Tuesday, November 24, 2009, 10:06PM ET - U.S. Markets Closed.

Mick Weinstein The Week's Best Stock Blogs

Mick Weinstein, The Week's Best Stock Blogs

The Shape of Things to Come (and Gone)

by Mick Weinstein

Good (145 Ratings)
2.489658/5
Posted on Friday, January 4, 2008, 12:00AM

The start of 2008 prodded market bloggers to offer a few startling predictions for the upcoming year and look back at 2007's machinations. The broad negative sentiment we're currently hearing is important for all investors to note -- but could also be understood as a contrarian indicator that 2008 will offer significant upsides for savvy investors.

Let's meet back here in 12 months and see what happened.

2008: Pessimism Abounds

Wall St. Journal blogger David Gaffen notes that strategist Byron Wien had some dead-on predictions for 2007, and summarizes Wien's largely bearish calls for 2008, including the S&P 500 index falling 10 percent and the United States suffering its worst recession since 2001.

Fellow skeptic Tim Iacono is confident that despite the widespread housing weakness last year, housing prices will fall another 10 percent nationally, and "this is not one of those cases where it would be better to go against the crowd." Iacono believes the dollar will continue to fall, crude oil will spike to $130 a barrel, U.S. equities will suffer, and inflation "will be the least of the country's problems by summer." Iacono predicts that with job growth turning negative, "help-wanted signs at coffee shops and restaurants will slowly disappear -- which will be unfortunate for those teenagers who finally have to start looking for low-paying jobs to buy their next iPod or cell phone because their parents have spent all their home equity."

CNBC and TheStreet.com personality Jim Cramer echoes Iacono's expectations for rising oil prices and, as a hedge, suggests buying the stock of the company under whose sign you filled up your car today. Alternatively, Cramer suggests buying a driller -- Transocean (RIG) is his favorite -- "then sit back and make money." Other 2008 predictions from Cramer: Apple (AAPL) stock will reach $300 and take over the music business, and European companies will take advantage of the weak dollar and "swoop in" to snap up U.S. giants Merrill Lynch, JP Morgan, Colgate, Clorox, Whirlpool, and Black & Decker.

Barry Ritholtz takes a quick run through fund manager Doug Kass' yearly predictions, ranging from a drop in corporate profits and higher market volatility to a resurgence of the Japanese market and an acceleration of the housing bust. Stock-wise, Kass expects "bubble status" for Research in Motion, Apple, and Google. In the M&A department, Kass suggests Yahoo! and eBay will merge, as will Amazon and Overstock.com.

Portfolio's Felix Salmon has two trade ideas for 2008. One is highly speculative -- to go long the ABX subprime index on the assumption that it's oversold; the other is highly defensive -- to buy 10-year inflation-indexed Treasury bonds, as Salmon believes official inflation figures have been artificially low of late.

Matt Callow encourages further exposing portfolios to China in 2008, buying the Canadian dollar, and panning for gold. Callow's fully behind the "Ag boom," as he expects "just about anything tied to agriculture (from machinery, to food production) to do well in 2008." Given this and related trends, macro expert Gary Dorsch says the commodity "super cycle" should be "ready to rumble" in 2008.

ETFtrends' Tom Lydon says global markets will no longer be in sync with slower-growing U.S. markets, and that international exchange traded funds are the most compelling method to capture this trend. Lydon's looking at ETFs tracking Europe and Asia, fixed-income ETFs, and the entrance of big players like Fidelity and T. Rowe Price to the ETF provider market. He believes that as more investors learn about ETFs, they'll be running to their financial advisors, asking, "Why aren't these in my portfolio?!"

IndexUniverse's Matthew Hougan offers his wish list of five such ETFs he'd like to see hit the market this year, and notes that the remarkable recent growth of the ETF marketplace enables individuals to buy "a diversified portfolio that includes everything from Emerging Markets stocks to commodities futures ... for just 13.4 basis points [0.13 percent in yearly fees]."

David Fry says "good riddance" to a "sloppy" 2007 and, noting the growing importance of international Sovereign Wealth Funds (SWFs), speculates that this year SWFs may begin buying up precious metals miners as a hedge against the declining dollar.

Trader Charles Kirk says that despite the weak opening so far to 2008, "we are far from being oversold... and have a good way to go before we are again." Kirk's current plan? "[T]o wait until we are [oversold] again or until I have information and analysis to indicate a different plan of attack."

Finally, alternative energy expert Tom Konrad has a multipart series on investor "gambles" in that emerging sector for 2008. Konrad is bullish on the LED market with Cree, Inc., and Lighting Science Group, which got great publicity in Times Square on New Year's Eve. If that's not an incentive for the new year, what is?

2007: Meltdowns, Volatility, Globalism, and Deal-making

For financial bloggers, the major event of 2007 was the housing crisis, or as Trader Thoughts phrases it, watching "the world of structured finance go upside down and unravel faster than a ball of wool in a basket of kittens." The "contagion spread" as more than 25 subprime lenders declared bankruptcy and S&P and Moody's (belatedly?) downgraded more than $12 billion worth of bonds backed by subprime mortgages. Meanwhile, the European banking system suffered a credit crunch while U.S. inflation surged at the year's end.

The market may have seemed very volatile in 2007, with the big late-summer drop and Fall recovery, but Bespoke Investment Group notes that by one standard, the S&P 500 was actually less volatile in 2007 than its long-term trend.

PlanetQuant demonstrates that "anyone who made the decision to invest internationally in recent years has been well rewarded," and brings hard numbers that suggest this "golden age of global investing" will continue.

David Schrader's grandfather believes he should be depressed about the state of global economic and political events. Yet Schrader is an optimist. Retail was weaker than expected, while the state of the housing market remains "bent, but not yet broken." Financial institutions "need transfusions" to stay alive, but the stock markets were, all-in-all, positive. Schrader's hoping that the lesson of 2007 is that "things may be better than they seem."

Some bloggers measure 2007 by the deals that got done -- NewsVisual votes for Rupert Murdoch as this year's "king of deal-making" for his take over of Dow Jones. New media commentator Ashkan Karbasfrooshan couldn't agree more, calling Murdoch's Dow Jones acquisition "one helluva deal." Karbasfrooshan has a list of top M&A deals in web-oriented sectors -- he likes Yahoo!'s acquisition of Zimbra to improve offline office suites. WSJ's Stephen Grocer says deal-making in 2007 was "the tale of two halves" of the year and offers a "by-the-numbers look" at what was the biggest M&A year on record.

Himanshu Pandya deems 2007 a "Solar Year on Wall Street," with leader First Solar's stock up nearly 800 percent and 11 other publicly traded stocks in this sector up over 100 percent on 2007.

Finally, David Gaffen plays the blame game, looking back at the situations in which a company or executive decided that the ultimate responsibility for a problem lay with someone else. At Morgan Stanley, CEO John Mack blamed a massive $9 billion write down on just "one desk," while some housing industry players, amidst the worst downturn in decades for their business, preferred to blame the media for their current woes.

That's a sign that regardless of what 2008 has in store, market bloggers will play an important role in defining and chronicling it for the individual investor.

Rate This story

Good (145 Ratings)
2.5/5
Sign-in to rate!

48 Comments

Showing comments 1-5 of 48Next >>
Sort: first to last
  • Don - Monday, January 14, 2008, 12:22PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    Yawn. The only Yahoo "expert" less qualified to give financial advice than Weinstein is Suze Orman.

  • LeoR - Monday, January 7, 2008, 3:48PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 5/5

    This is a matter of "survivability" of a social and economic system based entirely on greed, and prospects don't look too good. Don't flatter yourselves, fellow right-wingers, the Soviets have died but it doesn't necessarily mean that the opposite extreme aka "US-style capitalism" is THE solution. Extremes tend to merge, and the truth - as always - is in the middle. Wake up and do the thinking!

  • Julie H - Monday, January 7, 2008, 12:07PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 3/5

    kenpoassassin: Why give up 7.5 when you can get away with 6? To answer your question it's simple. At 7.5, they can export a hell alot more. That's how China gets richer. That's why China resists as hell to go down to 6, but we Americans won't let them stay at 7.5 to distroy us.

  • AHAZ - Sunday, January 6, 2008, 11:52PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 2/5

    Mick, in your bio I read the following: "Mick believes the most compelling writing emerges from authors who have something personally at stake in the issues they address." The amount and type of information you provide in your four blogs, which I have read, thus far pose as up-to-date and pertinent; your writing voice with which you speak to us, however, lacks your personal investment you so relish in the bloggers you cover. We need more: Good writing takes the complexities and nuances of a subject, personal finance for example, and makes it understandable and engaging. Your samples are not lacking for coverage, but your lack of insights, your analyses, and your personal stake (who you are, your voice, and your viewpoints) have created, thus far, a distant "grand canyon" with your readership. Lifeless and disengaging notation after notation neither creates a partnership with us nor compells us reciprocally to do the same with you. Your vast Puzzle of pertinent (and most likely relevant and meaningful) financial info is akin to 20 different boxes of picture puzzle pieces thrown into a single box, a box perhaps that has an entirely different picture on the outside than any of the "inside puzzle pieces" could reveal. Give us a change to picture and unravel the "compellingness" of your writings. So far, we are lost in your Puzzle.

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Sunday, January 6, 2008, 12:46AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    This article is dreadful. Mick-Is your job to tell us when bloggers were right? You'd be doing your reader an even better service by telling us when bloggers are wrong. Will it ever happen or are you "in bed" with the bloggers you support here...Like you said, lets meet back in 12 months to see how your friends' predictions turn out. Let's do it in 3 or 6 months to see how they are doing at that point.

Showing comments 1-5 of 48Next >>

Recent Articles by Mick Weinstein

Seeking Alpha is the leading provider of stock market opinion and analysis from blogs, money managers, and investment newsletters, and a producer of its own financial content on market-moving news developments.

Read more from Seeking Alpha here.

More from Yahoo! Sources

  • CNN Money
  • Consumer Reports
  • Kiplinger
  • The Motley Fool
  • Business Week
  • Wall Street Journal

Historical chart data and daily updates provided by Commodity Systems, Inc. (CSI). International historical chart data and daily updates provided by Morningstar, Inc. Fundamental company data provided by Capital IQ. Quotes and other information supplied by independent providers identified on the Yahoo! Finance partner page. Quotes are updated automatically, but will be turned off after 25 minutes of inactivity. Quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes. Real-Time continuous streaming quotes are available through our premium service. You may turn streaming quotes on or off. All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. Neither Yahoo! nor any of independent providers is liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. By accessing the Yahoo! site, you agree not to redistribute the information found therein.

Yahoo! Answers is provided for informational purposes only, and no Q&A is intended for trading or investing purposes. Yahoo! shall not be responsible or liable for the accuracy, usefulness or availability of any Q&A information, and shall not be responsible or liable for any trading or investment decisions based on such information. View Complete Answers Disclaimer.