Thursday, December 31, 2009, 4:16AM ET - U.S. Markets open in 5 hours and 14 minutes.

Jim Citrin Leadership by Example

Jim Citrin, Leadership by Example

Xerox Duplicates Its Early Successes

by Jim Citrin

Good (82 Ratings)
2.768296/5
Posted on Tuesday, August 21, 2007, 12:00AM

On Aug. 1, 2001, Anne Mulcahy was named president and CEO of Xerox Corporation -- a corporate-America battlefield promotion if ever there was one.

A career veteran of the iconic company, Mulcahy started as a Xerox sales rep 30 years ago and worked her way up to become vice president of worldwide marketing in 1991 and president and COO in 2000. The 2001 promotion made her one of only five female CEOs of an S&P 500 company at the time.

Pulling Out of a Spiral

While that may have been a cause for some cheer, the company didn't have the luxury to host an elaborate celebration. It was in the throes of a near-death spiral.

Xerox shares had plummeted 80 percent in the prior year and the company had just posted a $281 million loss for the quarter -- its fourth quarterly loss in a row. Sales had declined for the first time in nearly a decade and, most urgently, the company faced a liquidity crisis, unable to borrow money to finance its daily operations.

Mulcahy was forced to take immediate and decisive measures, including selling billions of dollars in assets, laying off thousands of workers, cutting over $1 billion in her first year, and persuading banks to open up the credit nozzle.

At Peak Performance

Happily for the company's shareholders, employees, and customers, Mulcahy and her team were able to pull off these short-term fixes and get the company positioned once again for profitable growth.

It's been a stellar run over the ensuing six years, as Xerox has handily outperformed its competitors and the market overall. Its shares, for example, have risen over 115 percent compared to 15 percent for the S&P 500 and 30 percent for the Nasdaq.

I recently interviewed Mulcahy about the Xerox of today and how she's guiding the company going forward. Here are some highlights from our conversation:

Q: What's the single most important challenge facing Xerox today?

A: We're well into the transformation at Xerox from being a technology company to a services-led technology company, and this certainly continues to be the most important challenge for our future.

More and more of our revenues are now being delivered from services-led engagements, and there's less and less discussion about pure technology. Rather, our business is now about technology as an enabler to solve significant business problems that delivers bottom-line returns for our customers. For a company like Xerox, it's critical that our people really understand the services-led-solutions selling approach.

Q: How large is the services business today, and how does it compare with the time when you became CEO?

A: If you look at our annuity-based services contracts, it now represents between 25 percent and 30 percent of our revenue, depending on the quarter. About one-third of our revenues come from services-led engagements. A lot more of our revenue is annuity based; over two-thirds to be more precise.

But services-led engagements are now a double-digit-growth opportunity for the company, and that's really critical. Five or six years ago, our services business was diminutive. At the time the principal focus was on the price of the technology we were selling. That's not what customers are focused on now. They want a closed-loop proposal that incorporates capital investment, expenses, product, and service, and how the overall program delivers a return.

We all know the pressures on hardware margins, but the fact is that today customers are looking for returns that come with productivity and efficiency improvements and an integrated solution that drives a complete business result. They're less interested in a product that represents one component of the solution.

Legacies Earned

Q: Xerox has historically been known for two things: Innovations such as the copier, graphical user interface, and the computer mouse, as well as its legendary sales force. How has the organization had to adapt to this new services-led model?

A: I love this question, because these are legacies that Xerox has certainly earned. I think that's been a big piece of why we've been successful in services today. We've focused a lot more of our R&D investment on the solutions side of our business, to provide differentiated value through improved business processes and to create the tools that are required for customers to get greater productivity gains.

So we've been developing a whole new set of capabilities that differentiate Xerox from a lot of other folks out there -- our search tools, linguistic and translation capabilities, as well as many other opportunities surrounding smart-document technologies which we're inserting into our services portfolio. The innovation we see coming from our R&D centers and into our services offerings has been hugely important in creating value for our customers.

One of the historical aspects of a strong selling organization is a deep customer-centricity which is so fundamental now for a successful company. It's not just about the selling folks. We now develop on customer locations, for example. We have more engineers out there working with and talking to customers than we've ever had in the past. We're a leaner, more efficient organization, and everybody has to think in terms of the customer orientation.

This influences the decisions and investments that we make, all with an eye toward really creating customer value. We've shifted some of our investment, for example, from the sales force to our field organization, which is in many ways part of our transition from strictly technology to a services-led organization.

It's really about the knowledge we have about our customers and our ability to respond to the challenges and opportunities they put in front of us. Having a very strong heritage as a customer-facing organization is no question an advantage in thinking about the customer from a services perspective.

Dynamic Documents

Q: Xerox is "the document company." How is the traditional idea of the document changing, and what does it imply for Xerox?

A: The document is changing dramatically, and there's no question that we'll follow what we call the document container no matter what form it takes and wherever it goes.

Documents have always been static, but there's a change ahead to have active documents that can actually help do the work that's so time intensive and costly. For example, there's a transition to "smart documents" -- documents that have embedded intelligence and root themselves along business processes without manual intervention. Some documents will be automatically summarized or searched for in ways that are much more intuitive than technology allows today. Some will have sophisticated security technologies such as authorization codes, or even be "transient" documents that self-erase in relatively short periods of time.

This whole area of smart documents represents huge prospects for Xerox going forward, but we're just beginning to exploit these opportunities and their impact on the business world.

Leadership Values

Q: How do you think about leadership, and getting the right people in the right jobs at the right time?

A: I believe that one of the most important aspects of leadership in large companies is building great teams. Building great teams is really based on assessing and respecting what people do well and making sure that they're in positions where they can make the best possible contribution. It's the good-to-great analogy -- having the right people on the right seats on the bus.

I think about it as creating a team of people that has the capability to create broad "followership" across the rest of the company. That's the way to get large companies really moving, through the alignment of your people at the top with everyone across the company. This allows you to work across geographies, business teams, and products and move the needle in a fundamental way. This leadership dimension is the critical differentiator between good leadership and quite frankly management that doesn't really add a lot of value.

I'm grateful because Xerox has a heritage of developing really strong leadership, not just on the technology side, but on the values and people side, too. As a result ... it's a pleasure to be here.

Rate This story

Good (82 Ratings)
3/5
Sign-in to rate!

30 Comments

Showing comments 1-5 of 30Next >>
Sort: first to last
  • Yahoo! Finance User - Sunday, August 26, 2007, 10:51AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    Aren't they still on that "making products to break" so they can fix them. Who would want that. No innovation, a bizarre corporate culture. I agree with the other posters, they are posed for a nosedive.

  • jack - Sunday, August 26, 2007, 10:32AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    This company is too worried about the wrong things. The sales force is no longer the "cream of the crop". Very shabby and getting worse. Middle management is nothing but older sales reps who who excelled when there was no competition. Very comical. The business model is very similar to the Federal Government.

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Saturday, August 25, 2007, 3:12AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 2/5

    I agree with the "leadership" and "customer oriented" ideas. I have personal experience with 24' Fitness (an exercise club): the service is poorly managed and the staff is not customer oriented. No wonder they lose customers to competitors. They need a good leadership team that knows how to think!

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Saturday, August 25, 2007, 2:33AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    This was a PR record interview. No tough questions were asked regarding what real challenges lie ahead for Xerox. Xerox got off very lucky with the cooked books scandal. They were able to sell off a large number of assets prior to 9/11 when the implied value of the assets would have been half what the received. They avoided hemoraging talent by the grace of the dot com bust and 9/11. 9/11 provided much lower interest financial terms to refinance a large (7 billion) amount of debt. Then Ann and her team cut the benefits for anybody but the management team. Management was to "engage" the employees in the job challenges rather then financial rewards. Enter 2004 and the average engineer at the company now considers the job to be a 40 hr/wk job. The enemy is now corporate management instead of Canon/HP. Nor did the interview ask any tough questions of Anne's failed leadership in ink jet printer line which was going to take on HP. This was a 4 Billion dollar right off in 2001. She paid the disgorgement fines levied on the executive officers who cooked the books because it was such a small amount (21 Mill). Anne said it was the right thing to do and it was a trivial amount for the 3 executives who were held accountable by the SEC. Yet she is appealing a retirement lawsuit for improper calculation of retirement cash balance equivalents. The payout on that lawsuit for hard working honest retirees is 25 Million in 2007 dollars. What gives Anne. Do Paul and Rick have a lot of dirt on you? My has the revenue grown since Y2K. The company bought Tektronix in January 2000. Xerox had 15-16 Billion a year in revenue according to the restated numbers for 1999. Tektronix printers had about 850 Million in revenue. Combined that would put Xerox around 16.5-17 billion/year. Yet you keep highlighting this phenomenol 2% growth rate every quarter. Revenue is still about 15.5Billion per year. Where is the growth? The profit improvements have all come as a result of huge benefit cuts and RIFs. Not one bit of growth has been achieved. You have yet to release a significant coppier system which wasn't already well under development prior to the start of your watch. Come on Anne be honest! You don't know how to grow anything. When the numbers are adjusted for inflation, the revenue numbers for Xerox are down 21% since 2000! Profits are abysmally poor. Your SG&A is still excessive. Real talent has left the company. The only people who are staying are the managers with their bonus plan and the executive staff with you patting them on the back. Why don't you do to the executive/management bonus plan what you did for the avg. employees incentive plan. Cut it. See how many hours your managers put in when there is no incentive! Then you will understand why the crummy benefits will no longer retain or attract talent to this dying rust belt dinosaur "you know and love" so much.

  • WILLIAM - Thursday, August 23, 2007, 2:55PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    Sounds like she did a great job, but there are 60 thousand people that no longer have jobs. These were people that made XRX a great company, but a small group of leaders that changed its direction and almost put a great company out of business

Showing comments 1-5 of 30Next >>
The columns, articles, message board posts and any other features provided on Yahoo! Finance are provided for personal finance and investment information and are not to be construed as investment advice. Under no circumstances does the information in this content represent a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security. The views and opinions expressed in an article or column are the author's own and not necessarily those of Yahoo! and there is no implied endorsement by Yahoo! of any advice or trading strategy.

Recent Articles by Jim Citrin

More from Jim Citrin

The Dynamic Path

The Dynamic Path is a framework to live by if you aspire to reach your greatest potential in sports, business, public service, and life in general.

Based on three years of research and candid interviews with many of the world's most inspiring athletes and leaders, The Dynamic Path shows you how to develop the mind of a champion, avoid the "perilous perch," and build an enduring legacy, among many other personal transformations.

Order your copy today.

View more about Jim Citrin

More from Yahoo! Sources

  • CNN Money
  • Consumer Reports
  • Kiplinger
  • The Motley Fool
  • Business Week
  • Wall Street Journal

Historical chart data and daily updates provided by Commodity Systems, Inc. (CSI). International historical chart data and daily updates provided by Morningstar, Inc. Fundamental company data provided by Capital IQ. Quotes and other information supplied by independent providers identified on the Yahoo! Finance partner page. Quotes are updated automatically, but will be turned off after 25 minutes of inactivity. Quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes. Real-Time continuous streaming quotes are available through our premium service. You may turn streaming quotes on or off. All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. Neither Yahoo! nor any of independent providers is liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. By accessing the Yahoo! site, you agree not to redistribute the information found therein.

Yahoo! Answers is provided for informational purposes only, and no Q&A is intended for trading or investing purposes. Yahoo! shall not be responsible or liable for the accuracy, usefulness or availability of any Q&A information, and shall not be responsible or liable for any trading or investment decisions based on such information. View Complete Answers Disclaimer.