Recent

% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

福麒國際 Message Board

SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Highest Rated Expand all messages
  • Yahoo is not letting me post the link, but synopsis of the case can be found here: texbuslit(dot)org/SPRING2014deleware(dot)pdf
    This case is is one of those somewhat rare instances in which the Chancery Court denied a corporation’s motion to dismiss derivative claims against its current and former officers and directors for violating their Caremark duties. Accordingly, this opinion offers valuable insights into what kind of conduct courts may find give rise to potential Caremark liability.

    Where do we go from here? Any updates?

Must Watch