Wednesday, January 6, 2010, 12:53PM ET - U.S. Markets close in 3 hours and 7 minutes.

How-to Guides

Your step-by-step online resource

Good (186 Ratings)
2.16129/5

How Much Do You Need to Retire?

Note: This guide has been modified in response to reader feedback.

Uncertainty over the future of Social Security, longer life expectancy, and inflation all factor into how much you'll need to save for a comfortable retirement.

Before You Start

  • Assess your most recent retirement savings calculations and the assumptions you had in mind at the time.
  • Speak with your spouse or partner about the financial implications of your retirement plans.
  • Make a list of your likely sources of retirement income.
  • Take a fresh look at your retirement account statements.
1

How Much Do You Need to Retire?

Picturing yourself as a retiree may be hard if not impossible. But if you could envision those future years, you'd probably see a life full of activity and decades of health, happiness, and prosperity. No rocking chairs and lap shawls need apply.

The reality, however, is probably somewhere in between. The problem with the picture is that the pleasure and comfort of your later years depend, to an ever-increasing degree, on the actions you take today.

So many changing facets of the American workplace have made it more important than ever to take control of your financial future. By investing now with a long-term focus, you can greatly improve your chances of having a fulfilling retirement.

Americans used to count on a pension plus Social Security to get them through those "golden years." These days, people change jobs more often, rely on dual incomes, and manage their own retirement funds through defined contribution plans. By most estimates, you'll need between 60% and 80% of your final working years' income to maintain your lifestyle after retiring.

Sources of Retirement Income

0021.gif

This chart represents the income sources of American retirees.
Source: Social Security Administration, 2006.
Back to top

2

Saving Is the Key Component of Retirement Income

The accompanying pie chart shows the importance of saving now toward a retirement fund. Not only are Social Security benefits less significant, but the sums are diminishing and the age at which you can begin to receive benefits is higher. You can contact Social Security at 1-800-772-1213 to learn what you can expect in benefits, and when. Benefits are calculated on your earnings, with certain variable factors.

Alas, the responsibility for the bulk of your nest egg rests with you. Social Security represents approximately 39% of the typical retiree's income, according to the Social Security Administration.

Also, as you begin thinking about how much you'll need for a comfortable retirement, you may be startled to learn the impact of inflation. At an average inflation rate of 3%, your cost of living would double every 24 years. Your annual income will need to increase each year even during retirement in order to keep up with the gradual rise in prices of everyday goods.

You'll also have to consider the likelihood of increased medical costs and health insurance as you grow older. The average nursing home stay, for instance, now costs more than $74,000 a year and could rise to over $150,000 per year by 2030, assuming an annual inflation rate of 3%.
Back to top

3

Meeting Your Goals

Financial experts estimate that most people will need anywhere from 60% to 100% of annual pre-retirement income to live on each year after retirement. To find out how close you are to accumulating this amount, complete the exercise below.

  1. Estimate your last working year's salary. Multiply your current salary by the inflation factor from Table 1, based on the number of years you have until retirement. This represents the future value of your salary, assuming 3% annual inflation.

    Example: If you are currently making $40,000 and have 20 years until retirement, your formula is $40,000 x 1.81 = $72,400


  2. Determine the percentage of your last working year's salary that you expect to need for annual living expenses after retirement. If 100% seems high, consider that while you may be able to reduce some expenses, such as commuting costs, others, such as health care, may increase. Multiply the percentage of your last working year's salary that you expect to need by the amount in #1.

    Example: $72,400 x .80 = $57,920


  3. Estimate your future Social Security and retirement benefits. The best source for Social Security benefit projections is your annual Social Security statement (or one of the calculators from www.ssa.gov). If you don't have access to these, you can estimate your benefit using Table 2.

    a. From your Social Security Benefit Statement, multiply the monthly amount listed under "If you continue working until full retirement age") by 12, then multiply that figure by the inflation factor from Table 1.

    Example: If your benefit statement shows an estimated monthly benefit of $1,153 and you expect to continue working an additional 20 years, your formula is $1,153 x 12 x 1.81 = $25,043

    b. If you are using Table 2, take the number corresponding to your annual salary and years to retirement.

    Example: If you currently earn $40,000 and have 20 years to retirement, your estimated benefit would be $25,000


  4. Subtract your Social Security benefits and other retirement benefits from the amount calculated in #2. This will give you an estimate of how much income from your personal assets you are likely to need each year in retirement.

    Example: $57,920 - $25,000 = $32,920


  5. Estimate the total amount that you will need in retirement accounts (such as 401(k) plans and IRAs) and personal savings. To determine this amount, multiply 19.3 by the annual amount you calculated in #4. This answer represents the amount of savings you are likely to need to last 28 years, assuming a 3% annual inflation rate and a 6% annual investment return during retirement. A healthy, 65-year-old male has a 10% chance of living longer than 28 years.

    Example: $32,920 x 19.3 = $635,356


  6. Enter the amount of your current savings and investments and multiply it by the growth factor from the accompanying table. This is the amount that your savings would likely be worth by the time you reach retirement, assuming an 8% annual investment return prior to retirement compounded annually.

    Example: $30,000 (account balance) x 4.66 (growth factor for 20 years until retirement) = $139,800


  7. If line 5 is larger than line 6, congratulations! You are likely on your way to meeting your retirement savings goal. Keep saving! If line 6 is larger than line 5, subtract line 5 from line 6. Enter that amount here. This is the additional amount you'll need.

    Example: $635,356 - $139,800 = $495,556


  8. Divide #7 by the multiplier in Table 1 that corresponds to the number of years until your retirement. The multiplier represents how large your savings are likely to grow based on your annual contribution to qualified retirement accounts. The result is the approximate amount you may want to set aside each year.

    Example: $495,556 / 49.42 = $10,027

Table 1 - Factors
Years Until Retirement Inflation Factor Growth Factor Multiplier
5 1.16 1.47 6.34
10 1.34 2.16 15.65
15 1.56 3.17 29.32
20 1.81 4.66 49.42
25 2.09 6.85 78.95
30 2.43 10.06 122.35
35 2.81 14.79 186.10
40 3.26 21.72 279.78
Table 2 - Social Security Income
Years to Retirement
Current Salary 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5
$20,000 29,500 27,000 25,000 22,500 20,500 19,000 17,500 16,000
30,000 32,500 30,000 27,500 25,000 22,500 21,000 19,000 17,500
40,000 35,500 32,500 30,000 27,000 25,000 23,000 21,000 19,000
50,000 38,500 35,500 32,500 29,500 27,000 25,000 22,500 21,000
60,000 41,500 38,000 35,000 32,000 29,000 26,500 24,500 22,500
70,000 44,500 41,000 37,500 34,000 31,000 28,500 26,000 24,000
80,000 47,500 43,500 40,000 36,500 33,500 30,500 28,000 25,500
90,000 50,500 46,500 42,500 39,000 35,500 32,500 29,500 27,500
97,500+ 53,000 48,500 44,500 40,500 37,000 34,000 31,000 28,500

Back to top

4

Pensions, Social Security, and Other Allies

Traditional pensions are estimated to supply less than 19% of retirement needs, according to the Social Security Administration (2004; most recent report published).

Add that to the 39% or so a year you might expect from Social Security, and you'll probably still fall far short of your goal. A radically reduced standard of living for a quarter century or more is hardly the stuff "golden age" dreams are made of.

Fortunately, you have some allies. First is the power of compounding, which takes advantage of time. Tax deferral is another ally. Using investment vehicles such as 401(k) plans or individual retirement accounts (IRAs), you can put off paying taxes on your earnings until you are retired and potentially in a lower tax bracket. Meanwhile, your contributions may be pretax or tax deductible, helping reduce current tax bills.

For example, an investment of $10,000 would grow to more than $100,000 after 30 years, at an annual return of 8%, if all the returns were reinvested and the account grew tax deferred. As with all hypotheticals, this example does not represent the performance of any specific investment and the earnings would be subject to taxation upon withdrawal at then-current rates and subject to penalties for early withdrawal.

The more time you have until retirement, the more fortunate you may be. Delaying just months -- never mind years -- can significantly reduce your results. Consider this example: Jane begins investing $100 a month in her employer-sponsored 401(k) plan when she's 25. Mark does the same -- beginning when he's 35. Assuming a 9% annual rate of return compounded monthly, when Mark retires at 65, he'll have $183,074. Jane will have $468,132.

While this is only a hypothetical and there are no guarantees any investment will provide the same results, you can see the remarkable difference starting early can potentially make.

By starting early, investing systematically, and benefiting from the potential of compounding and tax deferral, you may pack a lot more punch into your portfolio.

Another advantage of today's retirement planning options is that you can control how your money is invested.

Investment plans need to be customized because different people have different degrees of risk they will accept as well as varying time frames they intend to hold their investments. A tailor-made portfolio can be diversified to take these factors into account. It's a wise idea to consult a professional financial advisor for complete information.
Back to top

Summary

  • The rising cost of living means you need to plan on an annual retirement income that could be substantially higher than what you spend now.
  • You may have higher expenses in some areas, such as medical care, but lower expenses in others. You can estimate your "personal inflation rate" by looking at your expected living costs in retirement.
  • You may need between 60% and 80% of your final working years' salary.
  • Retirement income may be made up of pension benefits, Social Security benefits, personal savings and investments, and income from part-time work.
  • Your financial advisor can help you develop an estimate of your needs and a plan to help you accumulate a retirement fund to provide income you'll need.

Checklist

  • Review your household budget to find ways you can spend less and set aside more for the future.
  • Contribute as much as possible to your retirement accounts -- particularly if your employer makes "matching" contributions.
  • Recalculate your retirement savings goals several times, using different assumptions about the future each time, to gain insights about your potential financial outlook.
  • Rebalance and diversify your investment assets if necessary.

Rate This how-to guide

Good (186 Ratings)
2/5
Sign-in to rate!

44 Comments

Showing comments 6-35 of 44<< PreviousNext >>
Sort: first to last
  • Tom B - Friday, May 11, 2007, 5:24PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    I tried doing this calculator and came out with an absurd result. Saving $57k a year on a $80k salary is nuts. After taxes, everything would need to be saved. And the crazy thing is, I have savings too as I have been maxxing the 401k and Roth IRA since starting work. Something is horribly flawed. A good start is to look at the rate of return but I have a feeling there is more to it than that. I also doubt I will need 60% of my last year's income, let alone 80%. I don't have an extravagent lifestyle. If you want to do the traditional save for retirement thing, best advice I can give is max out the 401k and IRA every year. With this calculator, that would not even get you to 1/2 of the way there. And most people don't even get close to doing that.

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Friday, May 11, 2007, 1:54PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    This article is just a regurgitation of every 'financial planning' web site. Using the author's example, how is someone with a $40,000 annual income supposed to save $20,164 per year for retirement? That's 50% of your PRE-TAX income! Yes, we want to save for retirement, but give us a break.

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Friday, May 11, 2007, 1:19PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    Flawed 100%. Is there a way to give this thing 0 stars?

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Friday, May 11, 2007, 10:52AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    This calculator assumes a 5% annual rate of return on long-term retirement investments (resulting in a real 2% return), which represents a very poor investment strategy. Even a relatively conservative long-term balanced approach should return more like 8% (yielding 5% real return). The excessively low 5% model would tend to leave people believing that reaching their retirement goals is unattainable; this is not a good way to motivate those people who most desperately need to start preparing for their long-term needs.

  • Henry - Sunday, April 15, 2007, 9:09AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    I don't think the article had any surprises. If you are happy downsizing your living arrangement and taking walks, reading (libraries are good places for books and videos), wathing TV, eating most meals at home, not giving large gifts to kids and grandkids, then you can live on social security and a reasonalble pension/401k/IRA. What I find is many of my clients don't really want to fully retire. They want to work. That's why work provides a good portion of many retirees cash flow. But if you want to retire, travel, and live the so called "good life," then you need to make a sacrifice now, putting the max into all available retirement options and also saving/investing something each paycheck. As in all economics, it's a trade off -- live better now or better later. Of course a nice inheritance doesn't hurt. As with life not all is fair; many baby boomers will have a signficant inheritance since their parents were savers and those that own homes in high growth areas have seen great appreciation in their homes. Others will get nothing and may have to spend their money to help their parents in their final years. Inheitance will help a number (perhaps 15%) of baby boomers to have a much better retirement. The key is to be flexible and find things to enjoy regardless of your financial status. It can be done. It doesn't take a lot of $$ to enjoy life. Some of the best things in life are free others cost big bucks. He more $$ you have, now or in retirement, the more $$ your can choose from.

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Sunday, April 15, 2007, 1:36AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 3/5

    there is only three things to do go to work .... save much as u can and go to poor country and live like rich...

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Friday, April 13, 2007, 5:17PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    A much better retirement calculator can be found on Yahoo at... http://finance.yahoo.com/calculator/retirement/ret-02 Just plug-in the numbers and it does the work for you. Also, I agree that we all need to save as much as possible for retirement. BUT, don't miss-out on having a comfortable life. I have been forced into unemployment for a few months now and I can honestly say I am loving it! My entire life used to revolve around work work and more work. Now I finally have time for me.

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Friday, April 13, 2007, 12:50PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 5/5

    There are calculators galore on the net and most will just ask you to enter information and spit the $/month that you need to save to achive your retirement objective. The algorithm given in this article let's us see the impact of every change to enter. Good article overall

  • Keith J - Friday, April 13, 2007, 12:06PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 2/5

    First, the assumed growth of 5% is a little conservative. Second, the end result is a constant amount each year with no adjustment for increasing salary. For someone earning 40k with no savings and 35 years to retirement the suggested amount to save is 12k. This is large percentage of the gross. If you allow for 6% growth and for the amount to be saved to increase by 3% a year the suggested starting savings is 7k which seems a little more realistic.

  • Sergio - Friday, April 13, 2007, 12:03PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    Extremelly poor and blown out of proportion. Most financial advisors want you to believe that you need a tremendous amount of money to retire, thus injecting fears that you will run out of money way before the real projections. SAVE LOGICALLY. DON'T PAY ATTENTION TO THIS RUBBISH.

  • Philip - Friday, April 13, 2007, 11:47AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    This is probably the worst retirement calculator I've seen. Even the example is absurd. I guess if it scares people into thinking they need to save more (which about 95% of Americans do), it does the job.

  • Michael - Friday, April 13, 2007, 11:14AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    I can't believe this person has actually published this calculator on Yahoo Finance..WOW. The people they let do these articles. Who is that god-awful to only get an average of 5% return over 20-30 yrs? That is about half of just playing the regular market. This doesn't assume any sort of raises or promotions either with your salary

  • Jean - Friday, April 13, 2007, 10:57AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    So far, all the retirement caculators that I have seen were pretty bad. This one is among the worse ones. A good calculator should consider the retirement age, health, whether one owns a home, the proportion of assets in the home, and the desire to stay in that home. It should give a range of amounts instead of a single value and should associate probabilities to the ends of the range.

  • Jacob O - Friday, April 13, 2007, 9:51AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 3/5

    hey reterm2003 ...how do you receive tax exempt capital gains from down sizing ones home?

  • Leec - Friday, April 13, 2007, 9:39AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    Absolutely absurd and misleading approach. Even the example suggests an individual with 20 years left must "save" half one's annual (gross) salary! Note that althought the text indicates social security will provide "only" 39% of needed funds, the calculator TOTALLY ignores this! It also provides no input for pensions or that many people will receive tax-exempt capital gains from downsizing their home. A useless and misleading article. term

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Monday, April 9, 2007, 1:35AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    A pessimistic guide written by a business that earns money from selling investments. Is life long enough to meet the goal set by this article? Will you have kids in college and be saving for retirement when you retire? An average return of 5% over 30 years seems low. Most people continue earning some money in retirement and many people will inherit some assets.

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Monday, April 9, 2007, 1:04AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 4/5

    What I've heard other experts say is that you need 25 times your annual income at the time of your retirement. This assumes that you don't have other pensions or earnings, however. What is really telling is the first example where the annual earnings are 40k and the savings required to retire in 20 years is more than half his gross current earnings. But this is reality in todays enlightened, self-sufficient world. I keep seeing experts write about working in retirement. Is this still retirement? What an exciting life we have to look forward to when we retire. First go back to work at 25% of your pre-retirement pay, then return to the nursing in the evening, paying a princely $74k per year for that!

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Sunday, April 8, 2007, 9:00PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    Pensions are great, but for all you out there living on pensions and thinking you are on easy street, might I direct your attention to United Airlines. And after all what is a pension but an annuity bought for you by the company, so maybe annuites are not all that bad after all......hummmmmmmmmmm

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Sunday, April 8, 2007, 8:42PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    I agree with the chap who advised on the expenses. This presentation on retirement is complex and stupid. Bozo is a good word. Can you believe that someone got paid big buck for this!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Sunday, April 8, 2007, 3:06PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    I too am sick of these ways to estimate your retirement needs. This one tells you to use 60-80% of your final years earnings as the target for your needs. A better asessment would be to take your last years expenditures, and see how much you need (adjusting for extraordinary expenses such as tuitions at this point in your life)...then use the inflation factors. You need less in those years to retirement since hopefully the kids are gone and the house is either paid for or has a low mortgage. We for instance are in our final years to retirement and are putting away a good percentage of our earnings, so 60-80% of what we earn is not representative of what we will need. On the other hand, the 9% growth factor is too optimistic; the accepted number at this time is 4% real rate of return to be expected from a average portfolio over the next decade at least, combined with a 3% inflation would say that 7% is the maximum expected long term return that should be used. One of the reports I saw recently seemed to have best explain this overly conservative estimates; someone has something to benefit from you putting away more money than you need....namely the mutual fund companies that collect fees from the money in their hands...they generally seem to be overly conservative on the amount that you need to put away, and overly conservative on the amount they project you can withdrawal...to keep the money in their hands.

  • Lt2211 - Sunday, April 8, 2007, 1:49AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    It's not the assests you amass but rather the income you will have at retirement. My wife and I recently retired with only $100k in Savings. I am a retired police lieutenant and she a retired teacher. Together we draw around $106,000 in pension money. Said pensions increase yearly for inflation. In our case your info is relatively useless. Life is great!!!!

  • kenneth - Saturday, April 7, 2007, 9:04PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    The rating system is overly complex. Come up with a plug in numbers and selection page to allow for different values for retirement and savings. Shouldn't need a calculater to figure out this stuff. See MSN and the various mutual fund websites, like T Rowe Price for what I mean.

  • readytoretiresoon - Saturday, April 7, 2007, 4:53PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    Really lousy assumptions and way too conservative...where do you come with these bozo's. I've got $305K nestled away with 20 years to go and I need to set aside $60K/yr based on my income..?? I don't think so.

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Saturday, April 7, 2007, 1:38PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    Ok, smarty. I'm sick enough of reading these stereotypical financial guru trash to actually respond to this one. Let's see if your formula really makes sense. Lets plug your numbers into a spreadsheet and set the values for income, savings, etc. Now lets rachet up the persons income from 20K up to 100K and see what happens (btw, I used 50K in savings and a 25 yr time horizon and I want to keep the same person to normalize spending habits, etc.). So according to you, starting with 20K in salary I'd need just over 5K a year to retire. At 50K, I'd need nearly $18K. At 100K I'd need nearly 40K! Well, heck, why should we bother with better paying jobs and raises? They just keep digging us deeper into a hole for retirement every year anyway! I should have just skipped college, saved the $100K it cost and go flip burgers until I retire - after all, I'd only be short about $1,600 in retirement. Heck, Social Security shold cover that much after 25 yrs right! Given that your initial assumption was a generalization for post-retirement income, I'm not entirely surprised this isn't even close to reality. Retirement might be a general thing we all pursue, but next time remember that there's more to this than than just straight math. Don't forget about the "Human Element". That factor will change the output of your formula every time. One size doesn't fit us all. Neither will one formula - at least not with so few variables.

  • RickL - Saturday, April 7, 2007, 12:49PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 2/5

    Too conservative! I am ready to retire now with $1.6 million but this tells me that I need to save another $52,000 for the next 5 years before I have sufficient retirement funds.

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Saturday, April 7, 2007, 2:29AM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 3/5

    Michael-- I don't know where are these people who save obsessively for retirement are. Most people, even many in their 50s are clueless about basic personal finance. I'm sure there are some who will save too much, but they will be in the minority. And wouldn't you rather die with some extra money than live out your old age in poverty??? Things were different for your grandparents generation. They didn't get booted out of decent paying jobs in their 50s like many people do today. Your grandparents generation also didn't live as long as people do today.

  • MoneyNing - Friday, April 6, 2007, 9:53PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 2/5

    The formulas do not work for all spectrum of numbers. Poorly done.

  • Yahoo! Finance User - Friday, April 6, 2007, 8:09PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    Oh no, another one of those articles that use %'s for people to estimate what their retirement income needs will be. This is a very poor way of planning for retirement. In order for a successful retirement you must know what your routine expenses are and how much you wish to set aside for travel and unexpected expenses i.e. home and auto repairs. If someone is saving a very large percentage of their pre-retirement income i.e 40 - 50%, then why would they need more in retirement than pre-retirement (the 80% suggestion). Just does not make sense. Incomes for many of us begin to peak in late 50's and with a mortgage paid off and no kids at home, it is very easy to begin saving large portions of your income prior to retirement. I would not want someone like the person that wrote this article to assist me with my retirement.

  • Tom - Friday, April 6, 2007, 3:41PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    The person that wrote this article can not be a financial advisor or planner..poorly done...

  • EdwardM - Friday, April 6, 2007, 1:57PM ET  Report Abuse

    • Overall: 1/5

    According to this example a person making $40000 a year should put away more than 50% of his gross income a year for retirement. This table is useless!

Showing comments 6-35 of 44<< PreviousNext >>

Rates

See today's average rates across the country.

More from Yahoo! Sources

  • CNN Money
  • Consumer Reports
  • Kiplinger
  • The Motley Fool
  • Business Week
  • Wall Street Journal

Sponsored Links

Get up to $5350/Year to Finish School
Financial Aid Available for Those Who Qualify. Go Back to School Now.
www.ClassesUSA.com
Free 2009 Credit Report and All 3 Scores
Free 3-bureau Credit Report – includes Transunion, Equifax, Experian.
FreeCreditReportsInstantly.com
Obama Supports Health Insurance Reform
Reform Your Health Insurance Policy Today, Compare Plans & Save Money.
www.eHealthInsurance.com
Obama Backs Insurance Regulation
Drive Less than 2 Hours a Day? You Could Get Auto Insurance Discounts.
Auto-Insurance-Experts.com
Buy Stocks for $4
No Account or Investment Minimums. $50 Account Bonus! Don’t miss out.
www.sharebuilder.com
Refinance Now at 4.1% Fixed
No hidden fees, 4.1% APR. No obligation. Get 4 free quotes. No SSN req.
MortgageRefinance.LendGo.com

Historical chart data and daily updates provided by Commodity Systems, Inc. (CSI). International historical chart data and daily updates provided by Morningstar, Inc. Fundamental company data provided by Capital IQ. Quotes and other information supplied by independent providers identified on the Yahoo! Finance partner page. Quotes are updated automatically, but will be turned off after 25 minutes of inactivity. Quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes. Real-Time continuous streaming quotes are available through our premium service. You may turn streaming quotes on or off. All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. Neither Yahoo! nor any of independent providers is liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. By accessing the Yahoo! site, you agree not to redistribute the information found therein.

Yahoo! Answers is provided for informational purposes only, and no Q&A is intended for trading or investing purposes. Yahoo! shall not be responsible or liable for the accuracy, usefulness or availability of any Q&A information, and shall not be responsible or liable for any trading or investment decisions based on such information. View Complete Answers Disclaimer.