nothing for you shorts to worry about you just keep posting
when we get to 14 then you can take your head out of sand and cover
Real news is at MU site and lots of things never get posted on Yahoo sites
many times info on Yahoo finance is corrupted or otherwise incorrect
Sometimes shorts even use hackers
You know typical corruption in all forms from Evil people.
You shorts best get to work harder
Maybe bribe another to put out a really bad article on MU
I'm sure you will think of something
break out that bag of tricks
I wonder how they can even look in a mirror
Everyone looks and sees the ugliness and if they had friends it is most likely they would do them no different.
Friends stabbing friends kind of a gang thing
How can you trust a thief, and liar, sell their own mother for a buck.
early bird gets the worm
Who knows more about the company Micron or some guy on a message board? I think I'll go with the company, thank you very much. MU is projecting .47 for 2016 and that's all I need to know. If they agreed with you they'd be projecting more wouldn't they? And if the market agreed with you, this stock would already be over $15.
One of the most challenging problem is to make a person like you understand money, corporate earning, supply and demand, boy the last thing you want to do is being in market! where do you get your money?
What is in your coffee? giving example of Apple and Google to justify MUs up trend. Man you are way way off.
navrbody is the one, not any one else. this poster continue to mix apple and oranges. What new products? what programmers? he/she needs to wake up! MU lost 70% yes 70% if its value for last 17 months, I believe he is the one who bought @ $36.49 and trying to come up with some BS to see if he ever gets half of his investment money back. Mu will see $8 again before earning and then will go between $4 to $6. Any one can look at the historical chart of MU, you don't need to look further. And one more thing, please do not give example of Apple and Google to compare MU, this is like comparing IBM with AMD.
Let's see wallisvveaver.There was a 49 million share block trade of Micron last week at $ 10.85 by someone with very strong hands.
Date Symbol Name Short Volume Long Volume Total Volume Short%
2016-02-05 MU Micron Technology 5434639 4404015 9838654 55
2016-02-04 MU Micron Technology 5005050 4811786 9816836 51
2016-02-03 MU Micron Technology 4194390 4203495 8397885 50
2016-02-02 MU Micron Technology 4779806 4123025 8902831 54
2016-02-01 MU Micron Technology 5955876 5905880 11861756 50
What this means is that we are trying to own some stocks that are diversified across a number of sectors that we consider to be the best and offer the most risk reward in their sectors.
In tech, for instance, both Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) and Google are appealing to us at these prices. Apple obviously has the much lower valuation, but Google is obviously the more aggressively growing company. We think this spot here with Apple under $100 and Google nearing $700 is a very attractive entry point, as we think we could see Apple in three digits and Google and four digits by the end of 2016. With continued mergers and acquisitions in semi-conductors, we also continue to keep one eye on Micron (NASDAQ:MU), the stock that we have followed for the better part of the last year. We continue to think the valuations are reasonable enough for the company to potentially be acquired here.
He is an expert on the Micron intellectual property that you have chosen to disregard. You also have chosen to disregard share purchases in the open market by Micron's CFO even while the stock has declined. But of course you have done "exhaustive" due diligence on Micron and you know better.
Apparently the company hasn't read Stephen Breezy either because they said .47. Is Stephen Breezy an officer or high ranking employee or is he just another guy with an opinion like you?
You couldn't be more wrong. Read the comments under the Stephen Breezy articles on Seeking Alpha. You don't respect Micron's IP either. At the VERY LEAST there will be a buyout.
narvrbody, Your post is really irrelevant to what MU is doing, rocket speed comparison with airplane sound really stupid. You seems like you don’t understand anything about market and technology at all. MU is in trouble I mean big trouble, if take over doesn’t take place then MU’s chance of survival is slim. Just like 2009-2012 MU will see $4 or even less. Keep in mind no demand=no sales=less earning= stock price falling, it is simple equation. Take a look at apple, 2 years ago iPhone was selling like hot cake, now there is no demand for iPhone6 nor iWatch the result is apple stock is in 90s and every day is another point down. Now look at Face Book, almost a billion people are using it and number keeps going, this means DEMAND. There is no demand for NAND, MU doesn’t have much beyond NAND now. People who are long MU should have realized the company’s trouble 2 years ago when the PC market start dying and they should have sold it in mid 30s. The stock is down 60%, I am damn surprise one can’t see the direction of MU! What does it take for company to tell shareholders “Hey dummies we are in trouble”? I believe 60% downward is not enough, it should be at least 90% down before some wake up.
If this is not awaking for you then what is it?
I based my comment on what the company said. Until you're the CEO of this company I think their projections are a bit more reliable than yours.
Do you know why I responded the way that I did? You come here and tell someone to do their DD and then we find out that you don't know what IP is. You come here acting like you know everything and you don't even have a grasp of the basics.
“One of the most challenging problems facing the developer community today is programmer productivity. In many cases, productivity is lost as developers work to identify and implement high levels of parallelism on conventional architectures. The Automata Processor and SDK will provide a new...