A former State Department employee who worked on Hillary Clinton's private e-mail server tried to beat back a subpoena this week from the House Benghazi panel, with his lawyer saying that he would invoke his Fifth Amendment rights to avoid incriminating himself.
Bryan Pagliano had worked on Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign before setting up the server in her New York home in 2009, The Washington Post reports.
The lawyer, Mark MacDougall, sent a letter to the committee on Monday. A copy was obtained by the Post. MacDougall declined to comment further.
Break out the popcorn and drinks ... almost curtain time .
Wow, I was just reading the latest NWS/NOAA weather station specification
that lays out the requirements for weather station equipment and placement ( roof tops are now out ) .
It only requires that the weather station thermometer be accurate to + or -1.0 degrees in the normal
ranges, and + or -2.0 degrees in the extreme ranges . That's quite a bit more than the entire
glow-ball-warming warming that Libs are so frightened by . What's wrong with them ?
PennyStock101 (org) has been pretty successful for me so far. I know there are mixed messages all over these boards but they are on top of things.
Oh, the trashing has begun:
UAH v6 gives a much lower weight to near surface temperatures and a higher weight to (cooling) lower stratosphere temperatures. This is partially balanced by an increased weight to warmer upper tropospheric temperatures (can any body say "upper tropospheric hotspot"). Spencer says this cools the record by " less than 0.01 C/decade". As the difference between v 5.6 and v 6 trends is 0.026 C/decade, that represents about a third of the difference just by changing the weighting profile.
The other note worthy cool changes in the record are, in order of magnitude, the NH north of the Tropic of Cancer (NExtraT), the USA 49, the USA 48, and the NH. Clearly almost the entire change comes from high latitude NH temperatures. That is clearly inconsistent with surface temperature records by GISS, or DMI:
This also does not pass the smell test in relationship to changes in Arctic ice (sea ice, glaciers and ice sheets).
Oh and to top it all they have a history of excluding satellite data and the latest satellites (NOAA-18 & 19) appear to have a negative bias when plotted relative to the other satellites.
It is also noteworthy that they have not submitted their work for peer review, I can see why. Keep up the good work stick.
"the climate science community will shred their new methods shortly"
There's that insect mentality again imagining you ave some sort of science community behind you. More comedy gold. The only thing headed for shredding is the IPCC models.
“It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is, it doesn't matter how smart you are. If it doesn't agree with experiment, it's wrong” - R Feynman
You mean V6? Riight, now they claim .114 instead of .13 C/decade BFD. Doesn't change the trend and the climate science community will shred their new methods shortly.
Looks like Obama saw no snow on his trip. Deniers come through again with bogus information. Maybe it snowed on Denali?
Boeing Co delivered 14 of its 787 Dreamliners in August, exceeding for the second straight month its 10-a-month target and suggesting strong financial performance later in the year, people familiar with the situation said on Wednesday.
The tally, likely to be confirmed by Boeing on Thursday, means the company has managed to deliver an average of just over 11 of the high-tech planes a month so far this year. That puts it on track to easily meet its target of 100 for 2015.
The 787, Boeing's newest plane, has a lightweight carbon-fiber composite fuselage and is designed to be more fuel efficient than previous aircraft.
There is no 'arguing' with science deniers like sdmiller or mediocre. They will always just cherry pick or make up a little factoid, then claim that global warming is a hoax because of that. There's no breaking that cycle.
The shills who support Boeing for mishandling Boeing employee's 401K pension are identified . Remember these users are Boeing stooges -shills for Boeing everything they say and do is to promote Boeing Corporate against its workers . elonmusk0121,cbx6cylinder,Donshuper50,russellg, Bob.Beal,unposter76, ONLY A BOEING SHILL WOULD SIDE WITH BOEING ON THEIR STEALING MONEY FROM THE BOEING EMPLOYEES Boeing Co. agreed on Wednesday to a preliminary deal to settle a long-running lawsuit accusing the company of mishandling its 401(k) plan to the detriment of its employees
Techpath is like a fighter leading with his chin. He keeps attacking my fist with his face when it comes to our exchanges on climate. I have to screenshot his climate comments as they comedy gold.
Techpath didn't read his own reference material or would have realized the data was only through 2004. This is what happens when a person copies and pastes without any real knowledge. The latest Satellite Troposphere data updates were done in 2015 and are very robust as of 2015 which Techpath also is unaware of. So I can only laugh at Techpath's feeble attempt to fool me with a report based on 12 year old outdated data and my knowledge that corrections were already made. The data I pulled from UAH is the robust data. His confirmation bias shines through once again and his lack of knowledge keeps feed it as he remains stuck in 2004.
Amen to that charts. It is breathtaking to see someone try to deny something as clear as the overlayed charts that I referenced.
And, as is well established by sdmiller repeatedly in the past, the main "facial expressions" referred to by sdmiller involved an other-than-white face. Sdmiller has posted many many things here reeking of his r acism, bigotry, etc. purely and solely based on race.
Don't bother or waste your time correcting your adversary here. Your adversary is in the "preferred ignorance" club. A proud member, in fact, along with most of today's Republicans.
Sir Paul can you enlighten the BA board as to why Prigressives in the UK got shellacked in the last election and why pollsters were so terribly inaccurate in their election predictions? Was it a combination of media bias and biased survey design that gave Prigressive candidates hope while the reality was that voters didn't want Prigressives in charge? What went so terribly wrong for Prigressives in the UK?
I've been on top since I was 19, and will always stay there. Hillary will win in 2016.