Thursday, January 7, 2010, 7:40PM ET - U.S. Markets Closed.

Jim Citrin Leadership by Example

Jim Citrin, Leadership by Example

Xerox Duplicates Its Early Successes

by Jim Citrin

Good (82 Ratings)
2.768296/5
Posted on Tuesday, August 21, 2007, 12:00AM

On Aug. 1, 2001, Anne Mulcahy was named president and CEO of Xerox Corporation -- a corporate-America battlefield promotion if ever there was one.

A career veteran of the iconic company, Mulcahy started as a Xerox sales rep 30 years ago and worked her way up to become vice president of worldwide marketing in 1991 and president and COO in 2000. The 2001 promotion made her one of only five female CEOs of an S&P 500 company at the time.

Pulling Out of a Spiral

While that may have been a cause for some cheer, the company didn't have the luxury to host an elaborate celebration. It was in the throes of a near-death spiral.

Xerox shares had plummeted 80 percent in the prior year and the company had just posted a $281 million loss for the quarter -- its fourth quarterly loss in a row. Sales had declined for the first time in nearly a decade and, most urgently, the company faced a liquidity crisis, unable to borrow money to finance its daily operations.

Mulcahy was forced to take immediate and decisive measures, including selling billions of dollars in assets, laying off thousands of workers, cutting over $1 billion in her first year, and persuading banks to open up the credit nozzle.

At Peak Performance

Happily for the company's shareholders, employees, and customers, Mulcahy and her team were able to pull off these short-term fixes and get the company positioned once again for profitable growth.

It's been a stellar run over the ensuing six years, as Xerox has handily outperformed its competitors and the market overall. Its shares, for example, have risen over 115 percent compared to 15 percent for the S&P 500 and 30 percent for the Nasdaq.

I recently interviewed Mulcahy about the Xerox of today and how she's guiding the company going forward. Here are some highlights from our conversation:

Q: What's the single most important challenge facing Xerox today?

A: We're well into the transformation at Xerox from being a technology company to a services-led technology company, and this certainly continues to be the most important challenge for our future.

More and more of our revenues are now being delivered from services-led engagements, and there's less and less discussion about pure technology. Rather, our business is now about technology as an enabler to solve significant business problems that delivers bottom-line returns for our customers. For a company like Xerox, it's critical that our people really understand the services-led-solutions selling approach.

Q: How large is the services business today, and how does it compare with the time when you became CEO?

A: If you look at our annuity-based services contracts, it now represents between 25 percent and 30 percent of our revenue, depending on the quarter. About one-third of our revenues come from services-led engagements. A lot more of our revenue is annuity based; over two-thirds to be more precise.

But services-led engagements are now a double-digit-growth opportunity for the company, and that's really critical. Five or six years ago, our services business was diminutive. At the time the principal focus was on the price of the technology we were selling. That's not what customers are focused on now. They want a closed-loop proposal that incorporates capital investment, expenses, product, and service, and how the overall program delivers a return.

We all know the pressures on hardware margins, but the fact is that today customers are looking for returns that come with productivity and efficiency improvements and an integrated solution that drives a complete business result. They're less interested in a product that represents one component of the solution.

Legacies Earned

Q: Xerox has historically been known for two things: Innovations such as the copier, graphical user interface, and the computer mouse, as well as its legendary sales force. How has the organization had to adapt to this new services-led model?

A: I love this question, because these are legacies that Xerox has certainly earned. I think that's been a big piece of why we've been successful in services today. We've focused a lot more of our R&D investment on the solutions side of our business, to provide differentiated value through improved business processes and to create the tools that are required for customers to get greater productivity gains.

So we've been developing a whole new set of capabilities that differentiate Xerox from a lot of other folks out there -- our search tools, linguistic and translation capabilities, as well as many other opportunities surrounding smart-document technologies which we're inserting into our services portfolio. The innovation we see coming from our R&D centers and into our services offerings has been hugely important in creating value for our customers.

One of the historical aspects of a strong selling organization is a deep customer-centricity which is so fundamental now for a successful company. It's not just about the selling folks. We now develop on customer locations, for example. We have more engineers out there working with and talking to customers than we've ever had in the past. We're a leaner, more efficient organization, and everybody has to think in terms of the customer orientation.

This influences the decisions and investments that we make, all with an eye toward really creating customer value. We've shifted some of our investment, for example, from the sales force to our field organization, which is in many ways part of our transition from strictly technology to a services-led organization.

It's really about the knowledge we have about our customers and our ability to respond to the challenges and opportunities they put in front of us. Having a very strong heritage as a customer-facing organization is no question an advantage in thinking about the customer from a services perspective.

Dynamic Documents

Q: Xerox is "the document company." How is the traditional idea of the document changing, and what does it imply for Xerox?

A: The document is changing dramatically, and there's no question that we'll follow what we call the document container no matter what form it takes and wherever it goes.

Documents have always been static, but there's a change ahead to have active documents that can actually help do the work that's so time intensive and costly. For example, there's a transition to "smart documents" -- documents that have embedded intelligence and root themselves along business processes without manual intervention. Some documents will be automatically summarized or searched for in ways that are much more intuitive than technology allows today. Some will have sophisticated security technologies such as authorization codes, or even be "transient" documents that self-erase in relatively short periods of time.

This whole area of smart documents represents huge prospects for Xerox going forward, but we're just beginning to exploit these opportunities and their impact on the business world.

Leadership Values

Q: How do you think about leadership, and getting the right people in the right jobs at the right time?

A: I believe that one of the most important aspects of leadership in large companies is building great teams. Building great teams is really based on assessing and respecting what people do well and making sure that they're in positions where they can make the best possible contribution. It's the good-to-great analogy -- having the right people on the right seats on the bus.

I think about it as creating a team of people that has the capability to create broad "followership" across the rest of the company. That's the way to get large companies really moving, through the alignment of your people at the top with everyone across the company. This allows you to work across geographies, business teams, and products and move the needle in a fundamental way. This leadership dimension is the critical differentiator between good leadership and quite frankly management that doesn't really add a lot of value.

I'm grateful because Xerox has a heritage of developing really strong leadership, not just on the technology side, but on the values and people side, too. As a result ... it's a pleasure to be here.

Rate This story

Good (82 Ratings)
3/5
Sign-in to rate!

30 Comments

Showing comments 6-30 of 30<< Previous
Sort: first to last
  • SantosE - Wednesday, August 22, 2007, 7:22PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 5/5

    Great buy new equipment new technology new ideas refreshing Xerox for the long term

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Wednesday, August 22, 2007, 5:44PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    What are you kidding? Where was Mulcahy for all those years leading up to the "near death spiral?" What was she doing in 2000 when she was president and COO? She should have been fired for contributing to the complete decimation of Xerox. What has she been doing for the last 7 years?. This stock has gone nowhere and provided no value to shareholders.

  • hjw - Wednesday, August 22, 2007, 4:29PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 5/5

    Women are the best in leadership roles no agendas

  • JohnD - Wednesday, August 22, 2007, 3:49PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 5/5

    Xerox has long been associated with exceptional training and development of its employees. I went thorough that training system which has proved as valuable as my college degree.

  • Bernice - Wednesday, August 22, 2007, 3:08PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 5/5

    I've been following XRX for some time now and Mulcahy's done a terrific job in an extremely tough environment of pulling them back from the jaws of death.

  • Peter - Wednesday, August 22, 2007, 3:03PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    Who really wrote this? Has he seen recent stock performance? Apparently, he is a contrarion to the max. Good luck to all that follow Jim's advice.

  • Bill - Wednesday, August 22, 2007, 2:06PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 5/5

    As a former account manager for XEROX, I am so happy to see them make the transition to a leadership position and profitability again. Thank you for teaching me PSS. It works.

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Wednesday, August 22, 2007, 1:39PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    Are you kidding me??? They've had zero innovation. PARC is dead as all its good people have left to Google and Microsoft research. Just check PARC's website and you'll see a bunch of "un"-innovative projections going on. They need to learn from lessons from EMC.

  • KendallA - Wednesday, August 22, 2007, 1:34PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 5/5

    I honestly did not think that Mulcahy could steer Xerox away from the icebergs fast enough, but she pulled it off. I was fascinated to see the new focus on solving real customer problems instead of simply engaging in a technology race with competitors. My jaw dropped at the amount of service-led business that adds to the top line. That doesn't happen unless Xerox is can save a company a lot more money than they spend on those services. That's powerful and will accelerate the business as the reputation grows. Personally, I am a big follower of "Good to Great" and I was pleased to hear her mention the seats-on-the-bus analogy. It's also fantastic that she's a 30-year veteran and not some rock-star business leader coming in to save the day with unsustainable results. I sorry to hear that so many people's lives were disrupted by the layoffs and restructuring, but try and put aside your bias and realize that Mulcahy has proven herself to be one of the great business leaders in America, and the world. If Xerox can produce solid and consistent revenue growth over the next four quarters, the shares should hit the 40's by 2010. Perhaps this was a bit of a puff article but Xerox is truly one of the great success stories of this decade.

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Wednesday, August 22, 2007, 1:07PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    Sad to see Xerox go from the best (PARC, anyone?) scientists and researchers doing true innovation to "business process improvement" crowd.

  • Eric - Wednesday, August 22, 2007, 12:20PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    Is this guys family and friends shareholders. Xerox is poised to take a nosedive over the next several years. THe Federal government is fed up with all of the layoffs in favor of cheap Indian etc.. labor. All tenured employees are being cut loose, the new hire turnover is incredible. Loyalty to the employer meant nothing and the Customers unfornately will feel this pain and will continue to choose other alternatives than staying with this bad apple.

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Wednesday, August 22, 2007, 12:11PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 3/5

    Since this will be edited by someone at Yahoo: the spelling of "Takeover" typed into the heading on Yahoo Financials home page is misspelled: "Talkeover" No need to post this, just fyi..

  • ryan - Wednesday, August 22, 2007, 11:48AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    This guy needs to learn how to ask some questions that actually matter. Get to the good stuff, not this puff about leadership and her definition of "document". This reads like a sample interview in a 6th grade textbook.

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Wednesday, August 22, 2007, 11:47AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    Whatever. I visit dozens of offices every week and have yet to see any piece of hardware or software made by Xerox. Yawn. Blah Blah. I look to thestreet.com, marketwatch, wsj and bloomberg for insightful opinions. My cat litter box has more nuggets of insight than this.

  • Sparky - Wednesday, August 22, 2007, 11:26AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    Pandering article. Even the title sucks. She destroyed the company by exiting technology business(es) in favor of her sales side cronies. She'll be happy when there is no hardware to sell only nebulous services of questionable value. As you can imagine, I'm a laid off 44 year engineer with 15 years service.

  • Bigfoot - Wednesday, August 22, 2007, 11:21AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    A pure puff piece, no real insights here.

  • Brian - Wednesday, August 22, 2007, 10:50AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    candy shell outside, rotten ingredients in teh middle

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Wednesday, August 22, 2007, 10:42AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    These are some of her accomplishments that you failed to mention. Come to Rochester NY some time and witness this first hand. 1) Mass layoffs of everybody over 40. 2) Elimination of the yearly bonus program. 3) Major reductions in benefits. 4) Contracting out most all sophisticated I.T. work so she does not have to pay benefits to the permatemps. 5) Initiating a new hiring policy of only hiring new college grads because she can pay them crap and they do not have any choice.

  • Chas - Wednesday, August 22, 2007, 10:30AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    take a look at Xrx's revenues over the last 5 yrs - mgt's refrain that growth is around the corner is getting old.

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Wednesday, August 22, 2007, 10:22AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 2/5

    Shoddy article. Are you trying to be a journalist?

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Wednesday, August 22, 2007, 10:19AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 3/5

    I was one of the casualties, along with my wife. My plant was moved to China. Glad to see they pulled through, a lot of people had their pension money in the stock. Sometimes you have to cut off a leg to save the rest of the body.

  • John - Wednesday, August 22, 2007, 10:13AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    "having the right people on the right seats on the bus" ?

  • Rod S - Wednesday, August 22, 2007, 10:04AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 2/5

    I have to agree with the first poster, the article is a puff piece filled with lots of CEO-speak. If Anne Mulcahy truly is the architect of Xerox's resurgence I would like to learn more of the details on how she made this happen. I would also like to learn more about how she developed her career and navigated the corporate ladder from front line salesperson to CEO.

  • LA Tiger - Wednesday, August 22, 2007, 9:54AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    This article is a puff piece, there is no mention of the accounting fraud and management denial of wrong. Anne may done a good job for investors buying in at the low, but it is still down 60% from its high 6 years later. You could have slept much better in an S&P index fund for the past 10 years than watch Xerox collapse and recover part way.

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Wednesday, August 22, 2007, 8:06AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    It's like a company paid PR piece. Where's the tough questions?

Showing comments 6-30 of 30<< Previous
The columns, articles, message board posts and any other features provided on Yahoo! Finance are provided for personal finance and investment information and are not to be construed as investment advice. Under no circumstances does the information in this content represent a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security. The views and opinions expressed in an article or column are the author's own and not necessarily those of Yahoo! and there is no implied endorsement by Yahoo! of any advice or trading strategy.

Recent Articles by Jim Citrin

More from Jim Citrin

The Dynamic Path

The Dynamic Path is a framework to live by if you aspire to reach your greatest potential in sports, business, public service, and life in general.

Based on three years of research and candid interviews with many of the world's most inspiring athletes and leaders, The Dynamic Path shows you how to develop the mind of a champion, avoid the "perilous perch," and build an enduring legacy, among many other personal transformations.

Order your copy today.

View more about Jim Citrin

More from Yahoo! Sources

  • CNN Money
  • Consumer Reports
  • Kiplinger
  • The Motley Fool
  • Business Week
  • Wall Street Journal

Sponsored Links

Don't Pay For School - Free Scholarships
Sign Up For Your Free Guide To $38 Million In Scholarships.
ProgramAdvisor.com/FreeScholarships
Online College Degrees
Get your AA, BA, Masters or PhD at a Top Online School. Start Now.
CollegeDegreeNetwork.com/Degrees
Become A Law Enforcement Officer
SWAT, K9, Narcotics, CSI & More. Online Degrees For Police Careers.
Public-Service.com/LawEnforcement
Free 2010 Credit Report and All 3 Scores
Free 3-bureau Credit Report – includes Transunion, Equifax, Experian.
FreeCreditReportsInstantly.com
Buy Stocks for $4
No account or investment minimums. No inactivity fees. Start Today.
www.sharebuilder.com
Refinance Now at 3.7% APR
$160,000 mortgage under $752/mo. Free. No Obligation. Get 4 quotes now.
MortgageRefinance.LendGo.com

Historical chart data and daily updates provided by Commodity Systems, Inc. (CSI). International historical chart data and daily updates provided by Morningstar, Inc. Fundamental company data provided by Capital IQ. Quotes and other information supplied by independent providers identified on the Yahoo! Finance partner page. Quotes are updated automatically, but will be turned off after 25 minutes of inactivity. Quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes. Real-Time continuous streaming quotes are available through our premium service. You may turn streaming quotes on or off. All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. Neither Yahoo! nor any of independent providers is liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. By accessing the Yahoo! site, you agree not to redistribute the information found therein.

Yahoo! Answers is provided for informational purposes only, and no Q&A is intended for trading or investing purposes. Yahoo! shall not be responsible or liable for the accuracy, usefulness or availability of any Q&A information, and shall not be responsible or liable for any trading or investment decisions based on such information. View Complete Answers Disclaimer.