Tuesday, December 8, 2009, 4:45PM ET - U.S. Markets Closed.

Ben Stein How Not to Ruin Your Life

Ben Stein, How Not to Ruin Your Life

A Peace Offering for Your Retirement

by Ben Stein

Very Good (508 Ratings)
3.1220454/5
Posted on Friday, July 20, 2007, 12:00AM

A few days ago I was in Berlin. It's a beautiful city, with an astonishing number of good-looking people. Its ancient buildings are magnificently designed, and were impressively rebuilt after World War II and nearly 45 years of Communist domination in the eastern zone.

Touring a Troubled Past

There are broad plazas and hauntingly familiar sights, such as the Brandenburger Tor (or Brandenburg Gate), through which Hitler paraded in triumph after the conquest of France in 1940. There's also the Reichstag, where Hitler's diehard soldiers fought inch by inch against the Red Army heroes who won the final battle of the war in Europe. It's been rebuilt, but is still haunting and frightening (like most of Germany).

When you go past the area of museums and monuments into the deeper recesses of what was Communist East Berlin, along Karl-Marx-Allee (yes, that's its name), you see immensely boring, immensely oppressive apartment blocks with typically hideous Soviet Bloc architectural uniformity. It's easy to imagine how regimented the lives of those who lived in those grim buildings were.

Then, of course, there's the Berlin Wall, which kept human beings in and freedom out. There are still some sections of the Wall that are quite intact, although they're now covered with graffiti. It's a testament to a serious attempt to stifle the human spirit, which succeeded for a long time.

Forgotten Heroes

As I drove and walked past these monuments to a horrifying past and to what might have been, I was moved to deep gratitude for the men and women of the armed forces, who defended this great nation against Hitler, then Stalin, and then Brezhnev. Without their sacrifice, without the lives they put up and often lost, we wouldn't be a free people. There was no heavenly mandate that we would win the Second World War, just as there was no assurance that we would win the Cold War.

But we did, and while primary credit goes to those in the trenches, in the skies, and at sea, there's another vital group that gets very little credit: the people in the defense industry.

World War II was won by a combination of Churchillian determination; the efforts of heroic American, British, and (yes) Russian soldiers; and the mighty power of the U.S. defense industry. Names that have largely disappeared, like North American Aviation, Studebaker, and Hudson, and names that are still very much on the scene, like Boeing, GM, Ford, and Chrysler, helped win the war at home while the troops won in combat.

Masters of Peace

During the Cold War, we couldn't possibly have done as well as we did against the Soviet juggernaut without the super-high-quality defense products of Northrop Grumman, Lockheed, Martin Marietta, Pantex, L-3, and many other great companies. We were spared Communist domination largely because we had such good technology that the Soviets didn't dare challenge our weaponry, even though we couldn't compete with them in manpower.

The anonymous engineers of Boeing, Rockwell, and all the other companies are as responsible for our living in peace and freedom as anyone. These people literally never get any credit or respect -- there are no monuments to them anywhere that I know of, and you never hear anyone praising them.

But I think they deserve a lot of praise. They aren't the "masters of war" that my hero, Bob Dylan, wrote about so angrily some 40 years ago. They're the masters of peace, freedom, and decency, and we have them to thank for not having to wage nuclear war.

Now they're fighting to keep terrorists at bay. I have a lot of correspondence with soldiers in Iraq, who tell me stories of amazing new weapons to stop small-arms attacks on them, to jam IEDs, to keep control of battlefields under unimaginably complex conditions, and to preserve bodies and lives.

Defend Your Retirement

I admire the hundreds of thousands of defense industry people more than ever. Let's pay tribute to them all -- and, like the good capitalists we are, let's invest in them.

There are two ETFs that make it easy to buy into the defense sector: the PowerShares Aerospace & Defense fund (PPA) and the iShares Dow Jones US Aerospace & Defense fund (ITA). Both have done fantastically well in the last few years, mostly led by Boeing's amazing performance (I was touting Boeing when it was in the high 20s a few years ago, and now it's in the hundreds or close to it.)

Personally, I see no sign of the threat to America receding. Hillary Clinton, possibly our next president, has come out for a substantial increase in defense spending (bless her pointy little head), and over the long run it's a field that's so vital to the nation's survival that it can't help but grow.

So let's pay our respects -- and help prepare for retirement -- by joining with the men and women who work to defend peace and freedom everywhere.

Ben Stein has no financial interest in the stocks and ETFs mentioned in this column.

Rate This story

Very Good (508 Ratings)
3/5
Sign-in to rate!

92 Comments

Showing comments 1-5 of 92Next >>
Sort: first to last
  • Yahoo! Finance User - Thursday, September 18, 2008, 10:56AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    Ben....I thought Dubya is your "hero' not Bob Dylan......anyway....I'm not against "defense companies" in general.....just the stranglehold and "no-bid" contracts they have over the Pentagon.....after we 'WON" the Cold War with Russia our economy "flourished" in the 1990's under President Clinton with the "peace dividend" and reduced military spending...No matter how you cut it they are not masters of peace......Ghandi was a master of peace.....The Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor on Dec.7 1941 and we attacked back .....Saddam Hussein and Iraq did not attack our country on 9/11. How about a green dividend when we "leave" Iraq in the next administration or will that cut into our "masters of peace's" profits???..

  • George - Sunday, August 26, 2007, 11:40PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 5/5

    Mr. BS is a lot of things, but he's no BS. His history, logic, and world perspective are unassailable. Based partly on that Boeing recommendation, and mostly on his wealth from investments, I trust his pick of ETFs is equally stellar.

  • Jane - Friday, August 10, 2007, 7:31PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 5/5

    My husband works for Raytheon! I agree with Mr. Stein's analysis. Let's invest in our freedom by investing in the American defense indistry.

  • Paul - Thursday, August 2, 2007, 12:51PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 5/5

    2 stars for the stock pick 5 stars for being right on the money about unsung technology and wartime advantage 5 stars for the number of comments and discussion generated. Is this a record? I wonder how many of those one star reviewers have every done anything for their country including military service, volunteerism, or choosing a lower paid profession over lifestyle to the benefit others (teachers, fire, police, etc). Risking stereotype, my guard goes up when I read some of those 1 star reviews. Driving a Prius doesn't prove you have you have a good heart, know right from wrong, or have any qualifications for advice giving. It just means you want improved mph mileage and will buy foreign to get it. Volunteering your time at a home for challenged adults or choosing a giving profession says something about your soul.

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Monday, July 30, 2007, 8:25PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    We do need a strong defense and strong intelligence, but we don't need to be going around policing the world. Did we go to war over Hong-Kong? Did we go to war over Chechnya? So why should we have gone to war over Korea, Vietnam or Iraq? There is clearly an unneeded "military-industrial complex" causing lives in exchange for money and/or oil. Those of you who believe otherwise are either Zionists or uninformed. We should have gone after Osama and fought any country that harbored him without compliance. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=497251819335380093 Speaking out against pre-emptive, un-declared war, and the military-industrial complex that causes it, does not mean we are weak on military. We should have a strong military that can mop up any TRUE threat.

Showing comments 1-5 of 92Next >>
The columns, articles, message board posts and any other features provided on Yahoo! Finance are provided for personal finance and investment information and are not to be construed as investment advice. Under no circumstances does the information in this content represent a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security. The views and opinions expressed in an article or column are the author's own and not necessarily those of Yahoo! and there is no implied endorsement by Yahoo! of any advice or trading strategy.

More from Yahoo! Sources

  • CNN Money
  • Consumer Reports
  • Kiplinger
  • The Motley Fool
  • Business Week
  • Wall Street Journal

Historical chart data and daily updates provided by Commodity Systems, Inc. (CSI). International historical chart data and daily updates provided by Morningstar, Inc. Fundamental company data provided by Capital IQ. Quotes and other information supplied by independent providers identified on the Yahoo! Finance partner page. Quotes are updated automatically, but will be turned off after 25 minutes of inactivity. Quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes. Real-Time continuous streaming quotes are available through our premium service. You may turn streaming quotes on or off. All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. Neither Yahoo! nor any of independent providers is liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. By accessing the Yahoo! site, you agree not to redistribute the information found therein.

Yahoo! Answers is provided for informational purposes only, and no Q&A is intended for trading or investing purposes. Yahoo! shall not be responsible or liable for the accuracy, usefulness or availability of any Q&A information, and shall not be responsible or liable for any trading or investment decisions based on such information. View Complete Answers Disclaimer.