oooh kay chimp lol seems as though we have 2 dates now dec 17 and jan 22nd lol...lining up to squash your stupidity nicely...expect jj to rule on the w/a prior as well ..but you shorties won't know when thats coming :)
Oh, I neglected to note that A-H Two Corys (with only one ball) joined this thread yesterday as well. Must be a brother raper to the other POS.
Well here we go again with another #$%$ hole or the idiot from earlier who joined this thread yesterday and uses another ID since he was banned...so for you, my friend, a sucker punch to the face, hopefully to your eye and causing ocular (get the definition, schoolboy) injury is too good for you. And I said earlier, just give me your address and I will arrive with my team of horses and watch as you get drawn and quartered but again only after being knee capped and have your #$%$ cut off and shoved dowm your throat! NEVER AGAIN, SCHMUCK. NEVER AGAIN, SCHMUCK...watch out and report me. I will find you and you will not live and will regret your toddler remarks. Now go back into mommy's basement and eat your mac and cheese and stop whining to us grownups.
They actually have bought stock and have been awarded stock as part of their payment agreements. That is why several have also sold some shares to cover their tax liabilities. You are such a dumb #$%$.
you mean implode........are you talking abt the bill coming up for a vote?
probably cheaper for google to pay off the entire legislature than to defend these suits.
I for one have always found that custom of theirs to be vulgar and degrading. Those wicked peculiarities of theirs is why 34 million were Mustard Gassed to death. Stop the virus!
These guys at GOOG are crooks who have been caught with their hands in the cookie jar, in every place. Now Oracle is back in court. They are good at stealing what others own
this is a joke.......the stock I held just before this is up 50% in the last 2 weeks and i'm stuck holding this stick-in-the-mud. Perhaps I should just learn and put my $$ under the mattress.
August 25, 2013 - The parties must produce any documents relevant for determining whether "New AdWords" is no more than a colorable variation of the adjudicated product.
September 25, 2013 - Expert witness reports due.
October 15, 2013 - Expert rebuttal reports due.
October 30, 2013 - The parties shall serve and file briefs and any supporting evidence.
November 10, 2013 - The parties may file responsive briefs.
Evidentiary Hearing - The Court, if necessary, may schedule an evidentiary hearing in which the parties may present appropriate evidence and offer arguments in support.
The District Court also held that the parties should be given the opportunity to set their own royalty rate before the Court imposes one. To that end, the District Court ordered that within five days of completing the aforementioned discovery and briefing schedule, the parties meet and negotiate an appropriate ongoing royalty rate, using 20.9% of U.S. AdWords revenues as the appropriate royalty base. If the parties are unable to come to an agreement, the District Court further ordered that the parties schedule a settlement conference with the United States Magistrate Judge assigned to the case no later than December 1, 2013.