Saturday, December 19, 2009, 7:58PM ET - U.S. Markets Closed.

Ben Stein How Not to Ruin Your Life

Ben Stein, How Not to Ruin Your Life

A Home Truth about Real Estate Investing

by Ben Stein

Very Good (1001 Ratings)
3.485514/5
Posted on Friday, January 19, 2007, 12:00AM

In 1978, my wife and I bought an adorable little condo near Palm Springs as a spot to relax and play with our Weimaraner dog, Mary.

It was a tiny place, but we loved it. We paid $100,000 or so for it. Four years later, we got bored with the place and sold it for about $125,000. That was in 1982.

Now we have a place nearby that we enjoy, and were looking for a smaller place in which to put up our guests. By complete coincidence, a condo very similar to the one we sold in 1982 came on the market and I went to look at it. A lovely spot, to be sure. But the asking price? $345,000.

The Buts and What-Ifs

That means the house has kept up with inflation -- barely.

In fact, when I do the math, I realize that it hasn't fully kept up with inflation. Plus, the owner would have had to pay rental fees (it's on land leased from a Native American tribe), condo fees, taxes, and insurance. Granted, he would also have gotten the great pleasure of living there, but it wouldn't have been a great investment at all.

On the other hand, if the same person had bought the Dow in 1982, he would've made roughly 10 times the money by now, not counting dividends, which would have meant he would've made close to 20 times the money.

There are lots of "buts" and "what ifs" in real estate, to put it mildly. There are neighborhoods along ocean fronts, lake fronts, and in New York City and San Francisco where anyone would've made a fortune buying real estate in 1982.

Prices in some parts of Manhattan, along Florida's coasts, and in Malibu have gone up substantially more than in Palm Springs. Usually, the key to low real estate price growth is an abundance of land to build on, such as in Phoenix or the Palm Springs area. The key to high real estate growth is a prestigious neighborhood or an extreme shortage of space, such as ocean front in Malibu.

Taking Stock

Still, my wife and I bought our house in Malibu for $600,000 in 1990. It might have gone up by 150 percent since then, but in that span, the stock market has more than tripled on the Dow, counting dividends. Other indexes such as foreign stock indexes have gone up vastly more than that.

Now, more "buts" and "what ifs": There are long periods when the stock market doesn't make you much money. The S&P is still lower than it was seven years ago. Stocks adjusted for inflation lost about 80 percent of their value in the slump of the 1970s and part of the 1980s. So nothing is a slam dunk.

Professor Robert Shiller of Yale has demonstrated, however, that over very long periods homes barely keep pace with inflation. Stocks, over very long periods, beat inflation by a large margin. (Please remember that "over very long periods" part. You can easily buy at a peak and not see that peak again for many years. But barring war, you will see it -- and zoom past it.)

There are many, many good reasons to buy a home -- and a vacation home -- besides price. There's much joy to be had in living inside a house that's yours on land you own (or lease from the Morongo Indians). But as an investment, homes -- unless bought with an eye to scarcity or in prestigious neighborhoods, and even those sometimes don't work -- are to be lived in, loved, and passed on.

I myself love houses, and own a lot of them. I get immense joy from them. But for long-term gains, broad indexes (also called indices) of stocks are where you want to be.

A Living Investment

Again, I don't want to disparage real estate. As you know, I usually write about how to make money, usually by investing but sometimes also by improving your human capital. But spending money is also a part of life, and buying things you like and get a lift from is a big part of life. The only things I know of that can do both are homes.

Yes, I realize I wrote above that they weren't a great investment compared with stocks on broad indexes, and they're not. But they'll keep their value a lot better than cars or jewelry or clothing or trips to Hawaii.

They'll also give you a fabulous sense that you have a fortification against landlords, neighbors sending yucky cooking smells into your apartment, and a lack of control over your own dwelling.

Great, But Not Perfect

Maybe it's just me, but I get great joy from knowing that I'm within my own four walls, owned jointly only by little old' me and the bank. As far as I can tell, houses -- or condos -- are the only items you can both own and enjoy as a consumer good and also as an investment.

Moreover, if you land in the right neighborhood or hit the right swing in the cycle, they can even be a great investment. Now is a very nice time to start owning, with prices way down in most of the United States.

Again, you won't make as much in the long run as you would on stocks, but no one I know can live inside a stock, make love inside a stock, read a story to a child inside a stock, or lie in bed reading next to their dogs in a stock.

So, yes, real estate rules. It's a good, even great, investment -- just not the perfect investment.

Rate This story

Very Good (1001 Ratings)
3.5/5
Sign-in to rate!

203 Comments

Showing comments 1-5 of 203Next >>
Sort: last to first
  • paying customer - Saturday, January 20, 2007, 12:17AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 5/5

    Yea Ben Stien! This has been my experience. I've only sold one house. They appreciate enough to pay Realitor and Title Company fees and you keep your principle payments. Now, visualizing Ben Stien making love in a no load indexed mutual fund will definatly have adverse effects on capital markets for weeks to come. (This is an attempt at a joke. Please laugh.)

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Saturday, January 20, 2007, 10:28AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    Love ya Ben, but you blew it. You forgot thae effect of LEVERAGE when dealing in real estate. That Malibu home of yours for $600K? You spent no more than 20% down and paid into it probably $20k (after tax) per year, and had no other living expenses. So your ~$340k investment over 15 years netted you more than $1MM in appreciation. If you want to move you can transfer that tax free to another home! Ben, Ben, you're a smart guy. Don't ignore the fact that leverage makes the real estate market what it is

  • Doreen - Saturday, January 20, 2007, 4:41PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 4/5

    Great column as usual. The one thing I'd add is that real estate isn't liquid, which is one of the reason's is a less-than-perfect investment. I can sell a mutual fund at the drop of the hat, but a house will sit on the market a lot longer than that. (And before anyone talks about tapping equity, not all homes appreciate).

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Sunday, January 21, 2007, 12:52PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 3/5

    Someone beat me to it, but one word sums up the paradox. Leverage. I own a few properties that have almost doubled in value in five years (pitiful compared to the stock market), but I bought with less than 5% equity in each, and the renters in my buildings more than cover the taxes and carrying costs. That means a small steady income, and about a 1900% return for me if I were to sell today. Sure you can leverage stock too, but only 50% on the initial purchase, and the interest rates are quite a bit higher than my mortgages, due to broker-greed. I own stock too, but to paraphrase Sammy Sosa, "real-estate 'as been berry berry good to me."

  • Matthew - Monday, January 22, 2007, 7:25AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 5/5

    Leverage can also have a negative effect. If you invest a dollar in stocks,the most you can lose is a dollar.If you invest in leveraged real estate,you can lose a lot more than your original investment.

Showing comments 1-5 of 203Next >>
The columns, articles, message board posts and any other features provided on Yahoo! Finance are provided for personal finance and investment information and are not to be construed as investment advice. Under no circumstances does the information in this content represent a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security. The views and opinions expressed in an article or column are the author's own and not necessarily those of Yahoo! and there is no implied endorsement by Yahoo! of any advice or trading strategy.

Let Ben Stein show you how! Stein outlines the steps you can take today to assure your future tomorrow.

Don't leave middle age without it!
Only $16.77 plus S&H

More from Yahoo! Sources

  • CNN Money
  • Consumer Reports
  • Kiplinger
  • The Motley Fool
  • Business Week
  • Wall Street Journal

Historical chart data and daily updates provided by Commodity Systems, Inc. (CSI). International historical chart data and daily updates provided by Morningstar, Inc. Fundamental company data provided by Capital IQ. Quotes and other information supplied by independent providers identified on the Yahoo! Finance partner page. Quotes are updated automatically, but will be turned off after 25 minutes of inactivity. Quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes. Real-Time continuous streaming quotes are available through our premium service. You may turn streaming quotes on or off. All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. Neither Yahoo! nor any of independent providers is liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. By accessing the Yahoo! site, you agree not to redistribute the information found therein.

Yahoo! Answers is provided for informational purposes only, and no Q&A is intended for trading or investing purposes. Yahoo! shall not be responsible or liable for the accuracy, usefulness or availability of any Q&A information, and shall not be responsible or liable for any trading or investment decisions based on such information. View Complete Answers Disclaimer.