Steal shares? Funny. Stock is the last thing he wants. He's never bought a share in these offerings. The only (tiny amount) he holds he got for free. He may be worthless, but he's smart enough not to risk his money. That's for the suckers. Ditto CFO. And why doesn't he take stock instead of salary, or less salary? Because he...well, you're smart enough to know when a CEO doesn't own much stock in a company what that means.
Agree 100% but I am mad and like many others I filed a report on the SEC web page
not much else to do until a law suit is started
Correct (( I think you like to divert attention to others because you could be part of a promotional team ))
Someone should subpoena the records to see who is really posting here and on stock twits, To me Eric is Steve Hall, I may be wrong but I dont think so
I'm not mad, don't belong to any group, and I'm not short. I am disgusted with the constant pumping of a company that dilutes its investors to sell more stock. There is no pressure on management to perform. They just wipe out a class of investor and issue more stock and plod along again. My shares are almost gone so what is left for me is to warn potential future victims to BEWARE! There's another reverse split looming.
Funny the guy that was pumping this stock over a buck PRE SPLIT is here calling out people. I should
say thinks he is calling people out. You must be down 90% and yet you still call this a buy? To me most
people that trade stocks get a little mad after a 90% LOSS I can understand you like to blame others
but I think you like to divert attention to others because you could be part of a promotional team working
these boards with a few others that I find odd isn't acting very mad about a 90% loss in the past two years.
Most of us vent about it and we are called shorts. You like to manipulate jalexander. Maybe you should
man up and get a real job something that isn't paying you per post under many ID's on many boards.
What is most interesting is if anyone actually understands the process to get to the revenues necessary for something to show. In a laboratory environment when bringing a test up and having it available for Immunoassay testing on an automated platform, most facilities will look to run 100 positives to correlate the results. It is part of the validation process. Some institutions will look to even as many as 300. THIS TAKES TIME. IT DOES NOT HAPPEN OVERNIGHT. Take a step back and look at the timelines. Abbott essentially launched this in July with the real efforts happening at AACC at the end of the month. The sales team was most likely trained in July and began calling upon customers in late July, early August. Most likely they will be cannibalizing the existing business which will move to the automated platform and then gain some "quasi - early adopters" now that it is automated. What do people expect to see with regards to performance? What do you want for an announcement? Any significant change in revenues won't be seen until the results for Q4-2015 come in sometime in early 2016. This constant hammering to see a change in the current price is ludicrous. The company is at a point where everyone has adopted a wait and see mode to verify if the test will sell on an automated platform when sold by a large salesforce. Personally, I see this as a buying opportunity as it continues to drop.
Sentiment: Strong Buy
i'll give it an OVERSOLD....and therefore it's a buy :)
shut up and eat your cheetos.
hey dr. real facts...................................question.........
how much does bg med get off each test made by abbott?
............"The ARCHITECT Galectin-3 assay is performed using the Abbott ARCHITECT automated immunoassay analyzer and is being commercialized through an agreement between BG Medicine and Abbott."
??????????????? don't know? then why do you fools bash.?
what if it's $1 per test royalty?
Of course bla, bla,bla. You are the expert of bla. BTW next time grow a pair and address me directly on ST instead of whining here.
Precisely. Nobody should base their trading decisions based on stock boards but unfortunately many do. How many today are holding bags here because of the pumping on ST. We don't have look far for negatives. The stock price itself is a BIG NEGATIVE and self explanatory. As long people post lies to pump this up people like Jalex don't have a problem. But if you post facts about the risks and issues concerning the stock, one is a hypocrite and dishonest. Funny people who don't know what honesty is preach about being honest.
You should be ashamed to put a buy sentiment on this stock. If you rate this a buy after more than 90% drop in value in just 18 months, you'd put a buy on anything. Some poor fool will see your rating and get stuck in this like the rest of us.
3-4 that are constantly looking for any and all negatives, yes, some pumpers but at least they are not hypocrites and are honest about being long, etc....
Jess, are you Daisey? I' m sure that is you, man up, or woman up.
He's preparing paperwork for next reverse split. Just a matter of time before all existing share holders are zeroed out. Wonder how the $2M investor feels now? Lesson in how to turn $2M into $1M.
heading for zero. no support from management. tell me again, why do we pay them? a empty chair would be the same effect and wouldn't cost anything.
Retail shareholders need to get together via email swap info and look to get a law suit started
as a group. Now in the .60's down over 60% from the split alone!
Goldman owns 30 mill shares, Wilbur Ross & Prem Watsa owns millions of shares. These guys are billionaires. Ross, a company director, said he won't dilute on shareholders. On CNBC, he said a "rights offering" is the most likely scenario.