Moralisms? God, you really are dumb. Even the autocorrect showed it was not a real word.
True, but unfortunately this judge is not being asked to rule on the legality of how the shares we repurchased but whether the questions hanging over those acquisitions, which have not yet been proven in court, are strong enough to take away the rights starching to the property on the chance that those rights were acquired illegally.
I'm not sure a judge in the US is willing to take such a stand. Pity.
I'm sorry but your writing skills are abysmal but I'll #$%$ume you are referring to the ISS "research" where they refer to seven, yes, SEVEN hostile instances, just seven. Why did they even bother. That research has as much validity as my granny on Sunset Boulevard.
As for how Pyott has run AGN. The great quarters recently are a result of the investments he has made through the recent years. He is now leveraging such investments. The organic growth is phenomenol as a result. But you wouldn't know much about that. It's called growing a pharmaceutical business organically. And it's kicking VRX's #$%$.
But when you want rid of the trash that is the VRX stock you get in exchange, you then have to pay the tax. What an idiot plan you put forward. "Daw, don't pay tax now, pay later."
VRX is the only gainer from a combination.
And you need a dose of reality VRX stock is a much better deal No taxes on stock and going to be worth a lot more when they are combined
Wrong again. Mom more meatloaf!! I love when you waste your valuable time posting the same thing over and over. Do you cut and paste?
Isn't it a male judge? To me it's not taking a stand, it is not allowing illegal activity such as Bill Ackman and Pearson performed to be permissible. A non conviction equates to a bad judge.
Sentiment: Strong Buy
I highly doubt that she will take a stand against this issue. Since SEC has initiated the investigation, it is a must that the judge take that into consideration and allow sufficient time so that she makes the right judgement. she apparently said that she will not delay judgement and that unless SEC acts she will not consider investigation in deciding the ruling. Amazingly ridiculous justice system but true!!! She should atleast realize that the SEC is investigating potential insider trading here.
Total hatchet job by some guy who only writes negative articles on Valeant has an agenda and you people hear what you want to hear
who about thee article this week that discusses deals and premiums and how most , not all , hostile deals that do not get done - the target company does not perform as well as it previously had Pyott thought AGN was fairly valued int eh low 120s so much so that he sold most of his stock THIS YEAR
2 months later - the VRX which offers a huge premium to the then AGN price - isot enough Pyott is looking after his interests NOT HIS SHAREHOLDERS and he has broken securities laws to do it You people all work for AGN and fear losing your jobs Soen of you SHOULD LOSE YOUR JOBS because Pyott has run this company so fat Only when VRX came did he start to do smarter things
Jeff Ubben has made more money and has had more successful investments because of his smarts than you and this entire board will ever make in a lifetime
You people do not know what you are talking about
to trying to drive the price of VRX down. That my friends is a securities law violation and in direct contrast to what their directors have said. That is a disingenuous and illegal way to treat his own shareholders What a jackass and a liar a total poser - not looking after his shareholders
I second that Elizabeth. Judge Carter please take a stand to Ackman and Valeant and do not let their behavior continue or succeed.
Sentiment: Strong Buy