Saturday, December 26, 2009, 2:41AM ET - U.S. Markets Closed.

Suze Orman Money Matters

Suze Orman, Money Matters

Pre-Recession Thinking Could Put You in Financial Peril

by Suze Orman

Very Good (343 Ratings)
3.431484/5
Posted on Friday, August 22, 2008, 12:00AM

I don't need an official government pronouncement to tell me that we're in a recession. Based on what I am hearing these days, I have all the evidence I need to know we're experiencing a serious downturn.

Past Masters

The most repeated phrase I'm hearing these days is "used to be." As in, "Suze, my investment used to be worth $20,000 and now it's worth $15,000, so I'm just waiting for it to get back to $20,000 before I sell." Or, "Suze, we want to sell our house, but our agent says its market value today is $250,000, but we know last year it used to be worth $300,000." Or, "Suze I was laid off four months ago and the only job I have been offered has a salary that's 15 percent below what my pay used to be."

Folks, what used to be is useless. I know it's hard to change your outlook and adjust to reality, but the former value of an investment, a home, or even your salary from the job you were just downsized out of doesn't really matter today.

When so many people are fixated on the past, I know we've got ourselves some serious economic problems. To survive today requires dealing with what's happening today, not what you remember from yesterday.

Anchor or Albatross?

Focusing on what used to be is part of a classic behavioral trait known as anchoring. We throw down an anchor at a reference point that's known to us -- the purchase price of a stock, say -- and won't budge one inch from that anchor point when evaluating its value.

What can happen is that someone who's bought a stock at $50 a share will decide that when that the stock trades at $40 a share they're going to hang on just until it gets back to $50. They're anchored on that price, and instead of looking at the fundamentals for that company they're absurdly basing their investment strategy on an arbitrary number.

Well, a stock has no idea what you personally paid for it. I know that sounds ridiculous, but it's basically what you're assuming if you find yourself holding onto an investment simply because you want to break even. Do you really think the stock knows what your break-even point is? If the investment no longer makes sense on the fundamentals, get out and put your money to work in an investment that does make sense.

Upside Anguish

The same flawed anchoring can even get you in trouble on the upside. Say you bought a stock and had it in your head that you would sell at a 20 percent profit. Everything is going great and you have an 18 percent gain when you start to see some deterioration in the fundamentals.

Instead of following the numbers you follow your artificial goal of netting 20 percent, so you don't sell. Three months later you're still waiting for the stock to reach your artificial 20 percent threshold, only it's fallen back to just a 5 percent gain. You could've taken your profits off the table when you had a good idea there was trouble ahead, but instead you got dragged down by your anchor.

Real Estate Reality

If you seriously want to sell your house right now, you need to get rid of your anchor mentality. The fact that you know the house next door sold two years ago for $150,000 more than your agent says you can get for your house today is irrelevant. The fact that Zillow.com indicates that your house was worth $80,000 more a year ago is beside the point -- you didn't put your house on the market two years ago, or a year ago. You're putting it on the market today.

Pricing correctly is the surest way to squeeze the most out of the sale. If you insist on overpricing, I promise you the house isn't going to sell. You can anchor all you want, but no buyer is going to pay you a price based on where the market was a year or two years ago. And while your house is languishing on the market, you're going to be stuck with the carrying costs.

Let's say your mortgage, tax, and insurance run you $4,000 a month: After four months of your house not selling, you're out $16,000 and you drop the price down to a competitive market price and the house sells. If you'd just done that when you first listed the house, you would've saved yourself $16,000 in carrying costs. That's one expensive anchor.

Competent Compensation Rules

If you find yourself out of work in this tough economy, it is vitally important to set a realistic price (salary) goal before you start your search. That means gathering market data on what the job you're interviewing for pays in today's open market. What you earned at your last job is a useless anchor -- that was a different company and a different job

In fact, if you've been with one company for a long time, you may have been highly compensated for all the internal knowledge you had about how that particular company ran. You had great company-specific value. Maybe some of that value is transferable to your next job, but maybe it isn't. You need to be open to the idea that all the value you had at your old job isn't necessarily going to be what prospective new employers need or want.

Ideally, you should always fall forward into a higher-paying job. But if you've been downsized and need to get back to work pronto, let go of your salary anchor and focus on what the going rate is for a job you can get hired for today.

Rate This story

Very Good (343 Ratings)
3.5/5
Sign-in to rate!

121 Comments

Showing comments 1-5 of 121Next >>
Sort: last to first
  • ussinvest - Monday, August 25, 2008, 8:52AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 4/5

    Not a bad article, she does touch on some good points: these things as we see them are not always in reality, mostly because every issue she touched on here is a decision that has too much emotion involved, particularly the real estate. I have had too many friends who want to take advantage of a down market by buying a new house, all the while thinking that they can get the seller to back way off the price of the house, but they won't back off the listing price of their house. You can't have it both ways, it just doesn't work out like that. Now I will say, there are a select few people out there that this doesn't apply to, we all have friends that can do these same things and they always come out smelling like a rose, but Suze is right, the majority of us should stop living in the past and focus on the future. A pastor friend of mine said it best when we were headed out of town for a church retreat, as he was driving the bus and we were sitting in the back searching for clues as to why the church wasn't growing (and focusing a little too much on the negative), he stated that "we can't focus on what's behind us if we are going to move forward. It is awfully dangerous to drive in the rearview mirror." Those words come back to me everytime I read columns like this or hear my friends and coworkers bring up these same subjects.

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Monday, August 25, 2008, 8:56AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 5/5

    Good advice....finally

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Monday, August 25, 2008, 9:03AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 2/5

    I don't agree with all of the assessments. First, we're not in a recession. People are still spending money. They're still buying plenty of gas. The biggest complaint about gas prices is from the media. It sounds more like a mental recession...I disagree with your thoughts about buying a home in this environment. A home is a long-term investment. A homeowner shouldn't be upset because his house has lost some of its value unless he has to move. Suze makes it sound like 10% yearly home value appreciation is supposed to be a given. She just feeding into the hype...The new job should pay market value. If someone has been overpaid, they may need to take a cut. If someone was underpaid relative to market value, they should try to increase their salary or stay where they are at. If they're unemployed, they should try to find something close to what they were making. Don't take substantially less or you'll never get ahead with that company...The investing advice depends on when the person needs the money. If they need it next week, they probably should sell. If they need it in 30 years, they should hold or at most adjust...This advice is extremely broad and reinforces the myth that everyone is suffering. The only people I know that are suffering are people who increased their business and personal spending assuming the economy would never slow down. Bad idea.

  • Scott - Monday, August 25, 2008, 9:15AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    We're obviously in a recession? Seems like some basic 101 courses are in order. Yes.. the economy is not "booming" like it was so of course people are saying things aren't as good as they used to be. Duh...

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Monday, August 25, 2008, 9:17AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 4/5

    Has the person who commented below read the entire article? Seems like their comments are not based on the article. They commented, "Suze makes it sound like 10% yearly home value appreciation is supposed to be a given. She just feeding into the hype" - where does she imply that? She's merely stating that you should not base your decisions on hopes of things going back to how they were in the recent past. Overall it is a good article and sound advice.

Showing comments 1-5 of 121Next >>
The columns, articles, message board posts and any other features provided on Yahoo! Finance are provided for personal finance and investment information and are not to be construed as investment advice. Under no circumstances does the information in this content represent a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security. The views and opinions expressed in an article or column are the author's own and not necessarily those of Yahoo! and there is no implied endorsement by Yahoo! of any advice or trading strategy.

Own the Power to Control Your Destiny

Women & Money

With her signature mix of insight and compassion, Suze Orman equips women with the financial knowledge and emotional awareness to overcome the blocks that have kept them from making more out of the money they earn.

Buy "Women & Money" now.

More from Yahoo! Sources

  • CNN Money
  • Consumer Reports
  • Kiplinger
  • The Motley Fool
  • Business Week
  • Wall Street Journal

Historical chart data and daily updates provided by Commodity Systems, Inc. (CSI). International historical chart data and daily updates provided by Morningstar, Inc. Fundamental company data provided by Capital IQ. Quotes and other information supplied by independent providers identified on the Yahoo! Finance partner page. Quotes are updated automatically, but will be turned off after 25 minutes of inactivity. Quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes. Real-Time continuous streaming quotes are available through our premium service. You may turn streaming quotes on or off. All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. Neither Yahoo! nor any of independent providers is liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. By accessing the Yahoo! site, you agree not to redistribute the information found therein.

Yahoo! Answers is provided for informational purposes only, and no Q&A is intended for trading or investing purposes. Yahoo! shall not be responsible or liable for the accuracy, usefulness or availability of any Q&A information, and shall not be responsible or liable for any trading or investment decisions based on such information. View Complete Answers Disclaimer.