So you're saying Windows 10 is just like a lot of message board posters. A few make shrewd observations and comments; those left* know who they are.
* As in Left.
and be down sharply tomorrow.
While having a couple of cool items this new platform is unstable and unsafe. The internet browser edge is wide open to attack. Both the 8 and 10 updates are not good operating platforms. I was giving Microsoft another chance, but it is back to Apple with reliable performance. What's worse, no anti-virus/malware packages work with 10.
"Another comment supporting me.
""Where do the statistics say that? The law of large numbers says that the proportion of heads and the proportion of tails will both converge on one half in this example, but that is not the same as saying the numbers of each will be equal.""
you are genuinely sad if you think you are right. I genuinely hope you are just pulling my leg because you are a genuine math idiot if you're not.
Large numbers are not infinity, large numbers are not comparable to infinity, you cannot let go of your gut feelings pillow osmosis degree in math that gives you that gut feeling that finite numbers apply to a definition that is not a number.
you're a math idiot.
Your quote proves you have not gotten it, it does NOT support you.
Another comment supporting me.
""Where do the statistics say that? The law of large numbers says that the proportion of heads and the proportion of tails will both converge on one half in this example, but that is not the same as saying the numbers of each will be equal.""
How many will it require before you understand you are wrong. Yeah I know another infinity in the mix.
"Infinity is not a place you can be at and stop. It is a direction. Anybody who knows calculus knows that you don't find any spot called infinity and just stop."
Infinity is not a place, it is not a number, which is why your idiotic comment about adding one to infinity was so tally stupid. It is a definition and you want to change it because your pillow education in math tells you it is a finite point that can be modified.
"On average the sum will be zero for a toss of 20 flips. Does this mean that the probability of a 20 flip run being zero is certainty??"
It proves that at infinity it will be zero math idiot, get help idiot, your gut feeling is not math.
On average the sum will be zero for a toss of 20 flips. Does this mean that the probability of a 20 flip run being zero is certainty??
You must be incapable of shame. But thanks for the entertainment.
Infinity is not a place you can be at and stop. It is a direction. Anybody who knows calculus knows that you don't find any spot called infinity and just stop.
One person answered in my favor, get ready for many others.
""the probability that the number of heads equals the number of tails (after an even number of tosses) tends towards zero as the number of tosses increases without limit""
"""So carried to infinity does the fact of equal probabilities for head and tails make the particular random walk from these tosses go to zero. In other words will the walk tend to zero distance at infinity because the flips obey the probabilities of the fair coin.""
Not "tending to" math idiot, that is a point that you cannot let go of because you ARE a math idiot. AT INFINITY , you fkucing math moron it is EXACTLY zero.
"No idea what you are talking about."
You have no idea that you agreed with my original point?
You said: "On average the sum will be zero..."
Yes it will, math idiot, that is what you disagreed with before. Glad someone advised you.
I posted this question on math stackexchange.
""So carried to infinity does the fact of equal probabilities for head and tails make the particular random walk from these tosses go to zero. In other words will the walk tend to zero distance at infinity because the flips obey the probabilities of the fair coin.""
So hawstupid is this the way you think about it??
No idea what you are talking about. That makes two of us.
Seriously, Hawcreek is a delusional old coot, who adheres to Republican dogma under any and all circumstances. I enjoy mocking him once in a while but its getting boring.
"Creek piszed down his leg again."
You may want to delete your own previous post where you finally realized I was correct on the infinite point, and tried to interject another off topic finite solution, math idiot.
Creek piszed down his leg again. Obviously he never took calculus in civul engunear skool. Or else they dumb it down for engunears.
The value of a function or process at infinite tries is the evaluation of a limit to infinity. For a limit to infinity to exist the output value must get ever closer to the limiting value as the domain value increases indefinitely.
His hypothesis that a coin toss summed up and carried to infinity must always equal zero violates the common understanding of a limit to infinity. There is no such thing as 'infinity' by itself if one cannot understand that some quantity is approaching a constant as you go that way.
The RMS distance from zero for the coin toss sum grows as the square root of the number of throws. Carried to infinity the RMS distance is infinity and the probability of the sum being zero at any particular stopping point goes to zero. Exactly the opposite of his idea.
He is confused about the difference between the outcome of a single experiment carried on to infinity and the average value of the experiment when each end result is averaged an infinite number of times.
But he is a scientist... LOL !!!!!
"On average the sum will be zero but any particular run even to infinity will NOT"
Again you are stuck on finite, which was never the point. You were wrong, as always, move on.
On average the sum will be zero but any particular run even to infinity will NOT. What ya got next.. Enjoying this immensely.
"I said go suck on a turd..."
You ALSO said not to respond to me, so obviously you're a liar or a hypocrite and in your case it has been established you are both.
you respond for my benefit not theirs but for a total all mouth loser like you, who cares?
Funny, you just said not to respond (with a different alias) and now you respond, do you use depends or are there some thing you can control?