Friday, December 11, 2009, 11:52AM ET - U.S. Markets close in 4 hours and 8 minutes.

Laura Rowley Money & Happiness

Laura Rowley, Money & Happiness

How Homeowners Can Benefit from Falling House Prices

by Laura Rowley

Good (192 Ratings)
2.416664/5
Posted on Wednesday, August 6, 2008, 12:00AM

With home values down sharply and projected to decline further this year, this may be the time to challenge your property tax assessment. In fact, a few tax authorities are beating homeowners to the punch.

Crunching the Numbers

Some jurisdictions are performing blanket reviews and proactively cutting property taxes on homes purchased at the market's top. Los Angeles County, for example, says it reduced assessments on 128,000 homes, with average savings of $750. California's Proposition 8, adopted in 1976, allows for reductions in assessment due to declining home values.

"It's not common -- we did this in early '90s, but haven't had this type of real estate recession since that time," says L.A. County Tax Assessor Rick Auerbach. "L.A. County reviewed everything purchased in last three years, as did most counties in the state."

Tax offices are also inviting homeowners in declining markets to do the research and send in a challenge themselves. Craig Withers, a banker, bought a three-bedroom, 2,200-square-foot home in January 2007 in a suburb of San Diego. "I guess you could say I caught a falling knife," he says. "When I bought, prices were already 10 to 15 percent off their high -- then they kept falling."

Withers received a notice from the assessor suggesting he log on to its website and follow the instructions to seek a reduction. "They wanted recent sales comparable to your home and what you thought your property was worth," says Withers, who ultimately won a 10 percent cut in his assessment. (Property taxes are determined by the home's assessed value multiplied by a local tax rate.)

Take the Challenge

The National Taxpayers Union estimates that just 10 percent of homeowners nationwide protest their property assessments, but many more could benefit from a challenge.

"It depends on the jurisdiction, but there are accounts of properties being 30 to 60 percent over-assessed," says spokesperson Pete Sepp. "Some have to do with losses or gains of market prices, others with sloppiness or inaccuracies, others with the changing character of the neighborhood -- in that the classification of properties is no longer accurate."

An estimated 30 to 50 percent of appeals are successful, says Sepp. "People shouldn't be intimidated by the appeals process -- it's like traffic court. Think about it as if you're protesting a parking ticket," he says.

With big hikes in property taxes in recent years, though, this protest can add up to much more than a parking violation. According to the Taxpayers Union, the most successful challenges come from long-time homeowners who have never viewed the factors that went into their tax assessment or the worksheets used by the assessor.

"Maybe you tore down a screened-in porch three years ago -- that's a simple error that can be fixed without a formal appeal," says Sepp. "You may also want to consider an appeal if home sales have taken either an upward or downward turn, or there have been major new developments around your neighborhood on previously vacant land."

Reassessing Values

That was Aimee Bennett's basis for appeal. The Colorado homeowner was one of the first residents to purchase in a new development in 2003, which was surrounded by vacant lots. "The assessor's office even admitted they didn't have a lot to go on -- they had to base the assessment on houses that were kind of nearby, but not really. A few miles away it's a whole different [neighborhood])," she says.

Properties in her area are reassessed every two years. When the Bennetts received their 2005 valuation, they noticed that it surpassed home sale prices in the same period. Bennett consulted a local website to run comparisons; you can also find comparable sales by asking a real estate broker or using a website such as Yahoo! Real Estate's Home Values page. (Homeowners can also hire professional appraisers -- just check if your jurisdiction allows it, Sepp says.)

"I went online and found all of the [recently sold] homes," says Bennett. "It took me time to walk all over the neighborhood, and I wrote down numbers of the homes that matched our model." She asked for a reduction of 20 to 25 percent in the assessed value of her home, and got 15 percent.

An Appealing Prospect

You may also have grounds for an appeal if your home has a unique flaw that differentiates it from your neighbors' houses. Maybe it's the only house on the street with a railroad running behind the backyard, or it's on a busy corner where there's minimal street parking. In that case, bring supporting evidence to the assessor's office, such blueprints, building records, or photographs.

Timing of an appeal is important; the filing deadline is typically 60 to 90 days after receiving either your notice of assessment or your property tax bill -- and some jurisdictions require you to file in as little as two weeks. There may also be a fee for filing an appeal. If you lose, you can appeal to a higher authority, typically a state board.

For a first appeal, don't hire help, experts say. Earlier this year, the L.A. County Assessors Office warned consumers about companies charging anywhere from $99 to $999 to file appeals. "Within California, the person can fill out a simple form saying 'this is the property address and I think it's worth less than the assessed value,'" says Auerbach. "It's a simple thing any taxpayer can do easily."

Homeowners may want to hire a professional if the challenge is declined, and they must appeal to a higher level, Auerbach adds. If you do hire an attorney, try to find one willing to work on contingency (in which the firm would receive a percentage of a successful reduction).

No Boom, No Bust

Meanwhile, if you feel your property has been overvalued, it's not a bad idea to check in with the neighbors. Counties will sometimes reduce assessments in an entire area if they receive enough appeals. That was the case in Wake County, N.C., which includes the cities of Raleigh, Durham, Chapel Hill, and Cary, where some homeowners were pleasantly surprised by an automatic reduction in their assessment.

"If we get a high number of appeals in a certain section we sometimes will go back and adjust the entire section based on the grade or quality of construction -- so the appeal of a few may affect several," says Marcus Kinrade, Wake County appraisal/collection manager. The county does a revaluation every 8 years, and only 8 percent of homeowners appealed following the re-assessment that ended this past January. Residential property values rose 43 percent countywide since 2000.

"We didn't boom here as much as other places -- it was very steady and controlled growth," says Kinrade. "Sales are slowing down, but because we didn't boom like other places, we weren't as affected when things went bad."

Rate This story

Good (192 Ratings)
2.5/5
Sign-in to rate!

100 Comments

Showing comments 1-5 of 100Next >>
Sort: first to last
  • Jim - Wednesday, August 13, 2008, 8:10PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    should be titled "How to save $4,000/year by losing $100,000 in value"

  • Born2Accrue - Wednesday, August 13, 2008, 4:56PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 5/5

    Wow. More people need to follow Laura's advice. If people paid attention to the details in the financial dealings, they could save a ton of money. These "small" savings add up. This is a very relevant article written by someone who knows what they're talking about. You don't want to protest your property tax bill? Fine, you can subsidize the rest of us by paying more. We won't waste your time by trying to help you save money anymore. By the way, if you have a $525k house, this benefits you the most. But then again, you're too busy complaining about the economy to care.

  • KevinC - Wednesday, August 13, 2008, 2:52PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 4/5

    let's all dump on Laura since house values are in the tank

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Wednesday, August 13, 2008, 2:15PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    Great news!! My house has fallen $100,000 in value since I bought it 2.5 years ago, which means I get to save $41/mo in property taxes! (If I spend $400 for an appraisal and many hours of my time.)

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Wednesday, August 13, 2008, 1:43AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    This has got to be the worst author ever. First off, if I buy a house for 525k and it goes down to 430k (this is exaclty what has happend on long island), but my property taxes go down $1500 a year, how in the world is that a "Benefit" as the author calls it. Its authors like this that just have no clue, just like the politicians who have no clue. Lets get one thing straight. Property taxes will never go down that much, and if they do, youll only save a few grand a year at most. And that 3 or 4k that you save on property taxes is just being spent on higher gas prices and insanely high food prices at the supermarket so there is no real gain. So I guess the author thinks saving 3k on your taxes a year and losing 30k to 90k on your house at the same time isnt that bad of a thing. What an idiot. Word to the author. Falling house prices are good for one reason. Its that more people can finially start to slowly afford a house. But the problem is that house prices should of never ran up the amount they did, and now all the people who purchased a home within the past 2 years are totally screwed. This article is pathetic. Just like how congress thinks a 600 dollar stimulus check will save the economy. Its laughable. It will never happen. The only way this country will ever be fixed is if financial education is taken seriously in this country and taught in schools. Not some esoteric algebra that we will never use. Until Americans understand credit, and ditch the mentality of "I will just charge it to my Visa card," Americans will always be poor and slave to the lender. The truly rich understand that debt is financial slavery and never put themselves in that position. My opinion is you should never buy a house until you can put at least 20 - 30% down and can afford a 15 year mortgage and still make one extra payment a year. 30 year mortgages are the biggest scam ever and buying a house that way is not an investment. Its just a burden.

Showing comments 1-5 of 100Next >>
The columns, articles, message board posts and any other features provided on Yahoo! Finance are provided for personal finance and investment information and are not to be construed as investment advice. Under no circumstances does the information in this content represent a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security. The views and opinions expressed in an article or column are the author's own and not necessarily those of Yahoo! and there is no implied endorsement by Yahoo! of any advice or trading strategy.

More From Laura Rowley

Money & Happiness

Discover the secrets to financial happiness. Laura's book offers practical tools and positive strategies to create "the good life" in a meaningful way.

More about Money & Happiness

Learn to identify your values, banish debt, start saving, and investing; plus Laura's favorite online resources.

Order your copy of Money & Happiness today and boost your financial well-being!

More from Yahoo! Sources

  • CNN Money
  • Consumer Reports
  • Kiplinger
  • The Motley Fool
  • Business Week
  • Wall Street Journal

Historical chart data and daily updates provided by Commodity Systems, Inc. (CSI). International historical chart data and daily updates provided by Morningstar, Inc. Fundamental company data provided by Capital IQ. Quotes and other information supplied by independent providers identified on the Yahoo! Finance partner page. Quotes are updated automatically, but will be turned off after 25 minutes of inactivity. Quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes. Real-Time continuous streaming quotes are available through our premium service. You may turn streaming quotes on or off. All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. Neither Yahoo! nor any of independent providers is liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. By accessing the Yahoo! site, you agree not to redistribute the information found therein.

Yahoo! Answers is provided for informational purposes only, and no Q&A is intended for trading or investing purposes. Yahoo! shall not be responsible or liable for the accuracy, usefulness or availability of any Q&A information, and shall not be responsible or liable for any trading or investment decisions based on such information. View Complete Answers Disclaimer.