is going much further in broadly sharing the rewards from the painstaking work and sacrifices required to turn the airline around, which included slashing costs and benefits for the entire workforce.

Nearly 40,000 employees, including flight attendants, baggage handlers, and reservation agents, will share in 3.5 percent of Delta's new stock, plus $130 million in cash. This total value of approximately $500 million translates to a meaningful $12,500 per employee.

A Solid Turnaround

For the record, Grinstein has achieved dramatic results since he became Delta's CEO in January 2004. He guided the airline into bankruptcy protection in September 2005, and led an aggressive operational and financial restructuring intended to keep the company independent.

Delta merged its discount airline, Song -- a hit with customers -- into the core operation, negotiated massive compensation concessions, laid off approximately 6,000 employees, achieved other cost reductions totaling $2 billion annually, and fended off a $9.75 billion hostile takeover bid by US Airways Group, Inc. in January.

During this phase, and quite against the expectations of its competitors, Delta went on the offensive and pursued aggressive international expansion of its routes. At the same time, it was able to increase average fares and passenger load factors. Thanks to all of these efforts, in 2006, the company achieved its first full-year operating profit since 2000.

If I were to advise a CEO on which path to take when leaving a company, especially if he or she was removed for performance reasons, I would strongly urge following the one taken by Delta's Gerald Grinstein.

Rate This story

Excellent (264 Ratings)
4.5/5
Sign-in to rate!

58 Comments

Showing comments 1-5 of 58Next >>
Sort: first to last
  • Bob - Wednesday, April 11, 2007, 7:19PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 5/5

    I agree that CEO compensation has gotten totally out of control & should be reduced drastically.

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Tuesday, April 10, 2007, 11:07AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    "Why is there so much focus on CEO compensation anyway, when top athletes and movie stars often make more for a season or film than even the best-performing stewards of our nation's economy? It's a double-standard." What is the role of workers in moving the economy? Is there any? Film Stars deal with loss of privacy, sportsmen, long practice sessions, physical and mental hard work, one mistake and they both are down. What about CEO? Does their one mistake can cause fall of their career - hard work of life? Apparently not! They make mistakes, a lot of them some of which go unnoticed and if major result in some dip in share price, not their career and personal life. (At most they sometimes get caught in scams: proportion not significant) They get away from many mistakes, cushioned by talents and hard work of managers, workers etc. They are not continuously judged in public eye like Sportsmen and Film stars. They sit in some air conditioned room somewhere or in the best available facilities and act as if they are working their butt off.

  • Bill - Wednesday, April 4, 2007, 9:21PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 3/5

    Perhaps there would be less money available for excessive ($10 million ) compensation packages for CEOs, if companies were forced by our government to pay their poorest employees the appropriate wage. Companies are not obligated or even expected to act morally, which is why it is such a surpise when they do. Our elected officials should act morally (or be replaced if they do not) and impose moral behavior on companies, such as forcing them to pay a reasonable wage, such as tying the minimum wage to inflation. If a company can only survive by screwing its poorest employees, then maybe we don't really need that company. Why would it be so bad, if the family that owns Walmart had a networth of $10 billion instead of $50 billion, and their employees made $9/hour medical insurance, rather the $6.25/hour without insurance?

  • ladrena - Monday, April 2, 2007, 6:23PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 5/5

    It's wonderful to hear that a CEO of a company would think of their employees and co-workers who would not be entitled to the same benefits. That's a smart move by Grinstein and a good move for Delta Air Lines.

  • ALBERT P D - Sunday, April 1, 2007, 8:17PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 5/5

    He is a highly moral and righteous man

Showing comments 1-5 of 58Next >>
The columns, articles, message board posts and any other features provided on Yahoo! Finance are provided for personal finance and investment information and are not to be construed as investment advice. Under no circumstances does the information in this content represent a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security. The views and opinions expressed in an article or column are the author's own and not necessarily those of Yahoo! and there is no implied endorsement by Yahoo! of any advice or trading strategy.

Recent Articles by Jim Citrin

More from Jim Citrin

The Dynamic Path

The Dynamic Path is a framework to live by if you aspire to reach your greatest potential in sports, business, public service, and life in general.

Based on three years of research and candid interviews with many of the world's most inspiring athletes and leaders, The Dynamic Path shows you how to develop the mind of a champion, avoid the "perilous perch," and build an enduring legacy, among many other personal transformations.

Order your copy today.

View more about Jim Citrin

More from Yahoo! Sources

  • CNN Money
  • Consumer Reports
  • Kiplinger
  • The Motley Fool
  • Business Week
  • Wall Street Journal

Historical chart data and daily updates provided by Commodity Systems, Inc. (CSI). International historical chart data and daily updates provided by Morningstar, Inc. Fundamental company data provided by Capital IQ. Quotes and other information supplied by independent providers identified on the Yahoo! Finance partner page. Quotes are updated automatically, but will be turned off after 25 minutes of inactivity. Quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes. Real-Time continuous streaming quotes are available through our premium service. You may turn streaming quotes on or off. All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. Neither Yahoo! nor any of independent providers is liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. By accessing the Yahoo! site, you agree not to redistribute the information found therein.

Yahoo! Answers is provided for informational purposes only, and no Q&A is intended for trading or investing purposes. Yahoo! shall not be responsible or liable for the accuracy, usefulness or availability of any Q&A information, and shall not be responsible or liable for any trading or investment decisions based on such information. View Complete Answers Disclaimer.