VirnetX Holding Corp Message Board
-
how can apple appeal ,when the entire verdict is not in
-
My best guess is tomorrow is the big chill. MACD will break below the 0-line and that will take this down to the 50day. $21.10 would be a 50% pull back. Today's low bounced off the lower BB. GLL's.
FWIW I think we are still few weeks out from any decision from HJD. csco retrial is a #$%$ shoot. Too bad so much is put on this because it means little in the long run. Look back 5 years and project out 5 years from now. Remember, these guys back in 1999 looked out to see where we would be today. GLSentiment: Strong Buy
- Reply to
Patent Troll Just An Outstanding Short. Can't Even Sell Gabriel. Tremendous Short Opportunity
by terp516 •27 minutes agoWhile judges are slow to act, isn't it just a matter now of the judge deciding on a royalty percentage, after waiting and hoping that vhc and apple will agree on a percenatage first, so that the judge doesn't have to earn his pay???
-
sorry doctor, but this action is just smart investors getting short. Nothing else. They know a company who can't execute when they see it. Look at their track record. It might open your eyes.
-
so what's new
-
This is a great time to get short above 20. It's going to be a quick ride down to single digits once MSFT announces they are fighting the new lawsuit and AAPL gets a positive ruling.
-
It was so much better when you were under your rock, how about going back under ?
-
@ lex..........Investor Village is most certainly your best shot for right now. That way you don't have to concern yourself with putting up with UCAN and all of his/her other aliases due to the fact that he/she doesn't have the nuts to spew his/her garbage on the IV Board. Good luck and stay VHC strong.
-
i saw all the RCs going through, and bailed at $25.10. Bought in low $17s, so it was a fun ride.
BUT I WANT BACK IN. there are no shares to short, so they are doing Reverse Conversions to keep the PPS down.
But this 1% a day is #$%$ me off. i want a 5% down day to jump back in. -
Shares in VirnetX Holding Corporation dwindled by 1.93% in its last trading session on Tuesday, thus extending its losses from previous market sessions. The company's shares hit an intraday low of $22.16 before finishing the day at $22.87 on a total of 592,860 shares traded. Its daily average volume is 667,016. Further, the company's shares have now fallen more than 7.10% in the last three sessions
-
This junk can't even get a small pop so shorts can add. What a pathetic stock and patent troll. At least go green so shorts can add. There's no easier money in the market than shorting this junk
-
we know what to do now OK ? right - dum#$%$_ers
LOSERS NEVER WIN -
YOU know who Jsteve -saying no big deal does not matter to Market Cap
yeah all "pros" over there = GFY -
Head over to investor village.
-
Does anyone know of another message board for VHC that is more professional? I would like to know what is actual going on not pumpers and dumper trash talk.
Sentiment: Hold
-
you already have the #$%$ covered as I said earlier.
-
EMBRACE THE SHLONG mort - YOU such as fast learner and all ASK Suker
-
such a come back. Boy you are one brilliant cocksuker.
-
FWIW "Judge had told them not to present an example" or not necessary whatever - does not matter but this was never stated by HJD in any way shape of form and must be your own made up beliefs/ meaningless nonsense.
FALSE:
because the existing evidence was overwhelming and that it defied common sense that Cisco customers spent billions of dollars to buy millions of products but never used any of them correctly" -
it was also the reason EVERYONE claimed Cisco would settle - again the "predictability" was there and many chose new WAGs and dreams INSTEAD OF the Facts, especially when Cisco went for its own trial without Apple.
YOU WROTE:
At the end of the case CSCO Counsel John Desmarais told the jury that VHC hadn't shown any of their products had actually been configured to infringe. VHC's Doug Cawley answered that the Judge had told them not to present an example because the existing evidence was overwhelming and that it defied common sense that Cisco customers spent billions of dollars to buy millions of products but never used any of them correctly.
So who does believe customers spent billions to buy millions of products that were never used? The twelve people on that jury. And if you found due diligence that predicted that outcome I would love to see it.
Sony Latest News: Sony Pulls Buggy PS3 Update After User Complaints
Wochit - 53 minutes agoLatest Business News: Telecom Italia Eyes Network Deal With Regulator by Early 2014
Wochit - 1 hour 17 minutes agoDisaster & Accident Breaking News: Tesla Recalls Some Model S Cars Due to Seat-Mount Defect
Wochit - 1 hour 37 minutes ago