He's just doing his bit to advance the agenda of the neocons and the 1%.
I didn't hear you complaining when Bush was doing it.
How do you know it was stolen? Besides who should pay for the care of innocent victims? No doubt the Gun and ammo mfg profited even though that was not their intention, they knew there was the probability. Institute background checks in secondary sells. How do you distinguish between a stolen and a legitimately owned gun without registering them?
Why is it called the "New World Order"? I'm not seeing a whole lot of "order" and I'm certainly not seeing anything "new".
$130 is possible but keep in mind BA's upward momentum has been decreasing. $140 by Halloween is unlikely at this point. In the longer term, BA will most definitely climb higher though. BA's business is solid as proven by the sizable deals they can pull in frequently.
Still violates Syrian Airspace in violation of International law. FACT.....In any event...Obama was smuggling Arms from Benghazi through Turkey to Syrian Rebels...can no one add ?
Chris, Cindy Sheehan, Hooz and the rest of the libs must have gotten lock jaw. Lots of rusty nails out there, but if it wasn't for that I'm sure they would be screaming about obama being a baby killer, war criminal and all those other things they accused Bush of. I wonder how they will be able to sing those Crosby, Stills & Nash tunes at the candle light vigil for peace. Did obama get congressional approval for this like Bush did? Guess that slipped his mind.
The Observer has exclusively learned that Mr. Cantor is being subpoenaed to a deposition in a case against the Bank of China. Meanwhile, the bank — and possibly the highest level of Israeli government — are frantically trying to block the former Congressman from testifying.
According to the Jerusalem Post, a lawsuit named for Emil Almaliakh, an Israeli killed by a suicide bomber in 2007, was brought by the Israel Law Center charging the Bank of China with facilitating the attack by allowing Islamic Jihad and Hamas to use its wire transfer service via accounts in China.
The Israel Law Center leaves little doubt about its mission – its motto is “Help stop terrorism one lawsuit at a time.” It has successfully prevailed upon the courts to slow or stop nations from abetting terrorism, either willfully or by turning a blind eye.
So it was surprising when the group accused Prime Minister Netanyahu, who made his name punishing terror with maximum force and whose brother Yonatan was killed in the heroic raid on Entebbe, of filing a motion in a DC federal court to prevent a witness, former Israeli Mossad agent Uzi Shaya, from testifying in a way that the Prime Minister allegedly feared would harm Israel-China relations.
According to Time: “Israeli agents investigating Palestinian militant groups had already detected a money trail leading from the Damascus headquarters of Islamic Jihad and Hamas to Guangzhou in southern China. . The court papers say Israeli counterterrorism officials traveled to China to share their findings with their counterparts and to ask that the accounts be closed.” [Israel demands restitution from China in gold.]
Israel Law Center and GOP stepped in when Cantor subpoena emerged. The score is USA is OUT and Israel-China relations are IN. Israel to USA, "its been real, thanks for all the money and good stuff, so long suckers." For Zion China is a more lucrative ally. Mazel Tov!
They've made it clear that even though some of the strikes are on Syrian soil, they are not attacking Syria. They are attacking those renegades with the pirate flags.
Sentiment: Strong Buy
JIM DIDN;T WANNA TALK ABOUT 7TH GRADE #$%$
SO WE LINED UP THE STANDARD METAL 3.5 LB WASTE BASKET
AND LET MKE JUST SAY HE WASN'T AIMING DFOR THE TECEHER
BOITOF US OIUTSIDE /?
we tried to call her delta delta delta tri-lambda
but the hospital in Reno said]
"we cannot let her go...without a name...so here we are
]thaqt w2ould be B.N.A.
The gift that keeps on giving, another BELIEVER.
Roy Spencer, one of the legitimate 3%. However let's see what else he says:
" In TCS Daily, Spencer wrote, "Twenty years ago, as a PhD scientist, I intensely studied the evolution versus intelligent design controversy for about two years. And finally, despite my previous acceptance of evolutionary theory as 'fact,' I came to the realization that intelligent design, as a theory of origins, is no more religious, and no less scientific, than evolutionism." He sure doesn't let evidence get in the way of his opinions does he?