Sunday, December 20, 2009, 4:48AM ET - U.S. Markets Closed.

Robert Kiyosaki Why the Rich Get Richer

Robert Kiyosaki, Why the Rich Get Richer

Fear Can Cost You Money

by Robert Kiyosaki

Very Good (542 Ratings)
3.977858/5
Posted on Monday, January 8, 2007, 12:00AM

Wall Street recently paid out billions in bonuses to its employees. Those bonuses came from investors who believe investing is risky. In other words, there's a giant industry built around investor fears. The more fear, the bigger the bonuses.

A recent Time magazine article called "How Americans Are Living Dangerously" makes a number of good points on this reality. I'll look at a few of them.

Illusory Control

We misjudge risk if we feel we have some control over it, even if it's an illusory sense of control. The article uses the example of people who drive rather than fly.

Even though the risks of death are higher driving than flying, many people would rather drive simply because they feel they have more control driving. The facts are that only a few hundred people die a year flying and 44,000 are killed a year driving. After Sept. 11, 2001, many people took to the roads rather than the skies. Not surprisingly, between October and December 2001, there were a 1,000 more deaths.

Today, many people feel they have more control if they have money in savings. Thus the saying, "Safe as money in the bank." But the fact is that savers are the biggest losers of all.

Between 1996 and 2006, the purchasing power of the dollar dropped by 50 percent compared to gold. In 1996, gold was approximately $275 an ounce; by 2006 it was over $600 an ounce. In 1996, oil was approximately $10 a barrel ; in 2006 it was over $60 dollars a barrel. Compare the price of real estate in your area between the same 10 years and you'll notice that the purchasing power of your dollar has slipped.

The point is, in spite of the facts, many people feel safer with money in the bank because they feel they have more control over it. They don't have control over the price of gold, oil, or real estate, so they think investing in these assets is risky.

The Biggest Risks of All

The second point the Time article makes is that when we're afraid, we tend to ignore the statistics and listen to our emotions. As I mentioned above, you're over 500 times more likely to die in a car than in an airplane. Yet cars are not the biggest of all killers.

Of the 2.5 million deaths annually in the United States, the No. 1 killer is heart disease. In 2003, there were 685,089 deaths due to heart attack. Auto accidents caused 44,000 deaths. Only 17,732 deaths by murder and 1 death by shark attack occurred in the same year.

Despite these statistics, more people are afraid of sharks and murderers than driving up to a fast food restaurant and saying, "Super-size it." French fries kill more people than guns and sharks, yet nobody's afraid of french fries.

The same is true in the investment world. Since many people believe investing is risky, they go for the second-riskiest investment, mutual funds. As my rich dad used to say, "Mutual funds are like french fries. They may fill you up, but they aren't good for you in the long run."

John C. Bogle, founder of the Vanguard Funds, states in his book The Battle for the Soul of Capitalism, "When we have strong managers, weak directors, and passive owners, it's only a matter of time until the looting begins." Bogle has spoken out this way because the mutual funds industry is legally looting money from investors.

To put it another way, since most people think investing is risky and full of sharks, they've turned their money over to some of the biggest sharks in the world -- the managers of mutual funds.

True Expertise Counts

One of the reasons people think investing is risky is because there's an entire industry that wants you to believe so. Trading on your fears is very profitable.

This leads to point number three in the Time piece. The magazine quotes the findings of a study in which a panel of 20 communications and finance experts were asked about the risk of human-to-human transmission of avian (bird) flu. These experts said the risk was 60 percent. When the same question was asked of medical experts, their answer was 10 percent.

The point is that you need to be critical of experts. Is the person you seek advice from able to give you a credible answer?

Qualified and Unqualified Advice

There are three experts who are often not qualified to give you sound investment advice. They are:

  • Non-investors

    I'm always surprised by the number of people who take investment advice from non-investors -- people such as friends, family, and co-workers. A few years ago, I found a spectacular little condominium for sale for $50,000 in Phoenix, Ariz. All I had to do was put down $6,000 and assume the loan.

    At the time, it was worth about $95,000. Today the units in the same complex sell for $195,000. Best of all, the monthly rent at the time was approximately $1,000 a month and today rents are around $1,500.

    A friend from Portland, Ore., asked if I would let her purchase it. My wife, Kim, and I agreed, thinking at the time that this unit would be a great start for our friend. A few months went by and we asked her how the purchase was coming along. She said, "Oh, I forgot to tell you. I didn't buy the unit." When we asked her why, she said, "My neighbor Marge said it was too risky."

    "How many investment properties does Marge own?"

    "None."

    Clearly, taking advice from someone who doesn't know what they're talking about is the real risk.

  • Perceived experts, such as financial planners or stock or real estate brokers

    Most people take financial advice from salespeople, not rich people. Most stockbrokers are not rich nor do they invest in what they sell. The numbers are even worse for real estate brokers.

  • Investors themselves

    I've shown several great investments to an investor friend of mine. To this date, he hasn't purchased anything I've recommended. That's because he can always find something wrong with the investment. Instead of looking at what's good about them, he looks for what's wrong and then talks himself out of taking action.

    This is one reason why I invest as part of a team, so that I can consult with other investors rather than talk myself out of great deals.

The Time article made it clear that fear is normal. We all experience fear; I admit that I've let it hold me back. I probably would've been a lot richer a lot sooner if I flew more and drove less.

The important thing to remember is to pay attention to what we worry about -- and what we should be worrying about.

Rate This story

Very Good (542 Ratings)
4/5
Sign-in to rate!

110 Comments

Showing comments 1-5 of 110Next >>
Sort: last to first
  • J - Friday, January 19, 2007, 1:52PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    what nonsense. Paying 0.1 % overhead on a Vanguard mutual fund is bad? Whatever.

  • david - Friday, January 19, 2007, 6:33PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 5/5

    Most funds charge well more than .1% and many as high as 2%. The key point to understand is they charge it every year! People dont see it as it is simply reduced from their earnings (assuming the fund made money). So after say 20 years do the math - it is a huge amount to pay. What is 2% of a million bucks? $20,000 a year to pay someone to manage a fund every year is a LOT! Great article.

  • Million $$ Investor - Sunday, January 21, 2007, 9:19PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 5/5

    I agree with Kiyosaki, if I could put $6k down to make $100k in equity and up the rents $500 more per month which is an additional $6k per year, what a steal, thats not risky, thats brilliant... We pay 100k to make 900K here in Denver playing on sky scrapers, however we all started in condos and small properties, dream big and start small, mutual fund holders are the biggest losers in the world and obviously don't understand tax laws and true meaning of leverage, giving someone your money and expecting them to know whats in your best interest (and your family's) is madness and not called "investing" by true investors! Roberts point is simple, be aware of what people worry about but the odds are your worries should be the opposite of the lemmings and media figures are scared of! In other words, don't complain, profit instead, while everyone last year was complaining about gas prices, I was using commodity options to teak huge profits in the oil and natural gas markets!

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Monday, January 22, 2007, 7:21AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 5/5

    Most people today in this world of superior technology would have a very challenging time understanding what was wrote. Because still of their limited financial knowledge. We all have a tendency to shy aware from the risky and uncertain towards the seeming secure and safe.

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Monday, January 22, 2007, 11:04AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 5/5

    If there is a mutual fund family that charges an expense ratio of .1%? I'd love to see it. As a former financial industry insider the best expense ratio I have ever seen is around 50 basis points or .5%. Even a passively managed ETF charges around 18 basis points or .18% plus commission. If you go to a future value of money calculator and put in $20,000 for 20 years and compare the return of 10.92%(approximate historic return of S&P 500) vs 10.42% (adjusted for expenses) or better yet try 30 years and you will be shocked. This is what happens when even a small amount is take away from you annualized return. The point is that you need to learn and understand what you are investing in and how it works because in this case that small amount will cost you tens of thousands of dollars. Is it better than saving or hinding your money in a closet....yes but it isn't the best choice. Criticism in this case shows a lack of financial literacy and I have seen some of my former peers make hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars from people who aren't willing to invest in their own financial education and have limited financial literacy.

Showing comments 1-5 of 110Next >>
The columns, articles, message board posts and any other features provided on Yahoo! Finance are provided for personal finance and investment information and are not to be construed as investment advice. Under no circumstances does the information in this content represent a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security. The views and opinions expressed in an article or column are the author's own and not necessarily those of Yahoo! and there is no implied endorsement by Yahoo! of any advice or trading strategy.

More from Yahoo! Sources

  • CNN Money
  • Consumer Reports
  • Kiplinger
  • The Motley Fool
  • Business Week
  • Wall Street Journal

Historical chart data and daily updates provided by Commodity Systems, Inc. (CSI). International historical chart data and daily updates provided by Morningstar, Inc. Fundamental company data provided by Capital IQ. Quotes and other information supplied by independent providers identified on the Yahoo! Finance partner page. Quotes are updated automatically, but will be turned off after 25 minutes of inactivity. Quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes. Real-Time continuous streaming quotes are available through our premium service. You may turn streaming quotes on or off. All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. Neither Yahoo! nor any of independent providers is liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. By accessing the Yahoo! site, you agree not to redistribute the information found therein.

Yahoo! Answers is provided for informational purposes only, and no Q&A is intended for trading or investing purposes. Yahoo! shall not be responsible or liable for the accuracy, usefulness or availability of any Q&A information, and shall not be responsible or liable for any trading or investment decisions based on such information. View Complete Answers Disclaimer.