Monday, November 23, 2009, 12:32PM ET - U.S. Markets close in 3 hours and 28 minutes.

Robert Kiyosaki Why the Rich Get Richer

Robert Kiyosaki, Why the Rich Get Richer

Preparing for the Worst

by Robert Kiyosaki

Very Good (1867 Ratings)
3.647022/5
Posted on Monday, August 24, 2009, 12:00AM

"Is the crisis over?" is a question I am often asked. "Is the economy coming back?"
My reply is, "I don't think so. I would prepare for the worst."

Like most people, I wish for a better future for all of us. Life is better when people are working, happy, and spending money.

The stock market has been going up since March 9, 2009. Talk of "green shoots" fill the air. Yet, in spite of the more positive news, I continue to recommend that people prepare for the worst. The following are some of my reasons:

1. I believe the stock market is being manipulated. I suspect the government, banks, and Wall Street are doing everything they can to keep the market from crashing. Our leaders know that nothing makes the world feel better than a raging bull market.

Do I have any proof that the market is being manipulated? No. I just smell a rat, or a pack of rats. I believe greed, self-interest, arrogance, and fear control the financial markets. I suspect those in charge will do anything to keep us all from panicking... and I don't blame them. A global panic would be ugly and dangerous.

2. In my view, this global crisis has been caused by the Federal Reserve Bank, the U.S. Treasury, Wall Street, and the central banks of the world. They caused the problem, profited excessively in doing so, and now profit by being asked to fix the problem.

Every time I hear a politician mention the word stimulus, my mind flashes back to high school biology class, when I touched battery wires to a dead frog to make it twitch. Today, you and I are the dead frogs. Pretty soon the dead frog will be fried frog.

In the 1980s, our government's hot money stimulus was measured only in the millions of dollars. By the 1990s, the government had to ramp the stimulus voltage into the billions in order to get the frog to twitch. Today the frog has jumper cables with trillions in high-voltage hot money pouring through the lines.

While most us feel better when we have more high-voltage money in our hands, none of us feel good about higher taxes, increasing national debt, and rising inflation for the long term. Another old saying goes, "Sometimes the cure is worse than the disease." I say the government stimulus cure is killing us frogs.

3. Old frogs don't hop. Another reason I am cautious about the future is that the Western world has a growing number of old frogs. Between 1970 and 2000, the economy responded to bailouts and stimulus packages because the baby boomers of the world were entering their greatest earning years -- their purchasing power increased, and demand for homes, cars, refrigerators, computers, and TVs boosted the economy.

The stimulus plans seemed to work. But when a person turns 60, their spending habits change dramatically. They stop consuming and start conserving like a bear preparing for winter. The economy of the Western world is heading into winter. Hot wires and hot money will not get old frogs to hop. Old frogs will simply join the bears and stick that money in the bank as they prepare for the long, hard winter known as old age. The businesses that will do well in a winter economy are drug companies, hospitals, wheelchair manufacturers, and mortuaries.

4. The dying frog economy will lead us to the biggest Ponzi schemes of all: Social Security and Medicare. If we think this subprime financial crisis is big, it's my opinion that this crisis will be dwarfed by the crisis brewing in Social Security and Medicare...Medicare being the biggest crisis of all. As old frogs head for the big lily pad in the sky, they will demand young frogs spend even more in tax dollars just to keep old frogs from croaking.

5. The 401(k)Ponzi scheme. A Ponzi scheme, like the scheme Madoff ran, depends upon young money to pay off old money. In other words, a Ponzi scheme needs tadpoles to finance old frogs. The same is true for the 401(k) and other retirement plans to work. If young money does not come into the stock market, the old money cannot retire. One reason so many people my age are worried, not only about Social Security and Medicare, is because they're concerned about getting their money out of the stock market before the other old frogs decide to drain the swamp.

The facts are that the 401(k) plan has a trigger that requires old frogs to begin withdrawing their money at a certain age. In other words, as baby boomers grow older, more and more will be required, by law, to begin withdrawing their money from the market. You do not have to be a rocket scientist to know that it is hard for a market to keep going up when more and more people are getting out.

The reason the 401(k) has this law related to mandatory withdrawals is because the Federal government wants to collect the taxes that they deferred when the worker's money went into the plan. In other words, the taxman wants their pound of flesh. Since they allowed the worker to invest without paying taxes, the government wants their tax dollars when the employee retires. That is why the laws require older workers to sell their shares ¬-- and pay their pound of flesh.

Demographics show that we are entering a battle between young and old. I call it the "Age War." The young want to hang onto their money to grow their families, businesses, and wealth. The old want the tax and investment dollars of the young to sustain their old age.

This war is not coming...it is upon us now. This is one of many reasons why I remain cautious and say, "The worst is yet to come."

Rate This story

Very Good (1867 Ratings)
3.5/5
Sign-in to rate!

528 Comments

Showing comments 1-5 of 528Next >>
Sort: first to last
  • Yahoo! Finance User - Saturday, November 14, 2009, 4:57PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    This guy ignores the huge transfer of wealth from the dead old frogs to their tadpole offspring that is coming soon. This not financial analysis, it is just blatant fear-mongering.

  • Z - Thursday, November 5, 2009, 2:20AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    When will this guy go away

  • Hillbilly Economist - Friday, October 23, 2009, 12:26AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    Pssst...pass the word. We are boycotting all credit card companies this Christmas. Hunker down and let's send these companies a message from our heart by not using them. Maybe then we can get some real change that is good for the consumer. P.S. They don't want you to know it but your credit score is BOGUS. Don't let them use it to lead you around by the nose.....Remember, Hunker Down and Merry Christmas.

  • Lucidmaze - Tuesday, October 13, 2009, 10:58PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    Keep in mind that Robert is a little biased with the Austrian School of Economics. There are some empirical mistakes in his analysis. Sorry Robert, but the Austrian School is still considered a fringe group in economics although they do have some fun things to read. The most obvious error here is that the market is openly being manipulated. This is not news to people that study economics, and it's covered in a 101 class. Simply put, when the Fed lowers its target interest rate, it is attempting to expand the money supply. Lower interest rates mean that an investor has a choice between what appears to be “risk free” government bonds at a lower interest rate, or an investment with a higher return. Raise the rate on government bonds, and investors that seek higher returns elsewhere have less options available, since those options compete with the higher rate from the government. The money supply then contracts as well with economic output. So when the Fed sunk the interest rate, and the government outright purchased assets, the price of the markets rose and economic output increases because more projects receive investment funds. These are only short term fixes, and Robert is absolutely correct that this can lead to inflation in the long run and higher debts that could possibly hamper long run economic growth. It probably will as a matter of fact. He is also correct in the fact that Social Security and Medicare commitments exceed long run government revenue expectations. This is where I may disagree with Robert and the Austrians. Think about it. When faced with hyper inflation from printing money, or hyper taxes, or just cutting benefits, which would you chose? Simply cut benefits to the upper 1/3 of wage earners in the US, with “replacement legislation,” that is a simple reinterpretation of the law – like the recent health care bill which will raise premiums on private insurance- which is the exact same thing as reducing the income of the wealthy that only have that insurance as an option. Social Security and Medicare Problem solved. It’s that simple and no one will realize what you did until 10 or so years from now. So if you have a college degree of any kind, or you have your own business, you need to save for yourself. After this passes the house and Senate and gets signed into law, you have no benefits if you make any money of any kind.

  • John - Saturday, October 10, 2009, 10:24AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 3/5

    Not all old frogs cash out of IRAs and 401Ks and leave the stock markets. For the last 14 years the two old frogs in this household have sold enough stocks to meet the mandatory withdrawal requirements, and then put the after-tax remains back into the market. I wish that I could take seriously your tadpole "advice" about investing in funeral homes, etc.

Showing comments 1-5 of 528Next >>
The columns, articles, message board posts and any other features provided on Yahoo! Finance are provided for personal finance and investment information and are not to be construed as investment advice. Under no circumstances does the information in this content represent a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security. The views and opinions expressed in an article or column are the author's own and not necessarily those of Yahoo! and there is no implied endorsement by Yahoo! of any advice or trading strategy.

More from Yahoo! Sources

  • CNN Money
  • Consumer Reports
  • Kiplinger
  • The Motley Fool
  • Business Week
  • Wall Street Journal

Historical chart data and daily updates provided by Commodity Systems, Inc. (CSI). International historical chart data and daily updates provided by Morningstar, Inc. Fundamental company data provided by Capital IQ. Quotes and other information supplied by independent providers identified on the Yahoo! Finance partner page. Quotes are updated automatically, but will be turned off after 25 minutes of inactivity. Quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes. Real-Time continuous streaming quotes are available through our premium service. You may turn streaming quotes on or off. All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. Neither Yahoo! nor any of independent providers is liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. By accessing the Yahoo! site, you agree not to redistribute the information found therein.

Yahoo! Answers is provided for informational purposes only, and no Q&A is intended for trading or investing purposes. Yahoo! shall not be responsible or liable for the accuracy, usefulness or availability of any Q&A information, and shall not be responsible or liable for any trading or investment decisions based on such information. View Complete Answers Disclaimer.