OH Qdog... ANOTHER DIRECTION CHANGE??? SO SHOCKING.... Say it isn't so! LOL
-July 20th (positive)... "Fab will rock in 2015.... mark it Guruski"
- July 9th (positive again)... "scared...straight....I will be back in
And ONLY A FEW DAYS EARLIER...
- July 3rd (negative)... ."Fab will go down also if it ever opens.....nobody trust a #$%$....once a #$%$ always a #$%$"
- June 29th... "its still halted #$%$.....and if we see a short squeeze it will be short lived because there will be a lot of dumping because shareholders and institution have lost credibility"
- June 25th... "can you say DELIST"
- May 21st...(negative) "Now look at Fab its going to get delisted"
And a few months earlier...
- Feb 16th.. (positive). ".the DOG believes in Fab so get ready to cover old man"
AND JUST FOR FUN...
- Jan 28th... "...NQ $40 by yrs end
BUT WAIT... Surely they'll hire another PR person who'll once again say some "magic words" and Qdog will be pumping once again.... WHAT A COMEDY. LOL
I think bottom line most of these short IDs are not real people, maybe not even Ibcb. These short IDs are just a coordinated set of IDs for driving the stock price down by making stockholders uneasy. That is the #$%$ life of short traders, and they usually operate in packs like hyenas.
Deanne What is your story ? How many shares short ? Why did you short ? Carnes ? You aren't scaring anyone it will probably trade. but you could get lucky. I think a lot of longs will be so relieved to see it trade that you will be able cover in the mid to high 2's. But you better put in a market order on the open I would not risk chasing this on the way up after the losers are flushed out.
Gotta somewhat disagree here. You can do all the DD in the world and the PRC can bring any company to its knees. Why did QCOM tank today after a beat ! Because China investigating them for being a monopoly. BIDU is fantastic but I only had small position just sold after hours.
Hum. I had convo's with her when Wze turned into Fab and she was a pumper....strange how she is not around any more....Now this whole Fab BullS**T is corrupt.....Not going to buy this crappolla
You may be right. It may take that long, but I think we will know within a week, maybe sooner. I have always assumed a positive response from the NYSE would take this long or up to another week. I'll be surprised if it takes longer than a week to review the decision among NYSE staff members, etc. and for FAB to make clarifications, etc., and for the announcement to be coordinated and issued. I will very surprised if FAB does not maintain its NYSE listing.
Once the NYSE announcement comes, I expect a barrage of information updates to come from FAB, assuming the lawsuits allow. The lawsuits are the least of my worries. I expect the internal investigation information shared with plaintiffs will result in a willingness to settle soon for a dime on the dollar, under the coordination of the insurance attorneys.
I look forward to the resumption of trading. But I think at least a week will be allowed for dissemination of information before trading resumes.
My guess is we will hear something of the coming Friday or next Monday. Just a guess...
I'm not saying 30 more days...
I'm saying more info...
I figure we know within 30 days...
I don't know, but his hedge fund was up about 1,400% while the SP did around 50% before he retired.
Carnes or Rogers?
But be careful, according to Lcbc they both could be bad.
You fall for the Carnes Scam or bite on the "smoking gun" bond?
There is a HUGE amount of money to made in digital sector in China, you just have to find the right horse. I understand those that state they will never invest in Chinese companies. I just see them as another investment that needs a little extra DD. Why shy away from an economy with over 1 Billion people that need pretty much everything?
BIDU is also based on VIE structure, just like FAB.
QCOM just dumped 150M in China's mobile space also.
Luckily, you don't know Jim Rogers so well. Otherwise, you would not have believed the Carnes Scam or this Ibcb drivel he spwes all around like a crazy man. Your mistake was not learning more about FAB before going short.
I understand you have a short position and you want to scare people away from FAB. But your syphilis brain static comments will not influence people. Any long with any sense knows it's just a sign of your desperation and lack of class. You short traders are like spoiled babies with no sense of reality and right behavior. You are a disgrace. Luckily, life will swallow you up. You are on the wrong side of history, which will soon be clear. i would love to see your fat behind running for the exits.
what a sharp guy you are buying a lousy stock that hasnt traded in 8 months...and may never trade again.
"Too bad they ran and hid and won't answer anything anymore."
They are clearly hiding from all news, both bad/questionable and good. The 10K numbers were spectacular, far better than those that caused the share price to run from 3 to 11.
Somehow I suspect before they start trading again they'll start with the PR barrage and a Conference Call if they are smart.
I have plenty of questions, including the Kiosk License shutdown (even if for just one quarter).
"Now you are saying ABAT's insurance company DID pay out a settlement and they were a fraud. Which is it Joe... were you lying before or are you lying now? You and I both know that the argument of they must not be a fraud because their insurance company is defending them doesn't hold water. It is BECAUSE they are a fraud that the insurance company will tell the Plaintiffs to take a small settlement or get nothing when they are abandoned."
I said if the company turns out to be a fraud their insurance company will pay SQUAT.
A few thousand dollars as a nuisance suit to me is SQUAT....probably far less than one penny on the dollar when all is said and done....and that is SQUAT.
Why is it SQUAT? For the last time it's because the insurance company has a disclaimer for fraud.
Now you could go after the accountants, but they won't settle for a LONG TIME, if ever, because it make them look bad and is really hard to prove they were directly involved/or should have known.
Why did ONP's insurance give up 2M while ABAT gave up 275K?
It's because one was a straight up fraud (nuisance suit...so they got SQUAT) and one company was legit and the possibility existed they would lose a greater amount.