Monday, December 28, 2009, 3:45PM ET - U.S. Markets close in 15 mins..

Laura Rowley Money & Happiness

Laura Rowley, Money & Happiness

Finding Flexibility in Work and Parenting

by Laura Rowley

Good (325 Ratings)
2.547692/5
Posted on Thursday, May 10, 2007, 12:00AM

I worked full-time in media companies for 17 years before going to work for myself in 2001, when my two children were 3-1/2 years and 16 months old. I had a third child but never stopped working, because I have the ultimate flexible job.

I've always felt lucky that I chose writing for a living, because it's something that can be done alone, at any hour of the day or night. Because my occupation accommodated the other demands of my life, I never had to quit.

No Second Chances?

A new book suggests that if most mothers had the same accommodations, they'd still be working. On the bright side, more companies are recognizing that creating flexible options benefits their bottom line.

"There are structural characteristics of the male competitive model that fit very badly into the reality of women's lives," says Sylvia Anne Hewlett, an economist, founding president of the Center for Work-Life Policy, and author of the new book "Off-Ramps and On-Ramps: Keeping Talented Women on the Road to Success."

"The requirement that you have a continuous, cumulative lockstep employment record seems to be a necessary condition for success for all kinds of professional niches," Hewlett says. "Most career models demand that the steepest gradient in the career path needs to be in one's 30s -- that's when you catch a wave or you don't, and there are no second chances."

In 2004, Hewlett established the Hidden Brain Drain Task Force with Carolyn Buck Luce of Ernst & Young and Cornel West of Princeton University. They were eventually joined by 34 leading companies, including Microsoft, American Express, and Unilever, who sponsored focus groups and a national study of over 3,000 highly qualified workers -- 2,500 women and 653 men.

The Old Heave-Ho

Contrary to media stories suggesting that women were "opting out" of the workforce voluntarily to care for children, Hewlett found most are "pushed out": 76 percent of those who left their jobs would've taken a flexible, reduced-hour job had it been available.

The task force study also found:

Among women who off-ramp, 93 percent of those surveyed want to rejoin the ranks of the employed, but only 74 percent manage to do so.

Of those who do on-ramp, only 40 percent return to full-time, mainstream jobs; 24 percent work part-time and 9 percent are self-employed.

Women who spend just 2.2 years out of the workforce lose 18 percent of their earning power; for women out 3 or more years, it's 37 percent.

The Freedom to Work Smarter

Fortunately, some large companies have recognized the economic toll of this loss of talent, and are responding. Ernst & Young, for example, has created flexible work arrangements that allow workers to reduce their load to 60 percent of that of a full-time job. Increasing rates of retention among female professionals yielded savings of $10 million a year.

Some 75 percent of workers at BT (formerly British Telecom) work flexible hours under the company's Freedom to Work initiative. It was fueled by BT's experience dealing with the Y2K problem in 1999. Its employees, racing against the Jan. 1, 2000, deadline and collaborating with colleagues in India, were hampered by traditional work schedules.

BT allowed the team members to work whenever they wanted as long as they coordinated schedules with each other. They took fewer sick days, were more productive, and accomplished more over a shorter time period than other BT teams.

Success Stories

Many other companies are tapping recruiting agencies that specialize in work-family balance. Atlanta-based Mom Corps, started by Harvard Business School grad and CPA Allison O'Kelly, has more than 6,000 resumes of accountants, attorneys, marketing specialists, and the like in its database, and six offices nationwide.

"Some clients want a professional in the office 30 hours a week," says O'Kelly, who has two children, ages 4 and 2. "We might find the perfect candidate, but she can only be in the office 24 hours and is happy to do the other 6 hours from home. A lot of staffing agencies make it difficult for people with flexibility requirements. They don't ask those questions."

In the human resources field, there's HR OptIn, founded by Atlanta-based consultant and mom Monique Dearth. She left a high-level job at GE in 1999 to spend more time with her one-year-old and started consulting for GE and other clients such as DuPont, Frito-Lay, and Home Depot. That business eventually grew to 12 women who work flexible schedules.

When clients sought specialists to service assignments outside the scope of her consulting business, Dearth started her recruiting firm. "We're placing fantastic people who are no longer in the corporate workforce but have great skills, and are at a point where their kids are a little older and they're ready to get back in," says Dearth, who has an eight-year-old and a six-year-old.

Most of her workers are women of 35 to 50 years old with a few children, although some are men who have been downsized. They work on an hourly or project basis. A recent HR assignment paid $65 an hour.

Hit the Ground Running

The key for employers is that the temporary professionals hit the ground running, says Dearth. "There's no handholding or micromanaging required, and oftentimes the professional brings skill sets or a thought process the client never considered."

Austin-based Lesley Spencer Pyle started Home-Based Working Moms, an online community of parents who run or aspire to run businesses from home, in 1995. Pyle launched a second site this year -- HireMyMom.com -- to match professionals looking for temporary or part-time projects with clients, rather than launching their own businesses.

"It's so much more accepted than even just a few years ago, when people were hesitant to hire someone working from home because they couldn't keep an eye on them," says Pyle. "Productivity goes up when someone works from home, because they're so appreciative of that benefit of flexibility, and try harder to prove themselves."

Working Hard at Home

Meanwhile, technology has been a boon for women who aren't in a position to return to their former careers but still want an income. Wisconsin-based Kim Conner, a mother of three children under age five and former high school chemistry teacher, earns up to $15,000 a year working for LiveOps, a customer call-center service. She works about 20 hours a week, mostly at night and on weekends, when her spouse is home.

"After my first child I went to part-time, but I realized when I was pregnant with my second child it wasn't going to work -- my whole income would go to day care," she says. Conner logs into the LiveOps web site on Thursday, and clicks on whatever hours she wants to work, handling calls for fitness products, charitable groups, food service companies, and the like. If one of her children is sick, she can cancel 30 minutes before her shift.

"I average $12 to $15 an hour and never leave my house," she says, adding that the money goes into her children's college savings. "I don't have to worry about a work wardrobe, commuting, or gasoline. I actually love what I'm doing."

For more discussion of women (and men) off-ramping and on-ramping in their careers, see my blog.

Rate This story

Good (325 Ratings)
2.5/5
Sign-in to rate!

106 Comments

Showing comments 6-35 of 106<< PreviousNext >>
Sort: first to last
  • Yahoo! Finance User - Saturday, May 12, 2007, 1:13PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 3/5

    www.noexcusebudget.com says that a living can be made from home while raising the kids... 50 ways listed at www.NoExcuseBudget.com

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Saturday, May 12, 2007, 12:41PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 4/5

    First of all anyone of you that calls someone else a moron is, well just that, a moron yourself. To the man that makes enough money so that his wife doesn't have to work, well good for you but unfortunately it is not like that everywhere. When I had my son 7 yrs ago I intended to be a stay at home mom however I did not realize that he was going to born with a genetic heart defect, so sir I make very good money at my government job and my husband makes good money at his maintanance job however if I quit my job I would have to go on public aid just to be able to get my son health insurance. I also do work out of my home to help have the extra's. There are alot of work from home jobs. You just have to be committed and dependable. I work with a group called MomsWIN and we are an internet marketing group and yes we make very good money for what we do. So maybe you think I am a moron but I know that it is my responsabilty to take care of my son and provide for him. http://momswin.com/kjl0502 for more iformation (This is a link)

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Saturday, May 12, 2007, 11:33AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    I'm tired of all of the lame articles with the lame pictures that lead them. Yahoo sucks.

  • Christina - Saturday, May 12, 2007, 11:25AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 4/5

    Ok...to all those who couldn't find references to jobs in here...She mentioned in this article where many women worked WITH direct links to those sites that stay-at-home mothers work for. Soooooo that would entail that one could probably click on one or more of those links and find a career opportunity. Yes the title was a little deceiving as this article did not blatantly do all it claimed to, but if you have any reading abilities at all you could have gone from reading to thinking...did she really have to spell it out for you?

  • ValenciaJ - Saturday, May 12, 2007, 10:52AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    I agree with hte others who commented, this is stupid, boring and lame, It doesn't offer info on REAL jobs for stay at home moms so this lady just wasted our time.

  • Amer - Saturday, May 12, 2007, 10:24AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    Reading these awful reviews has been more entertaining/imformative than reading this stupid article.

  • BarneyC - Saturday, May 12, 2007, 9:21AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    What a bunch of losers. I make enough so that my wife doesn't have to work. Quit complaining about how the corporate world doesn't accommodate your stinking needs, and work harder. Instead of reading this crap read the real financial pages. The stock market is soaring and anyone who isn't making a fortune is just a moron, plain and simple.

  • MikeAndHeather - Saturday, May 12, 2007, 7:15AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    This had absolutely no help what so ever in it, a waste of reading time. Would have been a helpful article if it gave ideas of jobs for stay home mothers like the title lead you to believe. I guess it doesnt take any expertise to write these articles on yahoo. Where do i sign up?

  • Naomi - Saturday, May 12, 2007, 6:36AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    Still wondering what the best jobs are for mothers...

  • Char - Saturday, May 12, 2007, 6:03AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    I think Yahoo needs to find more writers. This article was not up to par at all. In other words LAME.

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Saturday, May 12, 2007, 5:39AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    Story does not relate to LINK title... Poorly written with no useful information to anybody in "real life".

  • Judy - Saturday, May 12, 2007, 2:09AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    I am like the rest. I was expecting something a grandmother could do at home while watching the grandchildren. Not some big company that gives perks and all if you work form your home. I wanted something I could do at night or early in the morning maybe by computer.

  • ShelliC - Saturday, May 12, 2007, 1:21AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    I am not sure why she is still writing. This is the third, and last, article that I have read from Ms. Rowley. Poorly written and extremely misleading. The tag on the home page was 'best companies for working moms' and there are very few listed. The research on Ms. Rowley's part was shoddy (per usual) to say the least. Yahoo! read, edit and then let go of staff that doesn't meet expectations....

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Saturday, May 12, 2007, 12:38AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 2/5

    the format is horrible. There is no list and who has time to look through all the paragraphs. It would help to put the jobs and why it would be good then put success stories. But there needs to be a list!

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Saturday, May 12, 2007, 12:21AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    Well since I'm just getting done raising my children and I'm in my mid 40s and I didn't "Catch the Wave" in my 30s I guess my life is just useless right and I will spend the rest of my life working at a fast food resturant Thanks for all your Motivation.

  • Jaimy - Saturday, May 12, 2007, 12:15AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    This article is very misleading. Did anyone bother visiting the links. The LiveOPs website charges a $30 background check fee, the other two make you pay a fee just to sign you up to look at the jobs they have listed. What a waste of time. And as a mom I take offense to the comment made about people who aren't parents having to pick up the slack at work for us parents. I work very hard and I can't help it if my children get sick, what am I supposed to do tell them to take a couple of asprin and call me later? No way not when they are 6 and 3.

  • none - Saturday, May 12, 2007, 12:12AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    This is why most wome make less than Men. in my experience, the male counterparts dont take off as much. The women I worked with did a great job but were at the job due to children, or illness way more than men.

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Saturday, May 12, 2007, 12:01AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    I am postive that Procter and Gamble will be on "the list" but what "the list" doesn't say is that none of the perks listed are available to the manufacturing employees. These are all corporate office perks. There are no daycares on site at the manufacturing plants that run 24/7 365, no flex time, no work from home (that's a good one! I can see it now, "Please back your 53ft semi trailer in my driveway so I can load your truck with products and watch my kids at the same time!" ), no light duty. I have 5 children and have worked for P&G for 10 yrs and have yet to see these great perks! Articles and lists like this are VERY deceptive. Most do not apply to the common working people, just the suits and ties.

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Saturday, May 12, 2007, 12:01AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    No list and really no substance. Grammer was very good. Misleading and disappointing. Does this person write for Fox News???? Did anyone at Yahoo read this story?????? Where is the list??

  • Kevin P - Friday, May 11, 2007, 11:54PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    you can tell this article was written by a woman...says she has the top companies to work for in the tag line then tells you none of them.

  • Janet - Friday, May 11, 2007, 11:50PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    I wanted to see which companies this article represented. This was a waste of my time.

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Friday, May 11, 2007, 11:46PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    Please list the companies.

  • Jen S - Friday, May 11, 2007, 11:38PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 2/5

    Were are all these wonderful companies I live in a very large city and I cant find any.

  • Celeste D - Friday, May 11, 2007, 11:29PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    What the article fails to mention is that for those "mother's who get to have flexible hours" other employees without children don't and have to pick up the slack. I can barely make a doctor or dentist appointment with out getting the "stink eye" from my boss. Yet, several mother's in my office get to run home at the drop of a hat because their child has the sniffles!

  • Katie B - Friday, May 11, 2007, 11:19PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    What company's??? Lame!!!

  • Lizard - Friday, May 11, 2007, 11:13PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    What jobs are they? Very misleading. LAME!

  • L. - Friday, May 11, 2007, 11:11PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    Top companies???? hmmm

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Friday, May 11, 2007, 10:56PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 2/5

    I think what this artical leaves out, is that if you live in a smaller city or town, it is much harder to find a job that will allow you to work from home. As in my case, where I was forced out, due to the fact that I could no longer travel. Because this was a smaller company, there was no other positions available. As for the customer call center, she may be making $12 to $15 an hour, but how much goes to paying self employment tax. Most of these jobs consist of contract employees, which means no benefits, and having to pay self-employment tax.

  • AshleighM - Friday, May 11, 2007, 10:45PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 2/5

    Look, I find it a little sexist that it's giving this option only for mothers. Plus, flexible hourse aren't always needed for a mom. Mine works as a doctor, so that means long hours, and I've been raised just fine.

  • Gary - Friday, May 11, 2007, 10:45PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    Where are the Top companies?

Showing comments 6-35 of 106<< PreviousNext >>
The columns, articles, message board posts and any other features provided on Yahoo! Finance are provided for personal finance and investment information and are not to be construed as investment advice. Under no circumstances does the information in this content represent a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security. The views and opinions expressed in an article or column are the author's own and not necessarily those of Yahoo! and there is no implied endorsement by Yahoo! of any advice or trading strategy.

More From Laura Rowley

Money & Happiness

Discover the secrets to financial happiness. Laura's book offers practical tools and positive strategies to create "the good life" in a meaningful way.

More about Money & Happiness

Learn to identify your values, banish debt, start saving, and investing; plus Laura's favorite online resources.

Order your copy of Money & Happiness today and boost your financial well-being!

More from Yahoo! Sources

  • CNN Money
  • Consumer Reports
  • Kiplinger
  • The Motley Fool
  • Business Week
  • Wall Street Journal

Historical chart data and daily updates provided by Commodity Systems, Inc. (CSI). International historical chart data and daily updates provided by Morningstar, Inc. Fundamental company data provided by Capital IQ. Quotes and other information supplied by independent providers identified on the Yahoo! Finance partner page. Quotes are updated automatically, but will be turned off after 25 minutes of inactivity. Quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes. Real-Time continuous streaming quotes are available through our premium service. You may turn streaming quotes on or off. All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. Neither Yahoo! nor any of independent providers is liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. By accessing the Yahoo! site, you agree not to redistribute the information found therein.

Yahoo! Answers is provided for informational purposes only, and no Q&A is intended for trading or investing purposes. Yahoo! shall not be responsible or liable for the accuracy, usefulness or availability of any Q&A information, and shall not be responsible or liable for any trading or investment decisions based on such information. View Complete Answers Disclaimer.