"Debka_file is West Virginia where you and your friends rodentologist and pilodialcyst were home schooled?"
Wherever I was schooled, I got into MIT and Princeton afterwards.
"Maybe you are like the TESLA people that call batteries an energy source. LOL"
Which Tesla people have made that claim?
Are you one of the non-Tesla people who claim that our economy will crash if we do not molest little boys?
"The models on global warming are simply to flawed"
And specifically how are they flawed?
Me "And the whole idea of using temperature data to establish that CO2 causes warming is anti-scientific. I can tell you WITHOUT ANY EXPERIMENTAL DATA that if the windows are open with my bedroom and the outdoors cold (and stable), and with my heater on, closing the windows will heat my bedroom. No one needs 500 years of experimental data, or even one nanosecond of experimental data to establish that."
rodent: "I hope you don't call that logic? I can say the opposite also, if it is hot inside will my AC start?"
Truly amazing. How could something have been brain to be that brain-dead?
"Global satellite measurements cast even more doubt on the claims of 2014 setting a temperature record. Two sets of global satellite system data, the Remote Sensing Satellite and the University of Alabama and Huntsville (UAH) satellites recorded 2014 as having been only slightly above average in temperature. The UAH data found 2014 was just the third-warmest year since 1979"
You dunces cannot even keep your lies consistent. If it was the third warmest year since 1979 it would not have been only slightly above average.
Obama really has done a very bad job for the US and the world.
out of almost a 2 billion share float........2 days to cover on normal volume. SI is pretty low, just my take on things.
It’s one of the favorite tactics of would-be dictators throughout history: Get ahold of the information sources in a country and you can control what’s said about you
Yes, Obama won't even let people put Monday May 11 2013 on the calendar!
In early January, just a little over a month ago, the federal government’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) made front-page news by announcing 2014 was the warmest year on record. Mere days later, somewhat farther back in the pages of the newspapers, both agencies were forced to admit they couldn’t actually say 2014 was the warmest year on record.
NASA’s “record” global average temperature was just two hundredths of a degree above the previous record, with the margin of error being several times greater than the amount of warming. NASA backtracked, saying there was only a 38 percent chance 2014 was the warmest year on record. And that record goes back only about 150 years, a microscopic sliver of the planet’s history.
Global satellite measurements cast even more doubt on the claims of 2014 setting a temperature record. Two sets of global satellite system data, the Remote Sensing Satellite and the University of Alabama and Huntsville (UAH) satellites recorded 2014 as having been only slightly above average in temperature. The UAH data found 2014 was just the third-warmest year since 1979.
It’s one of the favorite tactics of would-be dictators throughout history: Get ahold of the information sources in a country and you can control what’s said about you, your inner cabal, your government, your enemies. He who controls the information controls the people.
Never fear. I’m sure Obama only has the best intentions, and his minions are only keeping the rules quiet so that America can enjoy its surprise.
You know you have to pass these things to know what’s in them. Like Obamacare. Look how well that’s working out.
This package of rules is doubly interesting because Wheeler has apparently made some last-minute changes at the request of Google and some other special-interest groups, but he has no time to talk to Congress.
This Net Neutrality business has been a struggle for years. Almost since Obama got in office. A coincidence, I’m sure.
Some of the groups advocating heavily for the regs have managed to get people jobs on the White House staff, according to the Washington Examiner. Lucky happenstance.
Those same groups have received $196 million from George Soros in recent years, the Examiner reported. A fluke.
There is nothing to fear. I mean, the rules have the word “Neutrality” in the title.
What’s there to worry about?
We are racing towards a dictatorship at breakneck speed.
Does anyone know what Altria's Tender Offer means?
"Altria Announces Cash Tender Offer for Any and All of Its 9.700% Notes Due 2018"
Is this like a bond that earns a min 9.7% in 2018 if you buy in to it now?
Administration Making Grab for Control of Internet
The Federal Communications Commission Chairman Tom Wheeler has refused, on the eve of the rules change, to even speak to Congress, which suddenly has a lot of questions.
Questions are understandable, since even Silicon Valley advocates of Net Neutrality seem incapable of explaining what it is and why we need it.
Gives the little guy a break, regulates the Internet, increases competition, raises taxes, slows down data speed, lines the pockets of Facebook and other big companies … take your pick. Nobody seems to know for sure because the FCC isn’t talking about the contents of its 300-plus pages of orders and rules changes.
This is another one of Emperor Obama’s end runs around Congress, and it may be one the Left is ultimately happy with, though many of them are recoiling in terror right now.
That’s because at the heart of Net Neutrality is a huge power grab by an Administration hungry to control all information in the United States.
It’s not enough that the NSA already absorbs most of the data sent in the United States, or that the Obama Administration has tremendous control over the flow of news through its White House press agency/Media Matters complex, or that the fawning media will do what Obama says up to and including remove already-published stories from websites.
What Obama and his handlers want is to be able to have total control over which stories are covered and not covered in the media.
At least, that’s the concern of critics who remember the government’s spying on journalists’ computers and phone records, along with harassment of conservatives by the IRS.
That’s also the hope of some high-profile Democrats, such as Hillary Clinton, who must be drooling at the possibility of being president with control over the entire Internet.
Climate research is dominated by adherence to monied interests. But you'll never guess who is really paying.
National Review (2/25/15) editorializes: “In truth, the overwhelming majority of climate-research funding comes from the federal government and left-wing foundations. And while the energy industry funds both sides of the climate debate, the government/foundation monies go only toward research that advances the warming regulatory agenda. With a clear public-policy outcome in mind, the government/foundation gravy train is a much greater threat to scientific integrity...Despite claims that they are watchdogs of the establishment, media outlets such as the Times have ignored the government’s oversized role in directing research. And they have ignored millions in contributions from left-wing foundations — contributions that, like government grants, seek to tip the scales to one side of the debate.”